|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jdmurr(at)juno.com Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 5:46 pm Post subject: Mode C Veil Question |
|
|
What are the regulations for ultralights without transponders regarding being inside the 30mn circle but not in Class B airspace? Thanks!
John
What are the regulations for ultralights without transponders regarding being inside the 30mn circle but not in Class B airspace? Thanks!
John
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Roger Lee
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 1464 Location: Tucson, Az.
|
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:24 pm Post subject: Re: Mode C Veil Question |
|
|
Hi,
Your not allowed inside the mode-c circle without a transponder and alt. encoder.
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ Roger Lee
Tucson, Az.
Rotax Instructor & Rotax IRC
Light Sport Repairman
Home 520-574-1080 TRY HOME FIRST
Cell 520-349-7056 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ceengland(at)bellsouth.ne Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 7:44 pm Post subject: Mode C Veil Question |
|
|
Roger Lee wrote:
Quote: |
Hi,
Your not allowed inside the mode-c circle without a transponder and alt. encoder.
--------
Roger Lee
Tucson, Az.
|
Things may have changed since 911 enabled the storm troopers, but there
once was an exception for planes without an electrical system that can
support a transponder. This was interpreted to mean that you can have
electrical power but not enough generator power to keep your battery up
while the transponder & all other equipment is operating. You could
probably make a strong case that a 2stroke with only a 'lighting coil'
fit that description. Piper Cubs, Taylorcraft, etc have flown inside the
veil regularly in the past. You still had to stay out of the actual B
airspace, of course.
A call to your ATC (or better yet, a call to EAA's info line) would get
you current info.
Charlie
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Steve Boetto
Joined: 11 Jan 2006 Posts: 364
|
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 4:33 am Post subject: Mode C Veil Question |
|
|
In a message dated 1/14/2006 8:47:23 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
jdmurr(at)juno.com writes:
What are the regulations for ultralights without transponders regarding
being inside the 30mn circle but not in Class B airspace? Thanks!
John
This is a tricky one, I researched this one last year because I operate in
the Orlando, FL veil. Clearly my Firefly is exempt because I have no elec
syst. The reg says "Certified Electrical System" Antiques with no starter are
considered exempt by Local FAA here. The gray area is in the case of a
homebuilt with a non certified engine. My local FAA source(he used to do my engine
inspections) told me that technically a non certified engine and electrical
system is exempt but he did not suggest testing the theory. I ran a mode c on
my EZ.
BTW you can thank Ex Beauty Queen Ms Dole for this requirement.
Steve B
FF
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
planecrazzzy Guest
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kfackler(at)ameritech.net Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 9:22 am Post subject: Mode C veil question |
|
|
The following is a copy/paste of the relevant FAR, with highlighting via
capitalization added by me to indicate what most of us need to know:
Federal Aviation Regulation Part 91 Section 215
ATC transponder and altitude reporting equipment and use
1.. All airspace: U.S.-registered civil aircraft. For operations not
conducted under part 121 or 135 of this chapter, ATC transponder equipment
installed must meet the performance and environmental requirements of any
class of TSO-C74b (Mode A) or any class of TSO-C74c (Mode A with altitude
reporting capability) as appropriate, or the appropriate class of TSO-C112
(Mode S).
2.. All airspace. UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED OR DIRECTED BY ATC, NO
PERSON MAY OPERATE AN AIRCRAFT IN THE AIRSPACE DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPHS
(B)(1) THROUGH (B)(5) OF THIS SECTION, UNLESS THAT AIRCRAFT IS EQUIPPED WITH
AN OPERABLE CODED RADAR BEACON TRANSPONDER having either Mode 3/A 4096 code
capability, replying to Mode 3/A interrogations with the code specified by
ATC, or a Mode S capability, replying to Mode 3/A interrogations with the
code specified by ATC and intermode and Mode S interrogations in accordance
with the applicable provisions specified in TSO C-112, and that aircraft is
equipped with automatic pressure altitude reporting equipment having a Mode
C capability that automatically replies to Mode C interrogations by
transmitting pressure altitude information in 100-foot increments. This
requirement applies --
1.. All aircraft. In Class A, Class B, and Class C airspace areas;
2.. All aircraft. IN ALL AIRSPACE WITHIN 30 NAUTICAL MILES OF AN AIRPORT
LISTED IN APPENDIX D, SECTION 1 OF THIS PART FROM THE SURFACE UPWARD TO
10,000 FEET MSL;
3.. Notwithstanding paragraph (b)(2) of this section, ANY AIRCRAFT WHICH
WAS NOT ORIGINALLY CERTIFICATED WITH AN ENGINE-DRIVEN ELECTRICAL SYSTEM OR
WHICH HAS NOT SUBSEQUENTLY BEEN CERTIFIED WITH SUCH A SYSTEM INSTALLED,
balloon or glider MAY CONDUCT OPERATIONS IN THE AIRSPACE WITHIN 30 NAUTICAL
MILES OF AN AIRPORT LISTED IN APPENDIX D, SECTION 1 OF THIS PART PROVIDED
SUCH OPERATIONS ARE CONDUCTED--
1.. OUTSIDE ANY CLASS A, CLASS B, OR CLASS C AIRSPACE AREA; and
2.. Below the altitude of the ceiling of a Class B or Class C airspace
area designated for an airport or 10,000 feet MSL, whichever is lower; and
4.. All aircraft in all airspace above the ceiling and within the
lateral boundaries of a Class B or Class C airspace area designated for an
airport upward to 10,000 feet MSL; and
5.. All aircraft except any aircraft which was not originally
certificated with an engine-driven electrical system or which has not
subsequently been certified with such a system installed, balloon, or
glider -- --
1.. In all airspace of the 48 contiguous states and the District of
Columbia at and above 10,000 feet MSL, excluding the airspace at and below
2,500 feet above the surface; and
2.. In the airspace from the surface to 10,000 feet MSL within a
10-nautical-mile radius of any airport listed in appendix D, section 2 of
this part, excluding the airspace below 1,200 feet outside of the lateral
boundaries of the surface area of the airspace designated for that airport.
