Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Fuel Tanks

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Europa-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
paul.mcallister



Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 177
Location: Waukesha, WI USA

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 5:25 pm    Post subject: Fuel Tanks Reply with quote

Hi all,

I recall watching Ivan Shaw's impromptu demonstration of a Landrover driving
over a Europa fuel tank.

I remember thinking at the time, wondering if it would fare as well if it
was full of liquid. I suspect that the hydraulic pressure would easily
rupture the tank, no matter what it was constructed of.

I would offer up a hypothesis that a full tank in a Europa that was
subjected to a high G load would rupture, but one that has had fuel burnt
off would have sufficient airspace in it that could be compressed and not
cause the tank to burst.

Just a theory.

Paul


- The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
asarangan(at)YAHOO.COM
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 7:02 pm    Post subject: Fuel Tanks Reply with quote

I am not sure about that theory. It is easier to crush an empty soda
can than a full one. Air is more compressible than liquid. When a full
tank is impacted, the liquid will transfer that energy to all surfaces
with little or no compression. A partial tank on the other hand will
compress until the air inside is squeezed to match the liquid. By then
the tank might have undergone enough bending stress to break it. Again,
just a theory.

--- Paul McAllister <paul.mcallister(at)qia.net> wrote:

Quote:

<paul.mcallister(at)qia.net>

Hi all,

I recall watching Ivan Shaw's impromptu demonstration of a Landrover
driving
over a Europa fuel tank.

I remember thinking at the time, wondering if it would fare as well
if it
was full of liquid. I suspect that the hydraulic pressure would
easily
rupture the tank, no matter what it was constructed of.

I would offer up a hypothesis that a full tank in a Europa that was
subjected to a high G load would rupture, but one that has had fuel
burnt
off would have sufficient airspace in it that could be compressed and
not
cause the tank to burst.

Just a theory.

Paul









- The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List
Back to top
davidjoyce(at)doctors.org
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 12:52 am    Post subject: Fuel Tanks Reply with quote

Paul, Being in the process of building a long range fuel tank at present, I
have had to look out the VLA regs for this, which will be applied by the PFA
before approval. Key requirements are: The tank needs to be able to
withstand a pressure of 24 kPa (about 3.48 lbs/sq. in) without rupture or
leakage. The tank must have an expansion space of minimum 2% of volume. The
tank must be restrained to resist inertial forces in forced landings, etc -
I have not got precise figures to hand but believe this to be to withstand
10g.
3.48 psi may not sound a lot but a tank with a side measuring 18 by
24 ins will need to withstand1503 lbs on that side to give an idea of the
strength required, and a 110 litre tank weighing about 200 lbs full should
have a restraining system of 2000 lbs strength. I wonder whether any system
sitting in the luggage bay can meet these requirements, as opposed to one
sitting in the passenger seat and using the passenger seat belt system as
restraint
Regards, David Joyce G-XSDJ
---


- The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List
Back to top
asarangan(at)YAHOO.COM
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 11:11 am    Post subject: Fuel Tanks Reply with quote

I think you have a point. I just spoke to one of my students who does
failure analysis of aircraft parts. They have giant machines that pulls
and pushes a part until it breaks, and they take high speed photos
during the process for analysis. He seems to think that the tank being
full or not can go either way depending on the construction. In an
empty tank, the impact will tend to buckle the walls until the
structure collapses. In a full tank the fluid will equalize the forces
on all contacting surfaces, and will cause it to fail at the weakest
point, usually a weld joint. He seems to think that on welded
structures a full tank is probably worse, in agreement with Paul's
message.

--- Jeremy Davey <europaflyer_3(at)msn.com> wrote:

[quote]
<europaflyer_3(at)msn.com>

Andrew,

I think Paul is right. There is a direct parallel in the mechanism he
refers
to in the Concorde accident in Paris - there debris hit the very full
tank
causing a segment of the wall to be blown out at the weakest point.
It might
not have happened had the tanks not been brimmed.

With the Europa tank, what the Land Rover unscientific demonstration
tells
us is that the tank can flex hugely without splitting. What any
materials
scientist will tell us is that the material will have a limit to the
tension
loads it can take: it is possible for a full tank taking an impact to
split
in tension; that tension arises because the contents will not allow
if to
flex.

Taking your can analogy: fill it with a dense foam (compressible) and
throw
it against a wall, hard. It will likely not split. Fill it with
liquid and
throw it similarly: it will likely split.

If the above stands scrutiny, it does tell us that brimming the tanks
"just
because there is space so I might as well use it" is not always the
wisest
policy if that fuel is not required.

Regards,
Jeremy

--


- The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Europa-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group