Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Soob temps

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kitfox-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
smokey_bear_40220(at)yaho
Guest





PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 9:42 pm    Post subject: Soob temps Reply with quote

Hi John and Rick,

It is my understanding from the experience of others
here that you are OK up to 788 C/1450 F EGT. Rick is
one of our GURU's for SS valves and other engine
improvements that keep them running, so I follow his
advice. I still have the origional valves, but I
think it is good to stay 1450 with the SS valves too.

Is that right Rick?

Oh, we take the EGT reading about 1" or 2.5 cm on the
pipe below the heads. Different results for different
locations.

I try to run 1450 F/788 C in cruise and can usually
lean a bit to get that. Today my Fuel/Air gauge was
showing on peak at a little less EGT, but full rich.
Probably a lack of use problem giving some gauge
error, but I left it run full rich just in case.
Usually my F/A gauge shows rich at 1450, so I feel
safe to lean to it.

Your 760 EGT might carbon you up a bit, if you use
that for cruise. Seems a touch rich, but you will
know from experience.

I have to lean mine for taxi and runup or it shudders.
That is because I have a rich idle port setting,
since there is no choke for winter ops.

On my engine, I can take off at full power, full rich
and see well under 1400 F. When I reduce power the
EGT's rise as I reduce thru 4000 RPM, then falls
again. I haven't found a prop/power setting that will
keep me under 1450 in cruise in a range of 3600-4200
rpm. Maybe with more time I will. The engine isn't
broken in until 300 hrs.

I rebuilt my CAP prop and it works better than new,
but now its smoothest RPM is about 3200 instead of the
3900 I had before. Since 3200 engine rpm gives me a
good egt, I cruise there. I set 5.5 GPH on the flow
meter leaned to 1450 and use that for cruise speed.

Until I have some more anti-drag devices installed, it
feels like the plane is working too hard for little
more speed above those power settings. This is good
for 85-95 knots or 98 to 110 mph depending on
thermals. Wink

Sounds like your water is right on, but the oil is
just a bit cool. That is the better fault to have.
Smile I think if you could keep the oil at 95, that
would be better.

Took me 6 years to build mine. Took you 10 years to
design, create and then build yours. The Wright
Brothers built theirs in less time, but I think we out
fly them by a bit.

Kurt S.

--- John Anderson <janderson412(at)hotmail.com> wrote:

Quote:
1400F is not too bad is it Kurt? I'm 760-780c and
water 90c, oil 95 on climb and 80 cruise.
Took me 10 years to build mine, slow eh....John

__________________________________________________


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
wingsdown(at)comcast.net
Guest





PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 5:24 pm    Post subject: Soob temps Reply with quote

Yes Sir that is what I would do. I think with the SS you can go higher
but I believe the limitation will shift to the heads and seats at that
point. Plenty power available at that for cruise. I think 1500 is OK for
brief full power climb outs. Seems the turbo 81 IMHO is sensitive to
rich/lean situations at least with present intake and fuel delivery
limitations. Now John A. may be working right past that now. It does not
like rich condition in either taxi or full power settings. I taxied at
900 to 1000F. Now full power was also tricky. At very lean 1550 1600
power up the yingyang. Go beyond that either in full power or trying
lean of peak and things can get real quiet. Not good quiet either. Don't
recommend it unless it's the granite cloud your trying to clear, but on
the other hand leave her to rich in cruise and the same loading problems
as before but bigger problem. I do believe in running LOP, but I could
never get a repeatable trusted setting. For those not familiar with this
procedure do some searches and read up, its worth the time. Yes you can
run cooler at a leaner cruise setting, not for full power, for cruise.
OK got to go, dinner calls.

Rick

--


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
janderson412(at)hotmail.c
Guest





PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 5:53 pm    Post subject: Soob temps Reply with quote

So Rick and Kurt, are you saying richer gives higher EGT or leaner? I always
though being too lean gave higher temps? I recently did a linier enrichment
on the EMC as the plugs looked a bit lean? John


From: "wingsdown" <wingsdown(at)comcast.net>
Reply-To: kitfox-list(at)matronics.com
To: <kitfox-list(at)matronics.com>
Subject: RE: Soob temps
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 18:22:40 -0700


Yes Sir that is what I would do. I think with the SS you can go higher
but I believe the limitation will shift to the heads and seats at that
point. Plenty power available at that for cruise. I think 1500 is OK for
brief full power climb outs. Seems the turbo 81 IMHO is sensitive to
rich/lean situations at least with present intake and fuel delivery
limitations. Now John A. may be working right past that now. It does not
like rich condition in either taxi or full power settings. I taxied at
900 to 1000F. Now full power was also tricky. At very lean 1550 1600
power up the yingyang. Go beyond that either in full power or trying
lean of peak and things can get real quiet. Not good quiet either. Don't
recommend it unless it's the granite cloud your trying to clear, but on
the other hand leave her to rich in cruise and the same loading problems
as before but bigger problem. I do believe in running LOP, but I could
never get a repeatable trusted setting. For those not familiar with this
procedure do some searches and read up, its worth the time. Yes you can
run cooler at a leaner cruise setting, not for full power, for cruise.
OK got to go, dinner calls.

