Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

New FireStar II Owner

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kolb-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
FIRESTARII



Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 5:49 pm    Post subject: New FireStar II Owner Reply with quote

Very Happy Hello everybody, My name is Seth Miller I live in Ohio just south of Medina. I recently purchased "GoTime's" FSII airplane. To date I have logged a little over 40 hours in the airplane and thats in less than a month of ownership! I have flown many, many different airplanes and have logged a little over 9800 hours. I currently hold a first class medical, an ATP with a type in the EMB-145, an ME-CFII and all the other ratings that go alone with that! The FSII by far the most fun, easiest to fly, and rewarding aircraft I have flown to date. Since my purchase I have installed new much larger tires in order to get in and out of my meager 600' strip at my farm in southern Ohio. I also installed the Stol Speed VG's and the difference, although not "profound", is noticeable and significant and I would recommend them to any Kolb owner. The low speed handling and feel was dramatically improved and the stall, although alrealy mild became a very predictable "mush", both power on and off. The reason for my post is the airplane is equipped with the 3 blade IVO quick adjust prop and, because I am spoiled, I want an in-flight, constant speed, adjustable prop. IVO offers this but only at a steep price. I am curious if any body has had experience with this set up and weather or not its worth the weight and complexity penalty. As far as flight conditions go I almost always have one of my two boys with me or my "Hot Wife"(who, surprisingly absolutely loves the airplane) so I fly fairly heavy off an otherwise very short strip. The prop, not sure of the actual pitch, is set with a max static RPM of 6800 so its pure TO/CLIMB and cruise suffers some what. I would like a happy medium and/or that adjustable/constant speed retro fit that IVO offers. Any input/advise would really be appreciated. Thanks everybody and I really enjoy all your post(religious or not) the information really helped me after the purchase of my airplane.

- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List

_________________
Low and Slow FireStar II
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
herbgh(at)nctc.com
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 6:10 pm    Post subject: New FireStar II Owner Reply with quote

I have a three blade in air adjustable ivo...for 503 and 582...Half
price...Herb
At 08:49 PM 9/13/2011, you wrote:
Quote:


Very Happy Hello everybody, My name is Seth Miller I live in Ohio just
south of Medina. I recently purchased "GoTime's" FSII airplane. To
date I have logged a little over 40 hours in the airplane and thats
in less than a month of ownership! I have flown many, many
different airplanes and have logged a little over 9800 hours. I
currently hold a first class medical, an ATP with a type in the
EMB-145, an ME-CFII and all the other ratings that go alone with
that! The FSII by far the most fun, easiest to fly, and rewarding
aircraft I have flown to date. Since my purchase I have installed
new much larger tires in order to get in and out of my meager 600'
strip at my farm in southern Ohio. I also installed the Stol Speed
VG's and the difference, although not "profound", is noticeable and
significant and I would recommend them to any Kolb owner. The low
speed handling and feel was dramatically improved and the stall,
although alrealy mild became a very predictable "mush", both p!
ower on and off. The reason for my post is the airplane is
equipped with the 3 blade IVO quick adjust prop and, because I am
spoiled, I want an in-flight, constant speed, adjustable prop. IVO
offers this but only at a steep price. I am curious if any body
has had experience with this set up and weather or not its worth
the weight and complexity penalty. As far as flight conditions go
I almost always have one of my two boys with me or my "Hot
Wife"(who, surprisingly absolutely loves the airplane) so I fly
fairly heavy off an otherwise very short strip. The prop, not sure
of the actual pitch, is set with a max static RPM of 6800 so its
pure TO/CLIMB and cruise suffers some what. I would like a happy
medium and/or that adjustable/constant speed retro fit that IVO
offers. Any input/advise would really be appreciated. Thanks
everybody and I really enjoy all your post(religious or not) the
information really helped me after the purchase of my airplane.