==============================================
Sample of delimiters for Class B airspace within the Mode C:
http://www.kfackler.com/bin/mode_c.jpg
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Richard Pike
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 1671 Location: Blountville, Tennessee
|
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 10:23 am Post subject: Mode C veil question |
|
|
Bearing in mind that anything legally operating under Part 103 in not an
aircraft, it is a "vehicle."
So all the following you added is great, but does not apply to part 103
vehicles. Only aircraft.
An ultralight is not legally an aircraft, as defined by the FAA.
That is why ATC does not give ATC (separation) services to ultralights.
Thus the whole Sport Plane bit. And Experimentals, to which that all
applies.
Richard Pike
MKIII N420P (420ldPoops)
kfackler wrote:
Quote: |
The following is a copy/paste of the relevant FAR, with highlighting via
capitalization added by me to indicate what most of us need to know:
Federal Aviation Regulation Part 91 Section 215
ATC transponder and altitude reporting equipment and use
1.. All airspace: U.S.-registered civil aircraft. For operations not
conducted under part 121 or 135 of this chapter, ATC transponder equipment
installed must meet the performance and environmental requirements of any
class of TSO-C74b (Mode A) or any class of TSO-C74c (Mode A with altitude
reporting capability) as appropriate, or the appropriate class of TSO-C112
(Mode S).
2.. All airspace. UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED OR DIRECTED BY ATC, NO
PERSON MAY OPERATE AN AIRCRAFT IN THE AIRSPACE DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPHS
(B)(1) THROUGH (B)(5) OF THIS SECTION, UNLESS THAT AIRCRAFT IS EQUIPPED WITH
AN OPERABLE CODED RADAR BEACON TRANSPONDER having either Mode 3/A 4096 code
capability, replying to Mode 3/A interrogations with the code specified by
ATC, or a Mode S capability, replying to Mode 3/A interrogations with the
code specified by ATC and intermode and Mode S interrogations in accordance
with the applicable provisions specified in TSO C-112, and that aircraft is
equipped with automatic pressure altitude reporting equipment having a Mode
C capability that automatically replies to Mode C interrogations by
transmitting pressure altitude information in 100-foot increments. This
requirement applies --
1.. All aircraft. In Class A, Class B, and Class C airspace areas;
2.. All aircraft. IN ALL AIRSPACE WITHIN 30 NAUTICAL MILES OF AN AIRPORT
LISTED IN APPENDIX D, SECTION 1 OF THIS PART FROM THE SURFACE UPWARD TO
10,000 FEET MSL;
3.. Notwithstanding paragraph (b)(2) of this section, ANY AIRCRAFT WHICH
WAS NOT ORIGINALLY CERTIFICATED WITH AN ENGINE-DRIVEN ELECTRICAL SYSTEM OR
WHICH HAS NOT SUBSEQUENTLY BEEN CERTIFIED WITH SUCH A SYSTEM INSTALLED,
balloon or glider MAY CONDUCT OPERATIONS IN THE AIRSPACE WITHIN 30 NAUTICAL
MILES OF AN AIRPORT LISTED IN APPENDIX D, SECTION 1 OF THIS PART PROVIDED
SUCH OPERATIONS ARE CONDUCTED--
1.. OUTSIDE ANY CLASS A, CLASS B, OR CLASS C AIRSPACE AREA; and
2.. Below the altitude of the ceiling of a Class B or Class C airspace
area designated for an airport or 10,000 feet MSL, whichever is lower; and
4.. All aircraft in all airspace above the ceiling and within the
lateral boundaries of a Class B or Class C airspace area designated for an
airport upward to 10,000 feet MSL; and
5.. All aircraft except any aircraft which was not originally
certificated with an engine-driven electrical system or which has not
subsequently been certified with such a system installed, balloon, or
glider -- --
1.. In all airspace of the 48 contiguous states and the District of
Columbia at and above 10,000 feet MSL, excluding the airspace at and below
2,500 feet above the surface; and
2.. In the airspace from the surface to 10,000 feet MSL within a
10-nautical-mile radius of any airport listed in appendix D, section 2 of
this part, excluding the airspace below 1,200 feet outside of the lateral
boundaries of the surface area of the airspace designated for that airport.
