Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Takeoff & landing & stall help

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kolb-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
slyck(at)frontiernet.net
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:18 pm    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help Reply with quote

Grant, I'll reply to one of your questions......
On 16, Mar 2008, at 8:33 PM, grantr wrote:

Quote:

Is it ok to hold the tail on the ground until rotation speed?

Just once I tried the old "jump takeoff" technique I used on the

Aeronca 11AC
with my MkIII. -Stick hard back to liftoff. Not a good method.
Let the plane lighten up on its own and fly off when it feels like it.
This is, of course, with stock aluminum legs. It might be a
different plane
with long legs.
BB

Quote:
Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=170251#170251



- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
Dennis.Kirby(at)kirtland.
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 8:32 am    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help Reply with quote

"grantr" wrote: << He has military headsets and 1 GA headset. I have
comtronic which is not compatable. I bought a cord thats suppose to
adapt the GA headset to my comtronics. The head set works but the GA
mic doesnt work. >>

Hi, Grant -

Military headsets and civilian GA headsets operate with different
impedance levels - that is why the military sets won't work with our GA
intercoms.

And the Comtronics intercom will only work with Comtronics headsets. I
know this, because I have a set (2 helmets w/built-in headsets and
intercom). After I finished my initial 40 hours of flight testing, I no
longer used the helmet, and began using a regular GA headset. I found
that it would not work with the Comtronics intercom box. Like you, I
purchased (from Comtronics) a patch cord that interfaced between my GA
headset and the intercom, but my GA headsets STILL did not work. Just
like you said, you can hear, but the mike does not work.

When I called Comtronics to ask them why, they revealed to me that
because of impedance differences between their headsets and GA headsets,
the Comtronics intercom is not compatible with GA headsets. ("Great," I
thought - "why couldn't they have told me this BEFOREhand?") At least
they refunded me my $45 for the patch cord.

My solution was to simply buy a regular GA intercom box.

Dennis Kirby
Mark-3, 912ul, Powerfin-72 in
Cedar Crest, NM
do not archive


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
Dana



Joined: 13 Dec 2007
Posts: 1047
Location: Connecticut, USA

PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 9:35 am    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help Reply with quote

At 12:27 PM 3/17/2008, Kirby, Dennis CTR USAF AFMC MDA/AL wrote:

Quote:
And the Comtronics intercom will only work with Comtronics headsets...
because of impedance differences between their headsets and GA headsets,
the Comtronics intercom is not compatible...

Funny, though, my Comtronics helmet works perfectly with my Icom A24 radio,
which also supposedly works with GA headsets.

-Dana

--
"640K of computer memory ought to be enough for anybody." - Bill Gates, 1981


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
John Hauck



Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 4639
Location: Titus, Alabama (hauck's holler)

PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 5:06 pm    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help Reply with quote

> I have had a few good comments and tips. Does anyone else want to chime
in? Come on guys i know you all have some sort of technique. Smile
Grant:

I don't think there is any "special" techinique to fly a Kolb.

I think the name of the game is to fly the aircraft and not let the aircraft
fly you.

Using 40 degrees of flaps, idle power, to shoot an approach is not
technically demanding. Got to keep the aircraft above stall speed with
enough speed at the bottom to do a little flare and touch down. No need to
adjust flaps, throttle, or anything else except the control stick. If you
need to go faster, push the stick forward, if you want to slow up, pull it
back. The approach will be steep, much steeper than other airplanes, more
like a rotary wing approach and landing.

If you were shooting a landing into a postage stamp field, use a little
throttle to help you hit your mark. I can do this and keep my left hand on
the throttle and my right hand on the stick. I am not busy moving my hand
from one control to another. Keep it simple. It is a very simple aircraft.
Why make it complex?

Kolbs fly like any other three axis aircraft. The pilot must make the
proper decision to control the aircraft and not vice versa.

If you want to do full stall landings, do them a few inches above the
ground, not 10 feet. If you want to do a wheel landing, fly the darn thing
onto the ground.

