|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
pilotpat
Joined: 23 Dec 2006 Posts: 14 Location: Williamsport, PA
|
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 3:35 pm Post subject: AD's question for airworthy cert |
|
|
AD's Question - I am trying to get my kitfox airworthy certificate as a ELSA and the Faa says I forgot to put in the box the latest Note AD bi - weekly in publication at the time I signed the form (8130-6) Does anyone know what this number or current publication would be? This is a kitfox classic iv and never flew yet and I purchased it mostly built. it has the jabiru 2200A engine ....any help or link to these would be helpful.
do not archive
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ Pilotpat
Kitfox Classic IV
Jabiru 2200
Williamsport , PA |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eskflyer(at)lvcisp.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 4:07 pm Post subject: AD's question for airworthy cert |
|
|
You will not have any AD's pertaining to your aircraft if i understand it
correctly . these only apply to Certified aircraft . You will however find
service bulletins posted by the manufacturer or kit provider .
John Perry
Kitfox 2 N718PD
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kirkhull(at)kc.rr.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 4:58 pm Post subject: AD's question for airworthy cert |
|
|
When the FAA ask, you built most of the airplane and way over 51% and
there are no AD's on experimental aircraft. I looked at the Faa form on the
web (FAA.GOV) and it has changed sence the last time I filled one out. I
would suggest that you lic your plane as an Experimental/armature built.
You will still be able to fly it as a sport pilot but the plane will not be
limited to only what a sport plane can do. This way the pilot will be the
limiting factor and not the plane. There may come a time when your planes
needs to be able to do those things ( night flight).
--
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
84KF Guest
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dcsfoto
Joined: 24 Aug 2006 Posts: 120
|
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 3:56 pm Post subject: Re: AD's question for airworthy cert |
|
|
First the AD Biweekly changes every two weeks. Yes ADs do not apply to our type aircraft but the FAA wants that block filled in on the Form 8130-6.
will look like "2007-06"
S-SLA must be built from a kit, that the mfg has built and certified at least one aircraft.
E-LSA is called the "wild west" it is what the "fat" ultralights that are not 51%
built are using.
S-SLA have 2" LIGHT SPORT placards.
E-LSA has 2" EXPERIMENTAL placards that is the easy way to tell diferance.
Go E-LSA if you did not build the and want to get a repairmans certificate
all you need to do is go to a short ( 2 or 3 weeks ) school and get a
E-LSA repairmans cert.
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
pilotpat
Joined: 23 Dec 2006 Posts: 14 Location: Williamsport, PA
|
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:45 pm Post subject: Re: AD's question for airworthy cert |
|
|
Again, can't say it enought, What a great site this is and thanks to you guys for your input. That is exactly what I needed, so I could fill in the block. It was more my misunderstanding than anything else , as I just thought I didnt need to enter that info, but the DAR explained to me what it was and along with you guys giving me the site location, I was able to find it and go thru things. Learning lots, mostly from my mistakes and you all bailing me out...Was use to just flying the cherokee and Cessna till my friend got me into this kitfox flying.. so here I am, probably will have a new quest for you soon. as I need to write a flight plan. any ideas....later
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ Pilotpat
Kitfox Classic IV
Jabiru 2200
Williamsport , PA |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Clem Nichols
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 88 Location: Munfordville, Ky
|
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:53 pm Post subject: AD's question for airworthy cert |
|
|
Re: ELSA repairman's certificate
All you need to get the repairman's certificate (which enables you to do the
annual inspection on your own ELSA plane) is to successfully complete the 16
hour course. The 2 or 3 week course enables you to inspect and work on your
SLSA plane. As I understand it, anyone, certificate or not, can work on any
experimental plane.
Clem Nichols
---
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
84KF Guest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 8:43 pm Post subject: Re: AD's question for airworthy cert |
|
|
E-mail users..this post is best viewed through:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewforum.php?f=8&sid=83b6acbe5602af72d6c023eab4688518
The following is from ..., well you should know by know...
44794 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2004 / Rules and Regulations
“The FAA believes
that the maximum take-off weight is an
appropriate limiting parameter for lightsport
aircraft, because it is an objective
measure that can easily be determined
when the aircraft configuration is
specified.”
----------------
44808 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2004 / Rules and Regulations
Operating limitations
specified in § 91.319 for experimental
light-sport aircraft certificated under
§ 21.191(i)(3) are more restrictive than
the operating limitations issued to
special light-sport aircraft.
-----------------
44808 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2004 / Rules and Regulations
In ‘‘experimental certificate,’’ the word
‘‘experimental’’ indicates that there is
no known standard for the design or
production of the aircraft. Therefore, the
FAA believes that experimental
certificates are appropriate for kit-built
aircraft.
44808 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2004 / Rules and Regulations
Proposed paragraph (i)(2) addressed
operating a light-sport aircraft that was
assembled from an eligible kit. Proposed
§ 21.0193(e)(5) stated that the assembler
of an aircraft, seeking certification under
paragraph (i)(2), had to provide the
instructions used to assemble the
aircraft. There was no requirement in
§ 21.191(i)(2) that a person had to
assemble the aircraft in accordance with
the manufacturer’s assembly
instructions. In the final rule, therefore,
§ 21.191(i)(2) now includes the
requirement that the aircraft kit be
assembled in accordance with the
manufacturer’s assembly instructions
that meet an applicable consensus
standard.
