|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
matronics(at)bob.brennan. Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:48 am Post subject: Light Sport certification |
|
|
I am now the proud owner of an ELSA certified, flyable!, UK imported Kitfox
II. My DAR just left, leaving my Airworthiness Certificate and a lot of
paperwork behind, and said "go fly it!". For 5 hours in a test area only,
but then free as a bird.
I made a wrong statement in a previous posting - a Light Sport certified
Kitfox is not excluded from night flight or IFR if properly equipped. So it
looks like Light Sport is a much better category for anyone owning a Kitfox
that is not the original builder. Once I have taken the 16 hour ELSA
Airplane Repair-Inspection course I can do all my own work and annual
inspection.
Time to add a few more tie-wraps and go flying )))
Bob Brennan
1991 UK Model 2 ELSA Kitfox
Rotax 582 with 3 blade prop
Wrightsville Pa
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kyle
Joined: 13 Jun 2008 Posts: 15 Location: Western Kentucky
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 8:01 am Post subject: Re: Light Sport certification |
|
|
Congratulations Bob,
I think the only reason you were able to certify as ELSA was because you had registered with the FAA and obtained your N number before the Jan. 31, 2008 deadline. I don't know that the ELSA category is available to kit builders now. I thought the window of opportunity to certify as ELSA ended on Jan. 31. 2008. A extension was granted if you had already started the process with the FAA before that date.
Again Congratulations,
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ Kyle Dunn
Eddyville, Kentucky
Kitfox IV 1200 912 Rotax
1978 Cessna 172 N
American Aero Phoenix II w/582 Rotax
Rotorway Exec. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dave
Joined: 22 Sep 2006 Posts: 1382
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 8:01 am Post subject: Re: Light Sport certification |
|
|
CONGRATS !!!!!!!!
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ Realtime Kitfox movies to separate the internet chatter from the truth
http://www.youtube.com/user/kitfoxflyer
Hundreds of Kitfox Movies
Most viewed Kitfox on youtube
Most popular on youtube
Highest rated on youtube |
|
Back to top |
|
|
matronics(at)bob.brennan. Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 8:10 am Post subject: Light Sport certification |
|
|
Yes - to certify as ELSA the airplane had to have it's N number before Jan
31 2008, which fortunately I did (after fighting the FAA for 9 months to get
it!). I also had to *prove* the airplane never had an Airworthiness
Certificate in the UK, which was the biggest hurdle. How does one prove a
negative? (that's rhetorical...)
Hard to believe though that no new kit-built airplanes can be certified as
Light Sport? Ever? Only production built Light Sport from now on? Sucks for
Sport Pilots, although might be good for the resale value of my Kitfox...
)
Bob Brennan
1991 UK Model 2 ELSA Kitfox
Rotax 582 with 3 blade prop
Wrightsville Pa
--
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
MichaelGibbs(at)cox.net Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 8:53 am Post subject: Light Sport certification |
|
|
Bob sez:
Quote: | Hard to believe though that no new kit-built airplanes can be certified as
Light Sport? Ever? Only production built Light Sport from now on? Sucks for
Sport Pilots, although might be good for the resale value of my Kitfox...
|
No, sport pilots are fine. You are confusing the aircraft's category
with the pilot qualifications necessary to operate them. Sport
pilots can fly any aircraft that meets the sport pilot limitations,
regardless of whether it is an Experimental Light Sport, Certified
Light Sport, or Experimental.
The airplane's category affects only the requirements for maintenance
and inspections.
Mike G.
N728KF, Kitfox IV-1200 Speedster
Phoenix, AZ
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kerrjohna(at)comcast.net Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 9:10 am Post subject: Light Sport certification |
|
|
There might be a lack of understanding regarding the Sport Pilot rule. A Sport Pilot can fly any plane, certified, experimental amature built, etc that falls within the limitations of the Light Sport Aircraft rule.
John Kerr
[quote]-------------- Original message --------------
From: "Bob Brennan" <matronics(at)bob.brennan.name>
[quote] --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Bob Brennan"
Yes - to certify as ELSA the airplane had to have it's N number before Jan
31 2008, which fortunately I did (after fighting the FAA for 9 months to get
it!). I also had to *prove* the airplane never had an Airworthiness
Certificate in the UK, which was the biggest hurdle. How does one prove a
negative? (that's rhetorical...)
