|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dwilde(at)clearwire.net Guest
|
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 7:23 am Post subject: Why not just build the fuel system as per the plan |
|
|
Brett Hanley wrote:
Quote: | I have not heard of any problem building the fuel system as per the
plan. What are we hoping to gain by changes? Speed? Simplicity? Save
money? Gain weight? I just do not see the need for modifications.
Brett Hanley
N858BH
701/ Subaru EA81
40 hours
Hilltown PA
*
_*
I built mine as per plan. No problems after 30 hours.
|
Dan Wilde
N948DW
Do not archive
| - The Matronics Zenith701801-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith701801-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
sonar1@cox.net
Joined: 02 Oct 2007 Posts: 55 Location: Santa Barbara, Ca
|
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:03 am Post subject: Re: Why not just build the fuel system as per the plan |
|
|
Brett:
I didn't like having one full tank and one empty tank on landing, and having no control over it. At the minimum I would suggest putting an accessible valve in each line.
Bubbles in the lines were my problem. One bubble will stop the flow.
I also put in an ACS gascolator on the firewall - at least it has a screen - and am very happy with that.
Those who are putting in header tanks are really complicating everything. I would never do that.
Fred........N9701
do not archive
| - The Matronics Zenith701801-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith701801-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
n85ae
Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 403
|
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 11:11 am Post subject: Re: Why not just build the fuel system as per the plan |
|
|
I built and fly a Kitfox with an Injected Continental IO-240B, with a header
tank. It's a very simple arrangement, and the header gives you a lot of
benefit.
For example. in a headerless system in a steep descent, if you for example
get some air in the fuel lines when the fuel feeds are exposed to air. Your
engine quits. This does not happen with a header. If you want to switch
main tanks in flight the header prevent fuels flow interruptions from
stopping the engine. If you have a header low sensor in the header,
you have a bit of warning before your engine will actually quit (dependant
on header volume).
Regards,
Jeff
| - The Matronics Zenith701801-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith701801-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|