Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Manhattan Project off the cuff.

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kolb-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:05 am    Post subject: The Manhattan Project off the cuff. Reply with quote

---

- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List



image0011.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  153.42 KB
 Viewed:  1424 Time(s)

image0011.jpg


Back to top
rickofudall



Joined: 19 Sep 2009
Posts: 1392
Location: Udall, KS, USA

PostPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:01 am    Post subject: The Manhattan Project off the cuff. Reply with quote

Pat, When Einstein wrote the letter to Roosevelt about the possibility of developing an atomic weapon, it was to warn him that he believed that Germany was developing it. He didn't know that Werner Heisenberg had advised against it thinking, as Hitler did, that the war would be over too quickly. It was only the problems with getting a perfect implosion for the plutonium bomb and the slow production of U-235 for the gun barrel bomb that kept Berlin from being the monument that Hiroshima is today.

Rick Girard
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Pat Ladd <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com (pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com)> wrote:
[quote]  
---


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List



image0011.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  153.42 KB
 Viewed:  1411 Time(s)

image0011.jpg



_________________
The smallest miracle right in front of you is enough to make you happy....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:34 am    Post subject: The Manhattan Project off the cuff. Reply with quote

slow production of U-235 for the gun barrel bomb that kept Berlin from being the monument that Hiroshima is today. >>

Hi,
I assume that the use of the bomb against Japan was done as quickly as possible after getting it to work at Alamagordo. It wouln not have been possible to deploy it against Europe as the war had already ended. I don`t think that a tactical atomic SHELL for battlefield use became possible for some years. Tanks were not equipped with them until well into the Cold War when hordes of Russian tanks were expected to storm across Europe. It would be interesting to know when planning for an atomic shell was started. There was only a limited supply of U 235 available. Not enough I suspect to have too many lines of experimentation goin on.

Had you seen that interview with Tibbetts before?

Pat


[quote][b]


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
rickofudall



Joined: 19 Sep 2009
Posts: 1392
Location: Udall, KS, USA

PostPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:36 am    Post subject: The Manhattan Project off the cuff. Reply with quote

No, but I have read about America's nuclear research and arsenal for years. U-235 was the quick way to a bomb, but it literally had to be built in the air on the way to Japan, since it will fission and explode if too great a quantity is brought together. When Tibbets was talking about the two scientists that rode to Hiroshima with him, that's why. The U-235 bomb was never tested until they used it. They hadn't produced enough to make a practice bomb. Plutonium, on the other hand can be stored safely without worry since it has to be compressed by conventional explosives to get it to explode. If you bring too much of it together it will just generate a lot of heat and melt.

Rick
PS, Yeah, John, we'll stop.

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Pat Ladd <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com (pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com)> wrote:
Quote:
slow production of U-235 for the gun barrel bomb that kept Berlin from being the monument that Hiroshima is today. >>
 

Hi,
I assume that the use of the bomb against Japan was done as quickly as possible after getting it to work at Alamagordo. It wouln not have been possible to deploy it against Europe  as the war had already ended. I don`t think that a tactical atomic SHELL  for battlefield use  became possible for some years. Tanks were not equipped with them until well into the Cold War when hordes of Russian tanks were expected to storm across Europe. It would be interesting to know when planning for an atomic shell was started. There was only a limited supply of U 235 available. Not enough I suspect to have too many lines of experimentation goin on.
 
Had you seen that interview with Tibbetts before?
 
Pat 


Quote:


_blank">www.aeroelectric.com
.com" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com
="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
tp://forums.matronics.com


--
Zulu Delta
Kolb Mk IIIC
582 Gray head
4.00 C gearbox
3 blade WD
Thanks, Homer GBYM


It is not bigotry to be certain we are right; but it is bigotry to be unable to imagine how we might possibly have gone wrong.
 - G.K. Chesterton


[quote][b]


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List

_________________
The smallest miracle right in front of you is enough to make you happy....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
by0ung(at)brigham.net
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 12:35 pm    Post subject: The Manhattan Project off the cuff. Reply with quote

Plutonium, on the other hand can be stored safely without worry since it has to be compressed by conventional explosives to get it to explode. If you bring too much of it together it will just generate a lot of heat and melt.
Quote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

thying to get this kolb related.... what do you think it would weigh to put on a plutonium reactor on my mark III... and what kind of thrust could i expect?????

please do not archive please!!!!!!

boyd young MKIII utah

LOL

[quote][b]


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
rickofudall



Joined: 19 Sep 2009
Posts: 1392
Location: Udall, KS, USA

PostPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:02 pm    Post subject: The Manhattan Project off the cuff. Reply with quote

Okay, Aviation related, if not directly Kolb. You might have read the review of Aerocinema.com in last month's issue of "Sport Aviation". I figured at $9.95 for a three month trial, well, I spend that much on bottled water in three months. Anyway, lots of great 30 to 35 minute documentaries about aircraft. One of the coming features is on America's nuclear powered bomber project of the 50's. They actually flew a reactor in a modified B-36 and ran it inflight. Of course there's been a lot of work on miniaturizing reactors since then so it might be doable. Getting the license to fly it might be a bit of a bother, though.

Rick

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:27 PM, b young <by0ung(at)brigham.net (by0ung(at)brigham.net)> wrote:
Quote:
 Plutonium, on the other hand can be stored safely without worry since it has to be compressed by conventional explosives to get it to explode. If you bring too much of it together it will just generate a lot of heat and melt.
Quote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
 


thying to get this kolb related...   what do you think it would weigh to put on a plutonium reactor on my mark III...  and what kind of thrust could i expect?????
 
please do not archive   please!!!!!!
 
boyd young MKIII utah
 
LOL

Quote:


_blank">www.aeroelectric.com
.com" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com
="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
tp://forums.matronics.com



--
Zulu Delta
Kolb Mk IIIC
582 Gray head
4.00 C gearbox
3 blade WD
Thanks, Homer GBYM


It is not bigotry to be certain we are right; but it is bigotry to be unable to imagine how we might possibly have gone wrong.
 - G.K. Chesterton


[quote][b]


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List

_________________
The smallest miracle right in front of you is enough to make you happy....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kolb-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group