|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
gcvisel
Joined: 23 Oct 2012 Posts: 11 Location: United States
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 5:54 pm Post subject: Newbie Questions? |
|
|
I'm looking at a Mark III Classic, with which to get my LSA ticket.
I have 50 hours toward my private 30+ years ago, but now the kids are
grown and gone and its time to fly again. I was looking seriously at a
Quad City Challenger II, but am leaning more toward the side-by-side
layout of the Mark III as a training aircraft.
Can anyone compare the two as a trainer aircraft?
The one I'm looking at has a Rotax 618 engine, which is no longer
sold. Should I stay away? Any major issues?
Thanks for any feedback!
Gerry Visel
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Richard Pike
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 1671 Location: Blountville, Tennessee
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 3:50 am Post subject: Re: Newbie Questions? |
|
|
Never flown a Challenger, but one of the guys in our club bought one several years ago. This guy flies everything for a living, and he described it as one of the worst flying airplanes he had ever flown. Back before I got my MKIII, the wife and I went to a Challenger dealer and tried one on. Unless you are slim and agile, you don't want to be in the back seat. Getting out is a media event. Funny Home Videos media...
The MKIII is not inherently stable, and requires active pilotage in all three axis at all times. Learn to fly in it and you will be good at flying anything. It will spoil you for flying other taildraggers, because it is the easiest taildragger to fly imaginable.
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ Richard Pike
Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops)
Kingsport, TN 3TN0
Forgiving is tough, being forgiven is wonderful, and God's grace really is amazing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 4:25 am Post subject: Newbie Questions? |
|
|
Hi Jerry,
Hardly anyone on this list will mention the Challenger without spitting.
I disagree. I flew the Challenger with a 503 engine very happily for several
years.It wandered a bit until the forward extension of the tailfin was
fitted. That improved it a lot.It did everything I wanted .A selfstarter
would have been nice but I could stand at the side with my left hand on the
throttle and pull the cord easily. I never chocked the wheels.The flaperons
worked to some extent but were more use in trimming the plane than as flaps.
That didn`t matter as she would side slip as though the wings had fallen
off and recover immediately on kicking off the slip.The U/c survived
unscathed through some really horrific landings/takeoffs from some appalling
fields.. Unlike the Kolb which will put a bend in the u/c legs if you drop
it in a bit heavily.The tricycle u/c made ground handling a doddle.
Unfortunately advancing age made getting in and out of the Challenger a bit
difficult and I wanted a 4 stroke engine.and a bit more comfort.
I had admired the lines of the Kolb for years.and bought a Mark 3 Xtra with
a Jabiru. The visibility is superb and the design well tried. The side by
side cockpit with a lid on looks very desirable and comfortable.
I trained on a taildragger so the change back from the Challenger was not a
major consideration. Macho too.`Real pilots fly taildraggers` but I wish I
hadn`t bothered. Trike u/c is superior in every way. No need for toe
brakes.No problems taxiing in a crosswind etc.
It is nice flying side by side and certainly better for receiving
instruction but if you fly mainly solo the decreased frontal area of the
Challenger makes for better efficiency.If you are big the cockpit is a bit
cramped. The big cockpit of the Kolb leaves plenty of room for maps, food
and general storage if you intend doing extended X country trips.The doors
make for easy access.
Unfortunately because of back problems I can no longer do the ground
handling, refuelling, maintenance etc and do not fly at all but if I was
forty again I would have a Challenger with a 4 stroke engine fitted. I
loved the open cockpit. If I was seventy again I would probably have a Kolb
Xtra but only if available with tricyle undercart.
This will probably provoke howls of disagreement on the list and will
provide material for a new thread for weeks to come. Sift through the
comments and you will learn a lot. Maybe even enough to make an informed
decision.
Stick with the Kolb list whatever you do. They are a great bunch, helpful
and knowledgeable.