Hard to believe though that no new kit-built airplanes can be certified as
Light Sport? Ever? Only production built Light Sport from now on? Sucks for
Sport Pilots, although might be good for the resale value of my Kitfox...
)
Bob Brennan
1991 UK Model 2 ELSA Kitfox
Rotax 582 with 3 blade prop
Wrightsville Pa
--
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
matronics(at)bob.brennan. Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 9:15 am Post subject: Light Sport certification |
|
|
Lack of understanding yes. Where does one find the "limitations of the Light Sport Aircraft rule" specifically?
From: owner-kitfox-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of kerrjohna(at)comcast.net
Sent: 13 August 2008 1:10 pm
To: kitfox-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: RE: Re: Light Sport certification
There might be a lack of understanding regarding the Sport Pilot rule. A Sport Pilot can fly any plane, certified, experimental amature built, etc that falls within the limitations of the Light Sport Aircraft rule.
John Kerr
[quote]-------------- Original message --------------
From: "Bob Brennan" <matronics(at)bob.brennan.name>
[quote] --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Bob Brennan"
Yes - to certify as ELSA the airplane had to have it's N number before Jan
31 2008, which fortunately I did (after fighting the FAA for 9 months to get
it!). I also had to *prove* the airplane never had an Airworthiness
Certificate in the UK, which was the biggest hurdle. How does one prove a
negative? (that's rhetorical...)
Hard to believe though that no new kit-built airplanes can be certified as
Light Sport? Ever? Only production built Light Sport from now on? Sucks for
Sport Pilots, although might be good for the resale value of my Kitfox...
)
Bob Brennan
1991 UK Model 2 ELSA Kitfox
Rotax 582 with 3 blade prop
Wrightsville Pa
--
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lynn Matteson
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 2778 Location: Grass Lake, Michigan
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:23 am Post subject: Light Sport certification |
|
|
I think some of you are confusing Light Sport Aircraft and Sport
Pilot. As far as I know there is no such thing as a "Light Sport
Aircraft rule." There are limitations on the Sport Pilot, and what,
where, and when he or she can fly, but the LSA is an aircraft, and
must meet the limitations/restrictions of Light Sport Aircraft,
mainly the gross weight rule, but certainly the speed and possibly
the number of passengers comes to mind.
I've heard people talk about Light Sport Pilot...(making up new names
as they go)....and try as I may (in my own little way) I can't get
them to call the pilot by the right title. I told one guy: "Look at
this beer gut on me...do you think I'm a LIGHT sport pilot?"
Lynn Matteson
Kitfox IV Speedster
Jabiru 2200
Status: "Condition grounded, but determined to try." (Pink
Floyd..."Learning to Fly")
do not archive
On Aug 13, 2008, at 1:14 PM, Bob Brennan wrote:
[quote] Lack of understanding yes. Where does one find the "limitations of
the Light Sport Aircraft rule" specifically?
From: owner-kitfox-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-
list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of kerrjohna(at)comcast.net
Sent: 13 August 2008 1:10 pm
To: kitfox-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: RE: Re: Light Sport certification
There might be a lack of understanding regarding the Sport Pilot
rule. A Sport Pilot can fly any plane, certified, experimental
amature built, etc that falls within the limitations of the Light
Sport Aircraft rule.
John Kerr
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "Bob Brennan" <matronics(at)bob.brennan.name>
>
>
> Yes - to certify as ELSA the airplane had to have it's N number
before Jan
> 31 2008, which fortunately I did (after fighting the FAA for 9
months to get
> it!). I also had to *prove* the airplane never had an Airworthiness
> Certificate in the UK, which was the biggest hurdle. How does one
prove a
> negative? (that's rhetorical...)
>
> Hard to believe though that no new kit-built airplanes can be
certified as
> Light Sport? Ever? Only production built Light Sport from now on?
Sucks for
> Sport Pilots, although might be good for the resale value of my
Kitfox...
> )
>
> Bob Brennan
> 1991 UK Model 2 ELSA Kitfox
> Rotax 582 with 3 blade prop
> Wrightsville Pa
>
> --
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ Lynn
Kitfox IV-Jabiru 2200
N369LM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
msm_9949(at)yahoo.com Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:26 am Post subject: Light Sport certification |
|
|
Congratulations Bob for having successfully negotiated the FAA regulatory minefield. Others will no doubt follow in your footsteps someday. Now go out and have fun.
