Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Rocket Emp

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Rocket-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
c.parkhurst(at)charter.ne
Guest





PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 8:25 pm    Post subject: Rocket Emp Reply with quote

Gents



After 6 years of sporadic effort on my F-1 QB (went to the war, moved, got
married, had a baby..) I am finally looking at the light at the end of the
tunnel and praying that it's not a train! Engine is on, panel is in and the
CP is painted so it's starting to look like something. I built a standard
RV-4 tail about 4 years ago and made the mod per John's plans as well as
added .020 skins. Got a couple of questions that I hope some of you smart
guys can help me out with:



1. Has anyone done any mods to the HS spar? Looks a little light as
designed and have been thinking of adding some sort of doubler at the attach
point. Comments/ideas welcome.
2. My ailerons are built but want to add a small trim tab/servo.
Anyone have any experience with that retrofit?
3. Has anyone done any work with the rudder? Is it possible to
balance?





Thanks all...



Chris


- The Matronics Rocket-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Rocket-List
Back to top
Jim Anglin



Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 47
Location: Independence, OR (7S5 Airpark)

PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 6:34 am    Post subject: Rocket Emp Reply with quote

As for redesigning important parts like the HS - if you are not an =
aeronautical engineer leave it alone. In fact, what makes you think it =
is suspect when over 4500 RVs and Rockets are flying with it?

Retroing a trim tab is a lot of work when all you have to do is put the =
spring loaded trim lever on the stick. I used it in 2 RVs and my HR II =
and it works great.

I have never heard of anyone balancing this rudder, but see above re =
aeronautical engineer. This should be common sense but you are not =
alone in trying to re-engineer the most successful, safe, and popular =
homebuilt in the world without professional credentials.
Jim Anglin
HR II N144HR
DO NOT ARCHIVE


- The Matronics Rocket-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Rocket-List

_________________
Jim Anglin
HR II N144HR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
nico(at)cybersuperstore.c
Guest





PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 7:40 am    Post subject: Rocket Emp Reply with quote

Good advice. I would hate to see someone change something that causes
dynamic loads on something else that might unexpectedly change you from a
pilot to a skydiver.
Nico

---


- The Matronics Rocket-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Rocket-List
Back to top
HR2Flyer



Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 9
Location: Bountiful Skypark, BTF

PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 8:08 am    Post subject: Rocket Emp Reply with quote

Hi I have done the first two. See below.
---


- The Matronics Rocket-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Rocket-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
u2nelson(at)prodigy.net
Guest





PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 6:17 pm    Post subject: Rocket Emp Reply with quote

Chris

The RV-4 spar is a little light when you look at the negative G.(From
turbulence, not acro) During Neg G the horizontal is lifting the tail, and
this puts compression forces on the top of the spar. If you look at how
this is built, the forward spar is not supported on top and is susceptible
to buckling. On the bottom it is supported by the attachments. The easy fix
is to put a standard .063 extruded angle doubler across the top away from
the vertical fins spar attach and tie it into the ribs. Also the forward
spar of the vertical is pretty thin, I beefed mine up by .032 in the area of
the bolt holes, and tapered the beef up into the spar about 8 inches. AFT
spars seem OK.

Ailerons; MAC trim servo is easily added into the aileron, even after it is
built. The tab can be built right into the trailing edge, I went one bay
out from the root end, and the width to fit between stiffeners and a chord
of about 1.75 inches. The servo is up against the forward spar, attaches to
the access plat which in turn is screwed on to the top of the skin, flush on
the leading edge where the skins overlap already. I did a similar deal for
the rudder also but attached the servo to the skin with doublers on the
inside, you would need to do this as you built the rudder.

As for balancing the rudder; Most don't and seem to not have any issues. I
built a mass balance for mine, and balanced about 50%. Peace of mind I
suppose, also lightens the rudder forces a bit.

My F-1 with RV-4 tail and most HRIIs I have flown, when loaded to an aft CG
like with a pax., have some Dutch roll in turbulence, although I have heard
the ones with the RV-8 vertical tail do not. I increased the size of my
vertical about 4 inches over stock RV-4 and I think it helped the situation
but did not totally solve it either. IMO the vertical tail needs to be a bit
bigger, and later F-1 kits have a much bigger vertical fin and I have not
heard any complaints.

Greg Nelson
--


- The Matronics Rocket-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Rocket-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Rocket-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group