Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

just a consideration

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Zenith-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
austria



Joined: 09 Feb 2007
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 11:29 am    Post subject: just a consideration Reply with quote

I am a flight engineer with more than 30 years expierience, and I know that all rudders have to be balanced.
601 XL rudders (rudder, aileron, elevator) are not balanced. You have to attach a lot of weight on the rudders for balancing to avoid shimming.
Maybe it is a reason for the seperaton of the wings in special conditions.
Just a consideration.
FS from AUT


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kurt.Schumacher(at)schumi
Guest





PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:39 pm    Post subject: just a consideration Reply with quote

Hallo FS,

Correct by rule of thumb. Then please consider balancing the flaps, new on
the XL, too. Incidentally, any rudder-like add-on can lead to shimmy and
later flutter. Face it - even with adding punctual counterweights to have
statically balanced rudders does not protect from torosional flutter of the
rudders. Once over, the story starts again.

Testing even this (relative simple) and low speed airframe would be much
more complex than just a static wing load. Should be done with and without
the aerodynamic influence...

Quote:
From all the interesting theories and ideas, we have seen here on the list
these days on design and static testing, I do not intend to go into the

dynamics of flutter here.

Under the line, every non-factory built aircraft should been taken to a
careful flight test program, including Vne+plus_some, CoG in the extremes...
And factory built aircraft should run over such a process on a regular
interval with the series production.

Grüsse aus der Schweiz!

-Kurt.

--


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
gboothe5(at)comcast.net
Guest





PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:58 pm    Post subject: just a consideration Reply with quote

Anybody run this by CH? I'm sure we could all come up with a dozen examples
of A/C without balanced control surfaces. My hat off to a 30 year Flight
Engineer, but the antique Pietenpol (1928) has no balanced surfaces. I'm
willing to bet that Vne has something to do with it, but, then, I'm not the
Designer of the aircraft.
Gary Boothe
Cool, CA
601 HDSTD, WW Conversion 90% done,
Tail done, wings done, working on c-section
--


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
amyvega2005(at)earthlink.
Guest





PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 3:34 pm    Post subject: just a consideration Reply with quote

i dont recall a j3 cub having balanced surfaces,

--


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
JohnDRead(at)aol.com
Guest





PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 4:27 pm    Post subject: just a consideration Reply with quote

Better not tell that to Piper cub fliers.

John Read

See what's free at AOL.com.
[quote][b]


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
Matt Ronics



Joined: 30 Apr 2007
Posts: 22

PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:26 pm    Post subject: Re: just a consideration Reply with quote

The KR series as designed does not balance the tail and several of the breed have flown over 200mph (listed VNE). Not that I'd do it, but emperic evidence nonetheless.

- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jetboy



Joined: 22 Jul 2006
Posts: 233

PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 11:57 pm    Post subject: Re: just a consideration Reply with quote

Fastback Cessna 150s don't have balance in the tails either, 150 series thru 150C model. Also, the 601 rudder, being similar to my 701, is at least partly aerodynamically and possibly mass balanced due to the position of the hinge axis? I dont see any issues there. I did sit up and take notice of the 'washboarding' wing vibrations reported on this forum a few months back to an XL, dismissed at the time as being likely caused by heat efflux from a powerplant below.

Ralph


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List

_________________
Ralph - CH701 / 2200a
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
badbob



Joined: 07 Jan 2007
Posts: 8
Location: Willamina, Oregon

PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2007 4:01 am    Post subject: just a consideration Reply with quote

I have had my Cassutt to WELL over 200 knots in a dive. Neither the rudder or elevator is balanced.

Do not archive.

Bob Johnson
badbob0007(at)earthlink.net
[quote][b]


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List

_________________
Bob Johnson
601XL scratch built.
badbob0007(at)earthlink.net
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Zenith-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group