==============================================
Sample of delimiters for Class B airspace within the Mode C:
http://www.kfackler.com/bin/mode_c.jpg
|
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ Richard Pike
Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops)
Kingsport, TN 3TN0
Forgiving is tough, being forgiven is wonderful, and God's grace really is amazing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kfackler(at)ameritech.net Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 10:29 am Post subject: Mode C veil question |
|
|
By your reasoning, I can fly right into Detroit Metro airspace since I'm
"not an aircraft." Isn't that silly on the face of it? Ultralights are
required to comply with the other FARs unless 103 gives them a specific rule
to the contrary, usually marked with the word "notwithstanding."
---
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
John Hauck
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 4639 Location: Titus, Alabama (hauck's holler)
|
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 10:38 am Post subject: Mode C veil question |
|
|
| By your reasoning, I can fly right into Detroit Metro airspace
since I'm
| "not an aircraft." Isn't that silly on the face of it? Ultralights
are
| required to comply with the other FARs unless 103 gives them a
specific rule
| to the contrary, usually marked with the word "notwithstanding."
Ken:
Without reading Part 103 again, ULs are not authorized in any
controlled airspace without specific permission to do so by the
controlling authority.
john h
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ John Hauck
MKIII/912ULS
hauck's holler
Titus, Alabama |
|
Back to top |
|
|
edchmiel(at)mindspring.co Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 10:48 am Post subject: Mode C veil question |
|
|
Hiya Ken & All,
FAR 103.17 states:
"No person may operate an ultralight vehicle within Class A, Class B, Class
C, or Class D airspace or within the lateral boundaries of the surface area
of Class E airspace designated for an airport unless that person has prior
authorization from the ATC facility having jurisdiction over that airspace."
Ed in JXN
MkII/503
---
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
luther b green
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 47
|
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 11:04 am Post subject: Mode C veil question |
|
|
Here is the ultralight thing.
103.17 Operation in certain airspaces.
No person may operate an ultralight vehicle within Class A, Class B, Class
C, Class D airspace or within the lateral boundaries of the surface area of
Class E airspace designated for an airport unless that person has prior
authorization from the ATC facility having jurisdiction over that airspace.
Bryan Green (Elgin SC)
---
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ Bryan Green Elgin SC
Firestar 447 Powerfin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
planecrazzzy Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 11:28 am Post subject: Re: Mode C Veil Question |
|
|
That didn't say anything aboutMODE "C"
Gotta Fly...
Mike in MN
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kfackler(at)ameritech.net Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:56 pm Post subject: Mode C veil question |
|
|
Quote: | By your reasoning, I can fly right into Detroit Metro airspace since I'm
"not an aircraft." Isn't that silly on the face of it? Ultralights are
required to comply with the other FARs unless 103 gives them a
specific rule to the contrary, usually marked with the word
"notwithstanding."
|
Quote: | Without reading Part 103 again, ULs are not authorized in any
controlled airspace without specific permission to do so by the
controlling authority.
|
Yes, that's true, which exemplifies my point, that some provisions of FAR
103 may supercede the other regs, but arguing that the other regs don't
apply to ultralights is, well, as I said, silly.
-Ken
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Richard Pike
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 1671 Location: Blountville, Tennessee
|
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 2:20 pm Post subject: Mode C veil question |
|
|
Sorry for the confusion. Never meant to imply that part 103 vehicles
could go where no one else could, was merely attempting to add one more
facet to the original question by John Murr, which was:
What are the regulations for ultralights without transponders regarding being inside the 30nm circle but not in Class B airspace? Thanks!
John
And all the replies focused on what sort of electrical system was
involved. However what I was trying to point out is that ultralights are
not any part of any of the regs that were quoted in those replies. But
since I omitted the part about ultralights not being allowed in
controlled airspace anyway, I can see how you drew your conclusion.
