 |
Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
yaftab(at)gmail.com
Guest
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2014 1:45 pm Post subject: WTB: Yak-52 |
 |
|
After chatting with a number of people; I am considering either buying or getting into a partnership for a 52. If somebody is selling - please let me know.
Prefer a basic flying 52 with heavy spar and mid to low time engines. Don't care other upgrades as much.
I am in the West Coast (San Francisco) - So closer is better for me.
Please send me a private email if you have any leads.
Thanks!
[quote][b]
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
byronmfox(at)gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2014 2:49 pm Post subject: WTB: Yak-52 |
|
|
Younus, I too had a burning need for a Yak 52. For one hour, there is no finer airplane. It handles beautifully, has a great roll rate and will fly upside down all day.Â
Then 13 years ago, dear friends took me in hand and gently persuaded me that the Nanchang CJ-6A was, well, just superior. First it's built for a grown man, and not just "140 lb.,18 year old boys," to quote Sergei Boriak. Also, the CJ's flush riveted, has gear that goes away, holds 3 hours of fuel, has a baggage compartment, runs the essentially bulletproof Housai, and is faster than the Yak 52. But most important for those in the San Francisco Bay Area, there are 8 other Nanchangs to fly with. Please see www.baybombersquadron.com. Â
Be assured, however, that if indeed you decide to go over to the dark side, we will still welcome you with open arms.... and a slightly retarded throttle.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Younus Aftab <yaftab(at)gmail.com (yaftab(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | After chatting with a number of people; I am considering either buying or getting into a partnership for a 52. If somebody is selling - please let me know.
Prefer a basic flying 52 with heavy spar and mid to low time engines. Don't care other upgrades as much.
I am in the West Coast (San Francisco) - So closer is better for me.
Please send me a private email if you have any leads.
Thanks!
| Quote: |
_blank">www.aeroelectric.com
.com" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com
="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com
="_blank">www.mypilotstore.com
ank">www.mrrace.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
et="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
tp://forums.matronics.com
|
|
--
... Blitz
Byron M. Fox
80 Milland Drive
Mill Valley, CA 94941
415-307-2405
[quote][b]
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dawg
Joined: 19 May 2013
Posts: 355
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2014 4:51 pm Post subject: WTB: Yak-52 |
|
|
But make sure you read the last several months of postings. All CJ6 issues and they all want to put in the Yak engine. So if you have a 3 hr butt, and free weekends to apparently work on it, go for it. Now, if you want to fight 1v1 or something more sporting, go with the Yak. Hard aerobatics, Yak. If you want to dance in the cockpit, go CJ. If you want room to go potty in flight, probably CJ. Potty and FLUSH rivets kind of go together. If you plan on staying young and exciting, YAK. You can even carry a whopper with cheese in a Yak. If you want a whopper, cheese and a Coke, CJ. After Enough whoppers then maybe CJ or Yak 18T.
Oh to be 18 again! I don't think I was ever 140lbs?
So there you have. 8 of your new friends in the city by the bay can work on them together. San Francisco, something about that city..... Can't quite remember what they do out there? Boys? Oh never mind.
Either choice is good. For some reason the CJ is a lot more money. Must be the flushing thing.
Dawg
On Nov 18, 2014, at 7:49, Byron Fox <byronmfox(at)gmail.com (byronmfox(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
[quote]Younus, I too had a burning need for a Yak 52. For one hour, there is no finer airplane. It handles beautifully, has a great roll rate and will fly upside down all day.
Then 13 years ago, dear friends took me in hand and gently persuaded me that the Nanchang CJ-6A was, well, just superior. First it's built for a grown man, and not just "140 lb.,18 year old boys," to quote Sergei Boriak. Also, the CJ's flush riveted, has gear that goes away, holds 3 hours of fuel, has a baggage compartment, runs the essentially bulletproof Housai, and is faster than the Yak 52. But most important for those in the San Francisco Bay Area, there are 8 other Nanchangs to fly with. Please see www.baybombersquadron.com.
Be assured, however, that if indeed you decide to go over to the dark side, we will still welcome you with open arms.... and a slightly retarded throttle.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Younus Aftab <yaftab(at)gmail.com (yaftab(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | After chatting with a number of people; I am considering either buying or getting into a partnership for a 52. If somebody is selling - please let me know.
Prefer a basic flying 52 with heavy spar and mid to low time engines. Don't care other upgrades as much.
I am in the West Coast (San Francisco) - So closer is better for me.
Please send me a private email if you have any leads.
Thanks!
|
--
... Blitz
Byron M. Fox
80 Milland Drive
Mill Valley, CA 94941
415-307-2405
| Quote: |
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
ot;">www.aeroelectric.com
books.com"">www.buildersbooks.com
quot;">www.homebuilthelp.com
quot;">www.mypilotstore.com
">www.mrrace.com
ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
ist"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
//forums.matronics.com
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
|
[b]
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
_________________
Dawg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dougsappllc(at)gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2014 5:08 pm Post subject: WTB: Yak-52 |
|
|
Oh geeze, is it that time again already? Â  )
Doug
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:50 PM, bill geipel <l129bs(at)gmail.com (l129bs(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
[quote]But make sure you read the last several months of postings. All CJ6 issues and they all want to put in the Yak engine. So if you have a 3 hr butt, and free weekends to apparently work on it, go for it. Now, if you want to fight 1v1 or something more sporting, go with the Yak. Hard aerobatics, Yak. If you want to dance in the cockpit, go CJ. If you want room to go potty in flight, probably CJ. Potty and FLUSH rivets kind of go together. If you plan on staying young and exciting, YAK. You can even carry a whopper with cheese in a Yak. If you want a whopper, cheese and a Coke, CJ. After Enough whoppers then maybe CJ or Yak 18T.
Oh to be 18 again! I don't think I was ever 140lbs?
So there you have. 8 of your new friends in the city by the bay can work on them together. San Francisco, something about that city..... Can't quite remember what they do out there? Boys? Oh never mind.
Either choice is good. For some reason the CJ is a lot more money. Must be the flushing thing.
Dawg
On Nov 18, 2014, at 7:49, Byron Fox <byronmfox(at)gmail.com (byronmfox(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | Younus, I too had a burning need for a Yak 52. For one hour, there is no finer airplane. It handles beautifully, has a great roll rate and will fly upside down all day.Â
Then 13 years ago, dear friends took me in hand and gently persuaded me that the Nanchang CJ-6A was, well, just superior. First it's built for a grown man, and not just "140 lb.,18 year old boys," to quote Sergei Boriak. Also, the CJ's flush riveted, has gear that goes away, holds 3 hours of fuel, has a baggage compartment, runs the essentially bulletproof Housai, and is faster than the Yak 52. But most important for those in the San Francisco Bay Area, there are 8 other Nanchangs to fly with. Please see www.baybombersquadron.com. Â
Be assured, however, that if indeed you decide to go over to the dark side, we will still welcome you with open arms.... and a slightly retarded throttle.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Younus Aftab <yaftab(at)gmail.com (yaftab(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | After chatting with a number of people; I am considering either buying or getting into a partnership for a 52. If somebody is selling - please let me know.
Prefer a basic flying 52 with heavy spar and mid to low time engines. Don't care other upgrades as much.
I am in the West Coast (San Francisco) - So closer is better for me.
