|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
barryhancock
Joined: 09 Oct 2008 Posts: 285
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:37 am Post subject: 300 nm range restriction |
|
|
Hey Skip,
I believe this was covered a few months back on the list, but essentially if you go to the EAAWB web site they will give you a step by step. With the memorandum in hand you can apply for an addendum to your existing Operating Limitations, or have new one's issued. We've been successful in doing both with the local FSDO. As always, the more educated you are the smoother the process will go.
Here's an excerpt from the EAAWB release in '07
- How to obtain the letter of deviation:
- Former military aircraft receiving initial experimental exhibition (FAR 21.191(d)) certification from today forward, need to present the September 11, 2007 FAA Memorandum to their FSDO in order to be exempt from the 300/600-mile proficiency flight area limitation. The next change to FAA Order 8130.2(F) will contain the elimination of this requirement, but in the meantime, this FAA Memorandum is the authority to remove the proficiency flight area limitation on their operating limitations.
- All former military experimental exhibition aircraft in Groups I, II, and III currently operating and with the flight proficiency 300/600 mile limitations on their operating limitations must continue to operate under the issued limitations until such time they get their operating limitations updated from their local FSDO.
- All former military experimental exhibition aircraft owners can immediately apply to their local FSDO to amend their operating limitations to eliminate the 300/600-mile flight proficiency area limitation. Once amended, they will no longer have a proficiency flight area limitation. When submitting the request to the FSDO to drop the proficiency area limitation, owners should:
- Submit a cover letter to their local FSDO—“Request the operating limitations issued to TYPE OF AIRCRAFT, N-NUMBER, be updated to eliminate the proficiency flight area limitation per FAA Memorandum, subject: Deviation to Order 8130.2, dated September 11, 2007, from Frank Paskiewicz, Manager AIR-200. FAA headquarters, AFS-800, and AIR-200 have approved that this operating limitation change request will be processed per FAA Order 8130.2F, paragraph 27b(6), and no aircraft certification inspection is required for this paperwork change.”
The owners need to attach the following to their letter:
(1) A completed FAA Form 8130-6 http://forms.faa.gov/forms/faa8130-6d.pdf; and
(2) A copy of their current operating limitations (not the original); and
(3) A copy of their aircraft registration (not the original); and
(4) A copy of the FAA Memorandum from AIR-200. - As a note, once the local FSDO office is ready to update the operating limitations, the owners can expect to go to that office and exchange their old operating limitations for a new set (face to face).
- The mailing addresses for local FSDOs is at: http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/field_offices/fsdo/
Good luck!
Barry
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
_________________ Barry Hancock
Worldwide Warbirds, Inc.
www.worldwidewarbirds.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GreasySideUp
Joined: 24 Oct 2007 Posts: 44
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 11:25 am Post subject: Program letter |
|
|
I am having the local FSDO redo the operating limits to get rid of the proficiency area. They are saying I'll still need a program letter. I thought the whole point was to avoid writing program letters each year. Is this still the case with the new op limits or is he mistaken? Will I still need to write a letter for every Airshow I wish to attend?
Thanks
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
viperdoc(at)mindspring.co Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 11:49 am Post subject: 300 nm range restriction |
|
|
Yep.
VD
--
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dsavarese0812(at)bellsout Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 2:32 pm Post subject: 300 nm range restriction |
|
|
Unfortunately, the program letter or sometimes called a Schedule of Events, has not been eliminated. Ridiculous as it may be, we still have to submit an annual Program letter. So your FSDO inspector is correct. Hopefully when FAA Order 8130.2F is rewritten, the need for a program letter will be eliminated.
Dennis
[quote] ---
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
barryhancock
Joined: 09 Oct 2008 Posts: 285
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 2:59 pm Post subject: Re: 300 nm range restriction |
|
|
We need to remember that we are flying "exhibition" airplanes. The intent of owning and operating these aircraft, as far as the FAA is concerned, is primarily for exhibition. Therefore, a Program Letter announcing the events you intend to attend each year is just part and parcel of ownership of a warbird.
Whilst inconvenient, it is certainly not onerous to type a letter with event dates and send it off via fax to the FAA. Further, if you are flying to an event, make sure you have a copy of your program letter WITH THAT EVENT on there, as that could open you up to FAA scrutiny.
The Program Letter serves as an opportunity to plan your flying for the year, so it ain't all bad....
Barry
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
_________________ Barry Hancock
Worldwide Warbirds, Inc.
www.worldwidewarbirds.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dsavarese0812(at)bellsout Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 3:34 pm Post subject: 300 nm range restriction |
|
|
I'm not trying to sound arrogant here, but a legitimate question is - If there are no restrictions on where you can fly for proficiency except for landing at Class B primary airports, they why does one need a program letter? If there are no restrictions on proficiency flights, which is what they are called, then flying to an airfield that on that day just happened to have a local fly-in could certainly be a flight for proficiency and not specifically for exhibiting the aircraft. If you're not going to exhibit the airplane, then it's just a pleasure flight or a so-called proficiency flight. But because there is an airshow or fly-in there that you flew to see (not exhibit), the FAA says you need a program letter. Why?
Legitimate question?
Dennis
[quote] ---
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
barryhancock
Joined: 09 Oct 2008 Posts: 285
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dsavarese0812(at)bellsout Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 4:11 pm Post subject: 300 nm range restriction |
|
|
You're right Barry. I do know better.
Dennis
[quote] ---
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
yak52driver
Joined: 05 Jul 2008 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 5:56 pm Post subject: 300 nm range restriction |
|
|
My local FSDO rep, who I fly with every six months for checkrides, told me to just put the airports I want to fly to during 2009 in the program letter, no dates/events necessary. Not sure if that's true for every FSDO, but that's what mine wanted.
