Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

To Earl

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Lightning-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
cdewey6969(at)yahoo.com
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 2:36 pm    Post subject: To Earl Reply with quote

Earl- Thanks for the candid response on the
possibility of flying to Mexico over the gulf. It's
good to know the Lightning has great range even with a
headwind. There are no islands b/w Key West and Cancun
so if you don't make it you just don't make it.
Congrats on your record-breaking trip- Charles
--- Jim Langley <pequeajim(at)gmail.com> wrote:

Quote:
As always, well said Buz





On 8/13/07, N1BZRich(at)aol.com <N1BZRich(at)aol.com>
wrote:
>
> Here is my input on the tail-dragger controversy
(is it a controversy?)
> and some reasons why I think it would be a good
move for a future Lightning
> design. Also, many potential customers have asked
about a tail dragger
> Lightning.
>
> People prefer to fly tail-draggers for different
reasons. Probably the
> largest group of tail-dragger fans would say that
an airplane looks better
> without the nose wheel. Another group prefers
them because of the slight
> performance improvement in cruise, top speed,
lower empty weight, and grass
> runway or rough field operations. Still another
group might want to fly
> them for nostalgic reasons (most vintage airplanes
are T/W) or perhaps that
> it "shows" that they are better pilots because
they can handle a
> tail-dragger. For example, have you ever heard
someone say, "See that guy
> (or gal), they fly tail-draggers." Whereas, you
will probably never hear
> someone impressively say, "That guy flys a
Cherokee." Oh well, I probably
> belong to all the above groups.
>
> The last statement about being a tail-dragger
pilot somehow making you a
> better pilot will probably get some peoples
hackles up. That was not my
> intent, as I am sure that some folks that have
never flown tail-draggers are
> great pilots. They just, up to this point, have
not had or taken the
> opportunity to get current in conventional
aircraft. And that is getting
> harder and harder to do in today's environment.
It really is hard to find
> an instructor that can check you out. But once
checked out and current in
> conventional gear airplanes, you will fly like a
better pilot. How is that
> possible? Actually, I can usually tell if a
person is tail-wheel qualified
> while they are taxing out, or for sure during the
takeoff roll. On takeoff
> roll, by necessity, a tail-wheel pilot notices the
need to make small
> heading corrections much sooner than a person who
has not flown
> tail-wheels. Their eyes are accustomed to seeing
the small deviations
> sooner - rather than later. A nose wheel airplane
actually corrects itself
> to some degree on takeoff and landing roll out,
where as a tail wheel
> airplane, needing a correction, will continue to
need more and more of a
> correction. So the current tail wheel pilot sees
that need sooner and makes
> the correction. I have seen nose wheel pilots let
the nose swing as much as
> ten degrees before making a correction. Probably
disaster in a tail wheel
> airplane. And that is why nose wheel airplanes
were invented. They are
> easier to takeoff and land. They were designed
for the weakest link. Yes,
> I threw that in for effect and to perhaps help you
decide to go get a tail
> wheel endorsement. You will improve your piloting
skill. And guess what,
> those skills will make you a better pilot in the
air as well. If you are
> seeing smaller heading changes and making
corrections quicker on the ground,
> you will also be doing the same in the air. Even
your instrument flying
> will improve.
>
> Of course the down side, as Doug has mentioned
(and Pete has in the past),
> is that tail dragger airplanes will probably cost
more to insure - certainly
> until you log quite a bit of T/W time. But I
think your overall enjoyment
> and increased piloting skills will be a big
benefactor. And besides, it
> opens up a large number of vintage airplanes for
you to have the chance to
> fly. As I said, this is just my $.02 worth, your
mileage may vary.
> Blue Skies,
> Buz
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> .
>
> *
>
> *
>
>



Need a vacation? Get great deals
to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel.
http://travel.yahoo.com/


- The Matronics Lightning-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Lightning-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Lightning-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group