Please send me a private email if you have any leads.
Thanks!
|
--
... Blitz
Byron M. Fox
80 Milland Drive
Mill Valley, CA 94941
[url=tel:415-307-2405]415-307-2405[/url]
_blank">www.aeroelectric.com
.com" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com
="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com
="_blank">www.mypilotstore.com
ank">www.mrrace.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
et="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
tp://forums.matronics.com
|
[b]
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
byronmfox(at)gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2014 5:42 pm Post subject: WTB: Yak-52 |
|
|
I would have been so disappointed had there been no reaction. My three hour butt is not the problem. It's my two hour bladder that's the issue.
Blitz Fox415-307-2405
On Nov 17, 2014, at 5:08 PM, doug sapp <dougsappllc(at)gmail.com (dougsappllc(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
[quote]Oh geeze, is it that time again already? )
Doug
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:50 PM, bill geipel <l129bs(at)gmail.com (l129bs(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | But make sure you read the last several months of postings. All CJ6 issues and they all want to put in the Yak engine. So if you have a 3 hr butt, and free weekends to apparently work on it, go for it. Now, if you want to fight 1v1 or something more sporting, go with the Yak. Hard aerobatics, Yak. If you want to dance in the cockpit, go CJ. If you want room to go potty in flight, probably CJ. Potty and FLUSH rivets kind of go together. If you plan on staying young and exciting, YAK. You can even carry a whopper with cheese in a Yak. If you want a whopper, cheese and a Coke, CJ. After Enough whoppers then maybe CJ or Yak 18T.
Oh to be 18 again! I don't think I was ever 140lbs?
So there you have. 8 of your new friends in the city by the bay can work on them together. San Francisco, something about that city..... Can't quite remember what they do out there? Boys? Oh never mind.
Either choice is good. For some reason the CJ is a lot more money. Must be the flushing thing.
Dawg
On Nov 18, 2014, at 7:49, Byron Fox <byronmfox(at)gmail.com (byronmfox(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | Younus, I too had a burning need for a Yak 52. For one hour, there is no finer airplane. It handles beautifully, has a great roll rate and will fly upside down all day.
Then 13 years ago, dear friends took me in hand and gently persuaded me that the Nanchang CJ-6A was, well, just superior. First it's built for a grown man, and not just "140 lb.,18 year old boys," to quote Sergei Boriak. Also, the CJ's flush riveted, has gear that goes away, holds 3 hours of fuel, has a baggage compartment, runs the essentially bulletproof Housai, and is faster than the Yak 52. But most important for those in the San Francisco Bay Area, there are 8 other Nanchangs to fly with. Please see www.baybombersquadron.com.
Be assured, however, that if indeed you decide to go over to the dark side, we will still welcome you with open arms.... and a slightly retarded throttle.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Younus Aftab <yaftab(at)gmail.com (yaftab(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | After chatting with a number of people; I am considering either buying or getting into a partnership for a 52. If somebody is selling - please let me know.
Prefer a basic flying 52 with heavy spar and mid to low time engines. Don't care other upgrades as much.
I am in the West Coast (San Francisco) - So closer is better for me.
Please send me a private email if you have any leads.
Thanks!
|
--
... Blitz
Byron M. Fox
80 Milland Drive
Mill Valley, CA 94941
[url=tel:415-307-2405]415-307-2405[/url]
_blank">www.aeroelectric.com
.com" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com
="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com
="_blank">www.mypilotstore.com
ank">www.mrrace.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
et="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
tp://forums.matronics.com
|
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
ot;">www.aeroelectric.com
books.com"">www.buildersbooks.com
quot;">www.homebuilthelp.com
quot;">www.mypilotstore.com
">www.mrrace.com
ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
ist"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
//forums.matronics.com
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
|
[b]
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dawg
Joined: 19 May 2013
Posts: 355
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2014 6:03 pm Post subject: WTB: Yak-52 |
|
|
i can relate
On Nov 17, 2014, at 6:42 PM, Byron Fox <byronmfox(at)gmail.com (byronmfox(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | I would have been so disappointed had there been no reaction. My three hour butt is not the problem. It's my two hour bladder that's the issue.
Blitz Fox415-307-2405
On Nov 17, 2014, at 5:08 PM, doug sapp <dougsappllc(at)gmail.com (dougsappllc(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | Oh geeze, is it that time again already? )
Doug
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:50 PM, bill geipel <l129bs(at)gmail.com (l129bs(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | But make sure you read the last several months of postings. All CJ6 issues and they all want to put in the Yak engine. So if you have a 3 hr butt, and free weekends to apparently work on it, go for it. Now, if you want to fight 1v1 or something more sporting, go with the Yak. Hard aerobatics, Yak. If you want to dance in the cockpit, go CJ. If you want room to go potty in flight, probably CJ. Potty and FLUSH rivets kind of go together. If you plan on staying young and exciting, YAK. You can even carry a whopper with cheese in a Yak. If you want a whopper, cheese and a Coke, CJ. After Enough whoppers then maybe CJ or Yak 18T.
Oh to be 18 again! I don't think I was ever 140lbs?
So there you have. 8 of your new friends in the city by the bay can work on them together. San Francisco, something about that city..... Can't quite remember what they do out there? Boys? Oh never mind.
Either choice is good. For some reason the CJ is a lot more money. Must be the flushing thing.
Dawg
On Nov 18, 2014, at 7:49, Byron Fox <byronmfox(at)gmail.com (byronmfox(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | Younus, I too had a burning need for a Yak 52. For one hour, there is no finer airplane. It handles beautifully, has a great roll rate and will fly upside down all day.
Then 13 years ago, dear friends took me in hand and gently persuaded me that the Nanchang CJ-6A was, well, just superior. First it's built for a grown man, and not just "140 lb.,18 year old boys," to quote Sergei Boriak. Also, the CJ's flush riveted, has gear that goes away, holds 3 hours of fuel, has a baggage compartment, runs the essentially bulletproof Housai, and is faster than the Yak 52. But most important for those in the San Francisco Bay Area, there are 8 other Nanchangs to fly with. Please see www.baybombersquadron.com.
Be assured, however, that if indeed you decide to go over to the dark side, we will still welcome you with open arms.... and a slightly retarded throttle.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Younus Aftab <yaftab(at)gmail.com (yaftab(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | After chatting with a number of people; I am considering either buying or getting into a partnership for a 52. If somebody is selling - please let me know.
Prefer a basic flying 52 with heavy spar and mid to low time engines. Don't care other upgrades as much.
I am in the West Coast (San Francisco) - So closer is better for me.
Please send me a private email if you have any leads.
Thanks!
|
--
... Blitz
Byron M. Fox
80 Milland Drive
Mill Valley, CA 94941
[url=tel:415-307-2405]415-307-2405[/url]
_blank">www.aeroelectric.com
.com" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com
="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com
="_blank">www.mypilotstore.com
ank">www.mrrace.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
et="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
tp://forums.matronics.com
|
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
ot;">www.aeroelectric.com
books.com"">www.buildersbooks.com
quot;">www.homebuilthelp.com
quot;">www.mypilotstore.com
">www.mrrace.com
ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
ist"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
//forums.matronics.com
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
|
href="http://www.aeroelectric.com/">www.aeroelectric.com
href="http://www.buildersbooks.com/">www.buildersbooks.com
href="http://www.homebuilthelp.com/">www.homebuilthelp.com
href="http://www.mypilotstore.com/">www.mypilotstore.com
href="http://www.mrrace.com/">www.mrrace.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
href="http://forums.matronics.com/">http://forums.matronics.com
|
|
[quote][b]
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
_________________
Dawg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Viperdoc
Joined: 19 Apr 2014
Posts: 484
Location: 08A
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2014 6:46 pm Post subject: WTB: Yak-52 |
|
|
Only to be exceeded by 101 uses for MMO!