From: barryhancock <bhancock(at)worldwidewarbirds.com>
To: yak-list(at)matronics.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2009 4:59:07 PM
Subject: Re: 300 nm range restriction
--> Yak-List message posted by: "barryhancock" <bhancock(at)worldwidewarbirds.com (bhancock(at)worldwidewarbirds.com)>
We need to remember that we are flying "exhibition" airplanes. The intent of owning and operating these aircraft, as far as the FAA is concerned, is primarily for exhibition. Therefore, a Program Letter announcing the events you intend to attend each year is just part and parcel of ownership of a warbird.
Whilst inconvenient, it is certainly not onerous to [quote][b]
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dsavarese0812(at)bellsout Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 6:21 pm Post subject: 300 nm range restriction |
|
|
That's rather odd! The purpose of the program letter is to notify the FAA/FSDO of the EVENTS you plan to attend/exhibit the aircraft or training events you plan on attending. Certainly not what airports you intend to fly to as you can fly anywhere your heart desires without restriction.
(37) The owner/operator of this aircraft must submit an annual program letter update to the local FSDO that lists airshows, fly-ins, etc., that will be attended during the next year, commencing at the time this aircraft is released into phase II operation. This list of events may be amended, as applicable, by letter or fax to the FSDO prior to the intended operation amendments. A copy of the highlighted aeronautical chart, when applicable, must be carried aboard this aircraft and be available to the pilot. (Applicability: All)
[quote] ---
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
barryhancock
Joined: 09 Oct 2008 Posts: 285
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 9:10 am Post subject: Re: 300 nm range restriction |
|
|
Agreed, it's odd, but beyond that do not ever take what someone tells you, regardless of their "expertise" or position within the FAA, as license to deviate from your Operating Limitations. If they want to cause you trouble they won't care what Joe FSDO said, only what is in the Program Letter and whether or not you complied with it.
We deal with the FAA on a rather regular basis and are in the process of joining up with a Part 145 operation. My eyes have been opened as I've now seen the "inner workings" of the way "interpretations", etc., can go down. It can get ugly quick if you don't fully comply with your paperwork and fully cooperate with the powers that be.
Again, what "someone" says, regardless of their position or authority, will matter not when someone decides they want to violate you. The ONLY thing that is going to save your bacon is working within the constraints of your program letter and getting any even potential deviation approved in writing first.
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
_________________ Barry Hancock
Worldwide Warbirds, Inc.
www.worldwidewarbirds.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dsavarese0812(at)bellsout Guest
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 10:04 am Post subject: 300 nm range restriction |
|
|
Well stated Barry.
Dennis
[quote] ---
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
GreasySideUp
Joined: 24 Oct 2007 Posts: 44
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 1:19 pm Post subject: Re: 300 nm range restriction |
|
|
So what is the purpose of the program letter? How is it used and what do they need it for? How is it maintained, does anyone look at it and enter it into a database or is it filed away never to be seen again? Is it something we can all get together on and petition it's relevance?
It seems as though there are many rules that at one time had a great intent, but over time the reason they were implemented is no longer valid.
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dsavarese0812(at)bellsout Guest
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 1:45 pm Post subject: 300 nm range restriction |
|
|
Many logical questions, which are all good. However, regardless of the answers and whether or not they are meaningful or meaningless, the Operating Limitations for your aircraft and mine require that we still submit them. Whether the local FSDO looks at them, reviews them, studies them, files them or just simply disregards them doesn't matter because if you don't have it along with updates with you in the airplane for any event you are attending that is not on your annual program letter, if you get ramp checked you could be violated.
The whole mess goes back to 1993 when the first FAA Order 8127 was issued covering Experimental Exhibition aircraft. The FAA wanted to "control" where these aircraft flew because at the same time in 1993 there were quite a few Mig 15's being imported. When the applications came in for Airworthiness Certificates for these former military fighters, all of the sudden the FAA said "Whoa!". We don't know how to handle this. So a moratorium was issued for all Experimental Exhibition aircraft while the FAA tried to figure out what to do with these airplanes. Yak's and CJ's that were issued Airworthiness Certificates and OL's prior to June of 1993 did not have any proficiency area limitations.
I guess they figured by knowing where these airplanes were going to fly by the requirement of a program letter which is really a schedule of events where the aircraft was to be exhibited, was the way to control them.
Through the many reiterations of the FAA Order to what it is today, 8130.2F Change 3, the requirement for the Program Letter has remained. Including with the issuance of the letter of Sept. 2007 removing the 300 and 600 mile proficiency areas. Unfortunately, not a lot of intelligence went into the issuance of that letter. Instead of stating something like "When carried in the aircraft, the 300/600 mile proficiency area stated in the aircraft's Operating Limitations is eliminated." or something to that effect. AIR 200 didn't think about the additional paperwork required to reissue OL's to remove the 300/600 mile proficiency area. Nor did they ask themselves, "well....why does the Experimental Exhibition aircraft need a Program Letter or Schedule of Events if they are not restricted on where they can fly for proficiency?"
I have discussed this entire issue with the EAA Gov't Affairs contact person, Randy Hanson and he understands how foolish it is and is pushing to have the program letter requirement removed when the FAA Order is rewritten. Until such time as that occurs, we're stuck with what we have and all the petitioning in the world is probably not going to make things change until the Order is rewritten.
Dennis
[quote] ---
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
viperdoc(at)mindspring.co Guest
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 2:03 pm Post subject: 300 nm range restriction |
|
|
Somewhere there is a shoe clerk getting his jollies off on these program
letters. This is a do so because I said so kind of deal.
Viperdoc
--
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dsavarese0812(at)bellsout Guest
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 2:12 pm Post subject: 300 nm range restriction |
|
|
You got that right!
Dennis
[quote] ---
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|