|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
tomcostanza
Joined: 19 Oct 2008 Posts: 49
|
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 4:26 pm Post subject: Antenna Installation Question |
|
|
Hi,
Comant instructions for a comm antenna installation says to mount the antenna base directly to the skin for proper electrical bonding. Makes sense to me. Then they include a cork gasket with the antenna. Any suggestions?
I was planning to alodine the skin under the antenna base. Should I put dielectric grease or anything else between the base and the skin?
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
_________________ Clear Skies,
Tom Costanza
-- in year 17 of a 3 year project |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ceengland(at)bellsouth.ne Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 5:01 pm Post subject: Antenna Installation Question |
|
|
On 01/24/2012 06:26 PM, tomcostanza wrote:
Quote: |
Hi,
Comant instructions for a comm antenna installation says to mount the antenna base directly to the skin for proper electrical bonding. Makes sense to me. Then they include a cork gasket with the antenna. Any suggestions?
I was planning to alodine the skin under the antenna base. Should I put dielectric grease or anything else between the base and the skin?
--------
Clear Skies,
Tom Costanza
There should be contact between the base & the heads of the mounting
|
screws, and contact inside the fuselage from the screws through the nuts
and lock washers to the inside of the skin. the teeth of the lock
washers should bite through any paint/primer into the surface of the skin.
Charlie
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Float Flyr
Joined: 19 Jul 2006 Posts: 2704 Location: Campbellton, Newfoundland
|
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 6:33 pm Post subject: Antenna Installation Question |
|
|
The cork gasket goes directly under the antenna, between the antenna and the
skin to prevent water from penetrating the skin under the base. The antenna
grounds through the washer and mounting nut inside the skin. This is
important as this is a ground plane for the antenna. Clean off the alodine,
or zinc chromate from inside the skin around where the mounting nut and
washer grip the inside of the skin.
Quote: | From here I'm assuming that you have a cloth plane...
Cloth planes usually have a frame structure under the cloth physically
|
strong enough to hold a com. ant. but you may need to install you own foil
ground plane. If this is your case then make sure your ground plane is well
grounded through the outside of the antenna connector or preferably the
mounting nut.
Small planes generally have their com antenna on top of the plane... away
from landing gear and other parasitic elements like landing gear. Being on
top is adequate to talk with towers and a good location to communicate with
other aircraft. If you expect to fly above FL2.0 you may need a com Ant on
the bottom of your plane to contact ATC.
Noel
--
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
_________________ Noel Loveys
Kitfox III-A
Aerocet 1100 Floats |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tomcostanza
Joined: 19 Oct 2008 Posts: 49
|
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 6:36 pm Post subject: Re: Antenna Installation Question |
|
|
Quote: | the teeth of the lock washers should bite through any paint/primer into the surface of the skin. |
Thanks Charlie. I know this makes a good D.C. ground, but I'm not sure how well it grounds at 100+ MHz. Maybe Bob could speak to that.
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
_________________ Clear Skies,
Tom Costanza
-- in year 17 of a 3 year project |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 8:13 pm Post subject: Antenna Installation Question |
|
|
At 08:36 PM 1/24/2012, you wrote:
Quote: |
<Tom(at)CostanzaAndAssociates.com>
> the teeth of the lock washers should bite through any
paint/primer into the surface of the skin.
Thanks Charlie. I know this makes a good D.C. ground, but I'm not
sure how well it grounds at 100+ MHz. Maybe Bob could speak to that.
|
It's nigh on to impossible to get the 'ideal' bond
between antenna base and skin without welding it. Further,
adding a cork gasket under the base puts a 'resilient'
material in the stack-up of parts under 'crush'. See:
http://aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Antenna/Comm_Antenna_Installation.gif
Since all electrical connections MUST come though the mounting
hardware, getting the highest practical make up forces
goes directly to gas-tightness of the connections at
interfaces marked with (*). All this happens within a few
tenths of an inch of the center of each screw. Taking all
the paint off skin under the antenna adds nothing.
I'd pitch the cork. Drill out the base holes to take at least
a #10 screw (if not already that large). Clean the mate up
surfaces marked (*) to bright. Run a thin bead of RTV around the
perimeter of the base before pressing it into place on the aircraft.