Doc
Sent from my iPad
On Nov 17, 2014, at 7:08 PM, doug sapp <dougsappllc(at)gmail.com (dougsappllc(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
[quote]Oh geeze, is it that time again already? )
Doug
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:50 PM, bill geipel <l129bs(at)gmail.com (l129bs(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | But make sure you read the last several months of postings. All CJ6 issues and they all want to put in the Yak engine. So if you have a 3 hr butt, and free weekends to apparently work on it, go for it. Now, if you want to fight 1v1 or something more sporting, go with the Yak. Hard aerobatics, Yak. If you want to dance in the cockpit, go CJ. If you want room to go potty in flight, probably CJ. Potty and FLUSH rivets kind of go together. If you plan on staying young and exciting, YAK. You can even carry a whopper with cheese in a Yak. If you want a whopper, cheese and a Coke, CJ. After Enough whoppers then maybe CJ or Yak 18T.
Oh to be 18 again! I don't think I was ever 140lbs?
So there you have. 8 of your new friends in the city by the bay can work on them together. San Francisco, something about that city..... Can't quite remember what they do out there? Boys? Oh never mind.
Either choice is good. For some reason the CJ is a lot more money. Must be the flushing thing.
Dawg
On Nov 18, 2014, at 7:49, Byron Fox <byronmfox(at)gmail.com (byronmfox(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | Younus, I too had a burning need for a Yak 52. For one hour, there is no finer airplane. It handles beautifully, has a great roll rate and will fly upside down all day.
Then 13 years ago, dear friends took me in hand and gently persuaded me that the Nanchang CJ-6A was, well, just superior. First it's built for a grown man, and not just "140 lb.,18 year old boys," to quote Sergei Boriak. Also, the CJ's flush riveted, has gear that goes away, holds 3 hours of fuel, has a baggage compartment, runs the essentially bulletproof Housai, and is faster than the Yak 52. But most important for those in the San Francisco Bay Area, there are 8 other Nanchangs to fly with. Please see www.baybombersquadron.com.
Be assured, however, that if indeed you decide to go over to the dark side, we will still welcome you with open arms... and a slightly retarded throttle.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Younus Aftab <yaftab(at)gmail.com (yaftab(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | After chatting with a number of people; I am considering either buying or getting into a partnership for a 52. If somebody is selling - please let me know.
Prefer a basic flying 52 with heavy spar and mid to low time engines. Don't care other upgrades as much.
I am in the West Coast (San Francisco) - So closer is better for me.
Please send me a private email if you have any leads.
Thanks!
|
--
... Blitz
Byron M. Fox
80 Milland Drive
Mill Valley, CA 94941
[url=tel:415-307-2405]415-307-2405[/url]
_blank">www.aeroelectric.com
.com" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com
="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com
="_blank">www.mypilotstore.com
ank">www.mrrace.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
et="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
tp://forums.matronics.com
|
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
ot;">www.aeroelectric.com
books.com"">www.buildersbooks.com
quot;">www.homebuilthelp.com
quot;">www.mypilotstore.com
">www.mrrace.com
ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
ist"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
//forums.matronics.com
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
|
[b]
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
_________________
Viperdoc |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Viperdoc
Joined: 19 Apr 2014
Posts: 484
Location: 08A
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2014 6:49 pm Post subject: WTB: Yak-52 |
|
|
Good choice Younus.
Doc
Sent from my iPad
On Nov 17, 2014, at 3:44 PM, Younus Aftab <yaftab(at)gmail.com (yaftab(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
[quote]After chatting with a number of people; I am considering either buying or getting into a partnership for a 52. If somebody is selling - please let me know.
Prefer a basic flying 52 with heavy spar and mid to low time engines. Don't care other upgrades as much.
I am in the West Coast (San Francisco) - So closer is better for me.
Please send me a private email if you have any leads.
Thanks!
[b]
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
_________________
Viperdoc |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Viperdoc
Joined: 19 Apr 2014
Posts: 484
Location: 08A
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2014 6:55 pm Post subject: WTB: Yak-52 |
|
|
Blitz,
TMI Dude..." Friends took me in hand and gently persuaded..."
Just saying...😱
Doc
Sent from my iPad
On Nov 17, 2014, at 6:50 PM, bill geipel <l129bs(at)gmail.com (l129bs(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
[quote]But make sure you read the last several months of postings. All CJ6 issues and they all want to put in the Yak engine. So if you have a 3 hr butt, and free weekends to apparently work on it, go for it. Now, if you want to fight 1v1 or something more sporting, go with the Yak. Hard aerobatics, Yak. If you want to dance in the cockpit, go CJ. If you want room to go potty in flight, probably CJ. Potty and FLUSH rivets kind of go together. If you plan on staying young and exciting, YAK. You can even carry a whopper with cheese in a Yak. If you want a whopper, cheese and a Coke, CJ. After Enough whoppers then maybe CJ or Yak 18T.
Oh to be 18 again! I don't think I was ever 140lbs?
So there you have. 8 of your new friends in the city by the bay can work on them together. San Francisco, something about that city..... Can't quite remember what they do out there? Boys? Oh never mind.
Either choice is good. For some reason the CJ is a lot more money. Must be the flushing thing.
Dawg
On Nov 18, 2014, at 7:49, Byron Fox <byronmfox(at)gmail.com (byronmfox(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | Younus, I too had a burning need for a Yak 52. For one hour, there is no finer airplane. It handles beautifully, has a great roll rate and will fly upside down all day.
Then 13 years ago, dear friends took me in hand and gently persuaded me that the Nanchang CJ-6A was, well, just superior. First it's built for a grown man, and not just "140 lb.,18 year old boys," to quote Sergei Boriak. Also, the CJ's flush riveted, has gear that goes away, holds 3 hours of fuel, has a baggage compartment, runs the essentially bulletproof Housai, and is faster than the Yak 52. But most important for those in the San Francisco Bay Area, there are 8 other Nanchangs to fly with. Please see www.baybombersquadron.com.
Be assured, however, that if indeed you decide to go over to the dark side, we will still welcome you with open arms.... and a slightly retarded throttle.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Younus Aftab <yaftab(at)gmail.com (yaftab(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | After chatting with a number of people; I am considering either buying or getting into a partnership for a 52. If somebody is selling - please let me know.
Prefer a basic flying 52 with heavy spar and mid to low time engines. Don't care other upgrades as much.
I am in the West Coast (San Francisco) - So closer is better for me.
Please send me a private email if you have any leads.
