|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
amyvega2005(at)earthlink. Guest
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:44 pm Post subject: Flying today |
|
|
Dave,
actually thats not quite correct. If you have an engine that is a bt heavier, the mount will only do so much. you still need the space between the engine and the fire wal for other things like filter, carbi, etc. that is why some planes carry the battery in back. the 601 needs the weight and balance, and even though mine shows CG aft, it still needs a bit of back weight, with one guy flying solo. With two people the CG and weight is more neutral.
Juan
--
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
bryanmmartin
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 1018
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 5:12 pm Post subject: Flying today |
|
|
I had to modify the bottom side of the cut out some for mine.
On Feb 10, 2008, at 3:03 PM, eddies wrote:
Quote: |
Hi Scott,
When you replaced the brackets, did you have to modify the cutout in
the skin of the rear turtle deck that the front of the horizontal
stab sits in?
Also what if any modifications did you need to make to the fiber
glass rudder fairing.
I am having the same issue, anything more than 10 degrees of flap
and I cannot trim for hands off on landing and I have the larger
trim tab installed
Thanks
Eddie
|
--
Bryan Martin
N61BM, CH 601 XL,
RAM Subaru, Stratus redrive.
do not archive.
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
_________________ --
Bryan Martin
N61BM, CH 601 XL, Stratus Subaru.
do not archive. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eddies
Joined: 20 Jun 2006 Posts: 40 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 8:41 pm Post subject: Re: Flying today |
|
|
Hi Guys,
There is another 601XL just recently flying out of my airport with a Jab 3300, this Zodiac has the gear flat to the front giving a more forward CG and it requires even more trim to fly strait and level, so I am guessing that this will be a common issue. (Both have the large trim tab fitted)
My only concern with the change was having to cut the rear turtle deck and also modify the fiber glass rudder saddle, only because I have already painted the plane
Eddie
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ashontz
Joined: 27 Dec 2006 Posts: 723
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 5:04 am Post subject: Re: Flying today |
|
|
I would agree that the underlying problem is either the engine mount or just, too heavy of an engine for CG reasons. Still I'm going to use the Corvair anyway. A bigger trim tab or a slightly more negatively inclined stabilizer will help, but it's also adding more drag either via the deflection of the elevator and trim tab or the deflection of the whole assembly. Having a stabilizer in the rear means you're creating negative lift to hold up the nose, which of course means you're taking away from the overall lift of the plane, adding drag etc... A more tail heavy plane, albeit extremely dangerous, is much faster, and of course a Canard design has less drag yet being that both the stabilizer and wings are providing lift. But that's a whole nother issue. Be interesting to see if someone comes up with a better engine mount design by the time I'm ready to install the engine. Or maybe I'll try making one myself.
Sabrina wrote: | If you were to review the empty CGs of the "heavy" engine aircraft and compare them to the empty CGs of the light engines (all with factory designed engine mounts) you will find that they are nose heavy or have a more forward empty CG (often nearing max. forward CG) as compared to the "light" engine craft. AMD could have done a better job designing the O-200 engine mount that Zenith sells--they have it a little too far forward. If you carry maximum baggage in back, you need it, but otherwise, it creates a "nose heavy" airplane that many people have a hard time trimming. Look firsthand at some AMD S-LSAs out there, there is no way those H stabs are neutral. If you still don't believe, measure the rise of the nose strut top stop plate on two craft of the same age (same bungee age). The heavy engine stop plate is raised, the light engine craft are not raised as much and are often "topped out." |
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
jlatimer1(at)cox.net Guest
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 9:13 am Post subject: Flying today |
|
|
Nice videos
Jerry
do not archive
--
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|