|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:13 pm Post subject: Questions for Bob after talking to B&C... |
|
|
At 04:08 PM 4/29/2013, you wrote:
Quote: |
Bob,
B&C recommended I ask you these questions because they did not know
the answer for them. As you may know, they have a document called
the 504-500 linked here http://www.bandc.biz/pdfs/504-500_REV_G.pdf.
This document shows wiring of the S704-1 when using the PMR1C-14
regulator for the SD-8. Anyway, the wiring on the newest revision of
Z-13/8 (R) conflicts with their wiring diagram on a couple of
points, can you please help me understand which one I should use?
Here are specifically my questions that remained unanswered after
talking to them:
1. On Z-13/8 (R) you have a jumper going between the positive side
of the coil and the common pin. On their 505-500 they have nothing.
On your older Z-13/8 (Q) you had a diode. What is the reason for
this and which one should I follow?
2. On Z-13/8 (R) you have wired the common on the relay with a 30A
inline fuse. On their 504-500 they used a 10A breaker. Both are
wired using a 14AWG wire. What is the reason for such a large fuse?
Should I really use 30A on this?
|
Either one works fine. The fuse was selected for
robustness . . . sorta like a mini current limiter.
Actually, if you'd like for your SD-8 to be self
exciting, you can wire it per
http://tinyurl.com/cdnqdf9
In that drawing I show s fusible link but a 20
to 30 amp inline fuse would be fine too.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
idleup
Joined: 06 Aug 2011 Posts: 19
|
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:23 pm Post subject: Re: Questions for Bob after talking to B&C... |
|
|
Bob,
Thanks for the response, but what about my question #1? should I do the diode between the common and coil or just a standard jumper? I also notice on the Z25L pdf that you linked to you have a diode between the N.O. pin and the Coil as well. What are these for and which method should I use?
Thanks,
Matt
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:08 am Post subject: Questions for Bob after talking to B&C... |
|
|
At 09:23 PM 4/29/2013, you wrote:
Quote: |
Bob,
Thanks for the response, but what about my question #1? should I do
the diode between the common and coil or just a standard jumper? I
also notice on the Z25L pdf that you linked to you have a diode
between the N.O. pin and the Coil as well. What are these for and
which method should I use?
|
I'm not trying to be obtuse. Your question seems
to offer the notion that there are errors of function
between the various drawings cited. They all function
as advertised with respect to the installation and
operation of an SD-8 alternator. Yes, there are
variations on a theme which are insignificant to
the function.
If you want me to pick one for you, then go with
the wiring shown in Z-13/8.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
idleup
Joined: 06 Aug 2011 Posts: 19
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 9:35 am Post subject: Re: Questions for Bob after talking to B&C... |
|
|
I was not trying to imply that one was incorrect, I just do not understand the purpose of the diode in that application and whether it is necessary or not. B&C support was unable to tell me what it was there for either and directed me to ask you.
- Matt
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect wrote: | At 09:23 PM 4/29/2013, you wrote:
Quote: |
Bob,
Thanks for the response, but what about my question #1? should I do
the diode between the common and coil or just a standard jumper? I
also notice on the Z25L pdf that you linked to you have a diode
between the N.O. pin and the Coil as well. What are these for and
which method should I use?
|
I'm not trying to be obtuse. Your question seems
to offer the notion that there are errors of function
between the various drawings cited. They all function
as advertised with respect to the installation and
operation of an SD-8 alternator. Yes, there are
variations on a theme which are insignificant to
the function.
If you want me to pick one for you, then go with
the wiring shown in Z-13/8.
Bob . . . |
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
user9253
Joined: 28 Mar 2008 Posts: 1921 Location: Riley TWP Michigan
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 4:42 pm Post subject: Re: Questions for Bob after talking to B&C... |
|
|
Matt,
Bob's and B&C's drawings do not conflict. They are different. There are many different ways to wire an aircraft. I suggest that you use one of Bob's drawings because his are for the whole electrical system, not just a part of it.
Z-13/8 Rev Q has two diodes connected to the dynamo relay. These diodes potentially provide power to the relay from two sources: 1. The main power bus. 2. The dynamo. The diodes isolate the two sources from each other until the relay is energized
Z-13/8 Rev R does not have diodes.