--------
Low and Slow FireStar II


Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352221#352221



- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
rickofudall



Joined: 19 Sep 2009
Posts: 1392
Location: Udall, KS, USA

PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 6:27 pm    Post subject: New FireStar II Owner Reply with quote

Seth, You didn't say what engine you have so forgive me if I assume wrong, but I would guess either a 447 or 503 Rotax. At any rate a two stroke. If you install an inflight adjustable prop you're going to find yourself chasing CHT and EGT readings all over the map because the prop is part of the intake and exhaust tuning on a two stroke. If you increase pitch you'll find your CHT readings going high, if you set the base for an ultra climb setting, the CHT's will drop but the EGT readings will go high. I am not a fan of IVO props. I've had both a two blade and three blade on a 447 powered trike and a 377 powered Minimax respectively. They don't seem to have much quality control over either how the crank is welded on the wire or how it's anchored in the blade. I honestly don't know which is the case, but when I put my Warp Drive propeller protractor on either of them I never found two blades the same. Both props had a one degree variation in pitch between the blades and with their system you cannot adjust it out. 
I also found I had to machine the blocks on the two blade to make them equal to the prop thickness otherwise the aluminum cover plate had to bend in order to contact the blades. 
My 2 cents.
Rick Girard

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:49 PM, FIRESTARII <CCMFarms(at)aol.com (CCMFarms(at)aol.com)> wrote:
Quote:
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "FIRESTARII" <CCMFarms(at)aol.com (CCMFarms(at)aol.com)>

Very Happy   Hello everybody,  My name is Seth Miller I live in Ohio just south of Medina.  I recently purchased "GoTime's" FSII airplane.  To date I have logged a little over 40 hours in the airplane and thats in less than a month of ownership!  I have flown many, many different airplanes and have logged a little over 9800 hours.  I currently hold a first class medical, an ATP with a type in the EMB-145, an ME-CFII and all the other ratings that go alone with that!  The FSII by far the most fun, easiest to fly, and rewarding aircraft I have flown to date.   Since my purchase I have installed new much larger tires in order to get in and out of my meager 600' strip at my farm in southern Ohio.  I also installed the Stol Speed VG's and the difference, although not "profound", is noticeable and significant and I would recommend them to any Kolb owner.  The low speed handling and feel was dramatically improved and the stall, although alrealy mild became a very predictable "mush", both p!
 ower on and off.   The reason for my post is the airplane is equipped with the 3 blade IVO quick adjust prop and, because I am spoiled, I want an in-flight, constant speed, adjustable prop.  IVO offers this but only at a steep price.  I am curious if any body has had experience with this set up and weather or not its worth the weight and complexity penalty.  As far as flight conditions go I almost always have one of my two boys with me or my "Hot Wife"(who, surprisingly absolutely loves the airplane) so I fly fairly heavy off an otherwise very short strip.  The prop, not sure of the actual pitch, is set with a max static RPM of 6800 so its pure TO/CLIMB and cruise suffers some what.  I would like a happy medium and/or that adjustable/constant speed retro fit that IVO offers.  Any input/advise would really be appreciated.  Thanks everybody and I really enjoy all your post(religious or not) the information really helped me after the purchase of my airplane.

--------
Low and Slow FireStar II




Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352221#352221







===========
arget="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
===========
http://forums.matronics.com
===========
le, List Admin.
="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
===========





--
Zulu Delta
Mk IIIC
Thanks, Homer GBYM
It isn't necessary to have relatives in Kansas City in order to be unhappy.
  - Groucho Marx


[quote][b]


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List

_________________
The smallest miracle right in front of you is enough to make you happy....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
beauford



Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 127
Location: Brandon, FL

PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 8:59 pm    Post subject: New FireStar II Owner Reply with quote

Brother Miller:

Welcome to the list... You are certainly well qualified, Sir.
I am what's left of Beauford, and I do my best to operate a FireFly with a
447.

For ratings, I currently hold a Florida driver's license backed up with a
moderately
oversized prostate.

The FS II is a sweetheart and I bet you will have a lot of fun with her;
Congrats.

