|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
rparigoris
Joined: 24 Nov 2009 Posts: 797
|
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:10 pm Post subject: 300mA AA NiMh charger design needed |
|
|
Hi Group
I need a design for an easy to build, low parts count and inexpensive constant current circuit to charge 3,000mA AA NiMh batteries (~300mA rate C/10 for 14 to 16 hours) from a 12 volt lead acid battery that could have the input voltage ranging anywhere from ~ 12.2 to 14.5volts.
I would prefer to have as many cells in series as possible when charging.
I have the charge stick figured out to hold cells in series by using 1/2" PVC water pipe that's a pretty good fit for AA cells.
Thanking you in advance.
Ron Parigoris
BTW I just ordered 50 AA NiMh supposedly 3,000mA batteries from E-bay including shipping for $25.85 (~$.52 each) Buy it now. I will report on self discharge rate, ability to dump amps and capacity once I get them.
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 8:47 pm Post subject: 300mA AA NiMh charger design needed |
|
|
At 03:10 PM 9/28/2011, you wrote:
Quote: |
<rparigor(at)suffolk.lib.ny.us>
Hi Group
I need a design for an easy to build, low parts count and
inexpensive constant current circuit to charge 3,000mA AA NiMh
batteries (~300mA rate C/10 for 14 to 16 hours) from a 12 volt lead
acid battery that could have the input voltage ranging anywhere from
~ 12.2 to 14.5volts.
I would prefer to have as many cells in series as possible when charging.
|
The simplest is an LM317 wired as shown here
http://diyparadise.com/yhlmccs.html
The resistor would be 1.25/.3 or 39 ohms.
The CC Gen will need at least 3 volts
of 'headroom' so 12.5 - 3.0 leaves
9.5 volts worth of cells. This means
you can charge 6 cells in series.
This charge rate will heat the cells.
Plastic pipe may not be the best holder
for allowing the string of cells to
reject heat.
If you like, I could take a few of those
cells and discharge them on the system I
used to produce this article:
http://aeroelectric.com/articles/AA_Bat_Test.pdf
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
rparigoris
Joined: 24 Nov 2009 Posts: 797
|
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 1:13 am Post subject: Re: 300mA AA NiMh charger design needed |
|
|
Hi Bob
Thx. for the reply.
** First off if you don't mind I can send you some AA NiMh cells to test once they arrive. How many would you like for testing?
** I like the simplicity of the circuit you pointed me to. The first question is would Allied part number 248-0718 LM317P be OK to use? This is not a National Semiconductor part, I like the TO220 style and didn't see one offered by National.
** Instead of a LM317, would Allied 288-0963 LM1117T-ADJ Low dropout be an OK choice with only a 1.2 volt drop out? This should allow a cell count increase?
** You mention that putting cells in a PVC plastic pipe may not be a good idea because it can aid in heat build up. You mention that this charger will heat the cells. I am questioning this because in my past experience charging NiMh cells at a one tenth capacity rate for 14 to 16 hours doesn't seem to develop too much heat. Has your experience proved in the past that a 1/10C charge rate for 14 to 16 hours warms up the cells? The cells are AA with a 3,000mA capacity, so 300mAs is 1/10 capacity.
** I would love for this simple circuit to accomplish the task of providing a constant 300mA charge rate. I don't have too much experience working with LM317s. I can kind of see where if you have a constant supply voltage and a constant load how the circuit should be OK. In my application where the supply voltage may be as low as 12.2 volts, or if the motor is running then up to 14.5 volts do you think it will still maintain a constant 300mAs?
Also we know that when NiMh cells when discharged have a lower resistance. As the cells begin to charge, the resistance begins to go up thus you need to begin increasing the voltage in order to maintain a constant 300ma charge rate. Then when the cells become fully charged the resistance begins to go down again, thus you need to begin lowering the voltage to maintain a constant current. If you put too much current into a fully charged cell this is where you can get them warm or downright hot (IE 1C or more).
Anyway do you think this circuit could do an OK job of maintaining 300mA charge rate with input voltage fluctuating between 12.2 and 14.5 volts, and the NiMh cells changing their internal resistance?
