|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mikefapex
Joined: 05 Jul 2007 Posts: 70 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 11:36 am Post subject: Component Enclosure Opinions Appreciated |
|
|
Hi,
I am upgrading my tube/rag type aircraft electrical system to a Z-19. In doing this I will need to mount components inside of some kind of enclosure near the engine (vibration). There is no other room inside the aircraft for such.
Components include: main/eng battery contactors, main bat/eng bat/main power fuse block bus, ground block, power diodes, OV module, Low voltage module). The component weight comes to about 6 pounds including wire inside the enclosure.
My choices are narrowed down so far to two types:
1. Nema Fiberglass with see-through latch cover
pros: sturdy, easy to preflight, existing mounting holes, water/oil resistent
cons: heavy (4 lb)
2. Aluminum Chassis box
pros: light (40 oz), easy to preflight with clear lexan cover
cons: .050 thickness aluminum, will have to add sealant to get more waterproof-ness, mounting a little trickier. Clear lexan cover not standard and removal with screwdriver, Concern that it will not be sturdy enough.
Your opinions and suggestions are appreciated. Thanks,
Mike
| - The Matronics Homebuilt-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Homebuilt-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikefapex
Joined: 05 Jul 2007 Posts: 70 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:13 am Post subject: Re: Component Enclosure Opinions Appreciated |
|
|
bump
I am still interested in hearing from experienced voices about whether the lighter aluminum enclosure (.050) would support the weight of around 6 pounds in a flying, vibration environment.
Or if I should use the heavier NEMA fiberglass enclosure.
Thanks much.
| - The Matronics Homebuilt-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Homebuilt-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ceengland(at)bellsouth.ne Guest
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:42 am Post subject: Component Enclosure Opinions Appreciated |
|
|
mikef wrote:
Quote: |
bump
I am still interested in hearing from experienced voices about whether the lighter aluminum enclosure (.050) would support the weight of around 6 pounds in a flying, vibration environment.
Or if I should use the heavier NEMA fiberglass enclosure.
Thanks much.
I'd take a look at what actually needs to be in the enclosure. The
|
contactors are designed for the 'hostile' environment under the cowl. If
you limit the stuff to the fuse holder & the less-than-robust electronic
circuit boards, you could go with extremely light weigh enclosures.
| - The Matronics Homebuilt-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Homebuilt-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikefapex
Joined: 05 Jul 2007 Posts: 70 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:33 pm Post subject: Re: Component Enclosure Opinions Appreciated |
|
|
In this case there is no cowel. It is a Weight Shift Control aircraft with a pusher engine. The only place left to mount additional components is below the engine, attached to the frame that supports the engine. It is about 1' from the batteries.
| - The Matronics Homebuilt-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Homebuilt-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ceengland(at)bellsouth.ne Guest
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 3:55 pm Post subject: Component Enclosure Opinions Appreciated |
|
|
mikef wrote:
Quote: |
In this case there is no cowel. It is a Weight Shift Control aircraft
with a pusher engine. The only place left to mount additional
components is below the engine, attached to the frame that supports
the engine. It is about 1' from the batteries.
|
That implies at least 3 mount points to stabilize the box. How about AL
angle strong enough support the weight, providing 2 of the attach points
to the frame members. Heavy components mounted through the back wall of
the box to the AL angle, rest distributed as convenient in the box. Then
box strength isn't an issue.
| - The Matronics Homebuilt-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Homebuilt-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikefapex
Joined: 05 Jul 2007 Posts: 70 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 7:55 pm Post subject: Re: Component Enclosure Opinions Appreciated |
|
|
That is a great idea combining the major mount points with the heaviest components. Thanks!
| - The Matronics Homebuilt-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Homebuilt-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|