|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jbr79r(at)yahoo.com Guest
|
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 10:51 pm Post subject: solid state relays |
|
|
Hi Bob
What is your opinion of these relays as replacements for the mechanical relays we have been using?
Jim Robinson
www.newark.com/crydom+relay
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 7:30 am Post subject: solid state relays |
|
|
At 12:45 AM 2/13/2011, you wrote:
Quote: | Hi Bob
What is your opinion of these relays as replacements for the mechanical relays we have been using?
Jim Robinson
|
Lamar (and perhaps others) have brought production
solid state contactors to the market that are
BI-DIRECTIONAL. I.e, the can both load and charge
a battery making them suitable for battery
contactors as opposed to rudimentary control
devices (relays).
[img]cid:7.1.0.9.0.20110213091942.01f109a0(at)aeroelectric.com.0[/img]
I have no reason to believe they do not perform
as advertised. Lamar was going to send me one
to play with but I think that offer fell into
a crack. In any case, assuming they DO perform
as advertised, what are your design goals that
might drive a decision to substitute this product
into your airplane? Assuming further that your
airplane is architectured to offer a plan-b
for contactor failure, will this substitution offer
a demonstrable reduction in cost of ownership?
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
18.06 KB |
Viewed: |
3622 Time(s) |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
berkut13(at)berkut13.com Guest
|
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:36 am Post subject: solid state relays |
|
|
Jim,
I’ve used them in several application in our projects. They performed well (better than the mechanicals) in high stress applications like running the hydraulic gear pump that is prone to fast on/off re-press cycles. In fact, I liked them so much I replaced my old heavy clunkers with the lighter Crydoms.
http://www.berkut13.com/berkut50.htm#SSR
Don’t forget the “freewheel” diodes on motor loads. The schematics are in the data sheet.
James Redmon
Berkut/Race 13
From: James Robinson (jbr79r(at)yahoo.com)
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2011 10:45 PM
To: aeroelectric-list(at)matronics.com (aeroelectric-list(at)matronics.com)
Subject: solid state relays
Hi Bob
What is your opinion of these relays as replacements for the mechanical relays we have been using?
Jim Robinson
www.newark.com/crydom+relay
[quote] [b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
JLuckey(at)pacbell.net Guest
|
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 11:49 am Post subject: solid state relays |
|
|
The Crydom units seem pretty cool & for certain applications they are ideal but.. (putting on my devil’s advocate hat..)
There are a couple of things to consider:
- They seem a little pricey – Digikey lists them for ~$118 each. (the equivalent ‘can-type’ contactor is ~$30)
- If you need SPST or DPST contacts you are SOL
- In many applications, you need to surround them w/ protection diodes and/or MOVs or whatever (more components to mount & connect & possibly fail…)
An example: (I’m just making this up;)
Let’s say you want to run a PM motor forward & backward. You can create an H bridge circuit w/ 2 mechanical SPDT relays pretty easily & for less than $50.
To accomplish the same thing w/ the Crydoms you’ll need 4 Crydom units. (That’s ~$500.) And some clever circuitry to prevent the wrong pairs of relays from energizing at the same time. (so you don’t release their [expensive] magic smoke)
With the versatility of a properly-chosen good-old mechanical relay, it is often possible to use the same relay in many different circuits aboard you plane. That can mean reduced part# count. That’s simpler, easier to keep spares, allows emergency substitution, etc.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m all over semiconductors when they make circuitry simpler, better, cheaper, etc. But until the price point comes down quite a bit, it’s hard to beat good-old mechanical relays.
-Jeff
From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of berkut13(at)berkut13.com
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2011 09:28
To: aeroelectric-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: solid state relays
Jim,
I’ve used them in several application in our projects. They performed well (better than the mechanicals) in high stress applications like running the hydraulic gear pump that is prone to fast on/off re-press cycles. In fact, I liked them so much I replaced my old heavy clunkers with the lighter Crydoms.
http://www.berkut13.com/berkut50.htm#SSR
Don’t forget the “freewheel” diodes on motor loads. The schematics are in the data sheet.
James Redmon
Berkut/Race 13
From: James Robinson (jbr79r(at)yahoo.com)
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2011 10:45 PM
To: aeroelectric-list(at)matronics.com (aeroelectric-list(at)matronics.com)
Subject: solid state relays
Hi Bob
[i]What is your opinion of these relays as replacements for the mechanical relays we have been using?
Jim Robinson
www.newark.com/crydom+relay[/i]
Quote: | http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List | 01234567890
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
berkut13(at)berkut13.com Guest
|
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 12:40 pm Post subject: solid state relays |
|
|
What you wrote is all true...however....