You asked which drawing to use. I suggest Z-13/8 Rev R with a minor change: Move the jumper from the common terminal of the dynamo relay to the normally open terminal. The reason is that there could be a failure mode when there is no power available at the main power bus to operate the dynamo relay. There will always be power available from the dynamo. And if there isn't, then there is no reason to turn the dynamo relay on. Perhaps Bob will comment on this suggestion.
Quote: | 1. Am I correct that the S704-1 relay used for the backup alternator is wired to the regulator with the N.O. lead? |
Yes
Quote: | 2. Can I use the N.C. lead for an "Aux Alt Offline" light? I assume this will be powered when the switch is off (or breaker tripped) right? |
Yes and Yes. But why have a light? It will always be on. Lights should warn of an unusual situation.
Quote: | 3. If I use an S704-1 relay for the E-Bus feed switch I would wire the Battery bus to the N.O. as well correct? |
Yes
The two parallel lines below the relay coil represent the metal core of the relay. When the coil is energized, the core becomes a magnet and pulls the movable contact towards the core and towards the normally open contact. So the contact closest to the core is N.O.
Quote: | 4. Lastly, if I want to add a light for when the E-Bus feed switch is closed where would I do that? it looks like when the switch is open the N.C. is powered from the Main bus and the N.O. powered from the battery bus, so I do not see where I would tap in a light that is only powered when the switch is closed. Should I just wire the light at the switch to accomplish this instead of at the relay (using Pin 1 on the switch?).
|
I think that a light will be useful to warn you if the E-Bus switch has been left on after shutdown. You do not want the battery to run down. You are correct that there will be power on both the N.O. and COM relay terminals. A light can not be connected there. And a light can not be connected to terminal 1 of the switch because it will be in series with the relay coil. In that case, the light could illuminate dimly with the switch off. Or the relay might not shut off with the switch. Of course the light will not illuminate with the switch on because the light will then have ground connected to both of its terminals. Use a DPST or a DPDT switch for the E-Bus relay. One half of the switch will operate the relay and the other half will operate the light.
Joe
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
_________________ Joe Gores |
|
Back to top |
|
|
idleup
Joined: 06 Aug 2011 Posts: 19
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:43 pm Post subject: Re: Questions for Bob after talking to B&C... |
|
|
user9253 wrote: | Matt,
Bob's and B&C's drawings do not conflict. They are different. There are many different ways to wire an aircraft. I suggest that you use one of Bob's drawings because his are for the whole electrical system, not just a part of it.
Z-13/8 Rev Q has two diodes connected to the dynamo relay. These diodes potentially provide power to the relay from two sources: 1. The main power bus. 2. The dynamo. The diodes isolate the two sources from each other until the relay is energized
Z-13/8 Rev R does not have diodes.
You asked which drawing to use. I suggest Z-13/8 Rev R with a minor change: Move the jumper from the common terminal of the dynamo relay to the normally open terminal. The reason is that there could be a failure mode when there is no power available at the main power bus to operate the dynamo relay. There will always be power available from the dynamo. And if there isn't, then there is no reason to turn the dynamo relay on. Perhaps Bob will comment on this suggestion.
Quote: | 1. Am I correct that the S704-1 relay used for the backup alternator is wired to the regulator with the N.O. lead? |
Yes
Quote: | 2. Can I use the N.C. lead for an "Aux Alt Offline" light? I assume this will be powered when the switch is off (or breaker tripped) right? |
Yes and Yes. But why have a light? It will always be on. Lights should warn of an unusual situation.
Quote: | 3. If I use an S704-1 relay for the E-Bus feed switch I would wire the Battery bus to the N.O. as well correct? |
Yes
The two parallel lines below the relay coil represent the metal core of the relay. When the coil is energized, the core becomes a magnet and pulls the movable contact towards the core and towards the normally open contact. So the contact closest to the core is N.O.