I flew a Legend Cub the other day with a 100 hp tractor engine. Darn thing
landed just like my Kolb MKIII. Granted, it did float a little more, but
basically I controlled it basically the same way. I very seldom fly any
other aircraft except Kolbs.

john h
mkIII


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List

_________________
John Hauck
MKIII/912ULS
hauck's holler
Titus, Alabama
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dana



Joined: 13 Dec 2007
Posts: 1047
Location: Connecticut, USA

PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 5:32 pm    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help Reply with quote

At 09:03 PM 3/18/2008, John Hauck wrote:

Quote:
I flew a Legend Cub the other day with a 100 hp tractor engine. Darn
thing landed just like my Kolb MKIII. Granted, it did float a little
more, but basically I controlled it basically the same way.

Interesting, when I flew my US for the first time I thought it handled very
much like the T-Craft I used to own (and, pleasantly, NOT like the Quick I
had recently been flying). The biggest difference was that slips in the
T-Craft actually _did_ something.

I wonder, has anybody ever added flapperons to an UltraStar?

-Dana


--
"You sure it's broken? Let me make sure..."


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
gaman(at)att.net
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 4:45 am    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help Reply with quote

Just a thought here;
On takeoff in the Firestar,I have always begun the roll with stick back and held it here until the wheels lifted then slowly eased the stick forward to hold the speed and angle of climb desired.Everyone who has flown it was instructed this way .It's like a soft field takeoff and always gives the shortest takeoff roll.

---


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
John Hauck



Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 4639
Location: Titus, Alabama (hauck's holler)

PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:00 am    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help Reply with quote

Gary A:

Had to sit here a minute to think how I made my normal takeoffs.

Usually, depending on the airstrip, I keep the throttle centered, when the tail starts up, I keep it level, at flying speed a little aft stick, and we are flying. At Lakeland and Oshkosh, we usually pick up a main wheel a little early to coax the aircraft into flying a little early.

john h
mkIII


[quote] On takeoff in the Firestar,I have always begun the roll with stick back and held it here until the wheels lifted then slowly eased the stick forward to hold the speed and angle of climb desired.Everyone who has flown it was instructed this way .It's like a soft field takeoff and always gives the shortest takeoff roll.

[b]


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List

_________________
John Hauck
MKIII/912ULS
hauck's holler
Titus, Alabama
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
John Hauck



Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 4639
Location: Titus, Alabama (hauck's holler)

PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:27 am    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help Reply with quote

Morning Gang:

"Usually, depending on the airstrip, I keep the throttle centered, when the tail starts up, I"


Naw, I don't keep the throttle centered on takeoff, I keep the control stick centered, but I do have the throttle WAO. Wink

john h
mkIII
[quote][b]


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List

_________________
John Hauck
MKIII/912ULS
hauck's holler
Titus, Alabama
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
by0ung(at)brigham.net
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:55 am    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help Reply with quote

I’m Open for an education here… but I was told that the shortest take off roll, at least from a hard surface, was to get the tail up after adding power, and this would allow you to accelerate faster because of reduced drag on the wing, then pull the stick back when up to take off speed. I have done testing, taking off clean, 20 & 40 Deg flaps. Both clean and 40 deg flaps had , as close as I could tell, the same takeoff roll, and 20 deg flaps was 50 to 100 ft shorter. The explanation was that even though 40 deg of flaps should allow you to fly slower because of greater lift, the extra drag caused a much slower acceleration. Now I can hear you thinking between the lines… if 40 was slower why not 20 Deg of flaps being shorter as well…. The explanation would be that if you chart the lift to drag ratio on a chart,,,, 20 deg of flaps produces quite a bit of added lift with only a small drag penalty,,, while 40 deg of flaps, while producing a little more lift than 20 deg, is affected by much higher drag ratio. In getting a tail dragger endorsement in a supper cub,, the shortest takeoff was starting with 10 deg flaps, getting the tail up to reduce drag on the wings then, at the same time, pulling the stick back while adding additional flaps. Again this if from a hard surface runway,,,, soft field takeoff would be quite different.

Boyd

Quote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.
Just a thought here;

On takeoff in the Firestar,I have always begun the roll with stick back and held it here until the wheels lifted then slowly eased the stick forward to hold the speed and angle of climb desired.Everyone who has flown it was instructed this way .It's like a soft field takeoff and always gives the shortest takeoff roll.

[quote][b]


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
WhiskeyVictor36(at)aol.co
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:38 am    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help Reply with quote

In a message dated 3/19/2008 11:56:32 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, by0ung(at)brigham.net writes:
Quote:
Both clean and 40 deg flaps had , as close as I could tell, the same takeoff roll, and 20 deg flaps was 50 to 100 ft shorter.