As far as "Ultralights are required to comply with the other FAR's
unless part 103 gives them a specific rule to the contrary," that
depends on which FAR's you are referencing.
Richard Pike
MKIII N420P (420ldPoops)
kfackler wrote:
Quote: |
> By your reasoning, I can fly right into Detroit Metro airspace since I'm
>"not an aircraft." Isn't that silly on the face of it? Ultralights are
>required to comply with the other FARs unless 103 gives them a
>specific rule to the contrary, usually marked with the word
>
>
"notwithstanding."
>Without reading Part 103 again, ULs are not authorized in any
>controlled airspace without specific permission to do so by the
>controlling authority.
>
>
Yes, that's true, which exemplifies my point, that some provisions of FAR
103 may supercede the other regs, but arguing that the other regs don't
apply to ultralights is, well, as I said, silly.
-Ken
|
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ Richard Pike
Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops)
Kingsport, TN 3TN0
Forgiving is tough, being forgiven is wonderful, and God's grace really is amazing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kfackler(at)ameritech.net Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 2:31 pm Post subject: Mode C veil question |
|
|
Quote: | Sorry for the confusion. Never meant to imply that part 103 vehicles
could go where no one else could, was merely attempting to add one more
facet to the original question
|
Got you. Good point.
Quote: | As far as "Ultralights are required to comply with the other FAR's
unless part 103 gives them a specific rule to the contrary," that
depends on which FAR's you are referencing.
|
Yeah, and to some extent, which person you ask and on what day! In any case,
you're darn right "it depends."
-Ken
do not archive
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kirk Smith
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 78 Location: SE Michigan
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Thom Riddle
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 1597 Location: Buffalo, NY, USA (9G0)
|
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 6:17 am Post subject: Mode C Veil Question |
|
|
Kolbers,
The regulations "certificated with electrical system". This means that
when the aircraft received its airworthiness certificate, if it had an
electrical system, then it requires the transponder within the veil.
There is no differentiation between Type Certificated and experimental
or UL "vehicles".
Thom in Buffalo
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ Thom Riddle
Buffalo, NY (9G0)
Don't worry about old age... it doesn't last very long.
- Anonymous |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Thom Riddle
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 1597 Location: Buffalo, NY, USA (9G0)
|
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 6:57 am Post subject: Mode C veil question |
|
|
Part 103 is very specific about operating rules including where it
cannot operate legally. See
http://www.ultralighthomepage.com/FAR.part103.html
Specifically see the following section:
Sec. 103.17 Operations in certain airspace.
No person may operate an ultralight vehicle within an airport
traffic
area, control zone, airport radar service area, terminal control area,
or
positive control area unless that person has prior authorization from
the air
traffic control facility having jurisdiction over that airspace.
The areas referred to in this section I think would include the area
within the Mode C Veil.
Thom in Buffalo
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ Thom Riddle
Buffalo, NY (9G0)
Don't worry about old age... it doesn't last very long.
- Anonymous |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Richard Pike
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 1671 Location: Blountville, Tennessee
|
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:11 am Post subject: Mode C Veil Question |
|
|
I disagree.
An ultralight is a vehicle, it is not an aircraft,
(We are talking FAR's here, not appearances or behaviors)
and specifically does not have an Airworthiness Certificate.
An ultralight is not required to have any particular equipment.
An Experimental or Type Certificated aircraft is exactly that, an
aircraft, and can
have or be required to have all sorts of stuff that ultralights don't.
There is no reason to put a transponder on an ultralight, since ATC doesn't
interact with ultralights like they do with aircraft anyway.
Richard Pike
TRI ATCT (retired)
Thom Riddle wrote:
Quote: |
Kolbers,
The regulations "certificated with electrical system". This means that
when the aircraft received its airworthiness certificate, if it had an
electrical system, then it requires the transponder within the veil.
There is no differentiation between Type Certificated and experimental
or UL "vehicles".
Thom in Buffalo
|
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ Richard Pike
Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops)
Kingsport, TN 3TN0
Forgiving is tough, being forgiven is wonderful, and God's grace really is amazing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Steve Boetto
Joined: 11 Jan 2006 Posts: 364
|
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:58 am Post subject: Mode C Veil Question |
|
|
In a message dated 1/16/06 8:17:39 AM Central Standard Time,
jtriddle(at)adelphia.net writes:
Quote: |
Kolbers,
The regulations "certificated with electrical system". This means that
when the aircraft received its airworthiness certificate, if it had an
electrical system, then it requires the transponder within the veil.
There is no differentiation between Type Certificated and experimental
or UL "vehicles".
Thom in Buffalo
|
Thom, I think that you are right in your interpretation. However I did not
want to try to explain the rule to the local FAA.
Steve
do not archive
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|