|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sfrIII
Joined: 09 Jun 2013 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2015 2:47 pm Post subject: MK III Engine Options |
|
|
Hi Rick,
Thanks for your information. I was in contact with "Kolb" for several
months and provided my intended engine choice and its specs for
weight and other things.
They said it would work so I paid them and am now building.
Thanks Sam
do not archive
From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Richard Girard
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2015 8:03 AM
To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: Re: MK III Engine Options
Sfrill, Great looking engine, but you need to consider its weight. Putting a 200 lb.+ engine in a MkIIIX reduces it to a single passenger airplane. I've flown the IIIX at 1280 lb. Very poor performance. My peronal recommendation is to not fly it at greater than 1100 lb. You also need to consider the strength of the rear portion of the fuselage truss. The MkIII was designed as a +4g airframe. Doubling the design engine weight seriously compromises the aircraft's designed strength margin.
Rick Girard
do not archive
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 5:06 PM, sfrIII <sfr3(at)speedyquick.net (sfr3(at)speedyquick.net)> wrote:
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "sfrIII" <sfr3(at)speedyquick.net (sfr3(at)speedyquick.net)>
Hi all! Sam here in Idaho. I am currently building a MKIII Extra.
My engine of choice is a converted Corvair Engine that I built for a
different project. There are several pros and cons but the main reason
for using a Corvair is price.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438562#438562
Attachments:
http://forums.matronics.com//files/corvair_engine1_171.jpg
===========
-List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
===========
FORUMS -
_blank">http://forums.matronics.com
===========
b Site -
-Matt Dralle, List Admin.
target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
===========
--
Believe those who are seeking the truth, doubt those who find it.
-Andre Gide
Quote: | http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List | 01234567
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
John Hauck
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 4639 Location: Titus, Alabama (hauck's holler)
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2015 2:53 pm Post subject: MK III Engine Options |
|
|
How does frontal area of the Corvair compare with the 912?
john h
mkIII
Titus, Alabama
--
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ John Hauck
MKIII/912ULS
hauck's holler
Titus, Alabama |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sfrIII
Joined: 09 Jun 2013 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2015 3:51 pm Post subject: MK III Engine Options |
|
|
Hi John,
I found this photo of a running Corvair on a Peitenpol.
I don't think it is any larger than the 912.
Thanks, Sam
--
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
58.19 KB |
Viewed: |
6280 Time(s) |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
rickofudall
Joined: 19 Sep 2009 Posts: 1392 Location: Udall, KS, USA
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2015 3:58 pm Post subject: MK III Engine Options |
|
|
Samuel, William Wynn is the defacto expert on the Corvair engine, is he not? His web site lists the all up wet flying weight of the Corvair at somewhere between 212 to 225 lb. That is not 30 lb. more than the Rotax 912, that's 62 to 75 lb.I worked on a MkIIIX for a customer and shaved every pound possible off the aircraft and couldn't get the weight below 620 lb and it was powered by a 582-99 that's over 100 lb. lighter than the weight listed by Mr. Wynn.
Rick
do not archive
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Samuel Ragland <sfr3(at)speedyquick.net (sfr3(at)speedyquick.net)> wrote:
[quote]--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Samuel Ragland" <sfr3(at)speedyquick.net (sfr3(at)speedyquick.net)>
Hi Ron,
I have looked Hi and Low for an EXTRA
powered with a Corvair.
People assume that this engine is very heavy.
In reality, a running aircraft converted Corvair
is only 30 LBS. heavier than a 912.
Sam
--
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ The smallest miracle right in front of you is enough to make you happy.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sfrIII
Joined: 09 Jun 2013 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2015 4:58 pm Post subject: MK III Engine Options |
|
|
Hi Rick,
Your absolutely correct. In revue of William's site, I found
that my comparison should have been with a VW installation.
I guess the girl friend will have to ride in the nose cone!!
Sorry about that,
Sam
do not archive
From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Richard Girard
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2015 4:58 PM
To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: Re: MK III Engine Options
Samuel, William Wynn is the defacto expert on the Corvair engine, is he not? His web site lists the all up wet flying weight of the Corvair at somewhere between 212 to 225 lb. That is not 30 lb. more than the Rotax 912, that's 62 to 75 lb.
