|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
brianrobertwood(at)gmail. Guest
|
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 4:50 pm Post subject: Is this scheme valid to save weight, add flexibility and |
|
|
Yep, you are right about that. Small wire=high-resistance=heat which leads
to smoke. How hot would a run of #4 get if it were shorted out (batt+ to
ground)? Would it smoke the insulation?
Brian in Brazil
Em Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:10:55 -0200, Robert L. Nuckolls, III
<nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com> escreveu:
Quote: | > I think the safest course is to avoid any smoking wires, either one foot
> or twelve feet, I think either one would probably kill you.
Without a doubt, the smoking of wires with insulation
of any pedigree produces a most disagreeable atmosphere.
But at the same time, let's made a distinction between small
wires that are ROUTINELY protected and fat wires that are
not. Small wires are very likely to smoke when driven by
high current sources. FAT wires are generally few in number,
installed with special care and more likely to burn away the
faulting intrusion than to burn and become an emitter of smoke.
Small wire protection is generally takes the form of breakers or
fuses (I prefer fuses cause they're light, cheap, fast
and take up minimum panel space on airplane). Had the #22 wire
cite above been thoughtfully protected, the outcome of the
experience would have been much less exciting.
Bob . . .
----------------------------------------)
( . . . a long habit of not thinking )
( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial )
( appearance of being right . . . )
( )
( -Thomas Paine 1776- )
----------------------------------------
|
--
Brian R. Wood
JH Manutencao
Anapolis. Goias, Brazil
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
CamLight
Joined: 19 Dec 2008 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 5:23 pm Post subject: Re: Is this scheme valid to save weight, add flexibility |
|
|
brianrobertwood(at)gmail. wrote: | Yep, you are right about that. Small wire=high-resistance=heat which leads
to smoke. How hot would a run of #4 get if it were shorted out (batt+ to
ground)? Would it smoke the insulation?
Brian in Brazil
Brian R. Wood
JH Manutencao
Anapolis. Goias, Brazil |
I've run 300A through #4 synthetic rubber insulated welding cable (105 degrees-C rated) for several minutes without the insulation smoking or failing. It did get VERY hot though.
A lot depends on the insulation. PVC is often rated at 85-degrees C. and will smoke a lot sooner than 400 degree-C rated fiberglass insulation. The "fusing current" level, at which the copper will melt and the wire acts like a fuse, is around 800A.
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
_________________ John M.
Owner
CamLight Systems |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|