 |
Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
robin02(at)mindspring.com
Guest
|
 Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:43 am Post subject: Antenna help |
 |
|
Guys, I am trying to increase the range of my comm radios. New antennas will have to be installed in the fuselage. The VHF-5T antenna would have to be installed on a about a 35 degree angle to fit vertically.
The SA-006 is a folded dipole antenna that can be installed as engineered in the fuselage as it is only 26" high and 9.5 inches wide. The manufacturer claims 170 mile range air to ground.
My original antenna are the foil ones supplied by Glasair back in 1983. The navs are doing Ok but the comms need to be replaced. What recommendations do you have? RObin Young
[quote][b]
| | - The Matronics Glasair-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
keepertoad(at)bellsouth.n
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:51 pm Post subject: Antenna help |
|
|
First I would caution you to adjust your expectations. Line of sight for VHF freqs is approximately 120 miles at 10,000 feet. A claim of 170 miles is, in my opinion, unlikely to be achieved on anything near a regular basis. As a project engineer with Bendix avionics in the 70's we struggled to get 130 to 140 miles using digital techniques and 25 watt transmitters at that altitude (10,000). If you read the ad carefully for the SA-006, the writer does not claim 170 mile performance, only that it occurred. The most important part of the equation is altitude of the antennas involved. At 20,000 the line of sight is approximately 1.4 times the 10,000 ft distance or roughly 170 miles. If you routinely fly at that altitude you will likely communicate over those distances. I fly a Glasair III with standard S-H antenna and routinely get line of sight comm. Any tilting of the comm antenna from vertical will diminish performance since the comm signal is vertically polarized. Theoretically a tilt from vertical of 45 degrees causes roughly a 30% loss of signal strength. In practice it's not quite that bad because of scatter/reflections from things metal on the aircraft. Also remember there is an engine in front of a fuselage mounted antenna which will effect the radiation pattern of the antenna. Curious why the foil antenna need to be replaced. If Tx and Rx meet spec, the antenna is installed per the book and all coax and connectors are properly done, you should be able to comm line of sight distances. Have you done a VSWR on your setup?
Sorry for the long diatribe but hate to see anyone spend bucks that may not yield a performance increase.
Regards,
B.J. McClure
CentOS 5.4, Linux 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 x86_64 13:25:22 up 9 days, 6:57, 1 user, load average: 0.17, 0.12, 0.09
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 12:36 -0500, Robin Young wrote: [quote] Guys, I am trying to increase the range of my comm radios. New antennas will have to be installed in the fuselage. The VHF-5T antenna would have to be installed on a about a 35 degree angle to fit vertically. The SA-006 is a folded dipole antenna that can be installed as engineered in the fuselage as it is only 26" high and 9.5 inches wide. The manufacturer claims 170 mile range air to ground. My original antenna are the foil ones supplied by Glasair back in 1983. The navs are doing Ok but the comms need to be replaced. What recommendations do you have? RObin Young | Quote: |
=[/b]
st Email Forum -[/b]
atures Navigator to browse[/b]
uch as List Un/Subscription,[/b]
load, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ,[/b]
more:[/b]
//www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List[/b]
=[/b]
WEB FORUMS -[/b]
vailable via the Web Forums![/b]
//forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com[/b]
=[/b]
bution Web Site -[/b]
ous support![/b]
-Matt Dralle, List Admin.[/b]
//www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution[/b]
=[/b]
|
[b]
| | - The Matronics Glasair-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
robin02(at)mindspring.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 1:06 pm Post subject: Antenna help |
|
|
BJ...thanks for the reply. I did not put the foil antenna in the vertical stabilizer when I built the plane. My primary radio has been a whip antenna on a ground plane with the back up radio antenna in too much of a horizontal, it has a very low range. I want to improve them but they cannot be removed and reused.