Rick

--


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
wingsdown(at)comcast.net
Guest





PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 7:33 pm    Post subject: Soob temps Reply with quote

Richer can give higher temps but not in the usual use as in full rich
for take off. Which in itself is a mis nomer. Full rich is what a
particular engine manufacturer says is and sets at full rich. Not trying
to word smith, but I doubt most carbs or TBIs for that matter are set
full rich. Full rich is the point of enrichment at a particular power
setting that results in acceptable or desirable EGTs. To answer directly
yes richer yields higher temps at the same manifold pressure because it
allows the engine to make more power. Only not true if you run rich of
peak which will in turn reduce temps, but IMHO cause undesirable effects
on the engine such as sooting, cylinder wash down, oil dilution, more
wear and such. Again full rich is a magic place for full power settings
that allows cooling while still not fouling the plugs and make optimum
power. Its kind of complicated. But I would suggest safer to run to rich
on full power than run to lean. Clear as mud.

Rick

--


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
janderson412(at)hotmail.c
Guest





PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 9:36 pm    Post subject: Soob temps Reply with quote

Interfaced to the ECU I have a LED interface which gives an O2 value and the
lambda indication is spot on. All over to the little mad man in that black
box, I'll have to talk to his master....John


From: "wingsdown" <wingsdown(at)comcast.net>
Reply-To: kitfox-list(at)matronics.com
To: <kitfox-list(at)matronics.com>
Subject: RE: Soob temps
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 20:31:09 -0700


Richer can give higher temps but not in the usual use as in full rich
for take off. Which in itself is a mis nomer. Full rich is what a
particular engine manufacturer says is and sets at full rich. Not trying
to word smith, but I doubt most carbs or TBIs for that matter are set
full rich. Full rich is the point of enrichment at a particular power
setting that results in acceptable or desirable EGTs. To answer directly
yes richer yields higher temps at the same manifold pressure because it
allows the engine to make more power. Only not true if you run rich of
peak which will in turn reduce temps, but IMHO cause undesirable effects
on the engine such as sooting, cylinder wash down, oil dilution, more
wear and such. Again full rich is a magic place for full power settings
that allows cooling while still not fouling the plugs and make optimum
power. Its kind of complicated. But I would suggest safer to run to rich
on full power than run to lean. Clear as mud.

Rick

--


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
smokey_bear_40220(at)yaho
Guest





PostPosted: Sun May 21, 2006 1:03 pm    Post subject: Soob temps Reply with quote

So John and Rick,

If I've got this right, leaning from whatever mixture
all the way rich gives, you should see the EGTs rise,
peak, then cool a bit before you get a rough runner,
or silence.

On mine, I can lean toward peak with temps increasing
at low and high power, but not at mid to high cruise.
There I will exceed 1450 EGT even "full rich". I can
only lean past peak to lower EGTs in the higher cruise
range. There is not enough enrichment before peak
available here for me to stay below 1450 on the rich
side.

I have not been flying lean of peak, but maybe should
try it on Rick's advice. I know the engine will run
there from my gascolator drain blow-out incident.
Lean of peak, I might keep the EGT's down, save some
gas and better lubrication too. Then I can use these
power settings in flight. I might even hit my goal of
100 knots on 6 GPH or less.

But as Rick said, will it be stable enough to use?
I'd need to test it to see if I can keep LOP both
smooth and cool. So far I have had 4 incidents where
I exceeded 1450 to as high as 1600 EGT's in flight.
Not for long, but I would rather avoid any more. This
is where I wish I had an EGT limit warning system so I
can catch it sooner.