** I kinda had an eyeball on this circuit #2:
http://talkingelectronics.com/projects/ChargingNiMH/ChargingNiMH.html
But they are using a constant current 500mA charger that is kinda regulated (because of transformer coupling?) and wasn't sure how it would work with a source that could provide a gazillion mAs of current.
I was thinking of trying both the regulators I mentioned above and since Allied doesn't sell BC338 NPN transistors (Digikey BC338ND), I was thinking of giving a Allied TIP122G 568-0402 a try. I would rather keep it simple, but if just the regulator and resistor proves unacceptable results, do you think this would work OK?
Thx.
Ron Parigoris
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:39 am Post subject: 300mA AA NiMh charger design needed |
|
|
At 04:13 AM 9/29/2011, you wrote:
<rparigor(at)suffolk.lib.ny.us>
Hi Bob
Thx. for the reply.
** First off if you don't mind I can send you some AA NiMh cells to
test once they arrive. How many would you like for testing?
Four. No hurry, that fixture is packed away
somewhere from the move. I'll have to dig it
out and dust it off. I've been thinking about
repeating some of the tests done earlier and
adding a few more 'house brands' of AA-alkalines
to the study. But I'm up to my eyeballs in a
project for Hawker-Beech and it will be a
couple months before I can 'play'.
** I like the simplicity of the circuit you pointed me to. The first
question is would Allied part number 248-0718 LM317P be OK to use?
This is not a National Semiconductor part, I like the TO220 style and
didn't see one offered by National.
** Instead of a LM317, would Allied 288-0963 LM1117T-ADJ Low dropout
be an OK choice with only a 1.2 volt drop out? This should allow a
cell count increase?
ANY of the 117/217/317 series parts will do.
You just need to make sure it's heat-sinked
well enough to dissipate the power. The low
dropout part is only a portion of the voltage
drop . . . the 39 ohm resistor has 1.25 volts
across it too which boosts your head-room
requirements.
** You mention that putting cells in a PVC plastic pipe may not be a
good idea because it can aid in heat build up. You mention that this
charger will heat the cells. I am questioning this because in my past
experience charging NiMh cells at a one tenth capacity rate for 14 to
16 hours doesn't seem to develop too much heat. Has your experience
proved in the past that a 1/10C charge rate for 14 to 16 hours warms
up the cells? The cells are AA with a 3,000mA capacity, so 300mAs is
1/10 capacity.
'Too much heat' is non-quantified. Further,
small surface area parts wrapped in an
low heat transfer media will experience
a greater temperature rise than when
operated in still air. Just a point to
ponder and explore.
** I would love for this simple circuit to accomplish the task of
providing a constant 300mA charge rate. I don't have too much
experience working with LM317s. I can kind of see where if you have a
constant supply voltage and a constant load how the circuit should be
OK. In my application where the supply voltage may be as low as 12.2
volts, or if the motor is running then up to 14.5 volts do you think
it will still maintain a constant 300mAs?
The LMx17 series devices are a fixed calibration
voltage regulator with a factory adjustment of
1.25 volts. Higher voltages can be achieved by
addition of the voltage divider shown in the
data sheets. But when wired with the single resistor
as suggested, the device works to maintain a
constant voltage of 1.25 volts across the series
resistor. 1.25 ohms yields 1 amp, 125 ohms yields
10 milliamps, etc. So yes, this is a true constant
current generator with an upper limit equal to the
design point. It will fall off only if the device
looses operating head-room discussed above.
Also we know that when NiMh cells when discharged have a lower
resistance. As the cells begin to charge, the resistance begins to go
up thus you need to begin increasing the voltage in order to maintain
a constant 300ma charge rate. Then when the cells become fully
charged the resistance begins to go down again, thus you need to
begin lowering the voltage to maintain a constant current. If you put
too much current into a fully charged cell this is where you can get
them warm or downright hot (IE 1C or more).
Anyway do you think this circuit could do an OK job of maintaining
300mA charge rate with input voltage fluctuating between 12.2 and
14.5 volts, and the NiMh cells changing their internal resistance?
Absolutely.
** I kinda had an eyeball on this circuit #2:
http://talkingelectronics.com/projects/ChargingNiMH/ChargingNiMH.html
But they are using a constant current 500mA charger that is kinda
regulated (because of transformer coupling?) and wasn't sure how it
would work with a source that could provide a gazillion mAs of current.
The circuit depicted are variations on a theme and
all will probably function as advertised.
