Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

E-Buss and Master Switches

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
david.nelson(at)pobox.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 7:34 am    Post subject: E-Buss and Master Switches Reply with quote

Hi Bob,

I'm going over the finer details of a design based largely upon Z-11. Why
wouldn't one, for normal ops, have both the E-Buss and Master in the 'On'
position?

My reasoning being:

- In the event of some electrical problems, you only have to contend with
switching off one switch rather than remembering to turn the E-buss 'On'
followed by turning the Master 'Off'.

- If the problem persists, we aren't in any different position than if we
turned on the E-Buss followed by turning off the Master.

Am I missing something fundamental here or was I always assuming that the
E-Buss was always originally 'Off' during normal ops?

Thank you,
/\/elson


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
jay(at)horriblehyde.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 9:23 am    Post subject: E-Buss and Master Switches Reply with quote

Hi there David,

I had to write a procedure on how to use a system that I wired to one of the
Z diagrams and then it became clear why one does not want to leave the e-bus
alt feed on. In the event of a fault, smoke, what have you, the first thing
that you want to do is isloate the power sources from the fault as fast as
possible- hence the DC master; once its off only the short fat wire between
the battery and your solenoid is live (and the E-bus alt to the switch
wire). So, unless the fault is right there (usually unlikely), then you
have removed the power that is driving the fault. In a mag equipped
aircraft the engine should still run and in an all electric aircraft the ECU
and fuel pumps should have directly connected wires that bypass the DC
master. If you still have smoke and trouble then you know that you are now
seriously in the dwang, as the fault is somewhere in those, non-isolatable,
wires.
However, if switching the DC master off clears the fault you can now switch
the E-bus alt feed on and see what happens; then maybe switch off a few
circuits on the main bus; switch the DC master back on, etc. This is
assuming that landing is not a luxury that you are presently afforded- such
as if you are crossing the Atlantic and you're 10 hours into a 22 hour
flight... Wink

If you can land, better to figure the problem out on the ground of course,
using just the E-bus to get you down.

Jay

--


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:37 am    Post subject: E-Buss and Master Switches Reply with quote

At 10:30 AM 8/16/2009, you wrote:
Quote:

Hi Bob,

I'm going over the finer details of a design based largely upon
Z-11. Why wouldn't one, for normal ops, have both the E-Buss and
Master in the 'On' position?

Could, but not necessary. Doesn't hurt. But you DO
want to pre-flight test the dual power path philosophy
for the e-bus.

Quote:
My reasoning being:

- In the event of some electrical problems, you only have to contend
with switching off one switch rather than remembering to turn the
E-buss 'On' followed by turning the Master 'Off'.

Remember? It's recommended that you have a checklist
for shutdown. It's also recommended that you consider
an ergonomic arrangement of switches wherein ship's
DC power controls are grouped. Leaving the airplane
should be preceded by placing all switches down (OFF).

Quote:
- If the problem persists, we aren't in any different position than
if we turned on the E-Buss followed by turning off the Master.

Am I missing something fundamental here or was I always assuming
that the E-Buss was always originally 'Off' during normal ops?

That was the original design philosophy. But failure
mode effects analysis for the system's design included
consideration of risk for having the switch ON under
any flight conditions. Wired as shown, you may operate
it with any philosophy you choose.
Bob . . .

---------------------------------------
( . . . a long habit of not thinking )
( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial )
( appearance of being right . . . )
( )
( -Thomas Paine 1776- )
---------------------------------------


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
david.nelson(at)pobox.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:45 am    Post subject: E-Buss and Master Switches Reply with quote

Hi Jay,

I certainly understand your reasoning for the below and I had a similar
argument in my head. But then this scenario popped up in my head. Currently,
I'm only VFR rated but plan to go for the IFR ticket within a couple of years
of project completion. I imagined flying in the soup and would I want to reset
all my avionics and wait for them to reinitialize? I'll be honest, I don't how
long it will take for my equipment to re-initialize while flying - I'll add it
as a 'todo' item for further investigation.

