|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Matt Dralle Site Admin
Joined: 08 Nov 2005 Posts: 25858 Location: Livermore CA USA
|
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:50 pm Post subject: Std vs. Aerobatic Engine Vibration Mounts |
|
|
Dear Listers,
I've got an IO-390 to mount on the RV-8. What are the pros and cons and opinions regarding the use of the "Standard" vs. "Aerobatic" engine vibration mounts? I have a set of both and can't decide which to use. Will there be more sag with the Std version over time? Is the different in vibration noticeable? Does having the larger engine make any difference in the selection? What other gotchas are there between the two different types.
One other question. Do they have a shelf life? Does a set sitting in the box, on a shelf for 15 years have any noticeable reduction in "performance"?
Thanks for your feedback!
Matt Dralle
RV-8 #82880 N998RV
FWF Starting This Weekend!
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
_________________ Matt Dralle
Matronics Email List Administrator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vanremog(at)aol.com Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2009 6:50 pm Post subject: Std vs. Aerobatic Engine Vibration Mounts |
|
|
Matt-
One wearout mode besides compression set (sag) in these isolators is loss of elastomeric properties over time due to outgassing of the natural oils/emollients in the rubber compound. This increases the durometer of the compound over time and increases their transmissibility. Aerobatic mounts are naturally stiffer than standard isolators from the get-go. IMO you should buy fresh standard isolators and immediately coat them in DC4, then you should dynamically balance your engine/prop combination. They then should last until engine TBO.
N1GV (RV-6A Flying 924TTAE Silicon Valley, CA)
In a message dated 8/5/2009 4:51:38 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, dralle(at)matronics.com writes:
Quote: | One other question. Do they have a shelf life? Does a set sitting in the box, on a shelf for 15 years have any noticeable reduction in "performance"?
|
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
martin(at)gbonline.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 5:12 am Post subject: Std vs. Aerobatic Engine Vibration Mounts |
|
|
---
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
martin(at)gbonline.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 5:20 am Post subject: Std vs. Aerobatic Engine Vibration Mounts |
|
|
Listers,
I now have 1000 hours on my 390 installation. I will be happy to comment
via telephone (at)920 619 6968.
Dick Martin
RV8 N233M
---
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
martin(at)gbonline.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 5:21 am Post subject: Std vs. Aerobatic Engine Vibration Mounts |
|
|
I now have 1000 hours on my IO-390 from Barrett Performance AC. I used the
aerobatic mounts because I noticed on my old IO360 on my RV8 that there was
some sag. As of this date their is no sag with the aerobatic mounts. Also
there is no descernable difference in vibration etc. The alignment of the
engine within the cowl shows no difference.
I did use a shim washer under one of the mounts to achieve perfect alignment
of the engine within the cowl.
Note, I also use a Aerocomposites 74" Carbon fiber prop with a Sam James
cowl and plenum. More speed and less weight.
Dick Martin
RV8 N233M
If you want to discuss, call me (at)9206196968
---
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
JohnInReno
Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 150
|
Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 6:44 am Post subject: Std vs. Aerobatic Engine Vibration Mounts |
|
|
What is DC4?
John
Vanremog(at)aol.com (Vanremog(at)aol.com) wrote: [quote] Matt-
One wearout mode besides compression set (sag) in these isolators is loss of elastomeric properties over time due to outgassing of the natural oils/emollients in the rubber compound. This increases the durometer of the compound over time and increases their transmissibility. Aerobatic mounts are naturally stiffer than standard isolators from the get-go. IMO you should buy fresh standard isolators and immediately coat them in DC4, then you should dynamically balance your engine/prop combination. They then should last until engine TBO.
N1GV (RV-6A Flying 924TTAE Silicon Valley, CA)
[b]
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
_________________ John Morgensen
RV-9A - Born on July 3, 2013
RV4 - for sale |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vanremog(at)AOL.COM Guest
|
Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 8:34 am Post subject: Std vs. Aerobatic Engine Vibration Mounts |
|
|
http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/cspages/dc4.php
In a message dated 8/6/2009 7:45:18 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, john(at)morgensen.com writes:
Quote: | What is DC4?
John
Vanremog(at)aol.com (Vanremog(at)aol.com) wrote: Quote: | Matt-
One wearout mode besides compression set (sag) in these isolators is loss of elastomeric properties over time due to outgassing of the natural oils/emollients in the rubber compound. This increases the durometer of the compound over time and increases their transmissibility. Aerobatic mounts are naturally stiffer than standard isolators from the get-go. IMO you should buy fresh standard isolators and immediately coat them in DC4, then you should dynamically balance your engine/prop combination. They then should last until engine TBO.
N1GV (RV-6A Flying 924TTAE Silicon Valley, CA)
====================================
="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List
====================================
ms.matronics.com/">http://forums.matronics.com
====================================
tp://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
====================================
|
|
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
AV8ORJWC
Joined: 13 Jul 2006 Posts: 1149 Location: Aurora, Oregon "Home of VANS"
|
Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 9:04 am Post subject: Std vs. Aerobatic Engine Vibration Mounts |
|
|
It is silicone in a tube and often used when installing O rings.
John
From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Morgensen
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 7:42 AM
To: rv-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: Std vs. Aerobatic Engine Vibration Mounts
What is DC4?
John
Vanremog(at)aol.com (Vanremog(at)aol.com) wrote:
Matt-
One wearout mode besides compression set (sag) in these isolators is loss of elastomeric properties over time due to outgassing of the natural oils/emollients in the rubber compound. This increases the durometer of the compound over time and increases their transmissibility. Aerobatic mounts are naturally stiffer than standard isolators from the get-go. IMO you should buy fresh standard isolators and immediately coat them in DC4, then you should dynamically balance your engine/prop combination. They then should last until engine TBO.
N1GV (RV-6A Flying 924TTAE Silicon Valley, CA)
[quote] [/b][/b][/b][/b][/b][/b]http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List[/b][/b][/b][/b]http://forums.matronics.com[/b][/b][/b][/b][/b]http://www.matronics.com/contribution[/b][/b] [b]
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dale Ensing
Joined: 11 Jan 2006 Posts: 571 Location: Aero Plantation Weddington NC
|
Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 4:26 pm Post subject: Std vs. Aerobatic Engine Vibration Mounts |
|
|
DC4 is Dow Corning 4 compound.
see : http://www..aircraftspruce.com/catalog/cspages/dc4.php
[quote] ---
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
_________________ Dale Ensing
RV-6A
Aero Plantation
Weddington NC |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|