|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
paulm(at)olypen.com Guest
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 10:33 am Post subject: ...failure mode |
|
|
Bob's scope digital sampling is very slow sampling as usual. The peak inrush
current is basically current limited to the power supply and wiring and
switcher resistance. He shows one sample at over 30 amps and who knows what
the peak current is. HID do have issues with wig wag and below I got info
from a pilot who solved it.
Your current limiter as you mentioned would limit this way down and produce
a great increase in lifetime.
However if one uses the H3 bulbs there is one type of HID supply that works
well with wig wag while most do not. The H3 is a drop in for most Vans and
other wing mountes aircraft. There is also a replacement bulb for the round
lights using the same ballast that should work well.. Then you need to use a
specific toroid filter on the lines and a no bounce switch contact (solid
state).
I got the info from a suscessful fligher months ago and the parts are cheep
also Like at the time 30 for a system. NOT all hid systems will work wig wag
as the supply simply dies soon
I can go back and try to find the link if you are interested. I will not
post to Bob's list ever!!!!
Pardon the smelling but my chkr is off as comp[uter crash and ng backup is
back and running but word is the spel checker and its not reinstalled
Paul
---
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 4:24 am Post subject: ...failure mode |
|
|
At 01:29 PM 9/11/2011, you wrote:
Quote: |
Bob's scope digital sampling is very slow sampling as usual.
|
Really? As usual? Exactly what was the sampling rate
for the data depicted? What is your basis for the assertion?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Quote: | The peak inrush current is basically current limited to the power
supply and wiring and switcher resistance. He shows one sample at
over 30 amps and who knows what the peak current is.
|
Is that the point? The purpose for producing that plot
was to demonstrate that the incandescent lamp under study
(I think it was an automotive halogen) does not cool
sufficiently between wig-wag flashes to produce a series
of inrush currents even close to what is produced by
the first, cold start.
<snip>
Quote: | I got the info from a suscessful fligher months ago and the parts
are cheep also Like at the time 30 for a system. NOT all hid systems
will work wig wag as the supply simply dies soon
I can go back and try to find the link if you are interested. I will
not post to Bob's list ever!!!!
|
. . . yet here you are!
Bob . . .
////
(o o)
===========o00o=(_)=o00o=========
< Go ahead, make my day . . . >
< show me where I'm wrong. >
=================================
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
paulm(at)olypen.com Guest
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 9:24 am Post subject: ...failure mode |
|
|
---
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 1:00 pm Post subject: ...failure mode |
|
|
Quote: | My comments were intended to be private and addressed what I
understood was the suggested cause of short Halogen auto lights. The
data you showed and my personal experience is the initial ON spike
does NOT shorten the life and your data shows wig wag surely does
NOT have a significant effect based on heating and cooling from wig
wag vs no wig wag after the initial ON pulse as there is no
significant inrush on later ON pulses.
|
My data shows the cold-start transient is typical
of incandescent lamps. The data further shows that
the initial current draw on subsequent on-cyles is
absent that transient because the filament doesn't
have time to cool down between cycles. The data
says nothing about heating and cooling cycles.
Heating and cooling cycles are directly related to
light output which ranges from very dim to full bright
which must be a transition of several thousand degrees
and is totally unrelated to the presence or lack of
an inrush event.
Quote: | >>Bob's scope digital sampling is very slow sampling as usual.
|
Quote: | > Really? As usual? Exactly what was the sampling rate
> for the data depicted? What is your basis for the assertion?
> Inquiring minds want to know.
Well Bob surely you know. You say its a TDS 220 which is advertised
as a 2 channel 100 mhz with sampling rates AS FAST AS 1GS/s; But
that applies only for a fast sweep speed as the line buffer is
limited to 2500 samples per line or one sample every MS (in the
above sample) far below what is needed to determine the initial
surge current width and peak to get the energy produced into the
bulb. Further there is HUGE NOISE on top of the signal from
apparently a defective setup. Further it (Sampling) is too slow to
characterize the wig wag ON inrush current spikes but it does imply
the inrush is small negating wig wag as a factor in bulb life.
|
But during the discussions which accompanied the
plot in question, we weren't really concerned
with specifics of the inrush transients which
by the way, were measured at other sweep settings
but not included as not being germane to the
discussion.