Thanks!
|
--
... Blitz
Byron M. Fox
80 Milland Drive
Mill Valley, CA 94941
415-307-2405
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
ot;">www.aeroelectric.com
books.com"">www.buildersbooks.com
quot;">www.homebuilthelp.com
quot;">www.mypilotstore.com
">www.mrrace.com
ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
ist"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
//forums.matronics.com
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
|
[b]
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
_________________
Viperdoc |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
markdavis(at)wbsnet.org
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2014 7:58 pm Post subject: WTB: Yak-52 |
|
|
Blitz,
    Do I see a future Depends commercial coming in Red Alert? : ) Maybe they could be signed up for a corporate sponsor!
Mark Davis
N44YK
From: owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Byron Fox
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 6:42 PM
To: yak-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: WTB: Yak-52
I would have been so disappointed had there been no reaction. My three hour butt is not the problem. It's my two hour bladder that's the issue.
Blitz Fox
415-307-2405
On Nov 17, 2014, at 5:08 PM, doug sapp <dougsappllc(at)gmail.com (dougsappllc(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: |
Oh geeze, is it that time again already? )
Doug
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:50 PM, bill geipel <l129bs(at)gmail.com (l129bs(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
But make sure you read the last several months of postings. All CJ6 issues and they all want to put in the Yak engine. So if you have a 3 hr butt, and free weekends to apparently work on it, go for it. Now, if you want to fight 1v1 or something more sporting, go with the Yak. Hard aerobatics, Yak. If you want to dance in the cockpit, go CJ. If you want room to go potty in flight, probably CJ. Potty and FLUSH rivets kind of go together. If you plan on staying young and exciting, YAK. You can even carry a whopper with cheese in a Yak. If you want a whopper, cheese and a Coke, CJ. After Enough whoppers then maybe CJ or Yak 18T.
Oh to be 18 again! I don't think I was ever 140lbs?
So there you have. 8 of your new friends in the city by the bay can work on them together. San Francisco, something about that city..... Can't quite remember what they do out there? Boys? Oh never mind.
Either choice is good. For some reason the CJ is a lot more money. Must be the flushing thing.
Dawg
On Nov 18, 2014, at 7:49, Byron Fox <byronmfox(at)gmail.com (byronmfox(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: |
Younus, I too had a burning need for a Yak 52. For one hour, there is no finer airplane. It handles beautifully, has a great roll rate and will fly upside down all day.
Then 13 years ago, dear friends took me in hand and gently persuaded me that the Nanchang CJ-6A was, well, just superior. First it's built for a grown man, and not just "140 lb.,18 year old boys," to quote Sergei Boriak. Also, the CJ's flush riveted, has gear that goes away, holds 3 hours of fuel, has a baggage compartment, runs the essentially bulletproof Housai, and is faster than the Yak 52. But most important for those in the San Francisco Bay Area, there are 8 other Nanchangs to fly with. Please see www.baybombersquadron.com.
Be assured, however, that if indeed you decide to go over to the dark side, we will still welcome you with open arms.... and a slightly retarded throttle.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Younus Aftab <yaftab(at)gmail.com (yaftab(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
After chatting with a number of people; I am considering either buying or getting into a partnership for a 52. If somebody is selling - please let me know.
Prefer a basic flying 52 with heavy spar and mid to low time engines. Don't care other upgrades as much.
I am in the West Coast (San Francisco) - So closer is better for me.
Please send me a private email if you have any leads.
Thanks!
0
--
... Blitz
Byron M. Fox
80 Milland Drive
Mill Valley, CA 94941
[url=tel:415-307-2405]415-307-2405[/url]
123456789012345
_blank">www.aeroelectric.com |
67890123456
789012345678901
="_blank">www.mypilotstore.com |
23456789012345678901234567890
[quote][b]
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
byronmfox(at)gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2014 8:31 pm Post subject: WTB: Yak-52 |
|
|
I think the folks at On The Go have a better idea, Mark. Tidier than Depends
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KingCJ6(at)aol.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2014 9:31 pm Post subject: WTB: Yak-52 |
|
|
TMI!
In a message dated 11/17/2014 8:31:31 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, byronmfox(at)gmail.com writes:
| Quote: | I think the folks at On The Go have a better idea, Mark. Tidier than Depends.
http://www.oneonthego.com
Blitz Fox 415-307-2405
On Nov 17, 2014, at 7:59 PM, Mark Davis <markdavis(at)wbsnet.org (markdavis(at)wbsnet.org)> wrote:
| Quote: |
Blitz,
Do I see a future Depends commercial coming in Red Alert? : ) Maybe they could be signed up for a corporate sponsor!
Mark Davis
N44YK
From: owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com) [mailto:owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com)] On Behalf Of Byron Fox
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 6:42 PM
To: yak-list(at)matronics.com (yak-list(at)matronics.com)
Subject: Re: WTB: Yak-52
I would have been so disappointed had there been no reaction. My three hour butt is not the problem. It's my two hour bladder that's the issue.
Blitz Fox
415-307-2405
On Nov 17, 2014, at 5:08 PM, doug sapp <dougsappllc(at)gmail.com (dougsappllc(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: |
Oh geeze, is it that time again already? )
Doug
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:50 PM, bill geipel <l129bs(at)gmail.com (l129bs(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
But make sure you read the last several months of postings. All CJ6 issues and they all want to put in the Yak engine. So if you have a 3 hr butt, and free weekends to apparently work on it, go for it. Now, if you want to fight 1v1 or something more sporting, go with the Yak. Hard aerobatics, Yak. If you want to dance in the cockpit, go CJ. If you want room to go potty in flight, probably CJ. Potty and FLUSH rivets kind of go together. If you plan on staying young and exciting, YAK. You can even carry a whopper with cheese in a Yak. If you want a whopper, cheese and a Coke, CJ. After Enough whoppers then maybe CJ or Yak 18T.
Oh to be 18 again! I don't think I was ever 140lbs?
So there you have. 8 of your new friends in the city by the bay can work on them together. San Francisco, something about that city..... Can't quite remember what they do out there? Boys? Oh never mind.
Either choice is good. For some reason the CJ is a lot more money. Must be the flushing thing.
Dawg
On Nov 18, 2014, at 7:49, Byron Fox <byronmfox(at)gmail.com (byronmfox(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: |
Younus, I too had a burning need for a Yak 52. For one hour, there is no finer airplane. It handles beautifully, has a great roll rate and will fly upside down all day.
Then 13 years ago, dear friends took me in hand and gently persuaded me that the Nanchang CJ-6A was, well, just superior. First it's built for a grown man, and not just "140 lb.,18 year old boys," to quote Sergei Boriak. Also, the CJ's flush riveted, has gear that goes away, holds 3 hours of fuel, has a baggage compartment, runs the essentially bulletproof Housai, and is faster than the Yak 52. But most important for those in the San Francisco Bay Area, there are 8 other Nanchangs to fly with. Please see www.baybombersquadron.com.
Be assured, however, that if indeed you decide to go over to the dark side, we will still welcome you with open arms.... and a slightly retarded throttle.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Younus Aftab <yaftab(at)gmail.com (yaftab(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
After chatting with a number of people; I am considering either buying or getting into a partnership for a 52. If somebody is selling - please let me know.
Prefer a basic flying 52 with heavy spar and mid to low time engines. Don't care other upgrades as much.
I am in the West Coast (San Francisco) - So closer is better for me.
Please send me a private email if you have any leads.
Thanks!
