Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

OV Protection for Three-Phase PM Alternator

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:37 pm    Post subject: OV Protection for Three-Phase PM Alternator Reply with quote

At 07:56 PM 1/25/2010, you wrote:


I've been considering how to use a three-phase permanent-magnet
alternator instead of the single-phase units shown in the Z-figures
and discussed in the AeroElectric book. I'd like to put overvoltage
protection upstream of the regulator-rectifier but the three-phase
output is delivered to it via three feed-wires instead of the two
from a single-phase PM stator. It seems that OV disconnect relays in
any two feed-lines would interrupt current from all three stator-coil
sets; the two AEC 9024-20 modules operating the relays would probably
be triggered at slightly different voltages due to component
tolerances but an OV event in the narrow window between those two
voltages seems unlikely. I have three questions:

(1) Have I overlooked something that makes the basic concept unworkable?

Don't want 2 ov sensors for reasons cited . . .

(2) What would be the consequences of an OV event that happened
to open one relay but not the other?

Not easily predicted . . .

(3) Is it possible to control two relays with one AEC 9024-20?

Yes, or get a two-pole relay. But two relays is workable too and
probably less expensive.

If necessary I could go with a single OV disconnect relay downstream
of the regulator but that would leave that not-cheap
regulator-rectifier vulnerable. Twinned OV protection is cheaper
than one fried regulator...

Agreed.
Rick Nordgarden
Council Bluffs IA


Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 83444#283444


Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
01/25/10 19:36:00


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 6:57 am    Post subject: OV Protection for Three-Phase PM Alternator Reply with quote

At 11:30 PM 1/25/2010, you wrote:

<etienne.phillips(at)gmail.com>

Hi Rick

Putting an OV module upstream of the regulator when using a permanent
magnet alternator is very likely to trip incessantly, as the regulator
keeps the voltage correct by dissipating the extra energy as heat,
unlike a field-coil alternator that actively modifies the voltage
generated by the alternator.

Etienne's assertions are based on the earliest marketplace
examples of rectifier regulator for PM alternators. The PM
alternator goes wAAAyyyy back in the history of electrical
systems on small engines where folks wanted to add things
light lighting and self starting to scooters, bikes,
and lawn care equipment.

Indeed, these alternators were seldom rated for more than
5-10 amps at max RPM (in a 6v system). The simplest means for
controlling their widely variable output voltage was to simply throw
a shunt load on the device to prevent excess energy from
making it out onto the system.

Of course, this means that the rectifier/regulator had to
be capable of turning 100% of the alternator's output
into pure heat under all conditions. So the heat dissipating
abilities of the R/R had to accommodate 50-100 watts of
output.

As the systems needing simple, low cost power matured the
the alternators were up-sized to accommodate design goals.
One can buy 3-phase, 30A PM machines today . . . but the
regulators are most certainly not capable of sinking all
that power. The reason is that SHUNT regulation has been
pretty much abandoned for SERIES regulation wherein
excess energy is kept off the system not by sinking it
to ground but by disconnecting the energy source from the
rest of the system.

This means that alternators are now taxed only as
the system demands can use the energy . . . before, the
alternator always ran flat-out and was necessarily
hot all the time. Exemplar schematics for modern rectifier/
regulators can be viewed here . . .

http://aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Schematics/3-Phase_PM_Rectifier_Regulator.gif

http://aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Schematics/PM_Regulator/Kubota_Schematic.jpg

For that reason, I wouldn't think that it's possible to have an OV
event, other than with a regulator failure, and the only way to catch
that would be to stick the OV relay and module downstream of the
regulator, after the rectification has happened, and when you're
dealing with DC.

The original idea for adding OV protection to the SD-8
DID put the disconnect relay downstream of the R/R. But
this didn't really comport with design goals for all
other OV protection systems . . . shut off the flow of
energy at the source. This is what prompted moving
the relay from the downstream side of R/R to the upstream
side in the AC wiring.

Now on a different note, wouldn't it be a good idea to stick the OV
relay upstream of the smoothing capacitor? I've seen one of those
70,000uF caps explode due to too much juice, and it's quite
impressive! My thinking is that if your regulator goes off the hook
and supplies the cap with 40V (or whatever the permanent magnet
alternator can generate), and that thing explodes in the cockpit, the
pilot is going to need a new set of underwear...