You seem knowledgeable about the Sa-006. It will fit better than the VHF-5t. It is also cheaper for some reason. Is it a choice I should consider? Thanks RObin
From: owner-glasair-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-glasair-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of b.j. mcclure
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 3:51 PM
To: glasair-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: Antenna help
First I would caution you to adjust your expectations. Line of sight for VHF freqs is approximately 120 miles at 10,000 feet. A claim of 170 miles is, in my opinion, unlikely to be achieved on anything near a regular basis. As a project engineer with Bendix avionics in the 70's we struggled to get 130 to 140 miles using digital techniques and 25 watt transmitters at that altitude (10,000). If you read the ad carefully for the SA-006, the writer does not claim 170 mile performance, only that it occurred. The most important part of the equation is altitude of the antennas involved. At 20,000 the line of sight is approximately 1.4 times the 10,000 ft distance or roughly 170 miles. If you routinely fly at that altitude you will likely communicate over those distances. I fly a Glasair III with standard S-H antenna and routinely get line of sight comm. Any tilting of the comm antenna from vertical will diminish performance since the comm signal is vertically polarized. Theoretically a tilt from vertical of 45 degrees causes roughly a 30% loss of signal strength. In practice it's not quite that bad because of scatter/reflections from things metal on the aircraft. Also remember there is an engine in front of a fuselage mounted antenna which will effect the radiation pattern of the antenna. Curious why the foil antenna need to be replaced. If Tx and Rx meet spec, the antenna is installed per the book and all coax and connectors are properly done, you should be able to comm line of sight distances. Have you done a VSWR on your setup?
Sorry for the long diatribe but hate to see anyone spend bucks that may not yield a performance increase.
Regards,
B.J. McClure
CentOS 5.4, Linux 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 x86_64 13:25:22 up 9 days, 6:57, 1 user, load average: 0.17, 0.12, 0.09
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 12:36 -0500, Robin Young wrote: [quote]Guys, I am trying to increase the range of my comm radios. New antennas will have to be installed in the fuselage. The VHF-5T antenna would have to be installed on a about a 35 degree angle to fit vertically. The SA-006 is a folded dipole antenna that can be installed as engineered in the fuselage as it is only 26" high and 9.5 inches wide. The manufacturer claims 170 mile range air to ground. My original antenna are the foil ones supplied by Glasair back in 1983. The navs are doing Ok but the comms need to be replaced. What recommendations do you have? RObin Young | Quote: |
=[/b]
st Email Forum -[/b]
atures Navigator to browse[/b]
uch as List Un/Subscription,[/b]
load, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ,[/b]
more:[/b]
//www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List[/b]
=[/b]
WEB FORUMS -[/b]
vailable via the Web Forums![/b]
//forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com[/b]
=[/b]
bution Web Site -[/b]
ous support![/b]
-Matt Dralle, List Admin.[/b]
//www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution[/b]
=[/b]
|
href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List
href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c
[b]
| | - The Matronics Glasair-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
keepertoad(at)bellsouth.n
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 2:01 pm Post subject: Antenna help |
|
|
Now I understand your motivation. I have never used nor tested the SA-006. I would ask for a list of customers who have purchased it and ask them if they get satisfactory performance. This is a terrible suggestion but is it possible to open the vertical fin and install there? It's as near a perfect location as you will find. Remember the radiation pattern for a theoretical dipole is toroidal (doughnut) in shape. Little energy is radiated or received off the ends of the antenna. Once you start tilting and bending the antenna you no longer have much knowledge what the radiation pattern looks like. Making that determination requires a field strength meter and lots of painstaking data collection and plotting. Any legitimate antenna designer should have data for their antenna mounted in an ideal install. It may also be computer generated as opposed to measurement in an anechoic chamber. You might ask if they also have data for the antenna with any degree of deformation. It might give you some clues as to what you can expect.
Sorry I couldn't be of more help.
B.J.
CentOS 5.4, Linux 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 x86_64 16:43:22 up 9 days, 10:15, 1 user, load average: 0.12, 0.10, 0.10
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 16:05 -0500, Robin Young wrote: [quote] BJ...thanks for the reply. I did not put the foil antenna in the vertical stabilizer when I built the plane. My primary radio has been a whip antenna on a ground plane with the back up radio antenna in too much of a horizontal, it has a very low range. I want to improve them but they cannot be removed and reused. You seem knowledgeable about the Sa-006. It will fit better than the VHF-5t. It is also cheaper for some reason. Is it a choice I should consider? Thanks RObin
From: owner-glasair-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-glasair-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of b.j. mcclure
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 3:51 PM
To: glasair-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: Antenna help
First I would caution you to adjust your expectations. Line of sight for VHF freqs is approximately 120 miles at 10,000 feet. A claim of 170 miles is, in my opinion, unlikely to be achieved on anything near a regular basis. As a project engineer with Bendix avionics in the 70's we struggled to get 130 to 140 miles using digital techniques and 25 watt transmitters at that altitude (10,000). If you read the ad carefully for the SA-006, the writer does not claim 170 mile performance, only that it occurred. The most important part of the equation is altitude of the antennas involved. At 20,000 the line of sight is approximately 1.4 times the 10,000 ft distance or roughly 170 miles. If you routinely fly at that altitude you will likely communicate over those distances. I fly a Glasair III with standard S-H antenna and routinely get line of sight comm. Any tilting of the comm antenna from vertical will diminish performance since the comm signal is vertically polarized. Theoretically a tilt from vertical of 45 degrees causes roughly a 30% loss of signal strength. In practice it's not quite that bad because of scatter/reflections from things metal on the aircraft. Also remember there is an engine in front of a fuselage mounted antenna which will effect the radiation pattern of the antenna. Curious why the foil antenna need to be replaced. If Tx and Rx meet spec, the antenna is installed per the book and all coax and connectors are properly done, you should be able to comm line of sight distances. Have you done a VSWR on your setup?
