|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
rockford67
Joined: 14 Jul 2011 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 10:27 am Post subject: Reviving the Pulsar |
|
|
Okay, since there isn't much chat happening...thought this might make for interesting discussion.
so here's a longshot....
Seems that lightweight, fuel efficient affordable aircraft are going to quickly become the most desirable, unless you have an unlimited fuel budget. A trip in my 172 leaving this weekend is going to run me $800 in fuel for about 14 hours flying there and back - ouch! If only my Pulsar was through with it's import...
So who has the tooling and rights to the Pulsar XP these days? Is it still in El Salvador? Was new tooling built down there? The more I tinker with mine the more I think the kit needs to be put back into production, albeit with some improvements. I wonder what it would really take to accomplish this and how much money would be involved?
Imagine a light sport eligible example, only a bit bigger, with a 912 or 914. It could easily meet the requirements of LSA without changing the lines of the original design....
Chris
| - The Matronics Pulsar-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pulsar-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
pilot623(at)gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 10:51 am Post subject: Reviving the Pulsar |
|
|
Chris,
A similar but better plane is in development by Mark Brown and Greg Smith.
Hopefully, it won't be that long until we see it featured on the cover of
Kitplanes and Sport Aviation.
Jim
--
| - The Matronics Pulsar-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pulsar-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cody.r.austin(at)gmail.co Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 10:58 am Post subject: Reviving the Pulsar |
|
|
The owner of Pulsar died recently in a crash. Not sure what will happen to the designs. Just because newer designs are coming out does not mean they will necessarily be better. The current designs have many hours of testing behind them.
http://nycaviation.com/2011/05/small-plane-crash-in-el-salvador-kills-three/
- Cody
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 1:27 PM, rockford67 <cphorsten(at)yahoo.ca (cphorsten(at)yahoo.ca)> wrote:
[quote]--> Pulsar-List message posted by: "rockford67" <cphorsten(at)yahoo.ca (cphorsten(at)yahoo.ca)>
Okay, since there isn't much chat happening...thought this might make for interesting discussion.
so here's a longshot....
Seems that lightweight, fuel efficient affordable aircraft are going to quickly become the most desirable, unless you have an unlimited fuel budget. A trip in my 172 leaving this weekend is going to run me $800 in fuel for about 14 hours flying there and back - ouch! If only my Pulsar was through with it's import...
So who has the tooling and rights to the Pulsar XP these days? Is it still in El Salvador? Was new tooling built down there? The more I tinker with mine the more I think the kit needs to be put back into production, albeit with some improvements. I wonder what it would really take to accomplish this and how much money would be involved?
Imagine a light sport eligible example, only a bit bigger, with a 912 or 914. It could easily meet the requirements of LSA without changing the lines of the original design....
Chris
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=347862#347862
===========
target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pulsar-List
===========
http://forums.matronics.com
===========
le, List Admin.
="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
===========
[b]
| - The Matronics Pulsar-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pulsar-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kymc(at)internode.on.net Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 2:18 pm Post subject: Reviving the Pulsar |
|
|
No need to change anything as there is already a "bigger" Pulsar the SP100. Same wings and great looks but bigger fuselage with more width and headroom. Loved mine and was most upset to lose it in an out landing following an engine failure.
Kym
Australia
On 28/07/2011, at 3:57 AM, rockford67 wrote:
Quote: |
Okay, since there isn't much chat happening...thought this might make for interesting discussion.
so here's a longshot....
Seems that lightweight, fuel efficient affordable aircraft are going to quickly become the most desirable, unless you have an unlimited fuel budget. A trip in my 172 leaving this weekend is going to run me $800 in fuel for about 14 hours flying there and back - ouch! If only my Pulsar was through with it's import...
So who has the tooling and rights to the Pulsar XP these days? Is it still in El Salvador? Was new tooling built down there? The more I tinker with mine the more I think the kit needs to be put back into production, albeit with some improvements. I wonder what it would really take to accomplish this and how much money would be involved?
Imagine a light sport eligible example, only a bit bigger, with a 912 or 914. It could easily meet the requirements of LSA without changing the lines of the original design....