Kurt S. S-5 NSI/turbo

--- John Anderson <janderson412(at)hotmail.com> wrote:

Quote:
Interfaced to the ECU I have a LED interface which
gives an O2 value and the
lambda indication is spot on. All over to the little
mad man in that black
box, I'll have to talk to his master....John


Quote:
From: "wingsdown" <wingsdown(at)comcast.net>
Reply-To: kitfox-list(at)matronics.com

Richer can give higher temps but not in the usual
use as in full rich
for take off. Which in itself is a mis nomer. Full
rich is what a
particular engine manufacturer says is and sets at
full rich. Not trying
to word smith, but I doubt most carbs or TBIs for
that matter are set
full rich. Full rich is the point of enrichment at a
particular power
setting that results in acceptable or desirable
EGTs. To answer directly
yes richer yields higher temps at the same manifold
pressure because it
allows the engine to make more power. Only not true
if you run rich of
peak which will in turn reduce temps, but IMHO cause
undesirable effects
on the engine such as sooting, cylinder wash down,
oil dilution, more
wear and such. Again full rich is a magic place for
full power settings
that allows cooling while still not fouling the
plugs and make optimum
power. Its kind of complicated. But I would suggest
safer to run to rich
on full power than run to lean. Clear as mud.

Rick

__________________________________________________


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
wingsdown(at)comcast.net
Guest





PostPosted: Sun May 21, 2006 1:33 pm    Post subject: Soob temps Reply with quote

Not exactly from whatever all the way rich, actually from cruise
setting all the way lean through peak and continue leaning Until rough
and back about 50F. I would strongly suggest reading the article on the
avweb web site. Its been awhile but I bet its still there. It's a simple
comcept but some how very difficult to explain. Just a couple of quotes
I had save ref the subject. LOP is not for full power settings.
"The Lyc rep might want to check back with his engineering dept. Their
more recent comments have been that properly instrumented a Lycoming
engine could be easily and safely run lean of peak. The old standby was
always "50 F degrees" whether ROP for high power operation or LOP for
reduced power. Actually testing has proven that 50 F ROP is the realm
in which detonation is most likely so when running ROP it is safer to be
100-125 F degrees ROP."
"Generally, a liquid cooled engine can run 10 to 15% leaner on EGT than
an air cooled counterpart. The lower head temperature (200 F. vs. 450
F.) is the main reason. An air cooled engine is limited to
approximately 1550 to 1600 F., whereas a liquid engine can go as high as
1725 for short bursts."

Rick

--


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
smokey_bear_40220(at)yaho
Guest





PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 9:18 am    Post subject: Soob temps Reply with quote

Rick,

I read the LOP info long ago before I had a plane to
use it on, so I need to re-read it and get up to
speed. Thanks for reminding me.

The liquid cooled limit you gave makes me feel better
about my excursions above 1450. Though I dont intend
to go there again, it will probably happen and it is
good to have an engine that gives me some slack.

But no Fox flying again for awhile. I am in Panama
and headed south. Please keep the items I requested
handy and Ill pay for them when I get back.

At least I can keep up with the list down here when
the net is up. Today it is down at the hotel, so I am
at a realtors house using dialup.... You do what you
have to. Smile

Kurt S.

...An air cooled engine is limited to
Quote:
approximately 1550 to 1600 F., whereas a liquid
engine can go as high as 1725 for short bursts."

Rick

__________________________________________________


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
akfotoman



Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 120
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 9:27 am    Post subject: Soob temps Reply with quote

There should be no need to take a two-cyle engine above 1150 F if you are
using in-flight mixture control.

I seized a 582 due to a water cooling issue (the radiator, slung under the
craft, was full of sand from a sandbar landing and caused over heating) and
I was able to keep the EGT at 1050 my adjusting the mixture inflight. Only
one cylinder was scored and the rest of engine looked like new despite the
over heating coolant issue.

I replaced the pistons and bored 1 over stock spec. The engine has 114 hours
on it since and runs fine.
Rob

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin
--


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List

_________________
Have cameras, will travel!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
wingsdown(at)comcast.net
Guest





PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 1:35 pm    Post subject: Soob temps Reply with quote

Already set aside my friend, not a problem. Does your room have the same
hot and cold running water I did, hot,cold,hot,cold,hot,cold, but still
better than the tent showers Smile. Stay cool.

Rick

--


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
janderson412(at)hotmail.c
Guest





PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 3:02 pm    Post subject: Soob temps Reply with quote

Well, my radiator exit cowl didn't last long(2hours), it split in two! No
harm done, a vibration set up and got worse, I was just about to look for
some where to put down (plenty of good ag strips in my area) when there was
a slight bump and it went smooth. I was scanning the engine instruments and
all looked ok thinking the worst like spinner, prop, drive belt etc. Then my
safety plane buddy called up and told me that the cowl was hanging down but
landed ok and no damage done. I'm amazed at the amount of turbulence that
there must be in the area behind the cowl as it was constructed out of .040"
aviation grade alclad and had a doubler riveted across the bottom too. Two
LAMEs checked it...Test flown without it and temps still ok (for winter
anyway) Thinking of adding some VGs along the bottom of the main cowl? John
A.

_________________________________________________________________
Need a new job? Check out XtraMSN Careers http://xtramsn.co.nz/careers


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kitfox-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group