|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bcondrey
Joined: 03 Apr 2006 Posts: 580
|
Posted: Sat May 27, 2006 12:35 pm Post subject: ELT Rubber Ducky Antenna? |
|
|
Bob N.,
In the past you've cited the possibility using a rubber ducky style antenna for ELTs. Would this also be an option for the newer style 121.5/406 MHz types such as the Artex ME406?
Thanks
Bob
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckollsr(at)cox.net Guest
|
Posted: Sat May 27, 2006 2:44 pm Post subject: ELT Rubber Ducky Antenna? |
|
|
At 01:35 PM 5/27/2006 -0700, you wrote:
Quote: |
<bob.condrey(at)baesystems.com>
Bob N.,
In the past you've cited the possibility using a rubber ducky style
antenna for ELTs. Would this also be an option for the newer style
121.5/406 MHz types such as the Artex ME406?
Thanks
Bob
|
Only if the "rubber duck" has been crafted for dual frequency
operations. The instance I suggested that the shortened antenna
be considered was the case where a pair of antennas . . . a 121.5
and a 406 MHz device were mounted side by side under the fiberglas
toe cover of the vertical fin fairing on a Beechjet:
http://www.aeroelectric.com/temp/400A_ELT.jpg
When the fairing cover was installed, metallic braces in
the fairing upset the SWR on the longer, 121.5 MHz antenna
and caused self-test failures. They considered the short antenna
until we discovered that the ELT had been qualified under TSO with
these specific antennas . . . we couldn't use a different
antenna without re-qualifying. So . . . they widened the
trip tolerance on the SWR self check . . . another case where
under very un-helpful regulation, two wrongs made a "right."
(sigh)
Anywho, I suspect your more modern design is paired with
an antenna designed for optimum performance at two frequencies
and the simple rubber duck is not an option for you.
Bob . . .
---------------------------------------------------------
< What is so wonderful about scientific truth...is that >
< the authority which determines whether there can be >
< debate or not does not reside in some fraternity of >
< scientists; nor is it divine. The authority rests >
< with experiment. >
< --Lawrence M. Krauss >
---------------------------------------------------------
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
craig(at)craigandjean.com Guest
|
Posted: Sat May 27, 2006 3:05 pm Post subject: ELT Rubber Ducky Antenna? |
|
|
Quote: | >
Anywho, I suspect your more modern design is paired with
|
an antenna designed for optimum performance at two frequencies
and the simple rubber duck is not an option for you.
Bob . . .
<<
The Artex 121.5/406.028 MHz ELTs can be bought bundled with antennas
selected to support the dual frequencies. That's what I did. I'll tell you
how it works after my next crash.
-- Craig
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|