A commenter stated that experimental
certificates should not be issued for
light-sport aircraft that are not intended
for experimental use but are intended to
be mass-produced on production line.
The commenter said that the FAA
should create another status for aircraft
whose certification falls between
current type-certificated aircraft and
true experimental aircraft. The FAA
believes that the special light-sport
aircraft certificate serves this purpose.
In ‘‘experimental certificate,’’ the word
‘‘experimental’’ indicates that there is
no known standard for the design or
production of the aircraft. Therefore, the
FAA believes that experimental
certificates are appropriate for kit-built
aircraft.
The same commenter noted that
proposed § 21.191(i) would allow
certification of aircraft carrying persons
for compensation or hire that have never
been shown to meet any design or
production airworthiness standard. The
FAA notes that these aircraft will not be
permitted to be used for the full range
of compensation or hire operations
normally carried out by aircraft with
standard airworthiness certificates.
Operating limitations for these aircraft
will restrict their use, as specified in
§ 91.319. The commenter also stated
that there is no rigid conformity
requirement for kit-built aircraft
certificated under this section. The FAA
disagrees and notes that an applicant
seeking to certificate a kit-built aircraft
under § 21.191(i)(2) must also comply
with § 21.193(e) and provide a statement
of compliance issued by the aircraft’s
manufacturer that contains the
information generally required by
§ 21.190(c). The commenter was also
concerned that an operator of a special
light-sport aircraft could decide to
obtain an experimental light sport
certificate when that operator no longer
intends to comply with the more
stringent operating limitations of the
special light-sport aircraft. The
commenter asserts that the operator
could still engage in many of the
operations permitted for special lightsport
aircraft without meeting those
more stringent limitations. The FAA
disagrees. Operating limitations
specified in § 91.319 for experimental
light-sport aircraft certificated under
§ 21.191(i)(3) are more restrictive than
the operating limitations issued
steve
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kitfox69(at)earthlink.net Guest
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 1:44 am Post subject: AD's question for airworthy cert |
|
|
Clem,
Just for varification, only the builder with a repairmans certificate
issued for his plane can work on it and he cannot work on
any other airplanes. A certified FAA A&E is the only other person who is
authorized to work on experimental or certified aircraft. Floyd
Quote: | [Original Message]
From: Clem Nichols <cnichols(at)scrtc.com>
To: <kitfox-list(at)matronics.com>
Date: 3/16/2007 9:57:17 PM
Subject: Re: Re: AD's question for airworthy cert
Re: ELSA repairman's certificate
All you need to get the repairman's certificate (which enables you to do
the
|
Quote: | annual inspection on your own ELSA plane) is to successfully complete the
16
|
Quote: | hour course. The 2 or 3 week course enables you to inspect and work on
your
|
Quote: | SLSA plane. As I understand it, anyone, certificate or not, can work on
any
|
[quote] experimental plane.
Clem Nichols
---
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
84KF Guest
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Clem Nichols
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 88 Location: Munfordville, Ky
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:06 am Post subject: AD's question for airworthy cert |
|
|
Floyd:
I don't know if it applies to all experimental airplanes or just to
experimental light sport aircraft, but I was taught in the 16 hour LS1
repairman course I attended that an ELSA "can be maintained by anybody".
The annual condition inspection must be done by an A&P or the owner as a
light-sport repairman with an "inspection" rating. I can work on and do the
annual inspection on my own ELSA, but not on someone elses. Nor can I do
the initial inspection in order to obtain an airworthiness certificate. I
don't have the time right now to try and look it up in the fed regs, but
will try later this weekend.
Clem
---
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
akflyer Guest
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 7:04 am Post subject: Re: AD's question for airworthy cert |
|
|
[quote="kitfox69(at)earthlink.net"]Clem,
Just for varification, only the builder with a repairmans certificate
issued for his plane can work on it and he cannot work on
any other airplanes. A certified FAA A&E is the only other person who is
authorized to work on experimental or certified aircraft. Floyd
Not quite right...Anyone including your 5 year old kid could work on an expiremental plane.. However, only the person holding the repairmans certificate (original builder) or any A&P can sign off on the condition inspection.
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
84KF Guest
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:34 am Post subject: Re: AD's question for airworthy cert |
|
|
Gentlemen,
Answers to who may perform maintenance and required inspections involving ELSA, SLSA, and Amateur-built is found on page 44779 of the Final Rule. Get it from AOPA website. I would post it here, but don't want to ruffle feathers.
Maintenance....Preventive Maintenance ... 2 different terms.
To find the items included under 'preventive maintenance' go to FAR 43, appendix A.
For more 'preventive maintenance' info on SLSA, go to FAR 43.3g,
The 'new guy' (ya, right.)
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
84KF Guest
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:41 am Post subject: Re: AD's question for airworthy cert |
|
|
BTW....."Anyone including your 5 year old kid could work on an expiremental plane.. However, only the person holding the repairmans certificate (original builder) or any A&P can sign off on the condition inspection."
100%correct
and...FAA AD's can, and will apply to SLSA.
Steve
http://84kf.blogspot.com/
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|