Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

parallel batteries on maintainer

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
raymondj(at)frontiernet.n
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 8:47 pm    Post subject: parallel batteries on maintainer Reply with quote

I am set up to use 1 maintainer to keep 4-5 or more batteries charged over the winter. How can I tell if I've exceeded the capacity of the maintainer? Will the voltage drop? How much of the total amperage of the charger is available for maintaining the batteries? One of my charger/maintainers is rated 6amps. I can't imagine any reasonable number of batteries needing that much current to be kept topped up. The batteries are at outside temp (currently below 0deg F). Is this a factor I need to consider?

Thanks for any information/opinions/warnings.

do not archive
[quote]--
Raymond Julian
Kettle River, MN.

"And you know that I could have me a million more friends,
and all I'd have to lose is my point of view." - John Prine [b]


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
bobnoffs



Joined: 04 Jul 2012
Posts: 132
Location: northern wi.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 4:37 am    Post subject: parallel batteries on maintainer Reply with quote

my experience in my cild barn last winter is that it works poorly or not at all. i think it is because one marginal battery always calls for power and the others don't get the right voltage. anyway, this year i bought a bunch of harbor frt. maintainers and every battery gets its own.
 bob noffs
 n. wi.
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:46 PM, rayj <raymondj(at)frontiernet.net (raymondj(at)frontiernet.net)> wrote:
[quote] I am set up to use 1 maintainer to keep 4-5 or more batteries charged over the winter.  How can I tell if I've exceeded the capacity of the maintainer?  Will the voltage drop?  How much of the total amperage of the charger is available for maintaining the batteries?  One of my charger/maintainers is rated 6amps.  I can't imagine any reasonable number of batteries needing that much current to be kept topped up.  The batteries are at outside temp (currently below 0deg F). Is this a factor I need to consider?

Thanks for any information/opinions/warnings.

do not archive
Quote:
--
Raymond Julian
Kettle River, MN.

"And you know that I could have me a million more friends,
and all I'd have to lose is my point of view." - John Prine

ist" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
tp://forums.matronics.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution


[b]


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 5:57 am    Post subject: parallel batteries on maintainer Reply with quote

At 10:46 PM 1/13/2013, you wrote:
Quote:
I am set up to use 1 maintainer to keep 4-5 or more batteries charged over the winter. How can I tell if I've exceeded the capacity of the maintainer?

Not possible to do with batteries that are capable of
being maintained. A smart charger-maintainer (SCM) has
two phases of operation (1) top off the battery's state
of charge and (2) support the battery at a voltage just
above the open-terminal voltage for the battery in
storage. The 'effort' required to do (1) has some battery
size issues associated with it. Obviously, a maintainer
with a 1 amp charge rate will take longer to top off a
32 a.h. battery than for a 17 a.h. battery.

Once top-off is achieved, the SCM will switch output
voltage to some level too LOW to deliver a practical
charge to a battery but just HIGHER than the battery's
normal open circuit resting voltage. For the SVLA battery,
OCV is on the order of 12.8 to 13.1 volts depending
on room temperature. So a MAINTENANCE voltage on the
order of 13.2 to 13.5 volts is called for. See:

http://tinyurl.com/b4td78b

In the maintenance mode, the LOAD on the SCM is
equal to the SELF DISCHARGE current built into
the battery itself. Given the very long self life
of SVLA batteries, this means that self discharge
currents are very low.

Quote:
Will the voltage drop? How much of the total amperage of the charger is available for maintaining the batteries? One of my charger/maintainers is rated 6amps. I can't imagine any reasonable number of batteries needing that much current to be kept topped up. The batteries are at outside temp (currently below 0deg F). Is this a factor I need to consider?

No and no. At lower temperatures the OCV of the
battery goes down but the self discharge rate
goes down too. Here is an excerpt from an essay
on battery management I found at:

http://tinyurl.com/bys7ty6

---------------------------

Few batteries do not die a natural death ­ most batteries are murdered. They are murdered by owners that charge them improperly, cycle them too deeply, let them sit discharged for too long, or store them at too high a temperature. Since our UPS units have built-in controllers and the units are rarely deeply discharged, the primary battery killer is heat.