Marco Menezes N99KX
Model 2 582-90 C-Box
--- On Wed, 8/13/08, Bob Brennan <matronics(at)bob.brennan.name> wrote:
Quote: | From: Bob Brennan <matronics(at)bob.brennan.name>
Subject: Light Sport certification
To: kitfox-list(at)matronics.com
Date: Wednesday, August 13, 2008, 11:47 AM
Quote: | --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Bob Brennan"
<matronics(at)bob.brennan.name>
I am now the proud owner of an ELSA certified, flyable!, UK imported Kitfox
II. My DAR just left, leaving my Airworthiness Certificate and a lot of
paperwork behind, and said "go fly it!". For 5 hours in a test area
only,
but then free as a bird.
I made a wrong statement in a previous posting - a Light Sport certified
Kitfox is not excluded from night flight or IFR if properly equipped. So it
looks like Light Sport is a much better category for anyone owning a Kitfox
that is not the original builder. Once I have taken the 16 hour ELSA
Airplane Repair-Inspection course I can do all my own work and annual
inspection.
Time to add a few more tie-wraps and go flying )))
Bob Brennan
1991 UK Model 2 ELSA Kitfox
Rotax 582 with 3 blade prop
Wrightsville Pa
|
|
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
matronics(at)bob.brennan. Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:58 am Post subject: Light Sport certification |
|
|
"Allows sport pilots to fly production (standard airworthiness certificate)
and experimental amateur-built aircraft that meet the definition of a
light-sport aircraft."
So a Sport Pilot *can* fly any airplane that meets the Light Sport category
requirements, whether it is certificated as Light Sport or not; but they can
*not* fly any larger/faster aircraft. Of course, who determines if a
non-certificated Light Sport eligible aircraft really qualifies is
ambiguous, and as I found out the hard way the FAA can easily say "no it
isn't..." if they feel like it. It seems to me that any Sport Pilot that
flies a non-ELSA plane is wide open to being charged with flying outside
his/her privileges without a long drawn out argument with the FAA. Like I
just had!
Hypothetically, if I was a Sport Pilot and my Kitfox was Experimental
Amateur-Built, I would believe that I could fly it legally. But if caught by
the FAA they would have approached my claim that my Kitfox was ELSA-eligible
from a persecution (oops, I'm sure I meant "prosecution") standpoint and I
could well have lost the battle.
Just my 2 cents from recent perspective. And experience.
Bob Brennan
1991 UK Model 2 ELSA Kitfox
Rotax 582 with 3 blade prop
Wrightsville Pa
--
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
pwmac(at)sisna.com Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 12:27 pm Post subject: Light Sport certification |
|
|
Bob I think that battle has already been fought. The EAA has a list
of the planes that a sport pilot can fly with no issues. All you have
to do is ask.
PAul
===========
At 01:56 PM 8/13/2008, you wrote:
[quote]
>From http://www.sportpilot.org/interest/privileges_limitations.html
"Allows sport pilots to fly production (standard airworthiness certificate)
and experimental amateur-built aircraft that meet the definition of a
light-sport aircraft."
So a Sport Pilot *can* fly any airplane that meets the Light Sport category
requirements, whether it is certificated as Light Sport or not; but they can
*not* fly any larger/faster aircraft. Of course, who determines if a
non-certificated Light Sport eligible aircraft really qualifies is
ambiguous, and as I found out the hard way the FAA can easily say "no it
isn't..." if they feel like it. It seems to me that any Sport Pilot that
flies a non-ELSA plane is wide open to being charged with flying outside
his/her privileges without a long drawn out argument with the FAA. Like I
just had!
Hypothetically, if I was a Sport Pilot and my Kitfox was Experimental
Amateur-Built, I would believe that I could fly it legally. But if caught by
the FAA they would have approached my claim that my Kitfox was ELSA-eligible
from a persecution (oops, I'm sure I meant "prosecution") standpoint and I
could well have lost the battle.
Just my 2 cents from recent perspective. And experience.
Bob Brennan
1991 UK Model 2 ELSA Kitfox
Rotax 582 with 3 blade prop
Wrightsville Pa
--
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kcflys
Joined: 28 Aug 2007 Posts: 33 Location: Rancho Cordova, CA
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 12:38 pm Post subject: Light Sport certification |
|
|
Bob,
Congrats, and welcome. Enjoy and pass along your knowledge.