Boyd,

I don't know what you are flying, but my older original model Kolb FireStar, with no flaps, gets off in about 100 feet or so now. So, if I had flaps and used 20 degrees, WOW! I could lift off vertically. No need for a runway. hehehe

Bill Varnes
Original Kolb FireStar
Audubon NJ
Do Not Archive


Create a Home Theater Like the Pros. Watch the video on AOL Home.
[quote][b]


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
jbhart(at)onlyinternet.ne
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:44 am    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help Reply with quote

Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 05:43:22 -0700 (PDT)

Just a thought here;

Quote:
On takeoff in the Firestar,I have always begun the roll with stick back and
held it here until the wheels lifted then slowly eased the stick forward to
hold the speed and angle of climb desired. Everyone who has flown it was
instructed this way. It's like a soft field takeoff and always gives the
shortest takeoff roll.

Gary,

I believe this is good practice, as you are always ready for the unexpected.
In most cases this will work. Once I stopped by at a grass field to meet a
friend. I had asked if the field was freshly mowed and he said it was. But
what I didn't know and found out was that a good part of the field was
covered by water. On final, you could not see it from the air, but when I
three pointed down, water flew every where. This is where my concern for fuel
usage let me down. I should have flown a low flyby to check out the field.

I tried my normal soft field takeoff three times, but I could not get off
before hitting water. To get off, I back taxied until I was in the middle
of a puddle. Then I became a little more aggressive on the throttle and let
the tail come up. Just before I got to the next puddle, I pulled the stick
back against the stop and the FireFly popped up into ground effect. If it
had not popped, I would have had to chop the throttle, and try again.

Flying off and on hard surface, I always use about 4 to 5 degrees of
flaperon. This lets the FireFly stagger off in a three point
attitude.

Jack B. Hart FF004
Winchester, IN

do not archive


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
rlaird



Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 373
Location: Houston

PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 10:34 am    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help Reply with quote

Grant --

Just about any method mentioned already will work in any situation. However, I do believe each situation has a preferred method.

This is how I see it:

Method #1 : When it's a smooth turf runway, I do what John H. does, put the stick at "neutral", let the wheel come up on it's own, then when I get to flying speed, I pull back just a bit on the stick and I'm away. (If it's --really-- smooth, I can also use Method # 3.)

Method #2 : When it's a rough or very rough field/terrain, I will intentionally bring my tailwheel up as soon as I possibly can, usually around 25-30mph, in order to minimize the stress on the tailwheel. I then wait for about 5-10mph past flying speed and the plane usually does the rest with just some gentle persuasion on the stick. If I really want to get off the field quickly, then at flying speed, I'll pop it up with a quick pull on the stick, then push the stick back down so I'm flying in ground effect, then wait for my airspeed to build before I pull up.

Method #3 : When it's a hard surface runway, I can do either of the two above, or I can just pull back the stick all the way, and wait for the plane to take off on it's own, then adjust the angle until I'm at best-climb. However, since I feel it's less stressful on the aircraft to use Method # 1, then I'll usually do that even on hard-surface or very-smooth-turf runways.

Anytime there is a possibility for gusts to hit me during my take-off roll, I might try to keep the tailwheel down a bit longer, as long as I don't think it will harm it... but where it's gusting and I have to pick up the tailwheel, well, I "get ready" for anything that might get thrown at me and get "happy feet" and a 'lively hand" when the gust comes a callin'. Smile

-- Robert
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Jack B. Hart <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net (jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net)> wrote:
[quote] --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net (jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net)>

Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 05:43:22 -0700 (PDT)

Just a thought here;

>On takeoff in the Firestar,I have always begun the roll with stick back and
>held it here until the wheels lifted then slowly eased the stick forward to
>hold the speed and angle of climb desired. Everyone who has flown it was
>instructed this way. It's like a soft field takeoff and always gives the
>shortest takeoff roll.


Gary,

I believe this is good practice, as you are always ready for the unexpected.
In most cases this will work. Once I stopped by at a grass field to meet a
friend. I had asked if the field was freshly mowed and he said it was. But
what I didn't know and found out was that a good part of the field was
covered by water. On final, you could not see it from the air, but when I
three pointed down, water flew every where. This is where my concern for fuel
usage let me down. I should have flown a low flyby to check out the field.