You didn't mention your engine... so will assume you have either a 447 or
503 2-stroke Rotax.

Re your prop... 6,800 static sounds a tad high...6,800 is 447/503 redline
and only for one minute... so that setting will likely put you well over
redline on full throttle climb.... and the 2-strokes do need to climb wide
open to get the extra cooling from the rich mixture.

Most folks seem to like them set somewhere around 62 or 63 hundred
static.... which will let it run at somewhere just below redline
wide open in level flight. Having a little heavier prop loading will also
help out with your EGT's, which are likely to be running a bit
on the toasty side right now with that light prop loading.

There are some really good 2-strokers on this here list... and I don't claim
to be one of 'em... But if you haven't fooled around with these pesky
little
engines before, you are about to have a whole new world open before your
bewildered eyes... There is a 4-way devil dance between CHT, EGT, carb
setup and the IVO...all done on the edge of a razor blade. Once a delicate
truce is established among these warring parties, most of the two-stroke
people I know tend to tiptoe around and speak in hushed tones when near the
Rotax lest the sleeping dragon awake and exact some perverse
2-stroke vengeance upon their body or their wallet. Changes to any one of
the four factors is likely to cause a change in one or more of the others,
so
I am not sure how well a variable pitch prop would work... you could well
have some unintended consequences.

Might be worth a trip through the Kolb List archives to see what you can
find on this, or even calling some of the Rotax sales & service folks for
their
opinions. In the meantime, I don't think you would go wrong by backing
that IVO center screw out a bit and loading the engine up some... down below
redline anyway.
Worth what ye paid fer it...

2-steppin' beauford
FF-076
Brandon, FL
--


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
caflygirl



Joined: 01 Sep 2011
Posts: 8
Location: Livermore, CA

PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 9:58 pm    Post subject: New FireStar II Owner Reply with quote

Hi Seth. Welcome

I am a previous owner of a firestar kxp with 337 and wood prop. Currently have a rans s14, 503, ivo 3 blade. I agree with the idea that increasing pitch will decrease egt only because it increases loading and not tuning. Want proof (get ready for a blown engine), try a powered decent. Very easy to do wrong and i have always been advised against it. I am a strong believer of two concepts though. Recommeded carb jetting and a grand rapids eis. Then play with pitch as much as you want and monitor for changes in egt and cht.

Now in my humble opinion, 6800 static is too high. It means you cant go full throttle on takeoff without exceeding max rpm, therefore a wasted range of throttle. I would want 6500 to 6800 on climb out with full throttle myself if i were pitching for a climb prop ( i prefer about 6200 static to get 6500 on climbout. For cruise pitch, maybe closer to 6200 on climbout( my preference for the rans due to high vne).

On a legal note, i dont know if your registration is elsa or amatuer built. If it is elsa, and faa finds out you ever had a in flight adjustable on it, they can void the certificate. I only bring it up here because of the number of errors i see on ads for sale as i shop for a kolbra or mark III, prefer xtra elsa.

Renee

Bas spellong blaned on ophone Smile

On Sep 13, 2011, at 9:56 PM, "Beauford " <beauford173(at)verizon.net> wrote:

[quote]

Brother Miller:

Welcome to the list... You are certainly well qualified, Sir.
I am what's left of Beauford, and I do my best to operate a FireFly with a
447.

For ratings, I currently hold a Florida driver's license backed up with a
moderately
oversized prostate.

The FS II is a sweetheart and I bet you will have a lot of fun with her;
Congrats.

You didn't mention your engine... so will assume you have either a 447 or
503 2-stroke Rotax.

Re your prop... 6,800 static sounds a tad high...6,800 is 447/503 redline
and only for one minute... so that setting will likely put you well over
redline on full throttle climb.... and the 2-strokes do need to climb wide
open to get the extra cooling from the rich mixture.