Quote: | 4. Lastly, if I want to add a light for when the E-Bus feed switch is closed where would I do that? it looks like when the switch is open the N.C. is powered from the Main bus and the N.O. powered from the battery bus, so I do not see where I would tap in a light that is only powered when the switch is closed. Should I just wire the light at the switch to accomplish this instead of at the relay (using Pin 1 on the switch?).
|
I think that a light will be useful to warn you if the E-Bus switch has been left on after shutdown. You do not want the battery to run down. You are correct that there will be power on both the N.O. and COM relay terminals. A light can not be connected there. And a light can not be connected to terminal 1 of the switch because it will be in series with the relay coil. In that case, the light could illuminate dimly with the switch off. Or the relay might not shut off with the switch. Of course the light will not illuminate with the switch on because the light will then have ground connected to both of its terminals. Use a DPST or a DPDT switch for the E-Bus relay. One half of the switch will operate the relay and the other half will operate the light.
Joe |
Thanks Joe, What happens if the Aux alternator is turned on while under normal operations and both alternators are feeding the electrical system at one time?
As for the ebus feed light, what about putting the anode of the LED on the N.O. contact of the relay (coming from the battery bus) and the cathode on the side of the coil where the switch is connected?
Thanks,
Matt
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
user9253
Joined: 28 Mar 2008 Posts: 1921 Location: Riley TWP Michigan
|
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 5:29 am Post subject: Re: Questions for Bob after talking to B&C... |
|
|
Matt,
Quote: | Thanks Joe, What happens if the Aux alternator is turned on while under normal operations and both alternators are feeding the electrical system at one time? |
I do not think that anything will blow up. But the voltage might not be steady. Bob can answer better than I can.
Quote: | As for the ebus feed light, what about putting the anode of the LED on the N.O. contact of the relay (coming from the battery bus) and the cathode on the side of the coil where the switch is connected? |
In other words, connect the diode in parallel with the relay coil. The Diode needs a series resistor to limit current. It is good wiring practice to be able to shut off all battery loads as close to the battery as possible. Thus the master contactor and E-bus relay should both be located near the battery. If a wire is connected to the battery side of the E-Bus relay and run into the cockpit, that wire will always be hot with no way to shut it off. In the event of an imminent forced off-airport landing, the pilot needs to shut off all electrical sources to prevent sparks that could ignite gasoline. Same thing in case of smoke in the cockpit. Using a double pole switch will eliminate that long hot wire run. And the switch will be located for easy connection to a light.
Another option is to connect an un-switched light to the E-Bus. It will warn if either the master switch or E-Bus switch is left on.
Or the pilot could just look at his electronic devices to be sure they are off before she exits the aircraft. Then no light is needed.
I think that having an avionics master is a bad idea. It is a single point of failure. I routinely leave all of my radios and EFIS on, even when cranking the engine.
Joe
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
_________________ Joe Gores |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 6:43 am Post subject: Questions for Bob after talking to B&C... |
|
|
At 12:35 PM 4/30/2013, you wrote:
Quote: |
I was not trying to imply that one was incorrect, I just do not
understand the purpose of the diode in that application and whether
it is necessary or not. B&C support was unable to tell me what it
was there for either and directed me to ask you.
|
Understand. The general rule of thumb is that inductive
loads (especially coils of relays and contactors) be
transient suppressed with some technology that satisfies
design goals.
Here's a data dump on the background for selection and
incorporation of inductive load transient mitigation:
http://tinyurl.com/ccuvhaf
http://tinyurl.com/c6zodmx
http://tinyurl.com/cxlx35m
http://tinyurl.com/c2c38ce
In some instances, drawings that I produce may NOT
include a transient suppressor. This is the case when
the electronics that drive the relay have field collapse
transient suppression built in . . . or when incorporation
of the feature adds no value. In the case where a crowbar
ovm is wired across an alternator control relay, components
within the ovm take care of the problem; no additional
suppression is needed.
My train of thought was getting de-railed by references to
N.O. or N.C. contacts on relays; vagaries of design that
did not impact the physics. Forgive me if I came off
unnecessarily terse . . . our trains of thought were
running on different tracks! Hope the narrative above
helps.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
idleup
Joined: 06 Aug 2011 Posts: 19
|
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 6:50 am Post subject: Re: Questions for Bob after talking to B&C... |
|
|
user9253 wrote: | Matt,
Quote: | Thanks Joe, What happens if the Aux alternator is turned on while under normal operations and both alternators are feeding the electrical system at one time? |
I do not think that anything will blow up. But the voltage might not be steady. Bob can answer better than I can.
