|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Craymondw(at)aol.com Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:13 am Post subject: 100LL |
|
|
I read in an AOPA article that stated that unless an aircraft engine isn't turbo charged or has high compression pistons, the engine doesn't need to use high octane 100LL fuel. It went on to say that the only reason 100LL has a high octane is for those mentioned turbo charged or high compression engines. Does this mean that 200HP and 300 HP engines can use auto gas. I know a Franklin engine dealer that has been using auto gas in his 200HP engines for years. He also informed me about a Moony Club that uses auto fuel in all of their aircraft. He recently returned from a conference that involved A/C fuel providers and related to me how in the near future the only fuel available will be unleaded leaded car gas with a few extra additives for altitudes. Does this mean that all along aviators using non turbo engines have been over paying for the use of 100LL when they could have used auto gas?
What's for dinner tonight? Find quick and easy dinner ideas for any occasion.
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics Glasair-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bruce(at)glasair.org Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:24 am Post subject: 100LL |
|
|
The most likely candidate will be 100LL without the lead or about 95 octane.
Bruce
www.Glasair.org
--
| - The Matronics Glasair-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
John Bolding
Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 281
|
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 1:24 pm Post subject: 100LL |
|
|
About 30 yrs ago I ran an RV3 for 500+ hrs on almost 100% premium auto fuel, The engine was a 0-320 160 hp I built up. IF I remember correctly (50% chance of that) the manual required 91 (or maybe 90) octane . Engine ran fine, plugs stayed clean even at the low power I ran a lot of time while skimming the beach.
John Bolding
[quote] ---
| - The Matronics Glasair-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
lists(at)stevet.net Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 2:41 pm Post subject: 100LL |
|
|
The real issue with mogas these days is ethanol content. With up to 10% ethanol in the gas, there are untold things that can happen to your airplane, including dissolving gas tanks, rotting fuel bladders, hose breakdown, and more. I am currently running a test on the effect of ethanol on my gas tanks. But, if your mogas has ethanol, you may have more than detonation for a problem.
Steve Thomas
________________________________________________________________________
On Jul 21, 2009, at 2:22 PM, John Bolding wrote:
[quote]About 30 yrs ago I ran an RV3 for 500+ hrs on almost 100% premium auto fuel, The engine was a 0-320 160 hp I built up. IF I remember correctly (50% chance of that) the manual required 91 (or maybe 90) octane . Engine ran fine, plugs stayed clean even at the low power I ran a lot of time while skimming the beach.
John Bolding
[quote]---
| - The Matronics Glasair-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
John Bolding
Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 281
|
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 2:55 pm Post subject: 100LL |
|
|
ABSOLUTELY, 30 yrs ago the car gas was MUCH different from today, gonna be interesting to see what shakes out from all this John
[quote] ---
| - The Matronics Glasair-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Craymondw(at)aol.com Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:57 pm Post subject: 100LL |
|
|
The AOPA article said that general aviation will definitely be running on unleaded mogas with a few extra additives and that unless an engine is turbo charged, it only needs 91 octane. I would like to see data from people flying 200/300 hp engines. I only know one Franklin dealer that says uses it in his 200hp aircraft and claims he has had no problems.
What's for dinner tonight? Find quick and easy dinner ideas for any occasion.
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics Glasair-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|