Sorry for the long diatribe but hate to see anyone spend bucks that may not yield a performance increase.
Regards,
B.J. McClure
CentOS 5.4, Linux 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 x86_64 13:25:22 up 9 days, 6:57, 1 user, load average: 0.17, 0.12, 0.09
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 12:36 -0500, Robin Young wrote:
| Quote: | Guys, I am trying to increase the range of my comm radios. New antennas will have to be installed in the fuselage. The VHF-5T antenna would have to be installed on a about a 35 degree angle to fit vertically.
The SA-006 is a folded dipole antenna that can be installed as engineered in the fuselage as it is only 26" high and 9.5 inches wide. The manufacturer claims 170 mile range air to ground.
My original antenna are the foil ones supplied by Glasair back in 1983. The navs are doing Ok but the comms need to be replaced. What recommendations do you have? RObin Young | Quote: |
=
st Email Forum -
atures Navigator to browse
uch as List Un/Subscription,
load, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ,
more:
//www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List
=
WEB FORUMS -
vailable via the Web Forums!
//forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
=
bution Web Site -
ous support!
-Matt Dralle, List Admin.
//www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
=
|
href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List
href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c
=[/b]
st Email Forum -[/b]
atures Navigator to browse[/b]
uch as List Un/Subscription,[/b]
load, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ,[/b]
more:[/b]
//www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List[/b]
=[/b]
WEB FORUMS -[/b]
vailable via the Web Forums![/b]
//forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com[/b]
=[/b]
bution Web Site -[/b]
ous support![/b]
-Matt Dralle, List Admin.[/b]
//www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution[/b]
=[/b]
|
[b]
| | - The Matronics Glasair-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
robin02(at)mindspring.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 3:16 pm Post subject: Antenna help |
|
|
BJ, thank you for the talk points. I have contacted a dealer for some references and hopefully will get the manufacturer contact also.
If anyone else has experience with a folded dipole antenna on a glasair, please comment. RObin
From: owner-glasair-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-glasair-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of b.j. mcclure
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 5:02 PM
To: glasair-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: RE: Antenna help
Now I understand your motivation. I have never used nor tested the SA-006. I would ask for a list of customers who have purchased it and ask them if they get satisfactory performance. This is a terrible suggestion but is it possible to open the vertical fin and install there? It's as near a perfect location as you will find. Remember the radiation pattern for a theoretical dipole is toroidal (doughnut) in shape. Little energy is radiated or received off the ends of the antenna. Once you start tilting and bending the antenna you no longer have much knowledge what the radiation pattern looks like. Making that determination requires a field strength meter and lots of painstaking data collection and plotting. Any legitimate antenna designer should have data for their antenna mounted in an ideal install. It may also be computer generated as opposed to measurement in an anechoic chamber. You might ask if they also have data for the antenna with any degree of deformation. It might give you some clues as to what you can expect.
Sorry I couldn't be of more help.
B.J.