Chris
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=347862#347862
|
| - The Matronics Pulsar-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pulsar-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
sollymelyon(at)yahoo.com Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 5:26 pm Post subject: Reviving the Pulsar |
|
|
Hei Kym,
Thanks a lot for the complement. The SP100 is truely the best plane out there.
Solly Melyon
AeroMax Aviation
www.aeromaxaviation.com
323.841.4822
--- On Wed, 7/27/11, Kym Cleggett <kymc(at)internode.on.net> wrote:
Quote: |
From: Kym Cleggett <kymc(at)internode.on.net>
Subject: Re: Reviving the Pulsar
To: pulsar-list(at)matronics.com
Date: Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 3:17 PM
--> Pulsar-List message posted by: Kym Cleggett <kymc(at)internode.on.net (kymc(at)internode.on.net)>
No need to change anything as there is already a "bigger" Pulsar the SP100. Same wings and great looks but bigger fuselage with more width and headroom. Loved mine and was most upset to lose it in an out landing following an engine failure.
Kym
Australia
On 28/07/2011, at 3:57 AM, rockford67 wrote:
Quote: | --> Pulsar-List message posted by: "rockford67" <cphorsten(at)yahoo.ca (cphorsten(at)yahoo.ca)>
Okay, since there isn't much chat happening...thought this might make for interesting discussion.
so here's a longshot....
Seems that lightweight, fuel efficient affordable aircraft are going to quickly become the most desirable, unless you have an unlimited fuel budget. A trip in my 172 leaving this weekend is going to run me $800 in fuel for about 14 hours flying there and back - ouch! If only my Pulsar was through with it's import...
So who has the tooling and rights to the Pulsar XP these days? Is it still in El Salvador? Was new tooling built down there? The more I tinker with mine the more I think the kit needs to be put back into production, albeit with some improvements. I wonder what it would really take to accomplish this and how much money would be involved?
Imagine a light sport eligible example, only a bit bigger, with a 912 or 914. It could easily meet the requirements of LSA without changing the lines of the original design....
Chris
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=347862#347862
vigator?Pulsar-List" target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pulbsp; - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - href="http://forums.matronics.com/" target=_blank>http://forums.matronbsp; - List Contribution Web Site -http://www=======================
|
| [quote][b]
| - The Matronics Pulsar-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pulsar-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
simonnelson(at)vodamail.c Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 11:07 pm Post subject: Reviving the Pulsar |
|
|
Have you guys seen the Sling from South Africa?
Sy
Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
--
| - The Matronics Pulsar-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pulsar-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
pulsarhenry(at)t-online.d Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 11:36 pm Post subject: Reviving the Pulsar |
|
|
Hi Solly
You're right The Sp100 is really the best.
I'm flying with my Sp 100 since 3 years now and I must say itīs very confortable.
Henry Schlueter
D - E O H S
[quote] ---
| - The Matronics Pulsar-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pulsar-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
gregsmi
Joined: 01 Jan 2011 Posts: 268 Location: Topeka, KS
|
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 5:17 am Post subject: Reviving the Pulsar |
|
|
Henry, can we get an update on the performance of the UL260 in your Pulsar? We sure would like to hear all about it.
Thanks
Greg
In a message dated 7/28/2011 2:37:05 A.M. Central Daylight Time, pulsarhenry(at)t-online.de writes:
[quote] Hi Solly
You're right The Sp100 is really the best.
I'm flying with my Sp 100 since 3 years now and I must say itīs very confortable.
Henry Schlueter
D - E O H S
[quote] ---
| - The Matronics Pulsar-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pulsar-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
pulsarhenry(at)t-online.d Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 1:57 am Post subject: Reviving the Pulsar |
|
|
Hi Greg
short update SP 100
UL - Power UL 260i
V Prop 3 blades 63,8 inch fully automatic microprocessor controlled prop ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19cEKIcBAoQ SILENCE AIRCRAFT )
http://www.ulpower.com/engines/ul260iSA/installations.html
empty 798 lbs / 362 kg
MTOW 1400 lbs / 635 kg
take off roll solo 600 ft / 180 m
landing ground roll 750 ft / 230 m
cruise (at) 60 % 120 kts / 138 mph / 220 km/h
cruise (at) 75 % 140 kts / 160 mph / 260 km/h
Henry
[quote] ---
| - The Matronics Pulsar-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pulsar-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|