viperdoc(at)mindspring.co
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:47 pm Post subject: No Title |
 |
|
Richard,
We in the colonies really are damned lucky to have the experimental show category. Safe operation of our aircraft should always be at the top of our list of actions we take before and during our flight operations. We live and fly in a self cleaning oven that proves every so often that rules can be broken or bent but the laws of physics are laws that can never be broken. It does not matter how old or how experienced we are. If you break the laws of physics then be prepared to pay the ultimate price. If that happens, the self cleaning oven will have claimed another.
There are bold pilots and there are old pilots but there are no old bold pilots. Its' your ass bust it if you like but don't F#%€ it up for me.
Doc
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 11, 2012, at 8:53 AM, "Richard Goode" <richard.goode(at)russianaeros.com (richard.goode(at)russianaeros.com)> wrote:
[quote] <![endif]--> <![endif]-->
Mark, I am sorry to say but you are wrong on this one. IF you were flying your Yak in total isolation in some strange country with no aviation control, then, you might be right, and in those circumstances it would not particularly matter how you fly, or, indeed, if you decided to destroy the aeroplane and kill yourself. However, you don’t, and what you do with your aeroplane inevitably affects all of us.
The first simple fact is is that Yaks do not have a great safety record, to an extent because of the way that they are flown; to an extent poor maintenance, but insurance is becoming increasingly difficult to obtain, and if Yaks generally have a poor safety record, then it could be impossible to insure, and in Europe that means impossible to fly – I suspect that would the same in the US.
Again you will be aware of certification and registration issues in Europe, and today there is no long-term solution to fly Yak-50 and 52 in Germany; France; Holland; Belgium, and other countries. These aircraft are not certificated, and the National Authorities do not want to go out of their way to create legal systems for them to be able to fly, although we are hopeful that this can be organised. BUT, if there is an excuse that these planes have a poor safety record, are generally crashing – in whatever part of the world – then that would be used as an excuse not to give them airworthiness paperwork.
The bottom line is that how we fly our aircraft does greatly affect other people.
Richard Goode Aerobatics
Rhodds Farm
Lyonshall
Herefordshire
HR5 3LW
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0) 1544 340120
Fax: +44 (0) 1544 340129
www.russianaeros.com
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by the Invictawiz MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. | Quote: |
===================================
//www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
===================================
cs.com
===================================
matronics.com/contribution
===================================
|
[b]
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Get Email Distribution Too!
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