Most folks seem to like them set somewhere around 62 or 63 hundred
static.... which will let it run at somewhere just below redline
wide open in level flight. Having a little heavier prop loading will also
help out with your EGT's, which are likely to be running a bit
on the toasty side right now with that light prop loading.

There are some really good 2-strokers on this here list... and I don't claim
to be one of 'em... But if you haven't fooled around with these pesky
little
engines before, you are about to have a whole new world open before your
bewildered eyes... There is a 4-way devil dance between CHT, EGT, carb
setup and the IVO...all done on the edge of a razor blade. Once a delicate
truce is established among these warring parties, most of the two-stroke
people I know tend to tiptoe around and speak in hushed tones when near the
Rotax lest the sleeping dragon awake and exact some perverse
2-stroke vengeance upon their body or their wallet. Changes to any one of
the four factors is likely to cause a change in one or more of the others,
so
I am not sure how well a variable pitch prop would work... you could well
have some unintended consequences.

Might be worth a trip through the Kolb List archives to see what you can
find on this, or even calling some of the Rotax sales & service folks for
their
opinions. In the meantime, I don't think you would go wrong by backing
that IVO center screw out a bit and loading the engine up some... down below
redline anyway.


Worth what ye paid fer it...

2-steppin' beauford
FF-076
Brandon, FL


--


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jbhart(at)onlyinternet.ne
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 6:22 am    Post subject: New FireStar II Owner Reply with quote

At 06:49 PM 9/13/11 -0700, you wrote:
Quote:


..............................

Quote:
I would like a happy medium and/or that adjustable/constant speed retro fit
that IVO offers. Any input/advise would really be appreciated. Thanks

everybody and I really enjoy all your post(religious or not) the information
really helped me after the purchase of my airplane.
Quote:


Seth,

If you are running a two-cycle engine, you will need an air/fuel mixture
control to keep your engine operating efficiently and to keep the EGT within
acceptable limits as you change the propeller pitch to and/or from climb to
cruise. I have developed such a control for the Bing 54 carburetor that is
used on the Rotax 447 and the Simonini Victor 1+. I used it for many hours
on the Victor 1+, It is very stable and easy to use. If you are interested
it can be viewed at:

http://jackbhart.com/firefly/firefly146.html

Jack B. Hart FF004
Winchester, IN


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
FIRESTARII



Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 7:22 am    Post subject: Re: New FireStar II Owner Reply with quote

Hello everybody sorry I did not post my engine type regardless its a 503DCDI oil injected. As far as EGT/CHT both fall well within the recommended range under the current set up. Based on that I have a tendency to believe that the "Tach" is reading slightly high of the actual RPMs so this week I am going to try out an optical tach that I have used previously on my model airplanes and helicopters for tuning purposed as it is very small and adjustable for 2 or 3 blade configurations. I will post the results and data.
Additionally the reply about pulling the certs confused me somewhat it is registered to the best of my knowledge ELSA-AMbuilt? So the statement about the prop is above my level of comprehension? Huh?
If the man with the prop for sale would email or call me I would like to try to get something worked out with ya. two one six-288-forty two ten.
The airplane fly's great the way it is but as all airplane owners know there is always room for improvement. I am very spoiled because for the last ten years I have flown only turbo-jets or high perf pistons with constant speed props. As an unintended consequence I have found I am extremely sensitive to RPM variations in flight and find myself aways on edge thinking that little sucker is going to quit in the next 30 seconds. BTW I fly the airplane with that in mind:)!
My goal here is simply to improve the overall usability of the bird as I absolutely love her and if it works the way the ones on the Lycomings and Continentals do I believe it would be a wonderful addition. Let me know what you guys figure out and thanks again for your input.


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List

_________________
Low and Slow FireStar II
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gpabruce(at)gmail.com
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 7:42 am    Post subject: New FireStar II Owner Reply with quote

If you're you're running a 2 stroke, you may want to retain your edge and consider it probably will quit in the next 30 sec. Smile  ". . .  find myself always on edge thinking that little sucker is going to quit in the next 30 seconds".