Batteries are electrochemical machines. Chemical reactions govern how they work and chemical reactions govern how they fail. Chemical reactions exist within a battery that cause them to discharge just sitting in storage. Other chemical reactions cause them to form crystalline lead sulfate. Both of these reactions are accelerated by temperature according to the Arrhenius equation, which I state in Equation 1.
Eq. 1 [img]http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=kA+cdot+e-E_aR+cdot+T&bg=ffffff&fg=333333&s=2[/img]

[img]cid:.0[/img]

where
Equation 1 tells us that increasing temperature produces an exponential increase in reaction rate. Let’s examine how this reaction rate affects a battery that appears to just be sitting there ­ it actually is experiencing an internal chemical reaction that is discharging the battery. I also want to examine a common rule of thumb for electrical engineers.

A battery at a temperature of T+10 °C self-discharges
twice as fast as the same battery at a temperature of T.

[/b] Is this rule true? If it is true, the customer that I mentioned earlier who stored his batteries at 50 °C would see his batteries discharged in his warehouse within about two and half months. At that point, the sulphation process begins. His batteries were dying right before his eyes.

----------------- end of excerpt -----------------

So the short answer to your question is first place each battery
in turn on the SCM and allow it to top off. Then place the array
of batteries in parallel with each other and connected to the
SCM. Storing the batteries in a cold location is beneficial
to the general health and well being of the battery's chemistry.
The number of batteries in the storage array has no practical
limit.



Bob . . .


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List



22f13f46.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  3.34 KB
 Viewed:  3108 Time(s)

22f13f46.jpg


Back to top
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 6:04 am    Post subject: parallel batteries on maintainer Reply with quote

At 06:35 AM 1/14/2013, you wrote:
my experience in my cild barn last winter is that it works poorly or
not at all. i think it is because one marginal battery always calls
for power and the others don't get the right voltage. anyway, this
year i bought a bunch of harbor frt. maintainers and every battery
gets its own.

bob noffs

The bit I just posted on the use of a single maintainer
for an array of batteries assumes that the batteries are
capable and worthy of maintenance. In other words, the
candidates for storage are reasonably well known for
their state of useful capacity. A battery that is damaged
and in need of recovery (suffers from light, short term
sulphation) needs to be attended to and tested for useful
capacity before adding it to an array of batteries already
know to be worthy of retention in anticipation of future
service.

A battery badly sulphated is not recoverable. Placing
crippled batteries in parallel with topped-off, good
batteries will degrade if not negate the benefits of the
maintenance mode.
Bob . . .


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
raymondj(at)frontiernet.n
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:10 am    Post subject: parallel batteries on maintainer Reply with quote



- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
raymondj(at)frontiernet.n
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:40 am    Post subject: parallel batteries on maintainer Reply with quote

Greetings Bob Noffs,

I bought 6+ of the HF battery maintainers and was planning on doing the same thing. In the process I started looking at the voltage provided by them and was surprised to find that NONE of the units I had provided more than about 12.75 volts. Some were as low as 12.4. As I understand the process it is necessary to provide a voltage higher than the OCV to the battery in order to offset the internal process. My conclusion is that the maintainers would only keep the batteries charged to a level which would result in an OCV lower that the maintainer voltage and less then 100% charge. Given that the maintainer I'm now using is at 13.5 volts in maintenance mode I don't think 12.75 or less is acceptable for maintaining my batteries.


Just my experience, hope you find it useful.
Quote:
Raymond Julian
Kettle River, MN.

"And you know that I could have me a million more friends,
and all I'd have to lose is my point of view." - John Prine
On 01/14/2013 06:35 AM, bob noffs wrote:

[quote] my experience in my cild barn last winter is that it works poorly or not at all. i think it is because one marginal battery always calls for power and the others don't get the right voltage. anyway, this year i bought a bunch of harbor frt. maintainers and every battery gets its own.
bob noffs
n. wi.


