|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jj(at)sdf.lonestar.org Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:25 pm Post subject: transorbs |
|
|
Howdy folks,
In my work we use 30v transorbs similar the ones that have been discussed on this list for years. We use them to limit relay contact arcing when switching inductive loads such as mag locks and electric strikes. We have hundreds in the field and until yesterday I would have said they never go bad - but yesterday I had a service call and sure enough a transorb had shorted. In our applications the coil currents range from 125ma to maybe an amp or so. I don't know why it failed, maybe a manufacturing defect, but the point becomes that they CAN fail.
So I'm thinking, if I have one of these things across the coil on my master contactor and it shorts - bad things happen. Not only would I loose electric power but the un-fused master switch wiring would be overloaded. I'm thinking maybe a 30v transorb across the master switch - not the contactor coil may be a better choice if you are going to use them at all. It would still protect the switch, it would still allow about 15v reverse voltage to collapse the field in the coil (12v system - use a 45v transorb in a 24v system) and in a failure mode you would just be unable to shut off the power.
Anyway, I just wanted to bring attention to an admittedly remote failure mode and a possible re-configuration that would have a much more favorable result if a failure did occur.
Joel
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mprather(at)spro.net Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:44 pm Post subject: transorbs |
|
|
Interesting.
I could imagine that Bob might like to look at the shorted device - if
it's still around.
I wonder what short circuit current such a transorb might support before
itself becoming a fuse (going open circuit).. If the switch and wiring
can handle it, this may not be a terribly serious issue. A bit smokey
perhaps...
Matt-
Quote: | Howdy folks,
In my work we use 30v transorbs similar the ones that have been discussed
on
this list for years. We use them to limit relay contact arcing when
switching inductive loads such as mag locks and electric strikes. We have
hundreds in the field and until yesterday I would have said they never go
bad - but yesterday I had a service call and sure enough a transorb had
shorted. In our applications the coil currents range from 125ma to maybe
an
amp or so. I don't know why it failed, maybe a manufacturing defect, but
the point becomes that they CAN fail.
So I'm thinking, if I have one of these things across the coil on my
master
contactor and it shorts - bad things happen. Not only would I loose
electric power but the un-fused master switch wiring would be overloaded.
I'm thinking maybe a 30v transorb across the master switch - not the
contactor coil may be a better choice if you are going to use them at all.
It would still protect the switch, it would still allow about 15v reverse
voltage to collapse the field in the coil (12v system - use a 45v transorb
in a 24v system) and in a failure mode you would just be unable to shut
off
the power.
Anyway, I just wanted to bring attention to an admittedly remote failure
mode and a possible re-configuration that would have a much more favorable
result if a failure did occur.
Joel
|
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
jj(at)sdf.lonestar.org Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:11 pm Post subject: transorbs |
|
|
Yes I still have it and I'd be happy to send it to Bob if he wants to take a look. It's in heat shrink with lead wires sticking out. I haven't molested it yet - just checked it with a meter. A transorb is basicaly two zeners back to back and one in this is shorted. It measures a standard diode drop one way and open the other.
Joel
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Matt Prather <mprather(at)spro.net (mprather(at)spro.net)> wrote:
[quote] --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Matt Prather" <mprather(at)spro.net (mprather(at)spro.net)>
Interesting.
I could imagine that Bob might like to look at the shorted device - if
it's still around.
I wonder what short circuit current such a transorb might support before
itself becoming a fuse (going open circuit).. If the switch and wiring
can handle it, this may not be a terribly serious issue. A bit smokey
perhaps...
Matt-
> Howdy folks,
> In my work we use 30v transorbs similar the ones that have been discussed
> on
> this list for years. We use them to limit relay contact arcing when
> switching inductive loads such as mag locks and electric strikes. We have
> hundreds in the field and until yesterday I would have said they never go
> bad - but yesterday I had a service call and sure enough a transorb had
> shorted. In our applications the coil currents range from 125ma to maybe
> an
> amp or so. I don't know why it failed, maybe a manufacturing defect, but
> the point becomes that they CAN fail.
>
> So I'm thinking, if I have one of these things across the coil on my
> master
> contactor and it shorts - bad things happen. Not only would I loose
> electric power but the un-fused master switch wiring would be overloaded.
> I'm thinking maybe a 30v transorb across the master switch - not the
> contactor coil may be a better choice if you are going to use them at all.
> It would still protect the switch, it would still allow about 15v reverse
> voltage to collapse the field in the coil (12v system - use a 45v transorb
> in a 24v system) and in a failure mode you would just be unable to shut
> off
> the power.
>
> Anyway, I just wanted to bring attention to an admittedly remote failure
> mode and a possible re-configuration that would have a much more favorable
> result if a failure did occur.
