|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com Guest
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:43 am Post subject: Firefly |
|
|
I have mentioned before that totally against the general flow of increasing legislation the CAA (FAA) had done a U turn and now allows a deregulated class of ultralight in the UK which the pilot can experiment with to his hearts content.
The spec for the new class is a single seat, empty weight less than 115kgs, stall at less than 35 knots and you have to have one square metre of wing for every10kg of empty weight. You need a current pilots licence and a noise certificate. The Firefly is the only 3 axix machine on the UK market which complies at present.
The regs were modelled on the USA but instead of the 25 mph stall speed and 62 mph max straight and level the CAA have used the above ruling so that it becomes self regulating.Top speed is unregulated so airofoil section struts can be used instead of the speed limiting round struts of the USA model.
The wing size of the Firefly under this ruling limits the weight to 106kg empty . This means that the favoured 447 engine is heavy so it has been replaced by the single cylinder 28hp. Hirth F33A which brings the weight to 103 kg. Belt reduction drive to a 1.68 metre diameter 2 blade GSC adjustable prop.. Complete set up is 13.7 kg instead of the 447`s 37kg.
Flight test figures max speed around 70 mph at 6210 rpm and cruise at 60 mph at 5650 rpm. Max climb 500ft per min. take off run to clear a 15m obstacle 60metre on grass.
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
jbhart(at)onlyinternet.ne Guest
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 4:17 am Post subject: Firefly |
|
|
Quote: | From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:42:49 -0000
|
...........................
The PFA is running a design competition for this class which has aroused
quite a bit of interest and several entries so it seems that the Firefly
will not have the field to itself for long.
Quote: | ..................................
|
Pat,
This is great news. Has the PFA limited the fuel capacity?
Jack B. Hart FF004
Winchester, IN
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 3:05 am Post subject: Firefly |
|
|
Has the PFA limited the fuel capacity?>>
Hi Jack,
as I understand it you can do what you like within the 115kg empty weight
and the 10kg per square metre wing loading.
The design competition has thrown up some interesting stuff. There are 2
classes.. The Simple Class.In this the plane must be simple and easy to
build at home, low cost. Submissions must include 3 view. Projected weight
and balance, expected performance and a report describing the airframe,
engine and control system.
The SOTA Class (state of the art) No restriction on technology. No
restriction on cost. Must address high performance and high effeciency
issues. Submissions to include full weight breakdown of components and a
full report to justify the projected performance.
The winning entry in the SOTA Class called the E-Plane is a smooth canard
design.Projected figures
113 kts max. 1100ft/min climb
Engine is the Hirth 29.5 hp F33. Gives 80 mpg at 104knots cruise. 22 litre
tank gives 424 nautical miles range
Wont stall or spin
Exceptional vfield of view
No flaps
Adjust. rudder pedals
Uses unleaded fuel
Panel
EFIS, hGrand Rapids horizon, on screen check lists,back up altim. and ASI
Tranceiver and transponder
Projected empty weight 106Kg. MAUW 210 kg
Accomodates pilot from 55 to 99 Kg
The canard area can be included in the wing loading calculation
The 2 designers are aeronautical engineers. One ex Marshall Aerospace and
one ex- Hawker Siddeley and British Aerospace
Details of the Simple Class winner will be in the next issue of our main mag
`Microlight Flight`. I will put something on the list if anyone is
interested
Sounds exciting doesn`t it but there is a very large gap between a drawing
and a marketable bit of hardware.
Cheers
Pat
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
jim
Joined: 03 Nov 2006 Posts: 107 Location: N. Idaho
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 7:59 am Post subject: Firefly |
|
|
I think I would increase the wing area so I could use a stock 447, 3-blade
prop, brakes, and any other accessories you wanted. Bigger flaps might be
an easy way to do it. If that was insufficient I'd extend the wing span.
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ Jim
N. Idaho |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com Guest
|
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 3:40 am Post subject: Firefly |
|
|
I think I would increase the wing area so I could use a stock 447, 3-blade
prop, brakes, and any other accessories you wanted. Bigger flaps might be
an easy way to do it. If that was insufficient I'd extend the wing span.>>
Hi Jim,
you don`t quote which post you are replying to but if it was my post about
UK new sub 115kg class you could do all of those things. But watch the total
empty weight. That is what makes the whole thing self regulating. You put
in a bigger engine, you need a bigger wing. The bigger wing weighs more. You
want the extra weight of flaps then it has to be saved somewhere else.
Bigger tanks...ditto.
Cheers
Pat.
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|