Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Airspeed static ports.

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Europa-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
tonyrenshaw268(at)gmail.c
Guest





PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2014 11:51 am    Post subject: Airspeed static ports. Reply with quote

Gidday,
I am considering how I will quick connect my pitot dynamic and static tubes from my wing root to the fuselage and am considering quick connects/disconnects. In the process of this investigation, I have wondered whether I could take a rear fuselage "internal" static pressure as well as the pitot, in case hypothetically it ever got blocked, but without any switching, just melding the two. I would think the worst case would be where cabin static could create a false reading on a rapid climb out, where the static could lag due to a greater pressure from an internal contribution, which would indicate you are flying slower than you actually are, which is safe. Seems to me since most light a/c leak like sieves, and our rear fuselage more so because of flap drive slots into wing root close out voids, that I could use this to my advantage.
Comments??
Regards
Tony Renshaw
P.S. I was inspired by these fittings:


Sent from my iPad
<pre><b><font size=3D2 color="#000000" face=3D"courier new,courier">


- The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List



image.png
 Description:
 Filesize:  160.5 KB
 Viewed:  4712 Time(s)

image.png


Back to top
frans(at)privatepilots.nl
Guest





PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2014 12:35 pm    Post subject: Airspeed static ports. Reply with quote

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/12/2014 09:46 PM, Tony Renshaw wrote:
Quote:
Gidday, I am considering how I will quick connect my pitot dynamic
and static tubes from my wing root to the fuselage and am
considering quick connects/disconnects.

I use the ones in your picture, but not for quick disconnects. I think
they are not really suitable for repeatable connections and they are
sometimes difficult to let go.

Quote:
In the process of this investigation, I have wondered whether I
could take a rear fuselage "internal" static pressure as well as
the pitot,

I have a static tube connector in the instrument panel with a blocked
piece of tubing in it. If I pull it out, I have static pressure from
the cockpit (in parallel to the static port in the wing). This works
very well. In fact, it works so well that I hardly see any difference
if I take the blockage out. (And yes, my static port system is leak
free). Unless I open one of the big vents in the door windows, then
the static pressure goes way off. But of course cockpit pressure is
very dependant on how tight your doors are, how much air leaks around
the throttle, etc. In my case it just happens that the cockpit
pressure is very neutral.

Frans
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=Y/0Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


- The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List
Back to top
tonyrenshaw268(at)gmail.c
Guest





PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2014 2:10 pm    Post subject: Airspeed static ports. Reply with quote

Hi Fran's,
I expect the pressure in the aft fuselage might be more representative than cockpit pressure, which is why my plan was to pick it up back behind the baggage bay, near the flap cross tube. I have wondered about plumbing a standby pitot static to the cockpit, but have wondered if I can make it a split system static. We have a similar system with multiple statics for the one system on bigger aircraft, albeit they measure ambient, for obvious reasons.
These fittings do work well though in my superficial testing, and leak of static from the fitting is a bit of an irrelevance, since we are talking about more a static equalization pressure tube more than anything. Believe it or not I have this Nylaflow? Tubing, the hard walled opaque stuff from ACS, and it makes an excellent push to fit. I am tempted to use the 3/8" OD inside a 3/8" ID joiner, and just push them together. Very un-aviation, but if you've ever done it, you'll appreciate how hard they are to pull apart, and no vibration is going to do it.
Regards
Tony Renshaw
Sent from my iPad

Quote:
On 12 May 2014, at 1:22 pm, Frans Veldman <frans(at)privatepilots.nl> wrote:



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> On 05/12/2014 09:46 PM, Tony Renshaw wrote:
> Gidday, I am considering how I will quick connect my pitot dynamic
> and static tubes from my wing root to the fuselage and am
> considering quick connects/disconnects.

I use the ones in your picture, but not for quick disconnects. I think
they are not really suitable for repeatable connections and they are
sometimes difficult to let go.

> In the process of this investigation, I have wondered whether I
> could take a rear fuselage "internal" static pressure as well as
> the pitot,

I have a static tube connector in the instrument panel with a blocked
piece of tubing in it. If I pull it out, I have static pressure from
the cockpit (in parallel to the static port in the wing). This works
very well. In fact, it works so well that I hardly see any difference
if I take the blockage out. (And yes, my static port system is leak
free). Unless I open one of the big vents in the door windows, then
the static pressure goes way off. But of course cockpit pressure is
very dependant on how tight your doors are, how much air leaks around
the throttle, etc. In my case it just happens that the cockpit
pressure is very neutral.