Check out the times on Rotax engines . . the real times under the ones for sale like: "Plane has 100 hrs, engine just overhauled"  Be looking for a good 4 stroke. 
Bruce

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 8:22 AM, FIRESTARII <CCMFarms(at)aol.com (CCMFarms(at)aol.com)> wrote:
[quote] --> Kolb-List message posted by: "FIRESTARII" <CCMFarms(at)aol.com (CCMFarms(at)aol.com)>

Hello everybody sorry I did not post my engine type regardless its a 503DCDI oil injected.  As far as EGT/CHT both fall well within the recommended range under the current set up.  Based on that I have a tendency to believe that the "Tach" is reading slightly high of the actual RPMs so this week I am going to try out an optical tach that I have used previously on my model airplanes and helicopters for tuning purposed as it is very small and adjustable for 2 or 3 blade configurations.  I will post the results and data.
Additionally the reply about pulling the certs confused me somewhat it is registered to the best of my knowledge ELSA-AMbuilt?  So the statement about the prop is above my level of comprehension? Huh?
If the man with the prop for sale would email or call me I would like to try to get something worked out with ya.  two one six-288-forty two ten.
The airplane fly's great the way it is but as all airplane owners know there is always room for improvement.  I am very spoiled because for the last ten years I have flown only turbo-jets or high perf pistons with constant speed props.  As an unintended consequence I have found I am extremely sensitive to RPM variations in flight and find myself aways on edge thinking that little sucker is going to quit in the next 30 seconds.  BTW I fly the airplane with that in mind:)!
My goal here is simply to improve the overall usability of the bird as I absolutely love her and if it works the way the ones on the Lycomings and Continentals do I believe it would be a wonderful addition.  Let me know what you guys figure out and thanks again for your input.

--------
Low and Slow FireStar II




Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352279#352279







===========
arget="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
===========
http://forums.matronics.com
===========
le, List Admin.
="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
===========



[b]


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
Thom Riddle



Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 1597
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA (9G0)

PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:19 am    Post subject: New FireStar II Owner Reply with quote

Sorry to report that there is no such thing as "ELSA-AMbuilt". Either it is ELSA or Experimental Amateur Built. Most are Experimental Am-Built but some were registered under the FAA amnesty program for fat ultralights which previously flew un-registered, and were issued an ELSA (experimental light sport aircraft) a/w certificate after inspection. 

The poster warning of the airworthiness certification being yanked if the airplane no longer meets ELSA requirements (a constant speed prop would do that because an ELSA or SLSA don't permit this) could loose its airworthiness certificate. if the FAA knows about it. THEN the only way to fly it legally would be to apply for Exp-Am-Built a/w certificate which would require all sorts of documentation that may or may not be available. If your pink slip (airworthiness certificate) says Experimental Amateur Built then you can do the constant speed prop and fly it legally as long as you maintain your FAA medical. 

I hope this does not add to the confusion.


Thom in Buffalo

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:39 AM, b d <gpabruce(at)gmail.com (gpabruce(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
[quote]

If you're you're running a 2 stroke, you may want to retain your edge and consider it probably will quit in the next 30 sec. Smile  ". . .  find myself always on edge thinking that little sucker is going to quit in the next 30 seconds".

Check out the times on Rotax engines . . the real times under the ones for sale like: "Plane has 100 hrs, engine just overhauled"  Be looking for a good 4 stroke. 
Bruce

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 8:22 AM, FIRESTARII <CCMFarms(at)aol.com (CCMFarms(at)aol.com)> wrote:

Quote:
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "FIRESTARII" <CCMFarms(at)aol.com (CCMFarms(at)aol.com)>

