 |
Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bhancock(at)worldwidewarb
Guest
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:20 pm Post subject: Yak-List Digest: Re: OL's and SAC's |
 |
|
Dennis,
Senior moment....I stand corrected. What I was referring to was the elimination of the requirement to notify the geographically responsible FSDO for maintenance flights outside the proficiency area....that was paragraph 46 in the old 8130-2. In 8130-2f the paragraphs are all changed.
Thanks for bringing this up and correcting it Dennis. In my slip up I was confusing the movement that created AFS-800 and *intent* of EAAWB, CJAA, and others to get the re-issuance of OL's done away with as opposed to what has actually been made official.....measure twice, hit the send button once...my bad.
That being said, there is nothing in any of the new OL's that we've had reissued for customers to remove the range restriction (all through our local FSDO) that states a requirement to have them reissued when the aircraft is relocated. But as you said, it's up to the discretion of you local FSDO.
Cheers,
Barry
On Sep 7, 2008, at 11:59 PM, Yak-List Digest Server wrote:
[quote]
Barry,
With all due respect, I don't believe the Memorandum eliminates the
requirement for reissuance of operating limitations when the aircraft is
relocated. It only eliminates the requirement for the appropriate
paragraph 161 b, (31), (32), (33) or (34), each of which referred to
proficiency area limitations. [b]
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dsavarese0812(at)bellsout
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 3:23 am Post subject: Yak-List Digest: Re: OL's and SAC's |
|
|
Barry,
No problem. I have them (senior moments) far more often than I would like to.
If AFS 800 would have thought before they issued the letter eliminating the proficiency area for NEW OL's, they could have easily included a paragraph in the letter saying something like, "This letter, when carried in the aircraft, removes the proficiency area stated in the aircraft's Operating Limitations." But no, they had to create more paperwork for the local FSDO's for aircraft with existing OL's. The only way the proficiency area is removed from existing OL's is to have them reissued by the FSDO. To my way of thinking, that's pretty shortsighted.
Dennis
[quote] ---
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
Get Email Distribution Too!
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