Frans
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=Y/0Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






- The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List
Back to top
rparigoris



Joined: 24 Nov 2009
Posts: 791

PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2014 2:36 pm    Post subject: Airspeed static ports. Reply with quote

Hi Tony
Have a look at Winter connectors that I am using at instrument module, also see the pneumatic switches I am using for switch between static and cockpit and switch between static and TE for variometer:
http://www.europaowners.org/main.php?g2_itemId=27305&g2_page=2
Also have a look at my mutilated Winter connector, Sermos (very close to Anderson power pole modular connectors) connector and plastic buckle that melded into a one connector solution for wing to fuse:
http://www.europaowners.org/main.php?g2_itemId=86942
Ron Parigoris
[quote][b]


- The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
frans(at)privatepilots.nl
Guest





PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2014 9:57 am    Post subject: Airspeed static ports. Reply with quote

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/13/2014 12:07 AM, Tony Renshaw wrote:
Quote:

<tonyrenshaw268(at)gmail.com>

Hi Fran's, I expect the pressure in the aft fuselage might be more
representative than cockpit pressure,

Not in my airplane. In my airplane the aft fuselage seems to be of
higher pressure than the cockpit. I installed a vent in the D-panel
with the intention to let the air out, but it is blowing into the
cockpit instead! I have no idea where the air is leaving again as
every opening in the cockpit seems to be blowing inward (and yes my
doors are sealed with a center pin arrangement). Also I don't
understand why the aft fuselage is pressurised. The main openings in
the aft fuselage are the tailplane drive slots but it looks to me they
are in a low pressure area. The slots for the flap drive are covered
by the wing root fairings so they are normally sealed in flight. The
only other openings are the small openings for the rudder cable and
one small opening in the sternpost for the rudder drive rod.

Quote:
Believe it or not I have this Nylaflow? Tubing, the hard walled
opaque stuff from ACS, and it makes an excellent push to fit. I am
tempted to use the 3/8" OD inside a 3/8" ID joiner, and just push
them together. Very un-aviation, but if you've ever done it, you'll
appreciate how hard they are to pull apart, and no vibration is
going to do it.

I have used this equipment to plumb my entire pitot/static system.
Only for the wing to fuselage connection I use the "official" quick
(dis)connect fittings. I agree that it is great stuff.

Frans

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=LAm1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


- The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List
Back to top
europa471



Joined: 08 Apr 2009
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 10:02 pm    Post subject: Airspeed static ports. Reply with quote

Tony, Frans and All

Sorry to be late getting to this, I have been out of commission for a while.

In OZ, in the strictly controlled era prior to experimental regulations,
(pre 1999). Our Civil aviation released an Airworthiness Directive for
Europa Aircraft stating there should be no airflow between the cockpit
and the rear fuselage. Their concern was, with the pressure rear of the
bulkhead being higher than the cockpit, engine exhaust could be drawn
into the rear fuselage via the flap slots and find itīs way into the
cockpit. This AD was withdrawn with the advent of experimental aviation
with responsibility being handed to the builder. Sorry I canīt find the
copy I thought I had.

Regards

Lance Sandford in OZ
On 14/05/14 03:49, Frans Veldman wrote:
Quote:


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/13/2014 12:07 AM, Tony Renshaw wrote:
>
> <tonyrenshaw268(at)gmail.com>
>
> Hi Fran's, I expect the pressure in the aft fuselage might be more
> representative than cockpit pressure,
Not in my airplane. In my airplane the aft fuselage seems to be of
higher pressure than the cockpit. I installed a vent in the D-panel
with the intention to let the air out, but it is blowing into the
cockpit instead! I have no idea where the air is leaving again as
every opening in the cockpit seems to be blowing inward (and yes my
doors are sealed with a center pin arrangement). Also I don't
understand why the aft fuselage is pressurised. The main openings in
the aft fuselage are the tailplane drive slots but it looks to me they
are in a low pressure area. The slots for the flap drive are covered
by the wing root fairings so they are normally sealed in flight. The
only other openings are the small openings for the rudder cable and
one small opening in the sternpost for the rudder drive rod.

> Believe it or not I have this Nylaflow? Tubing, the hard walled
> opaque stuff from ACS, and it makes an excellent push to fit. I am
> tempted to use the 3/8" OD inside a 3/8" ID joiner, and just push
> them together. Very un-aviation, but if you've ever done it, you'll
> appreciate how hard they are to pull apart, and no vibration is
> going to do it.
I have used this equipment to plumb my entire pitot/static system.
Only for the wing to fuselage connection I use the "official" quick
(dis)connect fittings. I agree that it is great stuff.

Frans

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=LAm1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


- The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Europa-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group