Hello everybody sorry I did not post my engine type regardless its a 503DCDI oil injected.  As far as EGT/CHT both fall well within the recommended range under the current set up.  Based on that I have a tendency to believe that the "Tach" is reading slightly high of the actual RPMs so this week I am going to try out an optical tach that I have used previously on my model airplanes and helicopters for tuning purposed as it is very small and adjustable for 2 or 3 blade configurations.  I will post the results and data.
Additionally the reply about pulling the certs confused me somewhat it is registered to the best of my knowledge ELSA-AMbuilt?  So the statement about the prop is above my level of comprehension? Huh?
If the man with the prop for sale would email or call me I would like to try to get something worked out with ya.  two one six-288-forty two ten.
The airplane fly's great the way it is but as all airplane owners know there is always room for improvement.  I am very spoiled because for the last ten years I have flown only turbo-jets or high perf pistons with constant speed props.  As an unintended consequence I have found I am extremely sensitive to RPM variations in flight and find myself aways on edge thinking that little sucker is going to quit in the next 30 seconds.  BTW I fly the airplane with that in mind:)!
My goal here is simply to improve the overall usability of the bird as I absolutely love her and if it works the way the ones on the Lycomings and Continentals do I believe it would be a wonderful addition.  Let me know what you guys figure out and thanks again for your input.

--------
Low and Slow FireStar II




Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352279#352279








===========
arget="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
===========
http://forums.matronics.com
===========
le, List Admin.
="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
===========





Quote:


get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
tp://forums.matronics.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution



[b]


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List

_________________
Thom Riddle
Buffalo, NY (9G0)



Don't worry about old age... it doesn't last very long.
- Anonymous
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
rickofudall



Joined: 19 Sep 2009
Posts: 1392
Location: Udall, KS, USA

PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:43 am    Post subject: New FireStar II Owner Reply with quote

Seth, I can explain about the certs issue. Below is the definition of a
Light Sport Aircraft from FAR 1.1 Definitions

Light-sport aircraft means an aircraft, other than a helicopter or
powered-lift that, since its original certification, has continued to meet
the following:

(1) A maximum takeoff weight of not more than—

(i) 1,320 pounds (600 kilograms) for aircraft not intended for operation on
water; or

(ii) 1,430 pounds (650 kilograms) for an aircraft intended for operation on
water.

(2) A maximum airspeed in level flight with maximum continuous power (VH) of
not more than 120 knots CAS under standard atmospheric conditions at sea
level.

(3) A maximum never-exceed speed (VNE) of not more than 120 knots CAS for a
glider.

(4) A maximum stalling speed or minimum steady flight speed without the use
of lift-enhancing devices (VS1) of not more than 45 knots CAS at the
aircraft's maximum certificated takeoff weight and most critical center of
gravity.

(5) A maximum seating capacity of no more than two persons, including the
pilot.

(6) A single, reciprocating engine, if powered.

(7) A fixed or ground-adjustable propeller if a powered aircraft other than
a powered glider.

(Cool A fixed or feathering propeller system if a powered glider.

(9) A fixed-pitch, semi-rigid, teetering, two-blade rotor system, if a
gyroplane.

(10) A nonpressurized cabin, if equipped with a cabin.

(11) Fixed landing gear, except for an aircraft intended for operation on
water or a glider.

(12) Fixed or retractable landing gear, or a hull, for an aircraft intended
for operation on water.

(13) Fixed or retractable landing gear for a glider.

Notice number 7. To operate as an LSA the aircraft has to have a fixed pitch
or ground adjustable propeller.
Now look at that phrase in the opening "has continued to meet the following"
That means if you put an inflight adjustable propeller on your aircraft it
not only is no longer an LSA, *it can NEVER be one again. *Even if you take
the prop off, once the aircraft has been outside the LSA definition you
can't bring it back in.
You say your aircraft is an ELSA-AM built. There is no such thing. It is
either an Experimental Light Sport Aircraft (E-LSA) or an Experimental
Amateur Built aircraft (E-AB). Now if your aircraft is an E-AB and you put
an inflight adjustable prop on it continues as before, except that it can no
longer be flown by a person with a Light Sport ticket. The lowest rating to
fly it would be a private pilot ticket. If your aircraft is registered E-LSA
and you put the inflight adjustable prop on it your Experimental
Airworthiness Certificate is void and no one can fly it. You also cannot get
a new A/W certificate as an E-AB either.