0
--
... Blitz
Byron M. Fox
80 Milland Drive
Mill Valley, CA 94941
[url=tel:415-307-2405]415-307-2405[/url]
123456789012345
_blank">www.aeroelectric.com |
67890123456
789012345678901
="_blank">www.mypilotstore.com |
23456789012345678901234567890
1
et="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
2 |
[quote][b]
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cjpilot710(at)aol.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 4:50 am Post subject: WTB: Yak-52 |
|
|
Amen to that. Â OF (old fart).
Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Byron Fox <byronmfox(at)gmail.com> </div><div>Date:11/17/2014 20:42 (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: yak-list(at)matronics.com </div><div>Subject: Re: Yak-List: WTB: Yak-52 </div><div>
</div>I would have been so disappointed had there been no reaction. My three hour butt is not the problem. It's my two hour bladder that's the issue.
Blitz Fox
415-307-2405
On Nov 17, 2014, at 5:08 PM, doug sapp <dougsappllc(at)gmail.com> wrote:
Oh geeze, is it that time again already? )
Doug
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:50 PM, bill geipel <l129bs(at)gmail.com> wrote:
But make sure you read the last several months of postings. All CJ6 issues and they all want to put in the Yak engine. So if you have a 3 hr butt, and free weekends to apparently work on it, go for it. Now, if you want to fight 1v1 or something more sporting, go with the Yak. Hard aerobatics, Yak. If you want to dance in the cockpit, go CJ. If you want room to go potty in flight, probably CJ. Potty and FLUSH rivets kind of go together. If you plan on staying young and exciting, YAK. You can even carry a whopper with cheese in a Yak. If you want a whopper, cheese and a Coke, CJ. After Enough whoppers then maybe CJ or Yak 18T.
Oh to be 18 again! I don't think I was ever 140lbs?
So there you have. 8 of your new friends in the city by the bay can work on them together. San Francisco, something about that city..... Can't quite remember what they do out there? Boys? Oh never mind.
Either choice is good. For some reason the CJ is a lot more money. Must be the flushing thing.
Dawg
On Nov 18, 2014, at 7:49, Byron Fox <byronmfox(at)gmail.com> wrote:
Younus, I too had a burning need for a Yak 52. For one hour, there is no finer airplane. It handles beautifully, has a great roll rate and will fly upside down all day.
Then 13 years ago, dear friends took me in hand and gently persuaded me that the Nanchang CJ-6A was, well, just superior. First it's built for a grown man, and not just "140 lb.,18 year old boys," to quote Sergei Boriak. Also, the CJ's flush riveted, has gear that goes away, holds 3 hours of fuel, has a baggage compartment, runs the essentially bulletproof Housai, and is faster than the Yak 52. But most important for those in the San Francisco Bay Area, there are 8 other Nanchangs to fly with. Please see www.baybombersquadron.com.
Be assured, however, that if indeed you decide to go over to the dark side, we will still welcome you with open arms.... and a slightly retarded throttle.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Younus Aftab <yaftab(at)gmail.com> wrote:
After chatting with a number of people; I am considering either buying or getting into a partnership for a 52. If somebody is selling - please let me know.
Prefer a basic flying 52 with heavy spar and mid to low time engines. Don't care other upgrades as much.
I am in the West Coast (San Francisco) - So closer is better for me.
Please send me a private email if you have any leads.
Thanks!
_blank">www.aeroelectric.com
.com" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com
="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com
="_blank">www.mypilotstore.com
ank">www.mrrace.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
et="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
tp://forums.matronics.com
--
... Blitz
Byron M. Fox
80 Milland Drive
Mill Valley, CA 94941
415-307-2405
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
ot;">www.aeroelectric.com
books.com"">www.buildersbooks.com
quot;">www.homebuilthelp.com
quot;">www.mypilotstore.com
">www.mrrace.com
ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
ist"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
//forums.matronics.com
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
_blank">www.aeroelectric.com
.com" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com
="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com
="_blank">www.mypilotstore.com
ank">www.mrrace.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
et="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
tp://forums.matronics.com
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
ot;">www.aeroelectric.com
books.com"">www.buildersbooks.com
quot;">www.homebuilthelp.com
quot;">www.mypilotstore.com
">www.mrrace.com
ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
ist"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
//forums.matronics.com
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wdjester(at)cox.net
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:19 am Post subject: WTB: Yak-52 |
|
|
 Good Stuff! Needed a laugh…
On Nov 17, 2014, at 7:42 PM, Byron Fox <byronmfox(at)gmail.com (byronmfox(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | I would have been so disappointed had there been no reaction. My three hour butt is not the problem. It's my two hour bladder that's the issue.
Blitz Fox415-307-2405
On Nov 17, 2014, at 5:08 PM, doug sapp <dougsappllc(at)gmail.com (dougsappllc(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | Oh geeze, is it that time again already? )
Doug
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:50 PM, bill geipel <l129bs(at)gmail.com (l129bs(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | But make sure you read the last several months of postings. All CJ6 issues and they all want to put in the Yak engine. So if you have a 3 hr butt, and free weekends to apparently work on it, go for it. Now, if you want to fight 1v1 or something more sporting, go with the Yak. Hard aerobatics, Yak. If you want to dance in the cockpit, go CJ. If you want room to go potty in flight, probably CJ. Potty and FLUSH rivets kind of go together. If you plan on staying young and exciting, YAK. You can even carry a whopper with cheese in a Yak. If you want a whopper, cheese and a Coke, CJ. After Enough whoppers then maybe CJ or Yak 18T.
Oh to be 18 again! I don't think I was ever 140lbs?
So there you have. 8 of your new friends in the city by the bay can work on them together. San Francisco, something about that city..... Can't quite remember what they do out there? Boys? Oh never mind.
Either choice is good. For some reason the CJ is a lot more money. Must be the flushing thing.
Dawg
On Nov 18, 2014, at 7:49, Byron Fox <byronmfox(at)gmail.com (byronmfox(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | Younus, I too had a burning need for a Yak 52. For one hour, there is no finer airplane. It handles beautifully, has a great roll rate and will fly upside down all day.
Then 13 years ago, dear friends took me in hand and gently persuaded me that the Nanchang CJ-6A was, well, just superior. First it's built for a grown man, and not just "140 lb.,18 year old boys," to quote Sergei Boriak. Also, the CJ's flush riveted, has gear that goes away, holds 3 hours of fuel, has a baggage compartment, runs the essentially bulletproof Housai, and is faster than the Yak 52. But most important for those in the San Francisco Bay Area, there are 8 other Nanchangs to fly with. Please see www.baybombersquadron.com.
Be assured, however, that if indeed you decide to go over to the dark side, we will still welcome you with open arms.... and a slightly retarded throttle.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Younus Aftab <yaftab(at)gmail.com (yaftab(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | After chatting with a number of people; I am considering either buying or getting into a partnership for a 52. If somebody is selling - please let me know.
Prefer a basic flying 52 with heavy spar and mid to low time engines. Don't care other upgrades as much.
I am in the West Coast (San Francisco) - So closer is better for me.
Please send me a private email if you have any leads.