At work, we were using the Leech Mill-Spec, inert gas filled, high-end relays...they were still failing during circuit break due to arcing. 2 Crydoms were cheaper than 4 of these for an H-bridge. Admittedly, the switch to SSRs was done in the interest of a quick fix to get the vehicles back in air...but it did solve the problem. Putting the mechanicals in the H-bridge config was not a guarantee that the failures would not re-occur and we didn’t want to pile on arc snubbers.
Personally, I had more than reliability reasons for the change – mainly weight, environmental concerns, and ease of retrofit.
-James
From: Jeff Luckey (JLuckey(at)pacbell.net)
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2011 11:44 AM
To: aeroelectric-list(at)matronics.com (aeroelectric-list(at)matronics.com)
Subject: RE: solid state relays
The Crydom units seem pretty cool & for certain applications they are ideal but.. (putting on my devil’s advocate hat..)
There are a couple of things to consider:
- They seem a little pricey – Digikey lists them for ~$118 each. (the equivalent ‘can-type’ contactor is ~$30)
- If you need SPST or DPST contacts you are SOL
- In many applications, you need to surround them w/ protection diodes and/or MOVs or whatever (more components to mount & connect & possibly fail…)
An example: (I’m just making this up;)
Let’s say you want to run a PM motor forward & backward. You can create an H bridge circuit w/ 2 mechanical SPDT relays pretty easily & for less than $50.
To accomplish the same thing w/ the Crydoms you’ll need 4 Crydom units. (That’s ~$500.) And some clever circuitry to prevent the wrong pairs of relays from energizing at the same time. (so you don’t release their [expensive] magic smoke)
With the versatility of a properly-chosen good-old mechanical relay, it is often possible to use the same relay in many different circuits aboard you plane. That can mean reduced part# count. That’s simpler, easier to keep spares, allows emergency substitution, etc.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m all over semiconductors when they make circuitry simpler, better, cheaper, etc. But until the price point comes down quite a bit, it’s hard to beat good-old mechanical relays.
-Jeff
From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of berkut13(at)berkut13.com
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2011 09:28
To: aeroelectric-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: solid state relays
Jim,
I’ve used them in several application in our projects. They performed well (better than the mechanicals) in high stress applications like running the hydraulic gear pump that is prone to fast on/off re-press cycles. In fact, I liked them so much I replaced my old heavy clunkers with the lighter Crydoms.
http://www.berkut13.com/berkut50.htm#SSR
Don’t forget the “freewheel” diodes on motor loads. The schematics are in the data sheet.
James Redmon
Berkut/Race 13
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ainut(at)knology.net Guest
|
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 12:58 pm Post subject: solid state relays |
|
|
What concerns are there from "freewheel" diodes?
Thanks,
David M.
berkut13(at)berkut13.com wrote:
Quote: | Jim,
I’ve used them in several application in our projects. They performed
well (better than the mechanicals) in high stress applications like
running the hydraulic gear pump that is prone to fast on/off re-press
cycles. In fact, I liked them so much I replaced my old heavy
clunkers with the lighter Crydoms.
http://www.berkut13.com/berkut50.htm#SSR
Don’t forget the “freewheel” diodes on motor loads. The schematics
are in the data sheet.
James Redmon
Berkut/Race 13
*From:* James Robinson <mailto:jbr79r(at)yahoo.com>
*Sent:* Saturday, February 12, 2011 10:45 PM
*To:* aeroelectric-list(at)matronics.com
<mailto:aeroelectric-list(at)matronics.com>
*Subject:* solid state relays
Hi Bob
What is your opinion of these relays as replacements for the
mechanical relays we have been using?
Jim Robinson
www.newark.com/ <http://www.newark.com/>*crydom+relay*
*
*
|
--
If you're an American, just say NO to the Obamanation, to socialism, and get rid of Soros.
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
berkut13(at)berkut13.com Guest
|
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 5:04 pm Post subject: solid state relays |
|
|
Quote: | From diodes? Point them the correct direction.
|
Quote: | From the motor...there is a reverse break down current generated when the
power to the motor is cut off. That reverse flow of current is not good for
|
the MOSFET inside the SSR. The diodes channel that current back to the
robust windings of the motor (freewheeling) instead of making the SSR
convert it to heat.
Fun stuff, no?
-James
--
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
jbr79r(at)yahoo.com Guest
|
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 6:04 pm Post subject: solid state relays |
|
|
I currently have one com antenna in the vertical of my Glasair. I only have one comm radio SL30. I have been thinking of adding a second com radio, possibly a
Garmin 430. Will I need an audio panel also? Can both radios share the one antenna? Or what would be the best arrangement for the setup?
Jim
James Robinson
Glasair lll N79R
Spanish Fork UT U77
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|