Quote: | As for the ebus feed light, what about putting the anode of the LED on the N.O. contact of the relay (coming from the battery bus) and the cathode on the side of the coil where the switch is connected? |
In other words, connect the diode in parallel with the relay coil. The Diode needs a series resistor to limit current. It is good wiring practice to be able to shut off all battery loads as close to the battery as possible. Thus the master contactor and E-bus relay should both be located near the battery. If a wire is connected to the battery side of the E-Bus relay and run into the cockpit, that wire will always be hot with no way to shut it off. In the event of an imminent forced off-airport landing, the pilot needs to shut off all electrical sources to prevent sparks that could ignite gasoline. Same thing in case of smoke in the cockpit. Using a double pole switch will eliminate that long hot wire run. And the switch will be located for easy connection to a light.
Another option is to connect an un-switched light to the E-Bus. It will warn if either the master switch or E-Bus switch is left on.
Or the pilot could just look at his electronic devices to be sure they are off before she exits the aircraft. Then no light is needed.
I think that having an avionics master is a bad idea. It is a single point of failure. I routinely leave all of my radios and EFIS on, even when cranking the engine.
Joe |
Joe, are you saying that the E-Bus relay should be located on the Engine side of the Firewall? I thought it was on the cockpit side for heat protection.
- Matt
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
user9253
Joined: 28 Mar 2008 Posts: 1921 Location: Riley TWP Michigan
|
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 7:37 am Post subject: Re: Questions for Bob after talking to B&C... |
|
|
Matt,
Quote: | are you saying that the E-Bus relay should be located on the Engine side of the Firewall? |
Yes
Quote: | I thought it was on the cockpit side for heat protection. |
Theoretically speaking, a relay will last longer in a cool environment. Practically speaking, the life of a relay will not be significantly shortened if located in the engine compartment. Automobiles have relays located in the engine compartment. It must get pretty hot under the hood in the summer when stuck in a traffic jam. The master contactor is a big relay usually located inside of the cowl. Relays can be used for different reasons like circuit isolation or to handle loads that are too big for a small switch. In the case of an E-bus relay, I believe the purpose is remote control. After all, a simple switch can carry the E-bus loads without using a relay. Remote control using relays or contactors allows power to be shut off near the source, thus reducing the chances of smoke or fire in case of an accident. When the engine quits over hostile terrain and the pilot is busy looking for a survival crash site, will she remember to shut off the master and E-Bus?
Joe
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
_________________ Joe Gores |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 8:21 am Post subject: Questions for Bob after talking to B&C... |
|
|
At 08:29 AM 5/1/2013, you wrote:
Matt,
> Thanks Joe, What happens if the Aux alternator is turned on while
under normal operations and both alternators are feeding the
electrical system at one time?
I do not think that anything will blow up. But the voltage might not
be steady. Bob can answer better than I can.
Running two alternators at the same time never
offers a potential for hazard. The alternator with
the higher regulation set point will attempt to shoulder
all system loads. In Z-12, the second, smaller alternator
is constantly connected to the bus and is normally switched
ON. Design goals for this configuration call for the smaller
alternator regulator to be set at 13.6 volts while the main
alternator is set for 14.6.
This means that the standby alternator is not capable of
charging the battery. Further, the standby regulator
senses a 'too high' bus voltage while the main alternator
is running. This causes the standby system to simply relax.
Standby alternator field voltage goes to zero.
If the main alternator quits, bus voltage sags. The SB
regulator wakes up and brings the SB alternator on line.
The SB regulator doesn't have a low voltage warning system.
Instead, the light monitors field voltage. If the voltage
comes up, the valid assumption is that the alternator is now
loaded due to a perceived drop in bus voltage. An added feature
measures load on the alternator and flashes the light if loads
exceed the alternator's rated current.
The SD-8 doesn't have that much sophistication. If it is
paralleled with a second alternator, it will STILL attempt
to pick up all system loads if its regulator is set higher
than its companion alternator. If loads exceed SD-8 output,
the bus voltage sags and the companion alternator will come
on line and pick up the difference while allowing the SD-8
to run 'full bore'.
If the main alternator voltage is set higher, the SD-8
will shut down and remain unloaded unless and until the
main alternator fails or is shut off. At that time, continued
flight with the SD-8 calls for reducing system loads to
some value at or below the SD-8 output of 8-10 amps.