Thanks!
|
--
... Blitz
Byron M. Fox
80 Milland Drive
Mill Valley, CA 94941
[url=tel:415-307-2405]415-307-2405[/url]
_blank">www.aeroelectric.com
.com" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com
="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com
="_blank">www.mypilotstore.com
ank">www.mrrace.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
et="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
tp://forums.matronics.com
|
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
ot;">www.aeroelectric.com
books.com"">www.buildersbooks.com
quot;">www.homebuilthelp.com
quot;">www.mypilotstore.com
">www.mrrace.com
ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
ist"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
//forums.matronics.com
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
|
href="http://www.aeroelectric.com/">www.aeroelectric.com
href="http://www.buildersbooks.com/">www.buildersbooks.com
href="http://www.homebuilthelp.com/">www.homebuilthelp.com
href="http://www.mypilotstore.com/">www.mypilotstore.com
href="http://www.mrrace.com/">www.mrrace.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
href="http://forums.matronics.com/">http://forums.matronics.com
|
|
[quote][b]
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
clouddog22(at)gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 2:20 pm Post subject: WTB: Yak-52 |
|
|
We all think we have bought the better of the two. Make a spreadsheet of the pros and con's of each especially when you find a couple of aircraft you are interested in. Here are a few ideas on the yak52 and CJ. The YAK has the M14P which has more power for HARD aerobatics but it also burns a lot more fuel when you are on a cross country and you will be slower than a CJ. Operating costs go up for this reason. The CJ is a lot more accessible when working on it. Especially the avionics bay and working within the larger cockpit areas and you do not have to tear floorboards out on the CJ, it has access panels on the belly! The YAKs are generally speaking cheaper to buy, Parts are available for both. The CJ has a better look with the wing design and gears in the well look (only a personal Opinion). Do not go by price alone. There is a reason the CJ cost a little more. Could be in the long run it is more desirable of the two!! I have to disagree with the amount of problems that show up on the forum. I have to say a lot more guys are needing help with the YAKs! If HARD aerobatics is NOT your thing then why wouldn't you want an almost bulletproof Housai cheaper gas costs and easier maintenance access. If you need or want the M14P you can always add it to the excellent features of the CJ. Happy Hunting,.....
On Nov 17, 2014 3:47 PM, "Younus Aftab" <yaftab(at)gmail.com (yaftab(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
>
> After chatting with a number of people; I am considering either buying or getting into a partnership for a 52. If somebody is selling - please let me know.
>
> Prefer a basic flying 52 with heavy spar and mid to low time engines. Don't care other upgrades as much.
>
> I am in the West Coast (San Francisco) - So closer is better for me.
>
> Please send me a private email if you have any leads.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
=============
This Month --
Get Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!)
on
r> ed
oelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com
"http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com
mebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com
ypilotstore.com">www.mypilotstore.com
mrrace.com">www.mrrace.com
ion">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
                  -Matt Dralle, List Admin.
=============
List Email Forum -
?Yak-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
=============
   - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
//forums.matronics.com
=============
>
[quote][b]
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
scdawson(at)gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 4:14 pm Post subject: WTB: Yak-52 |
|
|
The thing that would swing it for me would be the community. You've gotten an invitation to the CJ guys in the Bay Area. Set up a visit, but them some gas and go flying.
Based on my (limited) experience, it seems like certain areas have a preponderance of certain types. In LA, the CJs dominate. In San Diego, it's the Yaks for some reason. That's probably the case elsewhere in the country also.
You don't buy this type of airplane to fly by yourself, or to go on extended cross countries. You get into it to do interesting thing a with other pilots. Because of that, the minor paper differences between Yak or CJ are, IMO, immaterial. You are joining a community, so I would make that my focus if I were you. Which one has the bed representation in your area, of guys that you ole to be around?
That being said, I've heard that Yak pilots have larger sex organs as a general rule, so maybe that's the way to make the call...
Shaun
On Tuesday, November 18, 2014, Greg Wrobel <clouddog22(at)gmail.com (clouddog22(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
[quote]
We all think we have bought the better of the two. Make a spreadsheet of the pros and con's of each especially when you find a couple of aircraft you are interested in. Here are a few ideas on the yak52 and CJ. The YAK has the M14P which has more power for HARD aerobatics but it also burns a lot more fuel when you are on a cross country and you will be slower than a CJ. Operating costs go up for this reason. The CJ is a lot more accessible when working on it. Especially the avionics bay and working within the larger cockpit areas and you do not have to tear floorboards out on the CJ, it has access panels on the belly! The YAKs are generally speaking cheaper to buy, Parts are available for both. The CJ has a better look with the wing design and gears in the well look (only a personal Opinion). Do not go by price alone. There is a reason the CJ cost a little more. Could be in the long run it is more desirable of the two!! I have to disagree with the amount of problems that show up on the forum. I have to say a lot more guys are needing help with the YAKs! If HARD aerobatics is NOT your thing then why wouldn't you want an almost bulletproof Housai cheaper gas costs and easier maintenance access. If you need or want the M14P you can always add it to the excellent features of the CJ. Happy Hunting,.....
On Nov 17, 2014 3:47 PM, "Younus Aftab" <[url=javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','yaftab(at)gmail.com');]yaftab(at)gmail.com[/url]> wrote:
>
> After chatting with a number of people; I am considering either buying or getting into a partnership for a 52. If somebody is selling - please let me know.
>
> Prefer a basic flying 52 with heavy spar and mid to low time engines. Don't care other upgrades as much.
>
> I am in the West Coast (San Francisco) - So closer is better for me.
>
> Please send me a private email if you have any leads.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
=============
This Month --
Get Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!)
on
r> ed
oelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com
"http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com
mebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com
ypilotstore.com">www.mypilotstore.com
mrrace.com">www.mrrace.com
ion">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â -Matt Dralle, List Admin.
=============
List Email Forum -
?Yak-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
=============
 Â Â Â - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
//forums.matronics.com
=============
>
| Quote: |
_blank">www.aeroelectric.com
.com" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com
="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com
="_blank">www.mypilotstore.com
ank">www.mrrace.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
et="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
tp://forums.matronics.com
|
[b]
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
byronmfox(at)gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 5:18 pm Post subject: WTB: Yak-52 |
|
|
Well said, Shaun. Going away, I mostly enough the fraternal nature of the group.
Regarding your final observation, sad to say, the San Diego group is tragically unendowed.
Blitz Fox415-307-2405
On Nov 18, 2014, at 4:13 PM, Shaun Dawson <scdawson(at)gmail.com (scdawson(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
[quote]The thing that would swing it for me would be the community. You've gotten an invitation to the CJ guys in the Bay Area. Set up a visit, but them some gas and go flying.
Based on my (limited) experience, it seems like certain areas have a preponderance of certain types. In LA, the CJs dominate. In San Diego, it's the Yaks for some reason. That's probably the case elsewhere in the country also.
You don't buy this type of airplane to fly by yourself, or to go on extended cross countries. You get into it to do interesting thing a with other pilots. Because of that, the minor paper differences between Yak or CJ are, IMO, immaterial. You are joining a community, so I would make that my focus if I were you. Which one has the bed representation in your area, of guys that you ole to be around?
That being said, I've heard that Yak pilots have larger sex organs as a general rule, so maybe that's the way to make the call...