CentOS 5.4, Linux 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 x86_64 16:43:22 up 9 days, 10:15, 1 user, load average: 0.12, 0.10, 0.10
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 16:05 -0500, Robin Young wrote: [quote]BJ...thanks for the reply. I did not put the foil antenna in the vertical stabilizer when I built the plane. My primary radio has been a whip antenna on a ground plane with the back up radio antenna in too much of a horizontal, it has a very low range. I want to improve them but they cannot be removed and reused. You seem knowledgeable about the Sa-006. It will fit better than the VHF-5t. It is also cheaper for some reason. Is it a choice I should consider? Thanks RObin
From: owner-glasair-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-glasair-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of b.j. mcclure
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 3:51 PM
To: glasair-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: Antenna help
First I would caution you to adjust your expectations. Line of sight for VHF freqs is approximately 120 miles at 10,000 feet. A claim of 170 miles is, in my opinion, unlikely to be achieved on anything near a regular basis. As a project engineer with Bendix avionics in the 70's we struggled to get 130 to 140 miles using digital techniques and 25 watt transmitters at that altitude (10,000). If you read the ad carefully for the SA-006, the writer does not claim 170 mile performance, only that it occurred. The most important part of the equation is altitude of the antennas involved. At 20,000 the line of sight is approximately 1.4 times the 10,000 ft distance or roughly 170 miles. If you routinely fly at that altitude you will likely communicate over those distances. I fly a Glasair III with standard S-H antenna and routinely get line of sight comm. Any tilting of the comm antenna from vertical will diminish performance since the comm signal is vertically polarized. Theoretically a tilt from vertical of 45 degrees causes roughly a 30% loss of signal strength. In practice it's not quite that bad because of scatter/reflections from things metal on the aircraft. Also remember there is an engine in front of a fuselage mounted antenna which will effect the radiation pattern of the antenna. Curious why the foil antenna need to be replaced. If Tx and Rx meet spec, the antenna is installed per the book and all coax and connectors are properly done, you should be able to comm line of sight distances. Have you done a VSWR on your setup?
Sorry for the long diatribe but hate to see anyone spend bucks that may not yield a performance increase.
Regards,
B.J. McClure
CentOS 5.4, Linux 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 x86_64 13:25:22 up 9 days, 6:57, 1 user, load average: 0.17, 0.12, 0.09
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 12:36 -0500, Robin Young wrote:
| Quote: | Guys, I am trying to increase the range of my comm radios. New antennas will have to be installed in the fuselage. The VHF-5T antenna would have to be installed on a about a 35 degree angle to fit vertically.
The SA-006 is a folded dipole antenna that can be installed as engineered in the fuselage as it is only 26" high and 9.5 inches wide. The manufacturer claims 170 mile range air to ground.
My original antenna are the foil ones supplied by Glasair back in 1983. The navs are doing Ok but the comms need to be replaced. What recommendations do you have? RObin Young | Quote: |
=
st Email Forum -
atures Navigator to browse
uch as List Un/Subscription,
load, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ,
more:
//www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List
=
WEB FORUMS -
vailable via the Web Forums!
//forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
=
bution Web Site -
ous support!
-Matt Dralle, List Admin.
//www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
=
|
href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List
href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c
=[/b]
st Email Forum -[/b]
atures Navigator to browse[/b]
uch as List Un/Subscription,[/b]
load, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ,[/b]
more:[/b]
//www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List[/b]
=[/b]
WEB FORUMS -[/b]
vailable via the Web Forums![/b]
//forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com[/b]
=[/b]
bution Web Site -[/b]
ous support![/b]
-Matt Dralle, List Admin.[/b]
//www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution[/b]
=[/b]
|
href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List
href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c
[b]
| | - The Matronics Glasair-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
robin02(at)mindspring.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:06 am Post subject: Antenna help |
|
|
I found the manufacturer on the SA-006 folded dipole antenna....Bob Archer 310-316-8796. He has installed many of these in Lancairs to handle post construction problems. They do not work well inside graphite but are all working well otherwise. Lancair has purchased as many as 90 at the time from him and they are built into the fuselage in the factory. He was so sure I would like the results, he is sending the unit with an invoice. I either send him a check after testing it or send back the antenna after taping it inside for the test.
I appreciate all of your comments. RObin
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Robert Buckthal <rbuckthal(at)gmail.com (rbuckthal(at)gmail.com)>
Date: Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 3:55 PM
Subject: Re: Antenna help
To: glasair-list(at)matronics.com (glasair-list(at)matronics.com)
Robin,
I mounted the factory foil com antenna on the right side of the fuselage just aft of the hat rack. It bends slightly to conform to the roof line. I'm not aware of having any communications problems. When I transmit I always seem to get a response. I did mount another antenna in the rudder but I inadvertently damaged the coax after the rudder was closed. A runaway dremel opened up a 3/8" circular break in the shielding only. I have no idea whether that kind of damage is fatal to the antenna but I didn't try to repair it.