But in either instance, there is no immediate hazard to
electrical system operation with paralleled alternators
of equal or different sizes.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
idleup
Joined: 06 Aug 2011 Posts: 19
|
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 10:03 am Post subject: Re: Questions for Bob after talking to B&C... |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect wrote: | At 08:29 AM 5/1/2013, you wrote:
Matt,
> Thanks Joe, What happens if the Aux alternator is turned on while
under normal operations and both alternators are feeding the
electrical system at one time?
I do not think that anything will blow up. But the voltage might not
be steady. Bob can answer better than I can.
Running two alternators at the same time never
offers a potential for hazard. The alternator with
the higher regulation set point will attempt to shoulder
all system loads. In Z-12, the second, smaller alternator
is constantly connected to the bus and is normally switched
ON. Design goals for this configuration call for the smaller
alternator regulator to be set at 13.6 volts while the main
alternator is set for 14.6.
This means that the standby alternator is not capable of
charging the battery. Further, the standby regulator
senses a 'too high' bus voltage while the main alternator
is running. This causes the standby system to simply relax.
Standby alternator field voltage goes to zero.
If the main alternator quits, bus voltage sags. The SB
regulator wakes up and brings the SB alternator on line.
The SB regulator doesn't have a low voltage warning system.
Instead, the light monitors field voltage. If the voltage
comes up, the valid assumption is that the alternator is now
loaded due to a perceived drop in bus voltage. An added feature
measures load on the alternator and flashes the light if loads
exceed the alternator's rated current.
The SD-8 doesn't have that much sophistication. If it is
paralleled with a second alternator, it will STILL attempt
to pick up all system loads if its regulator is set higher
than its companion alternator. If loads exceed SD-8 output,
the bus voltage sags and the companion alternator will come
on line and pick up the difference while allowing the SD-8
to run 'full bore'.
If the main alternator voltage is set higher, the SD-8
will shut down and remain unloaded unless and until the
main alternator fails or is shut off. At that time, continued
flight with the SD-8 calls for reducing system loads to
some value at or below the SD-8 output of 8-10 amps.
But in either instance, there is no immediate hazard to
electrical system operation with paralleled alternators
of equal or different sizes.
Bob . . . |
Bob, thanks for the very detailed explanation of how the two alternators will respond to one other when in operation at the same time.
- Matt
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 10:43 am Post subject: Questions for Bob after talking to B&C... |
|
|
Quote: | In the case of an E-bus relay, I believe the purpose is remote
control. After all, a simple switch can carry the E-bus loads
without using a relay. Remote control using relays or contactors
allows power to be shut off near the source, thus reducing the
chances of smoke or fire in case of an accident.
|
Correct. The e-bus alternate feed relay is
actually a mini-contactor for a two layer
electrical system. Layer 1 is a battery and
SD-8 alternator driving a small bus (e-bus).
Closing a big battery contactor to add a second layer
consisting of larger alternator and bus that
runs items not necessary for en route endurance
operations.
Quote: | When the engine quits over hostile terrain and the pilot is busy
looking for a survival crash site, will she remember to shut off
the master and E-Bus?
|
Exactly. The function of the alternate feed
relay is to facilitate actions that get the
electrical system down to max-dark. This is
why the wires on the hot side of the alternate
feed relay are marked with the (*) calling for
'short as practical'.
Environmental temperatures for off-the-shelf
automotive relays are not a major concern. Everything
used under the hood of a car is entirely suited
for use under the cowl of an airplane.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 10:52 am Post subject: Questions for Bob after talking to B&C... |
|
|
Quote: |
Bob, thanks for the very detailed explanation of how the two
alternators will respond to one other when in operation at the same time.
- Matt
|
It occurs to me that the narration I offered was
true of two alternators like a L60/SD-20 pair
or perhaps an L60/SD-8 pair. If the two alternators
are of similar or equal size -AND- depending on
regulator dynamics, it's possible that the two
systems will launch into a sort of volley-ball
behavior where they toss system loads back and
forth at each other.
About 30 years ago I proposed a PARALLELING
regulator design for the Cessna 303 Crusader's
dual alternators. That was the first time I
witnessed this effect. Again, no particular
hazard is created but the behavior can be
annoying to spectacular.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|