Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FireFly prop

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kolb-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
DAquaNut(at)aol.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2007 2:08 pm    Post subject: FireFly prop Reply with quote

Fireflyers,

Anyone out there flying with a 2-blade 64" prop. Seems my Ivo has cratered and it is only about 30% more for a whole new prop than a single replacement blade. Is anyone flying a warp drive on a 447 W/ b box. I am intertaining that thought as John H has had good luck with his. Does the Warp flex more than the Ivo? Is it too heavy for the b box . Any Thoughts?

Ed Diebel
**************************************
See what's free at http://www.aol.com. [quote][b]


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
Richard Pike



Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 1671
Location: Blountville, Tennessee

PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2007 2:38 pm    Post subject: FireFly prop Reply with quote

Do not know the weight of that prop, but I think a 64" 2 blade Warp ought to be safe with a B box, but I would use Mobil One synthetic or equivilent and change it often. I put a Warp 66" 2 blade on a used B box, total time unknown, and it ended up making metal. But since total time was unknown, that proves nothing. The Warp does not flex like an Ivo. Nothing flexes like an Ivo...

Richard Pike
MKIII N420P (420ldPoops)

[quote] ---


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List

_________________
Richard Pike
Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops)
Kingsport, TN 3TN0

Forgiving is tough, being forgiven is wonderful, and God's grace really is amazing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
HShack(at)aol.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2007 3:16 pm    Post subject: FireFly prop Reply with quote

In a message dated 5/13/2007 6:09:27 PM Eastern Daylight Time, DAquaNut(at)aol.com writes:
Quote:
Does the Warp flex more than the Ivo? Is it too heavy for the b box . Any Thoughts?

The Warp does not flex hardly at all, but it's way too heavy for the b box.


Howard Shackleford
FS II
SC

See what's free at AOL.com.
[quote][b]


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
Snoopy Baxley



Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 42

PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 7:30 pm    Post subject: FireFly prop Reply with quote

Hey Ed
I fly with a 3 bladed 64 " Warp Drive Prop on a 447 with a 'B" box .
It performs very well on  my Firefly . Got 142 hours on the Prop .
A friend of mine has an 2-bladed 64 "Ivo on his GT400 which seems to have more flex to it and of course is a lighter prop . He can out climb me but I'm much faster than he is .

Stephen
Firefly
S.W. Georgia

Do Not Archive


See what's free at AOL.com.
[quote][b]


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jimhefner



Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 91
Location: Tucson, AZ

PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2007 5:35 am    Post subject: Re: FireFly prop Reply with quote

A 3 blade prop should out climb a 2 blade prop when everything is apples - apples.... different props and configs on different type aircraft don't tell you much conclusive about the props. Comparing a Firefly climb and cruise to a GT400 is apples and molasses... Smile Sorry, I couldn't resist.... no offense intended!

- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List

_________________
Jim Hefner
Tucson, AZ
Do Not Archive
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Eugene Zimmerman



Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 392

PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2007 7:53 am    Post subject: FireFly prop Reply with quote

But a two blade prop will out perform a three blade every time when
everything is optimized, especially prop diameter and prop speed.
On May 15, 2007, at 9:35 AM, jimhefner wrote:

Quote:


A 3 blade prop should out climb a 2 blade prop when everything is
apples - apples.... different props and configs on different type
aircraft don't tell you much conclusive about the props. Comparing
a Firefly climb and cruise to a GT400 is apples and molasses... Smile
Sorry, I couldn't resist.... no offense intended!

--------
Jim Hefner
Kolbless in Tucson Sad
Do Not Archive


Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=112922#112922




- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jimhefner



Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 91
Location: Tucson, AZ

PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2007 9:20 am    Post subject: Re: FireFly prop Reply with quote

Eugene said: But a two blade prop will out perform a three blade every time when everything is optimized, especially prop diameter and prop speed.

Eugene, you might be right, but according to my limited research back in the early days of my Firefly, a 3 blade prop, also optimized on length and pitch will out climb a 2 blade (more bite), but a 2 blade wins on all other scores, including cruise (less drag). I had a 2 blade IVO on a 4" extender on the 447 and was very happy with it's performance, including climb, but I didn't care to climb at 1100'/min either.


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List

_________________
Jim Hefner
Tucson, AZ
Do Not Archive
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
ElleryWeld(at)aol.com
Guest





PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2007 9:44 am    Post subject: FireFly prop Reply with quote

This is just my experience with props but I have better climb rate with a two blade prop eventhough the three blade runs with less vibration and in more than one case  I have found the same results but this might change if you have more power than I have in the 447 Rotax

Ellery in Maine

do not archive

**************************************
See what's free at http://www.aol.com. [quote][b]


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
Eugene Zimmerman



Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 392

PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2007 2:35 pm    Post subject: FireFly prop Reply with quote

Jim, I'll agree a three blade may be "better" it you factor in
personal preference. ;^)

On May 15, 2007, at 1:20 PM, jimhefner wrote:

Quote:
I had a 2 blade IVO on a 4" extender on the 447 and was very happy
with it's performance, including climb, but I didn't care to climb
at 1100'/min either.


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
d-m-hague(at)comcast.net
Guest





PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2007 6:58 pm    Post subject: FireFly prop Reply with quote

The problem with comparing two and three blade props is that you're always
comparing apples with oranges. All things being equal, the two blade prop
should be the better performer... but things are never equal. I'm not that
familiar with the Firefly, so I'm speaking in general terms:

The fewer blades, the more efficient. Yes, a ONE blade prop is most
efficient... but the weight penalty for the counterweight and a crankshaft
strong enough to handle the asymmetric loading probably negates the
advantages. One bladed props have been used successfully on racing model
airplanes, though. The faster the prop is turning, and the smaller the
prop, the bigger the advantage to fewer blades (which is why they work well
on a model engine turning a tiny prop at 20,000+ rpm!)

The only reason to use more than two blades is if the two bladed prop can't
efficiently absorb the engine's power in the space available. Typically
this is due to ground clearance issues (or tail boom clearance in the case
of a Kolb).

Regardless of the number of blades, any prop will be most efficient if the
blade pitch is set so that each point on the prop is acting at the maximum
L/D. This usually involves a compromise (unless you have an adjustable
prop) since you want the prop to perform well both during climb as well as
cruise. A flatter pitch is better for climb and vice versa. Generally you
optimize it for some speed between climb and cruise.

Now, what if your engine produces more power than the prop can handle? It
overspeeds, so you increase the pitch somewhat, effectively you now have
more of a "cruise prop" than a "climb prop". Since you're off the best L/D
point, it's less efficient. However, you can also absorb more power by
adding blade area: making the blades wider, or adding blades (or both...
look at the huge paddles on a T-2Cool. With more blade area you don't have
to add pitch to prevent overspeeding, so you're still in the better L/D
area, or you're back in the "climb prop" area... which explains why the 3
blade props may perform better on takeoff and climb, at the expense of cruise.

-Dana
--
--
Okay, who put a "stop payment" on my reality check?


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kolb-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group