And yes, I noted the noise present but didn't have
time to clean it up as again, the point being made
was to show the huge differences in lamp switching
transients between cold start and subsequent flashes.
Quote: | Its generally accepted in the industry one needs a MINIMUM sample
rate of 10 times the expected pulse width to characterize a
repetitive pulse and higher for a one shot event. In digital
sampling scopes the line buffer is critical in determing the true
sampling rate NOT the advertised sampling rate for slower sweep rates
|
No claims are being made to the contrary.
I think I've got the fast plots in the
archives. If you want to discuss transient
specifics, we can do that too. As I recall,
the fast plots also carried the signature
of flasher relay contact bounce and were
not even useful to the discussion du jour.
Quote: | Thus we can determine the inrush pulse is between 1 and 2 MS with a
peak of at least 31+ amps Who knows how much the true peak current
might be but that info is not known as the detailed setup is not
discussed. Further the next 1 MS sample is at least 15 amps followed
by a 10 amp sample.
|
Yes . . . but no claims were made as to the
inrush specifics . . . either when that plot
was published nor in the discussions that
started this tread.
Quote: | While there is no significant repeating inrush an inrush limiter
would stop the initial inrush and extens lamp life a point not
noticed in the discussion as I recall.
|
Possibly . . . but I'm unaware of any commercially
produced vehicle that includes such inrush limiters
on headlights . . . but I don't follow that market
closely. I believe I was the first designer in Wichita
to include an inrush limiter on an airplane. I put one
on the nose gear mounted taxi light of the GP180. It went
onto the first three prototypes but was removed when no
definitive data could be offered as to return on investment.
The only thing we could demonstrate is a reduction in the flashing
of other lights when the nose gear light was turned on.
Same thing happened with landing lights. The reliability
guys didn't want inrush limiters on those either due to
lack of data for return on investment and suppression of
reliability due to added parts.
Later I discovered that keep-warm circuits for tungsten
filaments on high vibration mounts had a far greater benefit
for bulb life than inrush limiting. Never had an opportunity
to explore that in a T/C aircraft as my job moved out of that
arena when I went to the Targets Group.
Quote: | Note sampling rate is not the average value during the sample time
its a very short time period every 1 MS as the value must be
captured and processed before the next sample period. Basically what
you see is a very small sample time period being taken every 1 MS
The tek data sheet for the scope suggests the sample period is a
very small part of 1 MS in this case thus perhaps 99+% of the time
the data value being sampled could be far away from the sample snap
shot on average.
Sadly sampling scopes are easilly misunderstood when it comes to
specifications and what is implied is often far from general truth
for other than the specificaed setup conditions
After the initial pulse ther is so much "NOISE" on the data its
basically impossible to determine if there is any following peaks in
the ON current.
Not only is there 4-5 amps of noise but there is a lower frequency
of noise implied suggestion low frequenct ripple even in the ground
along with high frequency noise. This suggests a bad setup coupled
with perhaps a switching power supply VS a batttery as the source of power.
|
No, it was just an RG battery. There's a 5KW AM
broadcast station 1 mile from the Wichita house
that is never entirely absent from test data.
I've suffered both the effects of 1.3Mhz carrier
and demodulated program material.
I didn't have time to chase it out that day
but my lab in Medicine Lodge is entirely clean
of such interference. I'll re-plot and publish both
the fast and slow data for the website archive.
It is not good that data be mis-interpreted as
to significance or the point being made.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
william_slaughter(at)att. Guest
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 6:33 pm Post subject: ...failure mode |
|
|
Promises, promises.
Have at it! as I will not post again unless I make another mistake in
addressing posts. Nor will I reply to any further comments
Paul
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|