Tighten the screws to spec limits. Using grade 8 hardware
will let you get some real, lasting pressure in the joints.
Bob . . .
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
email(at)jaredyates.com Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 2:32 am Post subject: Antenna Installation Question |
|
|
I fly airplanes in the high flight levels and even there we use the top antenna primarily. I've thought about it before, and I think a "to scale" diagram would explain why. Even though 5-6 miles seems high by altitude standards, it's not very far laterally. If the rco or tower is 20 or even 100 miles away, the acute angle in the triangle is small. To visualize more easily, think of the distance in feet instead of miles. The angles are the same regardless of the units of course. If you stood 5 feet below your antenna's base and 100 feet away, would the antenna be visible? Likewise at 20 and even 5 feet, it is probably visible from most angles. If it is blocked by the wing or some other piece of airplane, then it will likely not be for long in flight.
On Jan 24, 2012, at 21:29, "Noel Loveys" <noelloveys(at)yahoo.ca> wrote:
[quote]
The cork gasket goes directly under the antenna, between the antenna and the
skin to prevent water from penetrating the skin under the base. The antenna
grounds through the washer and mounting nut inside the skin. This is
important as this is a ground plane for the antenna. Clean off the alodine,
or zinc chromate from inside the skin around where the mounting nut and
washer grip the inside of the skin.
> From here I'm assuming that you have a cloth plane...
Cloth planes usually have a frame structure under the cloth physically
strong enough to hold a com. ant. but you may need to install you own foil
ground plane. If this is your case then make sure your ground plane is well
grounded through the outside of the antenna connector or preferably the
mounting nut.
Small planes generally have their com antenna on top of the plane... away
from landing gear and other parasitic elements like landing gear. Being on
top is adequate to talk with towers and a good location to communicate with
other aircraft. If you expect to fly above FL2.0 you may need a com Ant on
the bottom of your plane to contact ATC.
Noel
--
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 9:13 am Post subject: Antenna Installation Question |
|
|
At 04:29 AM 1/25/2012, you wrote:
I fly airplanes in the high flight levels and even there we use the
top antenna primarily. I've thought about it before, and I think a
"to scale" diagram would explain why. Even though 5-6 miles seems
high by altitude standards, it's not very far laterally. If the rco
or tower is 20 or even 100 miles away, the acute angle in the
triangle is small. To visualize more easily, think of the distance in
feet instead of miles. The angles are the same regardless of the
units of course. If you stood 5 feet below your antenna's base and
100 feet away, would the antenna be visible? Likewise at 20 and even
5 feet, it is probably visible from most angles. If it is blocked by
the wing or some other piece of airplane, then it will likely not be
for long in flight.
If the antenna's radiation angle were parallel
with the ground plane, your analogy would be
valid. The driving principal for this discussion
is "radiation angle". See:
http://www.hamradio.in/circuits/radiation_pattern.php
The short story is that an ideal 1/4 wave radiator's
angle of greatest sensitivity points up from the
ground plane by some substantial angle. For many
decades, ham radio operators have know that increasing
the mechanical length of an antenna to 5/8 wavelength
produces a much lower radiation angle. This antenna
is NOT resonant at the frequency of operation. That
deficiency is easily offset by a matching network at
the base of the antenna.
Antennas that long on airplanes would raise some
eyebrows if not elicit a few giggles/snickers.
Nevertheless, radiation angle variations in performance
between top and bottom mounted antennas can be
demonstrated. Large aircraft flying at high altitudes
will always get a stronger measured signal from the
bottom mounted antenna for stations having approximately
45 degree depression angle below the plane of flight.
However, given the line-of-sight performance of VHF/UHF
communications, the loss of performance from a top
mounted antenna may not be noticed from the pilot's seat.
The telling test would be to make contact with
a station that is barely readable on a top antenna
and then compare quality of communication with
a bottom mounted antenna.
A friend of mine (who is also an electron herder/
ham radio operator) has flown many of the heavy
iron birds. He has observed this effect many times.
At the same time, he has noted that when parked at
the gate, a top mounted antenna will talk to some
ground facilities that are degraded for the bottom
antenna when surrounded by jetways, baggage carts
and fuel trucks.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|