Shaun
On Tuesday, November 18, 2014, Greg Wrobel <clouddog22(at)gmail.com (clouddog22(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: |
We all think we have bought the better of the two. Make a spreadsheet of the pros and con's of each especially when you find a couple of aircraft you are interested in. Here are a few ideas on the yak52 and CJ. The YAK has the M14P which has more power for HARD aerobatics but it also burns a lot more fuel when you are on a cross country and you will be slower than a CJ. Operating costs go up for this reason. The CJ is a lot more accessible when working on it. Especially the avionics bay and working within the larger cockpit areas and you do not have to tear floorboards out on the CJ, it has access panels on the belly! The YAKs are generally speaking cheaper to buy, Parts are available for both. The CJ has a better look with the wing design and gears in the well look (only a personal Opinion). Do not go by price alone. There is a reason the CJ cost a little more. Could be in the long run it is more desirable of the two!! I have to disagree with the amount of problems that show up on the forum. I have to say a lot more guys are needing help with the YAKs! If HARD aerobatics is NOT your thing then why wouldn't you want an almost bulletproof Housai cheaper gas costs and easier maintenance access. If you need or want the M14P you can always add it to the excellent features of the CJ. Happy Hunting,.....
On Nov 17, 2014 3:47 PM, "Younus Aftab" <[url=javascript:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'yaftab(at)gmail.com\');]yaftab(at)gmail.com[/url]> wrote:
>
> After chatting with a number of people; I am considering either buying or getting into a partnership for a 52. If somebody is selling - please let me know.
>
> Prefer a basic flying 52 with heavy spar and mid to low time engines. Don't care other upgrades as much.
>
> I am in the West Coast (San Francisco) - So closer is better for me.
>
> Please send me a private email if you have any leads.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
=============
This Month --
Get Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!)
on
r> ed
oelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com
"http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com
mebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com
ypilotstore.com">www.mypilotstore.com
mrrace.com">www.mrrace.com
ion">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
                  -Matt Dralle, List Admin.
=============
List Email Forum -
?Yak-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
=============
   - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
//forums.matronics.com
=============
>
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
ot;">www.aeroelectric.com
books.com"">www.buildersbooks.com
quot;">www.homebuilthelp.com
quot;">www.mypilotstore.com
">www.mrrace.com
ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
ist"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
//forums.matronics.com
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
|
[b]
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
scdawson(at)gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 5:24 pm Post subject: WTB: Yak-52 |
|
|
I wouldn't even try to argue, given your no-doubt exhaustive experience. Â
On Tuesday, November 18, 2014, Byron Fox <byronmfox(at)gmail.com (byronmfox(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
[quote]Well said, Shaun. Going away, I mostly enough the fraternal nature of the group.
Regarding your final observation, sad to say, the San Diego group is tragically unendowed.Â
Blitz Fox415-307-2405
On Nov 18, 2014, at 4:13 PM, Shaun Dawson <[url=javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','scdawson(at)gmail.com');]scdawson(at)gmail.com[/url]> wrote:
| Quote: | The thing that would swing it for me would be the community. You've gotten an invitation to the CJ guys in the Bay Area. Set up a visit, but them some gas and go flying.
Based on my (limited) experience, it seems like certain areas have a preponderance of certain types. In LA, the CJs dominate. In San Diego, it's the Yaks for some reason. That's probably the case elsewhere in the country also.
You don't buy this type of airplane to fly by yourself, or to go on extended cross countries. You get into it to do interesting thing a with other pilots. Because of that, the minor paper differences between Yak or CJ are, IMO, immaterial. You are joining a community, so I would make that my focus if I were you. Which one has the bed representation in your area, of guys that you ole to be around?
That being said, I've heard that Yak pilots have larger sex organs as a general rule, so maybe that's the way to make the call...
Shaun
On Tuesday, November 18, 2014, Greg Wrobel <[url=javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','clouddog22(at)gmail.com');]clouddog22(at)gmail.com[/url]> wrote:
| Quote: |
We all think we have bought the better of the two. Make a spreadsheet of the pros and con's of each especially when you find a couple of aircraft you are interested in. Here are a few ideas on the yak52 and CJ. The YAK has the M14P which has more power for HARD aerobatics but it also burns a lot more fuel when you are on a cross country and you will be slower than a CJ. Operating costs go up for this reason. The CJ is a lot more accessible when working on it. Especially the avionics bay and working within the larger cockpit areas and you do not have to tear floorboards out on the CJ, it has access panels on the belly! The YAKs are generally speaking cheaper to buy, Parts are available for both. The CJ has a better look with the wing design and gears in the well look (only a personal Opinion). Do not go by price alone. There is a reason the CJ cost a little more. Could be in the long run it is more desirable of the two!! I have to disagree with the amount of problems that show up on the forum. I have to say a lot more guys are needing help with the YAKs! If HARD aerobatics is NOT your thing then why wouldn't you want an almost bulletproof Housai cheaper gas costs and easier maintenance access. If you need or want the M14P you can always add it to the excellent features of the CJ. Happy Hunting,.....
On Nov 17, 2014 3:47 PM, "Younus Aftab" <yaftab(at)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> After chatting with a number of people; I am considering either buying or getting into a partnership for a 52. If somebody is selling - please let me know.
>
> Prefer a basic flying 52 with heavy spar and mid to low time engines. Don't care other upgrades as much.
>
> I am in the West Coast (San Francisco) - So closer is better for me.
>
> Please send me a private email if you have any leads.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
=============
This Month --
Get Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!)
on
r> ed
oelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com
"http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com
mebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com
ypilotstore.com">www.mypilotstore.com
mrrace.com">www.mrrace.com
ion">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â -Matt Dralle, List Admin.
=============
List Email Forum -
?Yak-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
=============
 Â Â Â - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
//forums.matronics.com
=============
>
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
ot;">www.aeroelectric.com
books.com"">www.buildersbooks.com
quot;">www.homebuilthelp.com
quot;">www.mypilotstore.com
">www.mrrace.com
ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
ist"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
//forums.matronics.com
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
|
_blank">www.aeroelectric.com
.com" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com
="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com
="_blank">www.mypilotstore.com
ank">www.mrrace.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
et="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
tp://forums.matronics.com
|
[b]
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
drc(at)wscare.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:26 pm Post subject: WTB: Yak-52 |
|
|
For the OF (Old Farts)
[img]cid:BC8BD358-DED9-4748-AB49-19F0204DBE48[/img]
Dr. Herb Coussons, MD
drc(at)wscare.com (drc(at)wscare.com)
2641 Development Drive
Green Bay, WI 54311
Cell 920-639-8434
Work 920-338-6868
Fax 920-338-6869
| Quote: | On Nov 17, 2014, at 10:30 PM, Byron Fox <byronmfox(at)gmail.com (byronmfox(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
I think the folks at On The Go have a better idea, Mark. Tidier than Depends.
http://www.oneonthego.com Blitz Fox 415-307-2405
On Nov 17, 2014, at 7:59 PM, Mark Davis <markdavis(at)wbsnet.org (markdavis(at)wbsnet.org)> wrote:
| Quote: | Blitz,
Do I see a future Depends commercial coming in Red Alert? : ) Maybe they could be signed up for a corporate sponsor!