Hope this helps
Bob Buckthal
llS-FT 810 hours
.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Robin Young <robin02(at)mindspring.com (robin02(at)mindspring.com)> wrote:
[quote] BJ, thank you for the talk points. I have contacted a dealer for some references and hopefully will get the manufacturer contact also.
If anyone else has experience with a folded dipole antenna on a glasair, please comment. RObin
From: owner-glasair-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-glasair-list-server(at)matronics.com) [mailto:owner-glasair-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-glasair-list-server(at)matronics.com)] On Behalf Of b.j. mcclure
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 5:02 PM
To: glasair-list(at)matronics.com (glasair-list(at)matronics.com)
Subject: RE: Antenna help
Now I understand your motivation. I have never used nor tested the SA-006. I would ask for a list of customers who have purchased it and ask them if they get satisfactory performance. This is a terrible suggestion but is it possible to open the vertical fin and install there? It's as near a perfect location as you will find. Remember the radiation pattern for a theoretical dipole is toroidal (doughnut) in shape. Little energy is radiated or received off the ends of the antenna. Once you start tilting and bending the antenna you no longer have much knowledge what the radiation pattern looks like. Making that determination requires a field strength meter and lots of painstaking data collection and plotting. Any legitimate antenna designer should have data for their antenna mounted in an ideal install. It may also be computer generated as opposed to measurement in an anechoic chamber. You might ask if they also have data for the antenna with any degree of deformation. It might give you some clues as to what you can expect.
Sorry I couldn't be of more help.
B.J.
CentOS 5.4, Linux 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 x86_64 16:43:22 up 9 days, 10:15, 1 user, load average: 0.12, 0.10, 0.10
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 16:05 -0500, Robin Young wrote: | Quote: | BJ...thanks for the reply. I did not put the foil antenna in the vertical stabilizer when I built the plane. My primary radio has been a whip antenna on a ground plane with the back up radio antenna in too much of a horizontal, it has a very low range. I want to improve them but they cannot be removed and reused. You seem knowledgeable about the Sa-006. It will fit better than the VHF-5t. It is also cheaper for some reason. Is it a choice I should consider? Thanks RObin
From: owner-glasair-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-glasair-list-server(at)matronics.com) [mailto:owner-glasair-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-glasair-list-server(at)matronics.com)] On Behalf Of b.j. mcclure
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 3:51 PM
To: glasair-list(at)matronics.com (glasair-list(at)matronics.com)
Subject: Re: Antenna help
First I would caution you to adjust your expectations. Line of sight for VHF freqs is approximately 120 miles at 10,000 feet. A claim of 170 miles is, in my opinion, unlikely to be achieved on anything near a regular basis. As a project engineer with Bendix avionics in the 70's we struggled to get 130 to 140 miles using digital techniques and 25 watt transmitters at that altitude (10,000). If you read the ad carefully for the SA-006, the writer does not claim 170 mile performance, only that it occurred. The most important part of the equation is altitude of the antennas involved. At 20,000 the line of sight is approximately 1.4 times the 10,000 ft distance or roughly 170 miles. If you routinely fly at that altitude you will likely communicate over those distances. I fly a Glasair III with standard S-H antenna and routinely get line of sight comm. Any tilting of the comm antenna from vertical will diminish performance since the comm signal is vertically polarized. Theoretically a tilt from vertical of 45 degrees causes roughly a 30% loss of signal strength. In practice it's not quite that bad because of scatter/reflections from things metal on the aircraft. Also remember there is an engine in front of a fuselage mounted antenna which will effect the radiation pattern of the antenna. Curious why the foil antenna need to be replaced. If Tx and Rx meet spec, the antenna is installed per the book and all coax and connectors are properly done, you should be able to comm line of sight distances. Have you done a VSWR on your setup?
Sorry for the long diatribe but hate to see anyone spend bucks that may not yield a performance increase.
Regards,
B.J. McClure
CentOS 5.4, Linux 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 x86_64 13:25:22 up 9 days, 6:57, 1 user, load average: 0.17, 0.12, 0.09
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 12:36 -0500, Robin Young wrote:
href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List
href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c
href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List" target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List
target=_blank>http://forums.matronics.com
target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
|
[b]
| | - The Matronics Glasair-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
Get Email Distribution Too!
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