Good luck
Pat
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Thom Riddle
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 1597 Location: Buffalo, NY, USA (9G0)
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 3:30 am Post subject: Re: Newbie Questions? |
|
|
I think it is important to differentiate between the Long Wing Challenger and the Clipped Wing version. The Long Wing is much less responsive in roll than the clipped wing and with the enclosed canopy installed can be difficult to manage in windy situations, even with the horizontal stabilizer mods. For a given amount of power, the Challenger is faster than a MkIIIC (never flown an Xtra so I can't comment from personal experience). This is largely due to the engine being hidden somewhat behind the fuselage substantially reducing drag compared to Kolbs mostly above wing engine mounting. The Clipped wing Challenger is faster than the Long Wing and much more pleasant to fly. I've instructed in both a Challenger and MkIIIC and for instruction, I prefer the MkIII.
For solo flight or with a passenger, I prefer the tandem seating configuration, except for long x-country flights. If you are interested in the tandem seating, I consider a Clipped Wing Challenger to be viable but Kolb's Firestar II, Slingshot, and Kolbra are better all around airplanes. Of these tandem seat Kolbs, the Kolbra is the only one with dual controls.
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ Thom Riddle
Buffalo, NY (9G0)
Don't worry about old age... it doesn't last very long.
- Anonymous |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gcvisel
Joined: 23 Oct 2012 Posts: 11 Location: United States
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 6:34 am Post subject: Newbie Questions? |
|
|
  Does anybody on the list here with a Mark III live around northern Illinois? It sure would be nice to see one up close before investing... Are there any support/dealers in the area?
Â
Thanks,
Gerry Visel
Winnebago, near Rockford, IL
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
koxxy
Joined: 19 Oct 2011 Posts: 28 Location: Beaverton, OR
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 7:35 am Post subject: Newbie Questions? |
|
|
As an alternative to the Challenger, you might also consider the Excalibur - reportedly the better flying plane. I looked at a kit under construction and liked it: adequate room in both seats, dual controls, amazing STOL performance, but the big wing is not that easy to take off, and there is virtually no baggage space.
For me, the question is how to store the plane between flights. Here in the NW, we don't have to worry too much about frost and snow, but it does rain a lot. If you have a hangar, a plane like the Challenger or Excalibur (tube & fabric wing) makes sense. If you want to store in a partial hangar or a trailer, the Kolbs can't be beat, with their easy and fast wing folding. If you need to tie down in the elements, an all-metal wing is better. I am in that last group: I am working with Mark Beierle of Earthstar Aircraft to design me a tandem version of his eGull 2000 (electric propulsion), and I have flown his staggered-seat side-by-side Odyssey with him (HKS). All Mark's designs use a single-piece cantilevered (no struts) all-aluminum wing, similar to the Titan Tornado. If that does not work out, the Kolbra is my plan B.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Thom Riddle <riddletr(at)gmail.com (riddletr(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
[quote] --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Thom Riddle" <riddletr(at)gmail.com (riddletr(at)gmail.com)>
I think it is important to differentiate between the Long Wing Challenger and the Clipped Wing version. The Long Wing is much less responsive in roll than the clipped wing and with the enclosed canopy installed can be difficult to manage in windy situations, even with the horizontal stabilizer mods. For a given amount of power, the Challenger is faster than a MkIIIC (never flown an Xtra so I can't comment from personal experience). This is largely due to the engine being hidden somewhat behind the fuselage substantially reducing drag compared to Kolbs mostly above wing engine mounting. The Clipped wing Challenger is faster than the Long Wing and much more pleasant to fly. I've instructed in both a Challenger and MkIIIC and for instruction, I prefer the MkIII.
For solo flight or with a passenger, I prefer the tandem seating configuration, except for long x-country flights. If you are interested in the tandem seating, I consider a Clipped Wing Challenger to be viable but Kolb's Firestar II, Slingshot, and Kolbra are better all around airplanes. Of these tandem seat Kolbs, the Kolbra is the only one with dual controls.
--------
Thom Riddle
Buffalo, NY (9G0)
Kolb Slingshot SS-021
Jabiru 2200A #1574
Diamond Katana DA20-A1
Rotax 912 F3
Don't worry about old age... it doesn't last very long.
- Anonymous
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=386267#386267
===========
arget="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
===========
http://forums.matronics.com
===========
le, List Admin.
="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
===========
[b]
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|