Keith C.
Mod IV Speedster 912 IVO
Mather (MHR) CA
---
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ Keith C.
kitfox wannabe
C-150
Rancho Cordova CA |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MichaelGibbs(at)cox.net Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 12:44 pm Post subject: Light Sport certification |
|
|
Quote: | So a Sport Pilot *can* fly any airplane that meets the Light Sport category
requirements, whether it is certificated as Light Sport or not; but they can
*not* fly any larger/faster aircraft.
|
No, a Sport Pilot can fly any airplane that meets the requirements
for that license.
"Sport Pilot" is a type of pilot certificate. "Light Sport Airplane"
is a category of aircraft certification. The two are not directly
related. The "Light Sport Airplane" category was introduced to
simplify the certification and maintenance requirements for very
small airplanes while "Sport Pilot" was intended to reduce the
training requirements (and operational flexibility) for pilots.
Quote: | It seems to me that any Sport Pilot that flies a non-ELSA plane is
wide open to being charged with flying outside his/her privileges
without a long drawn out argument with the FAA.
|
Not at all. Plenty of sport pilots are flying certificated
airplanes, like Luscombes and Cubs, and various experimental aircraft
(including Kitfoxes and Avid Flyers) that meet the sport pilot
limitations and are not ELSAs.
Quote: | Hypothetically, if I was a Sport Pilot and my Kitfox was Experimental
Amateur-Built, I would believe that I could fly it legally.
|
If it meets the operational and performance limits for sport pilot
operation, yes.
Quote: | But if caught by the FAA they would have approached my claim that my
Kitfox was ELSA-eligible...
|
Has nothing to do with it. You can read the details on the FAA's web site:
Sport Pilot Certificate
<http://www.faa.gov/licenses_certificates/airmen_certification/sport_pilot/>
Light Sport Aircraft
<http://www.faa.gov/aircraft/gen_av/light_sport/>
Mike G.
N728KF, Kitfox IV-1200 Speedster
Phoenix, AZ
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
MichaelGibbs(at)cox.net Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 12:51 pm Post subject: Light Sport certification |
|
|
Bob sez:
Quote: | I made a wrong statement in a previous posting - a Light Sport certified
Kitfox is not excluded from night flight or IFR if properly equipped.
|
The plane isn't excluded from night or IFR flight, but a sport pilot
flying it would be. In order to operate a properly-equipped light
sport aircraft at night the pilot would have to hold at least a
private pilot certificate with a valid medical and to operate IFR he
or she would also have to be instrument rated.
Mike G.
N728KF, Kitfox IV-1200 Speedster
Phoenix, AZ
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
matronics(at)bob.brennan. Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:13 pm Post subject: Light Sport certification |
|
|
Exactly, which is part of the "confusion". I, as a fully rated PPL, could
fly my ELSA aircraft at night and/or IFR if properly equipped. A holder of a
Sport Pilot ticket could not, in any aircraft.
The confusion mostly comes from the fact that a Sport pilot is not
restricted to flying an ELSA certificated aircraft, and can fly any aircraft
that "meets ELSA requirements". Tell that to Dan McIntyre who could
technically legally fly his Amateur Built certificated (soon...) Kitfox IV
on a Sport Pilot ticket - the FAA official who has told him his airplane is
*not* ELSA eligible could now burn his ticket. While still in his wallet.
While still in his pants.
I just spent more than 2 months and more than $1,000 getting a real ELSA
certificate for my Kitfox 2 that was clearly ELSA-eligible; I doubt the FAA
would have agreed that it is ELSA-eligible if I was caught flying it in
restricted airspace on a Sport Pilot ticket and it wasn't ELSA certificated.
I would get done for airspace violations *and* flying outside the privileges
of my license, for sure. Which would be defensible yes, but time and money
consuming.
I just think, in my now-getting-tedious-opinion<g>, that a Sport Pilot
flying a non Light Sport aircraft is taking a risk.
Bob Brennan
1991 UK Model 2 ELSA Kitfox
Rotax 582 with 3 blade prop
Wrightsville Pa
--
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
matronics(at)bob.brennan. Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:26 pm Post subject: Light Sport certification |
|
|
Excellent information Paul, thank you.
I think the info is here for future readers of this thread:
http://www.sportpilot.org/learn/slsa/
Note though that there are no Kitfoxes on that list...