You need to abuse these guys pretty badly to achieve
such spectacular failures. Certainly a runaway 30A
alternator would be classified as pretty abusive.
Hence, putting the OV disconnect in the upstream
AC wiring affords the capacitor the same degree of
OV protection as the rest of the electro-whizzies
on the airplane.
Bob . . .


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
grnord



Joined: 23 Jan 2010
Posts: 5
Location: Council Bluffs IA

PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:46 am    Post subject: Re: OV Protection for Three-Phase PM Alternator Reply with quote

Bob and Etienne, thanks for your replies. You've shed some light on a controversy that erupted on the CorvairCraft list (on mylist.net) early this month: somebody started bad-mouthing PM alternators and as evidence he cited several instances of blown smoothing capacitors on Rotax installations. The thread got bogged down in ad hominem attacks and counter-attacks and eventually was dropped without resolving the question of why the capacitors had blown, but it appears in light of what you two have pointed out that those setups must have had the capacitors upstream of their OV protection -- or no OVP at all...

...Which leaves me puzzled with respect to the Z-figures' treatment of smoothing capacitors with PM alternators: only Z-9 and Z-16 show them downstream of the OVP; Z-10/8, -13/8, -17, -20 and -21 all have the capacitor upstream of the OVP. The guy stirring things up on CorvairCraft confirmed that failures of these caps are indeed spectacular. How likely to hear such a bang are users of Z-10/8 et al?

Am I right in concluding that my best bet for minimizing the probability of an unhappy ending with a three-phase PM alternator is to put a single disconnect relay in the DC line downstream of the R/R but upstream of the smoothing capacitor, leaving the R/R to fend for itself?
Rick Nordgarden
Council Bluffs IA


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:12 am    Post subject: OV Protection for Three-Phase PM Alternator Reply with quote

At 10:46 AM 1/26/2010, you wrote:
Quote:


Bob and Etienne, thanks for your replies. You've shed some light on
a controversy that erupted on the CorvairCraft list (on mylist.net)
early this month: somebody started bad-mouthing PM alternators and
as evidence he cited several instances of blown smoothing capacitors
on Rotax installations. The thread got bogged down in ad hominem
attacks and counter-attacks and eventually was dropped without
resolving the question of why the capacitors had blown, but it
appears in light of what you two have pointed out that those setups
must have had the capacitors upstream of their OV protection -- or
no OVP at all...

Hard to tell . . . mostly because they were using
hardware that has not been as well evaluated for
behavior as the SD-8 and regulators supplied by
B&C.

Quote:
Am I right in concluding that my best bet for minimizing the
probability of an unhappy ending with a three-phase PM alternator is
to put a single disconnect relay in the DC line downstream of the
R/R but upstream of the smoothing capacitor, leaving the R/R to fend
for itself?

No . . . best-we-know-how-to-do is disconnect the
offending energy flow AT ITS SOURCE . . . break the
AC leads. The Z-figures have not been all updated
to this idea . . . but unlike the larger, 3-phase machines,
and the 18A system on Rotax, the SD-8 on a vacuum pump
pad doesn't represent much of a hazard to the smoothing
capacitor. Alternators that run much faster (higher
open circuit voltage) are another matter entirely.

By the way, you can leave this capacitor off if you
wish . . . it's value is problematic. See:

http://www.aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Curves/SD-8_Noise_Data.pdf

Note that some of the plots are at 50 mv/division vertical
scale, others are at 200 mv/division.
Bob . . .


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
etienne.phillips(at)gmail
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 1:26 pm    Post subject: OV Protection for Three-Phase PM Alternator Reply with quote

On 26 Jan 2010, at 7:10 PM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III wrote:
Quote:

. . . best-we-know-how-to-do is disconnect the
offending energy flow AT ITS SOURCE . . . break the
AC leads.

Hi Rick and Bob

I realize now that I didn't get the picture in my mind across very
clearly at all! Agreed that the actual break in the circuit should be
as far upstream as possible, but the sensing should happen downstream
of the regulator, as you have explained. Apologies for confusing the
matter...

As for the cap disintegrating, my fears are put at ease if the relay
disconnects the source upstream of the regulator.

Thanks
Etienne


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group