On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:46 PM, rayj <raymondj(at)frontiernet.net (raymondj(at)frontiernet.net)> wrote:
Quote:
I am set up to use 1 maintainer to keep 4-5 or more batteries charged over the winter. How can I tell if I've exceeded the capacity of the maintainer? Will the voltage drop? How much of the total amperage of the charger is available for maintaining the batteries? One of my charger/maintainers is rated 6amps. I can't imagine any reasonable number of batteries needing that much current to be kept topped up. The batteries are at outside temp (currently below 0deg F). Is this a factor I need to consider?

Thanks for any information/opinions/warnings.

do not archive
Quote:
--
Raymond Julian
Kettle River, MN.

"And you know that I could have me a million more friends,
and all I'd have to lose is my point of view." - John Prine

ist" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
tp://forums.matronics.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution



[b]


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
raymondj(at)frontiernet.n
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:07 am    Post subject: parallel batteries on maintainer Reply with quote



- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:23 am    Post subject: parallel batteries on maintainer Reply with quote

At 11:39 AM 1/14/2013, you wrote:
Greetings Bob Noffs,

I bought 6+ of the HF battery maintainers and was planning on doing the same thing. In the process I started looking at the voltage provided by them and was surprised to find that NONE of the units I had provided more than about 12.75 volts. Some were as low as 12.4. As I understand the process it is necessary to provide a voltage higher than the OCV to the battery in order to offset the internal process. My conclusion is that the maintainers would only keep the batteries charged to a level which would result in an OCV lower that the maintainer voltage and less then 100% charge. Given that the maintainer I'm now using is at 13.5 volts in maintenance mode I don't think 12.75 or less is acceptable for maintaining my batteries.


Just my experience, hope you find it useful.

I tried a couple of HF devices about 5
years ago that purported to be smart-charger-maintainers
but found their performance disappointing. Don't
recall the details now. I've not tried them again
since.

Your note prompted me to take a peek at the two
Battery Tenders and one Schumacher 1562A charger
maintainers currently plugged into walls around
here.

Batteries not connected but recently topped off
were running 12.7 to 13.1 at 55F in the wood-shop
with two other batteries on SCMs were being held
at 13.4 (Battery Tender) and 13.58 (1562A).

In the house I have two batteries sitting open
12.95 and 13.01 and one on a Battery Tender
at 13.45 volts.

For the moment, my peronal stable of battery
maintenance tools seem to be functioning as
advertised. There's a handful of Schumacher
products here and perhaps another one coming.

I put a 12 a.h. battery on the cap meter for
discharge. I'll use the discharged battery to stroke
one of these chargers and see if they purr, snarl
or just lay there.

Thanks for the narrative.


Bob . . . [quote][b]


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
raymondj(at)frontiernet.n
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:25 am    Post subject: parallel batteries on maintainer Reply with quote

Bob,

Thanks for the very educational reply. Always appreciate having my plans reviewed, rather than waiting 'till spring to find out I'm wrong.

Understand the prohibition on including crippled batteries in the process. I will be charging the batteries on a non maintainer capable charger then checking the OCV 24 hrs after the end of charging and will not try to maintain batteries which don't show at least 12.9V.

Thanks again.
Quote:
Raymond Julian
Kettle River, MN.

"And you know that I could have me a million more friends,
and all I'd have to lose is my point of view." - John Prine
P.S. Matronics doesn't like something in your email when I try to include it in a reply.

[quote][b]


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:28 am    Post subject: parallel batteries on maintainer Reply with quote

Quote:
Understand the prohibition on including crippled batteries in the process. I will be charging the batteries on a non maintainer capable charger then checking the OCV 24 hrs after the end of charging and will not try to maintain batteries which don't show at least 12.9V.

Sounds like a plan . . .