Ugh - this is making my head hurt. To me, I guess what it comes down to is that
we must architect our systems for fault tolorance, know how the systems are
designed and how they work, understand the associated risks and trade-offs, and
train for emergencies. Thanks to Bob, we can thank him for the 1st three.

/\/elson

On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, Jay Hyde wrote:

[quote]
Hi there David,

I had to write a procedure on how to use a system that I wired to one of the
Z diagrams and then it became clear why one does not want to leave the e-bus
alt feed on. In the event of a fault, smoke, what have you, the first thing
that you want to do is isloate the power sources from the fault as fast as
possible- hence the DC master; once its off only the short fat wire between
the battery and your solenoid is live (and the E-bus alt to the switch
wire). So, unless the fault is right there (usually unlikely), then you
have removed the power that is driving the fault. In a mag equipped
aircraft the engine should still run and in an all electric aircraft the ECU
and fuel pumps should have directly connected wires that bypass the DC
master. If you still have smoke and trouble then you know that you are now
seriously in the dwang, as the fault is somewhere in those, non-isolatable,
wires.
However, if switching the DC master off clears the fault you can now switch
the E-bus alt feed on and see what happens; then maybe switch off a few
circuits on the main bus; switch the DC master back on, etc. This is
assuming that landing is not a luxury that you are presently afforded- such
as if you are crossing the Atlantic and you're 10 hours into a 22 hour
flight... Wink

If you can land, better to figure the problem out on the ground of course,
using just the E-bus to get you down.

Jay

--


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
david.nelson(at)pobox.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:12 pm    Post subject: E-Buss and Master Switches Reply with quote

Hi Bob,

100% agree that the pre-flight checklist should involve toggling both swithches
to ensure proper operation. That should be item regardless of normal ops.

I'm giving an awful lot of thought to switch placement and overall cockpit
ergonomics. Being my 1st time, I'm learning that it is not as easy as a task as
I had thought it would be....and I am making progress.

/\/elson

On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, Robert L. Nuckolls, III wrote:

Quote:

<nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com>

At 10:30 AM 8/16/2009, you wrote:
>
> <david.nelson(at)pobox.com>
>
>
> Hi Bob,
>
> I'm going over the finer details of a design based largely upon Z-11. Why
> wouldn't one, for normal ops, have both the E-Buss and Master in the 'On'
> position?

Could, but not necessary. Doesn't hurt. But you DO
want to pre-flight test the dual power path philosophy
for the e-bus.

> My reasoning being:
>
> - In the event of some electrical problems, you only have to contend with
> switching off one switch rather than remembering to turn the E-buss 'On'
> followed by turning the Master 'Off'.

Remember? It's recommended that you have a checklist
for shutdown. It's also recommended that you consider
an ergonomic arrangement of switches wherein ship's
DC power controls are grouped. Leaving the airplane
should be preceded by placing all switches down (OFF).

> - If the problem persists, we aren't in any different position than if we
> turned on the E-Buss followed by turning off the Master.
>
> Am I missing something fundamental here or was I always assuming that the
> E-Buss was always originally 'Off' during normal ops?

That was the original design philosophy. But failure
mode effects analysis for the system's design included
consideration of risk for having the switch ON under
any flight conditions. Wired as shown, you may operate
it with any philosophy you choose.
Bob . . .

---------------------------------------
( . . . a long habit of not thinking )
( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial )
( appearance of being right . . . )
( )
( -Thomas Paine 1776- )
---------------------------------------



- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
jay(at)horriblehyde.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:54 pm    Post subject: E-Buss and Master Switches Reply with quote

Hey David,

I kinda agree... re waiting for stuff to reset; I suppose that the best is
exactly what we are arming ourselves with right here- a pretty good
understanding of exactly how our sytems work.

As an aside, the MGL EFIS systems that I am using a lot now have the option
(as many others also do) of their own standby and backup battery ( a little
isty bitsy thing) that keeps them all running when you switch off the DC
master- sort of like an airborne UPS you might say; so the reset doesn't
really happen Smile I hope... Wink

Jay

--


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:24 pm    Post subject: E-Buss and Master Switches Reply with quote

At 02:56 PM 8/16/2009, you wrote:
Quote:

Hi Bob,

100% agree that the pre-flight checklist should involve toggling
both swithches to ensure proper operation. That should be item
regardless of normal ops.

