|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
KE6FIS(at)arrl.net Guest
|
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:11 pm Post subject: Mass Balance Docs was NTSB grounding |
|
|
Quote: | From: "jetboy" <sanson.r(at)xtra.co.nz>
take care in choosing mass balance modifications. The design rules applying to
European 601XL is CAP482 British Civil Airworthiness Requirements section S -
small light airplanes, section D, design and construction, S 6569
[snip]
I found this while reviewing the design rules documents that applied before the
ASTM became the rule for LSA. I have not been able to freely obtain the ASTM
spec anywhere but it may become more available now the NTSB have pointed to it.
Both BCAR-S and DS 10141E (formerly TP10141E from transport Canada) design rules
that applied to the 601XL in non LSA markets
require flight testing for flutter, and the pre- LSA 601XL design should therefore
have been tested in this manner, but I dont know the requirements under ASTM
certification for LSA.
[snip]
Ralph
|
Ralph, thanks for the pointers to CAP482/BCAR-S and DS10141E! A quick
google search and I got both.
Unfortunately, I very much doubt we'll see a publicly-available PDF for the
ASTM specs anytime soon. There are 50 some-odd standards, each in the
~$40 range: http://www.astm.org/SNEWS/ND_2008/stesidebar_nd08.html
In my engineering career I have found the vast majority of these standards
bodies (ASTM/ISO/IEEE,etc.) are primarily set up for $$PROFIT$$ and
providing competitive barriers to entry for anyone but the large
corporations whose employees make up most of the standards committees.
How the design requirements for such a relatively small and publicly
regulated sport/industry like LSA got sucked into one of these things
I just don't know. If you ever do find a copy legally available to the
public, however, please post the link!
Bob Johnson
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
JAPhillipsGA(at)aol.com Guest
|
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 5:17 pm Post subject: Mass Balance Docs was NTSB grounding |
|
|
I think some folks here have earned a rather a smart punch in the nose. Remember, that battery is only a misdemeanor. Have a grand and glorious day and you folks that earned it, enjoy.
eIn a message dated 4/18/2009 3:11:47 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, KE6FIS(at)arrl.net writes:
Quote: | --> Zenith-List message posted by: <KE6FIS(at)arrl.net>
Quote: | From: "jetboy" <sanson.r(at)xtra.co.nz>
take care in choosing mass balance modifications. The design rules applying to
European 601XL is CAP482 British Civil Airworthiness Requirements section S -
small light airplanes, section D, design and construction, S 6569
[snip]
I found this while reviewing the design rules documents that applied before the
ASTM became the rule for LSA. I have not been able to freely obtain the ASTM
spec anywhere but it may become more available now the NTSB have pointed to it.
Both BCAR-S and DS 10141E (formerly TP10141E from transport Canada) design rules
that applied to the 601XL in non LSA markets
require flight testing for flutter, and the pre- LSA 601XL design should therefore
have been tested in this manner, but I dont know the requirements under ASTM
certification for LSA.
[snip]
Ralph
|
Ralph, thanks for the pointers to CAP482/BCAR-S and DS10141E! A quick
google search and I got both.
Unfortunately, I very much doubt we'll see a publicly-available PDF for the
ASTM specs anytime soon. There are 50 some-odd standards, each in the
~$40 range: http://www.astm.org/SNEWS/ND_2008/stesidebar_nd08.html
In my engineering career I have found the vast majority of these standards
bodies (ASTM/ISO/IEEE,etc.) are primarily set up for $$PROFIT$$ and
providing competitive barriers to entry for anyone but the large
corporations whose employees make up most of the standards committees.
How the design requirements for such a relatively small and publicly
regulated sport/industry like LSA got sucked into one of these things
I just don't know. If you ever do find a copy legally available to the
public, however, please post the link!
Bob ======================== the ties Day ================================================ - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS ================================================ - List Contribution Web Site sp; ===================================================
|
Check all of your email inboxes from anywhere on the web. Try the new Email Toolbar now!
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|