I was thinking of trying both the regulators I mentioned above and
since Allied doesn't sell BC338 NPN transistors (Digikey BC338ND), I
was thinking of giving a Allied TIP122G 568-0402 a try. I would
rather keep it simple, but if just the regulator and resistor proves
unacceptable results, do you think this would work OK?
Yes. The transistor style is not critical. Go get
an LM317 and TIP31 at Radio Shack and do the
experiments.
LM317
http://www.radioshack.com/product/index.jsp?productId 62601&numProdsPerPage=60
TIP31
http://www.radioshack.com/product/index.jsp?productId 62610&numProdsPerPage=60
This is the simplest approach. If you want something
'fancier' with lower heat dissipation, some sort
of active constant current generator like the LED
drivers we offer
https://matronics.com/aeroelectric/Catalog/AEC/9051/9051-700A.pdf
can be used. With a single resistor to adjust
output current, you can set your charging level
at any value up to 1000 mA. Further, this particular
device has a boost output capability. I think it would
charge a longer string of cells.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
retasker(at)optonline.net Guest
|
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 7:41 pm Post subject: 300mA AA NiMh charger design needed |
|
|
Bob, your calculations are off by a factor of ten relative to the resistor needed to get 300 mA.
The 317 series has a reference voltage of 1.25V as you noted. But to get 300 mA you would need 1.25V/0.3A = 4.17ohms. A value of 3.9 ohms is the closest 5% resistor value and it would give you 320
mA - likely close enough. You would need at least a 1/2 W resistor for this application and a 1W would keep the temperature rise in the resistor more reasonable.
Other than that everything else you say is fine.
It should be noted that using a charger like this is fine as long as one removes it shortly after the batteries are fully charged. Otherwise, the overcharging will shorten their useful lives.
Dick Tasker
Robert L. Nuckolls, III wrote:
Quote: |
At 03:10 PM 9/28/2011, you wrote:
>
>
> Hi Group
>
> I need a design for an easy to build, low parts count and inexpensive constant current circuit to charge 3,000mA AA NiMh batteries (~300mA rate C/10 for 14 to 16 hours) from a 12 volt lead acid
> battery that could have the input voltage ranging anywhere from ~ 12.2 to 14.5volts.
>
> I would prefer to have as many cells in series as possible when charging.
The simplest is an LM317 wired as shown here
http://diyparadise.com/yhlmccs.html
The resistor would be 1.25/.3 or 39 ohms.
The CC Gen will need at least 3 volts
of 'headroom' so 12.5 - 3.0 leaves
9.5 volts worth of cells. This means
you can charge 6 cells in series.
This charge rate will heat the cells.
Plastic pipe may not be the best holder
for allowing the string of cells to
reject heat.
If you like, I could take a few of those
cells and discharge them on the system I
used to produce this article:
http://aeroelectric.com/articles/AA_Bat_Test.pdf
Bob . . .
|
--
Please Note:
No trees were destroyed in the sending of this message. We do concede, however,
that a significant number of electrons may have been temporarily inconvenienced.
--
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:10 am Post subject: 300mA AA NiMh charger design needed |
|
|
At 10:38 PM 9/29/2011, you wrote:
Quote: |
<retasker(at)optonline.net>
Bob, your calculations are off by a factor of ten relative to the
resistor needed to get 300 mA.
The 317 series has a reference voltage of 1.25V as you noted. But
to get 300 mA you would need 1.25V/0.3A = 4.17ohms. A value of 3.9
ohms is the closest 5% resistor value and it would give you 320 mA -
likely close enough. You would need at least a 1/2 W resistor for
this application and a 1W would keep the temperature rise in the
resistor more reasonable.
Other than that everything else you say is fine.
It should be noted that using a charger like this is fine as long as
one removes it shortly after the batteries are fully
charged. Otherwise, the overcharging will shorten their useful lives.
|
Yes! Thank you my friend!
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tonybabb(at)alejandra.net Guest
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:58 pm Post subject: 300mA AA NiMh charger design needed |
|
|
Hi Bob,
Snip
" The resistor would be 1.25/.3 or 39 ohms..."
I'm no electron herder but...isn't 1.25/.3 about 4 ohms?
Still learning about all this stuff...
Tony Babb.
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|