>
> Joel
>
===========
-List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
===========
http://forums.matronics.com
===========
le, List Admin.
="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
===========
[b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckollsr
Joined: 24 Mar 2009 Posts: 95 Location: Medicine Lodge, KS
|
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 8:45 am Post subject: Re: transorbs |
|
|
Yes I still have it and I'd be happy to send it to Bob if he wants to take a look.� It's in heat shrink with lead wires sticking out.� I haven't molested it yet - just checked it with a meter.� A transorb is basicaly two zeners back to back and one in this is shorted. It measures a standard diode drop one way and open the other.�
Yes, I'd like to look at it. Please send to Bob Nuckolls,
P.O. Box 130, Medicine Lodge, KS 67104-0130.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 5:49 am Post subject: transorbs |
|
|
At 06:23 PM 7/21/2009, you wrote:
Quote: | Howdy folks,
In my work we use 30v transorbs similar the ones that have been discussed on this list for years. We use them to limit relay contact arcing when switching inductive loads such as mag locks and electric strikes. We have hundreds in the field and until yesterday I would have said they never go bad - but yesterday I had a service call and sure enough a transorb had shorted. In our applications the coil currents range from 125ma to maybe an amp or so. I don't know why it failed, maybe a manufacturing defect, but the point becomes that they CAN fail. |
The transorb is indeed a specialized zener. In the
zener conduction mode, the potential for dissipating
a deleterious level of heat is much higher than for
a diode rectifier. The energy available from a magnetic
field collapse is quite low and measured in millijoules.
Certainly a low risk stress to any power semiconductor.
The ability of the electrical system to deliver energy
to the transorb in a voltage transient condition is
many times higher.
Quote: | So I'm thinking, if I have one of these things across the coil on my master contactor and it shorts - bad things happen. Not only would I loose electric power but the un-fused master switch wiring would be overloaded. I'm thinking maybe a 30v transorb across the master switch - not the contactor coil may be a better choice if you are going to use them at all. It would still protect the switch, it would still allow about 15v reverse voltage to collapse the field in the coil (12v system - use a 45v transorb in a 24v system) and in a failure mode you would just be unable to shut off the power. |
But there are OTHER, equally likely failure modes that
can take the battery contactor out of service. That's
what the e-bus alternate feed path is all about. The
optimum location for transient suppression is at the
contactor coil terminals.
Do I correctly deduce from your posting that your
contactor coils are protected by a single transorb?
If so, then it has to be wired as shown in -A- below.
[img]cid:.0[/img]
In this configuration, the device HAS to be biased in
the zener conduction mode polarity while coiled power
IS APPLIED. When the switch opens, the top of the coil
swings negative . . . and the transorb is now biased
in the diode conduction mode. This configuration doesn't
take advantage of the transorb's voltage limiting function
as a specialized zener. In other words, your transorb
functionality in the coil release mode is the same as
for the simple diodes described in:
http://www.aeroelectric.com/articles/spikecatcher.pdf
The proper application of uni-polar transorbs or zeners
for SPIKE mitigation is to place them in series with
a plain vanilla rectifier as shown in -B-. In this
case, power that energizes the coil is blocked by the
diode, but the strong negative swing at switch opening
time is carried through the diode to the transorb that
conducts like a ZENER to limit the excursion to more
attractive levels (and allows the contactor to release
faster). See:
If the contactor release time (15mS versus 60 mS)
is critical the use of transorbs as shown in -B- is
indicated . . . -OR- you can use a single, bi-directional
device to keep the wiring complexity down and eliminate
device polarity concerns.
If your transorbs are implemented as in -A- then
they've offered no more functionality than the simple
rectifier diode would offer. If contactor release time
is critical, then changing to -B- or changing to
bi-directional devices is called for. See:
http://www.aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Curves/Cole-Hersee_with_Diode.gif
http://www.aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Curves/Cole-Hersee_without_Diode.gif
http://www.aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Curves/CH_w_2x18v_Transorbs.gif
http://www.aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Curves/CH_w_120_Ohm.gif
http://www.aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Curves/CH_w_1n5400.gif
Quote: | Anyway, I just wanted to bring attention to an admittedly remote failure mode and a possible re-configuration that would have a much more favorable result if a failure did occur. |
Failures of the plain-vanilla diode are unknown to
me. They're simply never electrically stressed in
a manner that puts them at risk for failure. Similarly,
Transorbs wired as shown in -B- cannot be impressed with
system transients because they're isolated by the
series diode.
I'll suggest that there's more to your failure
experience than what you've related in your posting.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
30.53 KB |
Viewed: |
4850 Time(s) |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|