Mark Davis
N44YK
From: owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com) [mailto:owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com)] On Behalf Of Byron Fox Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 6:42 PM To: yak-list(at)matronics.com (yak-list(at)matronics.com) Subject: Re: WTB: Yak-52
I would have been so disappointed had there been no reaction. My three hour butt is not the problem. It's my two hour bladder that's the issue. Blitz Fox
415-307-2405
On Nov 17, 2014, at 5:08 PM, doug sapp <dougsappllc(at)gmail.com (dougsappllc(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | Oh geeze, is it that time again already? )
Doug
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:50 PM, bill geipel <l129bs(at)gmail.com (l129bs(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
But make sure you read the last several months of postings. All CJ6 issues and they all want to put in the Yak engine. So if you have a 3 hr butt, and free weekends to apparently work on it, go for it. Now, if you want to fight 1v1 or something more sporting, go with the Yak. Hard aerobatics, Yak. If you want to dance in the cockpit, go CJ. If you want room to go potty in flight, probably CJ. Potty and FLUSH rivets kind of go together. If you plan on staying young and exciting, YAK. You can even carry a whopper with cheese in a Yak. If you want a whopper, cheese and a Coke, CJ. After Enough whoppers then maybe CJ or Yak 18T.
Oh to be 18 again! I don't think I was ever 140lbs?
So there you have. 8 of your new friends in the city by the bay can work on them together. San Francisco, something about that city..... Can't quite remember what they do out there? Boys? Oh never mind.
Either choice is good. For some reason the CJ is a lot more money. Must be the flushing thing.
Dawg
On Nov 18, 2014, at 7:49, Byron Fox <byronmfox(at)gmail.com (byronmfox(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | Younus, I too had a burning need for a Yak 52. For one hour, there is no finer airplane. It handles beautifully, has a great roll rate and will fly upside down all day.
Then 13 years ago, dear friends took me in hand and gently persuaded me that the Nanchang CJ-6A was, well, just superior. First it's built for a grown man, and not just "140 lb.,18 year old boys," to quote Sergei Boriak. Also, the CJ's flush riveted, has gear that goes away, holds 3 hours of fuel, has a baggage compartment, runs the essentially bulletproof Housai, and is faster than the Yak 52. But most important for those in the San Francisco Bay Area, there are 8 other Nanchangs to fly with. Please see www.baybombersquadron.com.
Be assured, however, that if indeed you decide to go over to the dark side, we will still welcome you with open arms.... and a slightly retarded throttle.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Younus Aftab <yaftab(at)gmail.com (yaftab(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
After chatting with a number of people; I am considering either buying or getting into a partnership for a 52. If somebody is selling - please let me know. Prefer a basic flying 52 with heavy spar and mid to low time engines. Don't care other upgrades as much.
I am in the West Coast (San Francisco) - So closer is better for me.
Please send me a private email if you have any leads.
Thanks!
0
--
.. Blitz
Byron M. Fox
80 Milland Drive
Mill Valley, CA 94941
[url=tel:415-307-2405]415-307-2405[/url]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
_blank">www.aeroelectric.com |
6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
="_blank">www.mypilotstore.com |
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0
1
et="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
2
|
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
72.7 KB |
| Viewed: |
5708 Time(s) |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cjpilot710(at)aol.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:30 pm Post subject: WTB: Yak-52 |
|
|
FWIW. Jim "Pappy" Goolsby (CJ6 owner) has documented proof of having the longest pedot tube. Just saying.
Sent from my iPad from some where on The 3rd rock from the Sun.
On Nov 18, 2014, at 8:23 PM, Shaun Dawson <scdawson(at)gmail.com (scdawson(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
[quote]I wouldn't even try to argue, given your no-doubt exhaustive experience.
On Tuesday, November 18, 2014, Byron Fox <byronmfox(at)gmail.com (byronmfox(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | Well said, Shaun. Going away, I mostly enough the fraternal nature of the group.
Regarding your final observation, sad to say, the San Diego group is tragically unendowed.
Blitz Fox415-307-2405
On Nov 18, 2014, at 4:13 PM, Shaun Dawson <[url=javascript:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'scdawson(at)gmail.com\');]scdawson(at)gmail.com[/url]> wrote:
| Quote: | The thing that would swing it for me would be the community. You've gotten an invitation to the CJ guys in the Bay Area. Set up a visit, but them some gas and go flying.
Based on my (limited) experience, it seems like certain areas have a preponderance of certain types. In LA, the CJs dominate. In San Diego, it's the Yaks for some reason. That's probably the case elsewhere in the country also.
You don't buy this type of airplane to fly by yourself, or to go on extended cross countries. You get into it to do interesting thing a with other pilots. Because of that, the minor paper differences between Yak or CJ are, IMO, immaterial. You are joining a community, so I would make that my focus if I were you. Which one has the bed representation in your area, of guys that you ole to be around?
That being said, I've heard that Yak pilots have larger sex organs as a general rule, so maybe that's the way to make the call...
Shaun
On Tuesday, November 18, 2014, Greg Wrobel <[url=javascript:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'clouddog22(at)gmail.com\');]clouddog22(at)gmail.com[/url]> wrote:
| Quote: |
We all think we have bought the better of the two. Make a spreadsheet of the pros and con's of each especially when you find a couple of aircraft you are interested in. Here are a few ideas on the yak52 and CJ. The YAK has the M14P which has more power for HARD aerobatics but it also burns a lot more fuel when you are on a cross country and you will be slower than a CJ. Operating costs go up for this reason. The CJ is a lot more accessible when working on it. Especially the avionics bay and working within the larger cockpit areas and you do not have to tear floorboards out on the CJ, it has access panels on the belly! The YAKs are generally speaking cheaper to buy, Parts are available for both. The CJ has a better look with the wing design and gears in the well look (only a personal Opinion). Do not go by price alone. There is a reason the CJ cost a little more. Could be in the long run it is more desirable of the two!! I have to disagree with the amount of problems that show up on the forum. I have to say a lot more guys are needing help with the YAKs! If HARD aerobatics is NOT your thing then why wouldn't you want an almost bulletproof Housai cheaper gas costs and easier maintenance access. If you need or want the M14P you can always add it to the excellent features of the CJ. Happy Hunting,.....
On Nov 17, 2014 3:47 PM, "Younus Aftab" <yaftab(at)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> After chatting with a number of people; I am considering either buying or getting into a partnership for a 52. If somebody is selling - please let me know.
>
> Prefer a basic flying 52 with heavy spar and mid to low time engines. Don't care other upgrades as much.
>
> I am in the West Coast (San Francisco) - So closer is better for me.
>
> Please send me a private email if you have any leads.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
=============
This Month --
Get Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!)
on
r> ed
oelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com
"http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com
mebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com
ypilotstore.com">www.mypilotstore.com
mrrace.com">www.mrrace.com
ion">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
                  -Matt Dralle, List Admin.
=============
List Email Forum -
?Yak-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
=============
   - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
//forums.matronics.com
=============
>
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
ot;">www.aeroelectric.com
books.com"">www.buildersbooks.com
quot;">www.homebuilthelp.com
quot;">www.mypilotstore.com
">www.mrrace.com
ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
ist"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
//forums.matronics.com
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
|
_blank">www.aeroelectric.com
.com" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com
="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com
="_blank">www.mypilotstore.com
ank">www.mrrace.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
et="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
tp://forums.matronics.com
|
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
ot;">www.aeroelectric.com
books.com"">www.buildersbooks.com
quot;">www.homebuilthelp.com
quot;">www.mypilotstore.com
">www.mrrace.com
ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
ist"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
//forums.matronics.com
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
|
[b]
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
Get Email Distribution Too!
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