My experience with the FAA however is that the whole Sport Pilot / Light
Sport Aircraft thing is "too new" and it is still up to the pilot to defend,
sometimes at great expense (there he goes again!), their position and rights
under the new rules. I also would like to note that the EAA and AOPA have
been *very* supportive of their members regarding these issues.
Bob Brennan
1991 UK Model 2 ELSA Kitfox
Rotax 582 with 3 blade prop
Wrightsville Pa
--
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
MichaelGibbs(at)cox.net Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:46 pm Post subject: Light Sport certification |
|
|
Bob sez:
Quote: | Excellent information Paul, thank you.
I think the info is here for future readers of this thread:
http://www.sportpilot.org/learn/slsa/
Note though that there are no Kitfoxes on that list...
|
That doesn't mean much. This is a list of airplanes that people have
had airworthiness certificates issued to as Special Light Sport
Aircraft--nothing more. It doesn't mean that these airplanes are the
only ones that a Sport Pilot can operate and it doesn't mean you have
to change the certification of, for example, a Luscombe Silvaire to
SLSA in order to operate it as a Sport Pilot. It also isn't a
comprehensive list, it's just the ones that EAA is aware of.
Mike G.
N728KF, Kitfox IV-1200 Speedster
Phoenix, AZ
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
MichaelGibbs(at)cox.net Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:46 pm Post subject: Light Sport certification |
|
|
Bob sez:
Quote: | The confusion mostly comes from the fact that a Sport pilot is not
restricted to flying an ELSA certificated aircraft, and can fly any aircraft
that "meets ELSA requirements".
|
No, the confusion comes because they have nothing to do with each
other yet they both refer to "sport". ELSA requirements apply to the
type of airplanes that can be certified as "Light Sport Airplanes".
A Sport Pilot can fly any airplane that meets Sport Pilot operating
restrictions, regardless of the type of certification (if any) the
airplane underwent.
Quote: | Tell that to Dan McIntyre who could technically legally fly his
Amateur Built certificated (soon...) Kitfox IV on a Sport Pilot
ticket - the FAA official who has told him his airplane is *not*
ELSA eligible could now burn his ticket.
|
Whether or not his airplane qualifies as ELSA has nothing to do with
it. If the airplane meets Sport Pilot limitations, he can operate it
legally as a Sport Pilot. No burning wallets or pants.
Quote: | I just spent more than 2 months and more than $1,000 getting a real ELSA
certificate for my Kitfox 2 that was clearly ELSA-eligible...
|
What you bought with your money, time and trouble is a difference in
the way your aircraft can be maintained and inspected--something
valuable to you since you did not build the aircraft. It has no
bearing on what type of pilot certificate is required to fly it and
would provide little benefit to the builder who maintains and
inspects his own airplane unless he sold it later.
Quote: | I doubt the FAA would have agreed that it is ELSA-eligible if I was
caught flying it in restricted airspace on a Sport Pilot ticket and
it wasn't ELSA certificated. I would get done for airspace
violations *and* flying outside the privileges of my license, for
sure.
|
No, you wouldn't. Assuming that your aircraft meets the limitations
for Sport Pilots to operate it, you'd be perfectly legal to fly it as
an Experimental, Experimental Light Sport, or if it had been
certified as Normal or Light Sport categories.
Quote: | I just think, in my now-getting-tedious-opinion<g>, that a Sport Pilot
flying a non Light Sport aircraft is taking a risk.
|
You really need to read those sections of the FARs that I posted the links to.
Mike G.
N728KF, Kitfox IV-1200 Speedster
Phoenix, AZ
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
matronics(at)bob.brennan. Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 2:08 pm Post subject: Light Sport certification |
|
|
I agree with everything you say here Mike, I was simply relating my
real-world experiences with the new rules for the benefit of anyone on the
list who might share similar challenges.
I was *very* fortunate to find helpful and persistent sources at the FAA,
CAA, LAA, EAA, and this list just to name a few of my contacts during this
"adventure". On my very first trip to my local FSDO I was told point blank
"no way" I would ever be able to register and certificate my UK-built Kitfox
here in the US. But for the persistence on many people's part, he would have
been right.
Bob Brennan
1991 UK Model 2 ELSA Kitfox
Rotax 582 with 3 blade prop
Wrightsville Pa
--
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|