I'm giving an awful lot of thought to switch placement and overall
cockpit ergonomics. Being my 1st time, I'm learning that it is not
as easy as a task as I had thought it would be....and I am making progress.

Add this drawing to your sources of ideas . . .

http://www.aeroelectric.com/PPS/Switch_Panels/Switches.pdf
In several variations I've suggested an ordering of
switches that groups function and mitigates the
effects of mistakenly grabbing an adjacent switch.
Operating the wrong switch is high on the list
of concerns for some builders.

Here I've built the switch strings where the
least used are at the far left and most used
at far right with power distribution and control
in the middle. You may have other design goals in
mind but these drawings may offer a place to start.
Bob . . .

---------------------------------------
( . . . a long habit of not thinking )
( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial )
( appearance of being right . . . )
( )
( -Thomas Paine 1776- )
---------------------------------------


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:37 pm    Post subject: E-Buss and Master Switches Reply with quote

Quote:
I imagined flying in the soup and would I want to reset all my
avionics and wait for them to reinitialize? I'll be honest, I don't
how long it will take for my equipment to re-initialize while flying
- I'll add it as a 'todo' item for further investigation.

I forgot another item from your posting.

If it's ever necessary to force any piece of equipment
to re-boot, it's ill-advised to initiate it with any
part of the power distribution system that affects more
than one piece of equipment. Any such processes are
best accomplished on one piece at a time with controls
unique to that piece of equipment and then perhaps only
if you really need that piece of equipment for
comfortable completion of that flight.

More than one dark-n-stormy night story advanced to
higher levels of interest and intrigue as pilot
attempts to diagnose/fix some problem by manipulation
that serves only distracted him or made other things
happen that worsened the situation.

Quote:
Ugh - this is making my head hurt. To me, I guess what it comes down
to is that we must architect our systems for fault tolorance, know
how the systems are designed and how they work, understand the
associated risks and trade-offs, and train for emergencies. Thanks
to Bob, we can thank him for the 1st three.

It shouldn't be painful. It's called failure mode effects
analysis and generally takes a LONG time to do a good
job. Not that it's difficult . . . but new possibilities
or combinations arise with thought, time and conversation with
others. I'm pretty sure that every FMEA report I've submitted
was considered by others "complete" and suitable for
publication. Personally, I've considered them perhaps
99 percent complete while keeping an eye out for new
ideas. Don't rush it. The thing that's nice about the
airplanes we build here is that the last 1% item can be
accommodated in a timely manner and at our convenience.
The TC airplane guys HAD to call the work 100% complete
because any changes after certification was a horribly
protracted process.
Bob . . .

---------------------------------------
( . . . a long habit of not thinking )
( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial )
( appearance of being right . . . )
( )
( -Thomas Paine 1776- )
---------------------------------------


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
david.nelson(at)pobox.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 2:12 pm    Post subject: E-Buss and Master Switches Reply with quote

Hi Jay,

"Airborne UPS" - haha - I like that. I had been resistant to using the
internal battery option of the AFS unit. Instead opting for a small aux
battery. I've recently changed my mind on that front as it somewhat simplyflied
my panel and wiring while still maintaining the goal of being able to power up
the EFIS before engine startup. After that, everthing else can get turned on.

/\/elson
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, Jay Hyde wrote:

[quote]
Hey David,

I kinda agree... re waiting for stuff to reset; I suppose that the best is
exactly what we are arming ourselves with right here- a pretty good
understanding of exactly how our sytems work.

As an aside, the MGL EFIS systems that I am using a lot now have the option
(as many others also do) of their own standby and backup battery ( a little
isty bitsy thing) that keeps them all running when you switch off the DC
master- sort of like an airborne UPS you might say; so the reset doesn't
really happen Smile I hope... Wink

Jay

--


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group