Rick Girard


On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:39 AM, b d <gpabruce(at)gmail.com> wrote:

[quote]
If you're you're running a 2 stroke, you may want to retain your edge and
consider it probably will quit in the next 30 sec. Smile *". . . find
myself always on edge thinking that little sucker is going to quit in the
next 30 seconds"*.

Check out the times on Rotax engines . . the real times under the ones for
sale like: "Plane has 100 hrs, engine just overhauled" Be looking for a
good 4 stroke.

Bruce

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 8:22 AM, FIRESTARII <CCMFarms(at)aol.com> wrote:

>
>
> Hello everybody sorry I did not post my engine type regardless its a
> 503DCDI oil injected. As far as EGT/CHT both fall well within the
> recommended range under the current set up. Based on that I have a tendency
> to believe that the "Tach" is reading slightly high of the actual RPMs so
> this week I am going to try out an optical tach that I have used previously
> on my model airplanes and helicopters for tuning purposed as it is very
> small and adjustable for 2 or 3 blade configurations. I will post the
> results and data.
> Additionally the reply about pulling the certs confused me somewhat it is
> registered to the best of my knowledge ELSA-AMbuilt? So the statement about
> the prop is above my level of comprehension? Huh?
> If the man with the prop for sale would email or call me I would like to
> try to get something worked out with ya. two one six-288-forty two ten.
> The airplane fly's great the way it is but as all airplane owners know
> there is always room for improvement. I am very spoiled because for the
> last ten years I have flown only turbo-jets or high perf pistons with
> constant speed props. As an unintended consequence I have found I am
> extremely sensitive to RPM variations in flight and find myself aways on
> edge thinking that little sucker is going to quit in the next 30 seconds


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List

_________________
The smallest miracle right in front of you is enough to make you happy....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
FIRESTARII



Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 11:12 am    Post subject: Re: New FireStar II Owner Reply with quote

Very Happy Ok airplane certs say its Experimental Amiture Built. Sooo if I understand correctly putting the in flight adjustable prop\constant speed prop on there then its a non issue and since I have all required ratings(ATP,ME-CFII) then there is no problem. Also I just flew it and checked the RPM static is 6300 and climb at 45mph indicated is 6800 and i cruise at 5600 to 5800 and about 60mph indicated. CHT in climb is 300f and EGT is right at 1000 and cruise is 250CHT and 800 EGT. correct me if I am wrong but that sounds purdy well in line with exactly what Rotax recommends. Again thanks for all the input.

- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List

_________________
Low and Slow FireStar II
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lcottrell



Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 1494
Location: Jordan Valley, Or

PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:47 pm    Post subject: New FireStar II Owner Reply with quote

Everything sounds fine except your EGT's. They should be about 1150, other wise you run the risk of carbon build up on the pistons.
Larry

Note: If you forward this email, please delete the forwarding history, which includes my email address.
[quote] ---


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List

_________________
do not archive
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Richard Pike



Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 1671
Location: Blountville, Tennessee

PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 8:21 pm    Post subject: Re: New FireStar II Owner Reply with quote

All the posts that you have gotten are very much on the money. I would encourage you to look at the factory Rotax power curves and notice that there is very little variation between what happens just below the power peak and just above it. It is to your advantage to pitch the prop just below the power peak static because while on climb out you will end up right in the sweet spot, which is actually fairly broad.
Your ideal is to have the airplane hit red line at full throttle in level flight. That will work well in all regimes. An rpm higher than that will often give you egt's above safe in other regimes. Not to mention sucking up extra fuel.

Welcome aboard


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List

_________________
Richard Pike
Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops)
Kingsport, TN 3TN0

Forgiving is tough, being forgiven is wonderful, and God's grace really is amazing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kolb-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group