Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Compressor

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Yak-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
rijaeger(at)wausau.k12.wi
Guest





PostPosted: Thu May 09, 2013 5:55 am    Post subject: Compressor Reply with quote

So far - after chasing air system demons for 7 months - I've managed to avoid the obvious need for therapy and skirt a complete psychotic break down...but I'm getting close. Would anyone out there have a serviceable compressor you'd be willing to A) loan out (w/ a deposit) for testing purposes or B) sell outright at a price that will still allow me to purchase fuel IF my Yak ever becomes a fully-functioning aircraft? Wow. Hydraulics seem super-sexy to me right now... I would highly appreciate any help, Guys! THANX!

--
Rico Jaeger
Choir / East High School
General Music / Horace Mann

[quote][b]


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
Harv



Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 172

PostPosted: Thu May 09, 2013 11:00 pm    Post subject: Re: Compressor Reply with quote

Rico

Are you talking about a CJ6 or Yak compressor?

What's the problem with your air system, a re-cap and fresh look at it from someone on this list might turn up something you've missed.


Rgs
Harv


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dale



Joined: 30 May 2007
Posts: 178

PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2013 5:36 am    Post subject: Re: Compressor Reply with quote

Compressor same on both Cj and Yak. If your going through all the trouble to take it off you might as well clean yours and check for all the carbon . You can then turn it by hand to see if it pumps air. Look at the check valves and small port along with the top of piston.

- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
threein60(at)yahoo.com
Guest





PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2013 6:43 am    Post subject: Compressor Reply with quote

`And appearantly the AN2 is the same.  I fly with an AN2 compressor. About 4-5 inches longer and it appears there is a second compressor on top of what would be the normal M14 compressor. Works great. I can recharge an empty bottle at idle in about 5 minutes.


Larry Pine



From: Dale <dale(at)frii.com>
To: yak-list(at)matronics.com
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 6:36 AM
Subject: Yak-List: Re: Compressor


--> Yak-List message posted by: "Dale" <dale(at)frii.com (dale(at)frii.com)>

Compressor same on both Ci and Yak


Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopi= Same great content also available p; -M===============


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List



2011-03-17_17.50.17.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  1.44 MB
 Viewed:  3513 Time(s)

2011-03-17_17.50.17.jpg


Back to top
mark.bitterlich(at)navy.m
Guest





PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2013 8:23 am    Post subject: Compressor Reply with quote

That's a sweet setup Larry.

Mark
--


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
markdavis(at)wbsnet.org
Guest





PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2013 9:48 am    Post subject: Compressor Reply with quote

Does anyone know if the AN2 compressor pulls significantly more horsepower
to run the higher volume output? I've seen the AN2 compressors on eBay
before and knew they would fit but didn't know if they pulled harder and
would cause a slightly higher fuel burn unless they were unloaded in flight.

Mark Davis
N44YK
---


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
threein60(at)yahoo.com
Guest





PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2013 10:17 am    Post subject: Compressor Reply with quote

I can just tell you from my experience.. I can unload mine in flight and i see virtually no difference in % or speed between the two. Because it is bigger it has to be clocked at a different angle which in my case required the oil hose from the screen to the pump to be made longer and re-routed. Love the extra air though...


Larry Pine



From: Mark Davis <markdavis(at)wbsnet.org>
To: yak-list(at)matronics.com
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Compressor


--> Yak-List message posted by: "Mark Davis" <markdavis(at)wbsnet.org (markdavis(at)wbsnet.org)>

Does anyone know if the AN2 compressor pulls significantly more horsepower
to run the higher volume output? I've seen the AN2 compressors on eBay
before and knew they would fit but didn't know if they pulled harder and
would cause a slightly higher fuel burn unless they were unloaded in flight.

Mark Davis
N44YK
---


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
richard.goode(at)russiana
Guest





PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2013 10:17 am    Post subject: Compressor Reply with quote

By definition they will use more power, but not really significant. Standard
compressor uses a maximum of 3 hp.

Richard Goode Aerobatics
Rhodds Farm
Lyonshall
Hereford
HR5 3LW

Tel: +44 (0) 1544 340120
Fax: +44 (0) 1544 340129
www.russianaeros.com
--


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
mark.bitterlich(at)navy.m
Guest





PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2013 10:36 am    Post subject: Compressor Reply with quote

Mark, if you see them listed again on EBay again, please do me a favor
and send an alert my way, because I truly want one or two myself. Maybe
three. Smile

I think we could discuss the issue of power robbing pretty easily.
Given that the volumetric output of this compressor is higher than the
one we currently have, when the pump is filling an empty bottle, it
clearly is going to draw more power from the engine. How much exactly
would require a good deal of engineering data that would probably be an
exercise in frustration.

However, that is only transitional since the tank is going to fill more
rapidly and reach the point where the blow-off valve opens to relieve
over-pressure earlier. Thus the distributed load between the two while
filling is going to be about the same right?

So the question then becomes how much power is being robbed from the
engine as the compressor produces enough volume at approximately 735 PSI
to open the over-pressure valve. Since it has a higher volume output,
the engine is going to be putting power into the compressor for an
equivalently longer period of time as that excess volume is blown off
through the relief valve.

So a fair comparison of the power robbed from the engine could be
computed by knowing the exact differences in volume under load at 735
PSI for each compressor type. My personal opinion is that you would be
hard pressed to feel the difference.

This whole concept of "unloading" the compressor with the use of a
home-made arrangement of either opening the snot valve, or more
expensive yet, with the use of an electrically controlled relief valve
has always struck me as "urban legend". Yes, I have seen it on quite a
number of Unlimited Competitive Sukhoi's, and I am also aware of exactly
who came up with this concept in the first place. These same folks are
using every trick in the book to increase aircraft performance in ANY
WAY POSSIBLE, and they'll do it if there is even a CHANCE of it being
real. These same gents were also plugging up the accelerator pump in
the pressure carbs too, which in the end turned up to be less than a
good thing.

So in the end, I ask myself this question: Do you think that a three
horsepower four stroke gas lawnmower engine could drive our current
compressor to about 2000 RPM and deliver 735 PSI of output? Yes I
believe it would. But if there is any doubt, I am DARN sure that a 5 HP
engine would!

So, at load the compressor might be robbing 3-5 HP or so ... And worse
yet, as the compressor wears out, once the tank is full, it draws even
less load.

So how much additional fuel do you think you'll burn for about three
horsepower?

Then there is the issue of bearing loads. Will this compressor last
longer if it is operating under load at all times, or if you release all
load and just have it running along at full speed against zero load?
I'm really not sure. The question is not as easy to answer as one might
think. In any case, I do not unload mine, and the original compressor
is now reaching 800 hours and is still working perfectly.

Of course if you DO unload it, in theory the only difference between the
two would be frictional load, which would be very minimal.

Too long an email I know, but this is something I have had an opinion
about for a long time and just never felt like verbalizing it. Unless
you are looking for the ultimate edge, I don't believe unloading
compressors is really necessary... but I would be more than glad to hear
opinions otherwise based on factual info.

In the interim, I want one of the AN2 compressors. Smile

mgb

--


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Yak-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group