I tried my normal soft field takeoff three times, but I could not get off
before hitting water. To get off, I back taxied until I was in the middle
of a puddle. Then I became a little more aggressive on the throttle and let
the tail come up. Just before I got to the next puddle, I pulled the stick
back against the stop and the FireFly popped up into ground effect. If it
had not popped, I would have had to chop the throttle, and try again.

Flying off and on hard surface, I always use about 4 to 5 degrees of
flaperon. This lets the FireFly stagger off in a three point
attitude.

Jack B. Hart FF004
Winchester, IN

do not archive








[b]


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List

_________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Robert Laird
formerly: MkIIIc w/ 912ULS & Gyrobee
current: Autogyro Cavalon w/ 914ULS
Houston, TX area
http://www.Texas-Flyer.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
by0ung(at)brigham.net
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:14 pm    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help Reply with quote

I am flying a mkIII with a 912 and the testing was done on a summer day with over 6000 ft density altitude with field elevation of 4226 ft. doesn’t sound like apples here. But when you get it down to a vertical take off I want to see the video.

Boyd


Quote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In a message dated 3/19/2008 11:56:32 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, by0ung(at)brigham.net writes:

Both clean and 40 deg flaps had , as close as I could tell, the same takeoff roll, and 20 deg flaps was 50 to 100 ft shorter.


Boyd,

I don't know what you are flying, but my older original model Kolb FireStar, with no flaps, gets off in about 100 feet or so now. So, if I had flaps and used 20 degrees, WOW! I could lift off vertically. No need for a runway. hehehe

Bill Varnes
Original Kolb FireStar
Audubon NJ
Do Not Archive

[quote][b]


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
rowedenny



Joined: 09 Mar 2008
Posts: 338
Location: Western PA

PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:19 pm    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help Reply with quote

Grant
Sounds to me like your wheel alignment may be off if its that squirly on
pavement.

Denny
---


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dana



Joined: 13 Dec 2007
Posts: 1047
Location: Connecticut, USA

PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:55 am    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help Reply with quote

At 09:29 PM 3/19/2008, grantr wrote:

Quote:
On the paved runway we have been forcing the tail off the ground around 40
to 45mph. It takes some forward pressure on the stick to unstick the tail.
This is usually where it gets squirrelly as the plane wants to dart to the
left from the engine torque and p factor..

Torque will only roll the plane, not yaw it. P-factor will tend to yaw the
plane, but only at higher angles of attack (i.e. it'll want to yaw the
plane while the tail's down, but not afterwards). If the plane tries to
yaw just as you lift the tail, that's gyroscopic precession, all
taildraggers do it to a greater or lesser extent; you just have to be ready
for it.

A misalignment between your tailwheel and rudder could be causing it, too.

Quote:
My plane does not have differential brakes on it either so its all
rudder for the steering. The grass landings are easier to handle than the
paved landings.

You shouldn't be using differential brakes on takeoff anyway, unless things
_really_ get out of hand.

Grass is always easier than pavement, as there's less friction to side motion.

-Dana
--
End rush hour traffic now! Legalize vehicular weaponry!


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
jbhart(at)onlyinternet.ne
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 4:59 am    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help Reply with quote

At 06:29 PM 3/19/08 -0700, you wrote:
Quote:


Thanks a lot everyone for the helpful tips.

On the paved runway we have been forcing the tail off the ground around 40
to 45mph. It takes some forward pressure on the stick to unstick the tail.

This is usually where it gets squirrelly as the plane wants to dart to the
left from the engine torque and p factor.. We lift off at 55 as the tires
begin to shake from being worn and out of balance.
Quote:


Grant,

It really sounds like you have a wheel alignment problem, such as toe in or
out, or negative chamber. Both of these are easily checked by adding some
bags of sand to the seat(s) and rolling the plane to an fro to settle the
gear. A little positive chamber and zero toe-in are good. The only other
thing that can cause such a problem is unequal or low tire pressure. If
tire pressure is too low, it increases rolling resistance, and as the load
rocks from side to side it will cause yaw problems. Raise your tire
pressure to the max and see if it improves the situation. My FireFly was
wicked on hard surfaces until I fixed all of the above. Toe-in and chamber
can be adjusted with judicious force application with a long lever over the
axle.

Jack B. Hart FF004
Winchester, IN

do not archive


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kolb-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group