Bob . . . [quote][b]


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
skywagon



Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Posts: 184

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:23 am    Post subject: parallel batteries on maintainer Reply with quote

Hi Ray,
I also have used the HF cheapie maintainers...maybe a dozen or so.

I also found that some were either floating at too high or too low of a voltage. I believe the ideal is about 13.1 - 13.3 volts in the maintenance mode.

What I found, at lease in the older units, that the back plastic plate could be carefully cut loose using an exacto knife or similar to pop the glue joints. The simple circuit board contained a small potentiometer that had a dab of RTV on the pots center wiper. The glue could be picked off to the point that the wiper could be adjusted a small amount. I found that rotating the center wiper CCW a very small amount would increase the float voltage & CW to lower.

The final setting of the center wiper can be only determined after the load battery has stabilized, so it is a bit of a trial and error. You could use a load that has a fixed resistance and determine the final setting much quicker.

Later, I decide to drill a hole in the plastic case that lined up with the pot.

However, I suspect these Chinese designs change over time and I do not know if the above steps will work on later versions of the HF unit....David


[quote] ---


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:49 am    Post subject: parallel batteries on maintainer Reply with quote

At 01:21 PM 1/14/2013, you wrote:
Hi Ray,
I also have used the HF cheapie maintainers...maybe a dozen or so.

I also found that some were either floating at too high or too low of a voltage. I believe the ideal is about 13.1 - 13.3 volts in the maintenance mode.

What I found, at lease in the older units, that the back plastic plate could be carefully cut loose using an exacto knife or similar to pop the glue joints. The simple circuit board contained a small potentiometer that had a dab of RTV on the pots center wiper. The glue could be picked off to the point that the wiper could be adjusted a small amount. I found that rotating the center wiper CCW a very small amount would increase the float voltage & CW to lower.

The final setting of the center wiper can be only determined after the load battery has stabilized, so it is a bit of a trial and error. You could use a load that has a fixed resistance and determine the final setting much quicker.

Later, I decide to drill a hole in the plastic case that lined up with the pot.

However, I suspect these Chinese designs change over time and I do not know if the above steps will work on later versions of the HF unit....David

Good data. One could also hook the device to
the SCM test rig I just posted. cycle the charger
into the maintenance mode, drop the bench supply
to 13.2 volts then adjust the pot for 10 mA of
current flow into the load.


Bob . . . [quote][b]


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
raymondj(at)frontiernet.n
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 12:46 pm    Post subject: parallel batteries on maintainer Reply with quote

Greetings David,

I opened several of of the little black boxes and none had anything that was adjustable inside. New design I suppose.

I don't have the electronics skills yet to do an analysis of the little black box. I've just put them away figuring at some point I'll design a new black box to attach the 15VAC transformer. Just one more thing on my list of things to do.

Thanks for the note.
Quote:
Raymond Julian
Kettle River, MN.

"And you know that I could have me a million more friends,
and all I'd have to lose is my point of view." - John Prine
On 01/14/2013 01:21 PM, David Lloyd wrote:

[quote] Hi Ray,
I also have used the HF cheapie maintainers...maybe a dozen or so.

I also found that some were either floating at too high or too low of a voltage. I believe the ideal is about 13.1 - 13.3 volts in the maintenance mode.

What I found, at lease in the older units, that the back plastic plate could be carefully cut loose using an exacto knife or similar to pop the glue joints. The simple circuit board contained a small potentiometer that had a dab of RTV on the pots center wiper. The glue could be picked off to the point that the wiper could be adjusted a small amount. I found that rotating the center wiper CCW a very small amount would increase the float voltage & CW to lower.

The final setting of the center wiper can be only determined after the load battery has stabilized, so it is a bit of a trial and error. You could use a load that has a fixed resistance and determine the final setting much quicker.

Later, I decide to drill a hole in the plastic case that lined up with the pot.

However, I suspect these Chinese designs change over time and I do not know if the above steps will work on later versions of the HF unit....David


[quote] ---


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group