I worked on a MkIIIX for a customer and shaved every pound possible off the aircraft and couldn't get the weight below 620 lb and it was powered by a 582-99 that's over 100 lb. lighter than the weight listed by Mr. Wynn.
Rick
do not archive
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Samuel Ragland <sfr3(at)speedyquick.net (sfr3(at)speedyquick.net)> wrote:
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Samuel Ragland" <sfr3(at)speedyquick.net (sfr3(at)speedyquick.net)>
Hi Ron,
I have looked Hi and Low for an EXTRA
powered with a Corvair.
People assume that this engine is very heavy.
In reality, a running aircraft converted Corvair
is only 30 LBS. heavier than a 912.
Sam
--
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ron.dace(at)yahoo.com
Joined: 19 Feb 2015 Posts: 8 Location: Illinois
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2015 6:20 pm Post subject: Re: MK III Engine Options |
|
|
Thanks for all of the good feedback. I am going to need a 100hp engine to get my 6'4" 250lb carcass off the ground particularly if there is any hope of carrying a passenger. What I have concluded so far:
912s - although expensive, probably the best option, no air frame mods required, good resale potential, known quantity probably the highest market penetration. (that is what I was trying to discern with my original post)
VW w/re-drive - less expensive, overheating is a possible issue, would have to mod the air frame (additional cost with potential resale impact), there are a limited number currently flying on a MK III.
Speaking of resale, it is always an issue with an experimental / kit built airplane. The original owner of the air frame couldn't sell it with the motor intact and get any where near the build cost. Parting it out was a better option.
While some of the other options are intriguing and a good solution for some, maybe they aren't a good fit for me.
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ "But all the knowledge in the world is of no use to fools. And it's a long road out of Eden." - Eagles |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Richard Pike
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 1671 Location: Blountville, Tennessee
|
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 7:17 am Post subject: Re: MK III Engine Options |
|
|
Having built several Corvair engines over the years, while they can be made quite bulletproof, all the ones I have ever seen in aircraft use are tractors, so they can be easily cooled. As a pusher, cooling is going to get a lot more complicated. Besides; they are just too heavy.
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ Richard Pike
Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops)
Kingsport, TN 3TN0
Forgiving is tough, being forgiven is wonderful, and God's grace really is amazing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dennis Kirby
Joined: 05 Dec 2013 Posts: 35 Location: Albuquerque, NM
|
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 1:20 pm Post subject: MK III Engine Options |
|
|
"ron.dace" wrote:
<< I will probably fly it in the 50 to 80 hour a year range. An under 10K option would be optimal. If it cost more then a 912 would be worth considering. Buying new is expensive, buying used is fraught with risk. >>
Ron / All -
I must agree with John H's advice, that the Rotax-912 (either model) is a good bet for your money.
When I finished building my Mark-3 in 2002 (before it was labeled "Classic"), like you, I too was looking to save a few bucks on an engine. I bought a new Verner-1400 (80 hp) because it looked like a good 2-cylinder 4-stroke engine with lots of torque. New price was $7500. I even flew in another Mark-3 with that engine installed to be sure. Seemed to fly fine with that engine. The engine sounded good and provided plenty of power. The Kolb Company was also experimenting with that engine, so I thought I made a good choice. Well ...
Turns out the engine was creating an insidious and destructive harmonic vibration in my Kolb that made it unsuitable to continue use. Pulled it off after only 20 hours and began looking for a different engine. The guys at Kolb Co also concluded that the Verner was not a good match for the Mark-3, and scrapped further testing with that engine.
I began looking on Barnstormers, and found a low-time 80 hp 912ul (with only 22 hrs TT) for sale for $8500. Bought it, and it was the best choice I could have made. I've put 300 hours on my Kolb since then, and it has never missed a beat. As Hauck said, reliability is key, and this engine delivers. Plug and play for a Kolb Mark-3. No experimentation or modification necessary to make it fit right. I'd rather spend my time flying instead of experimenting.
So, keep your eyes on Barnstormers - the 912 does occasionally come up for sale. And if you buy one that's in good shape, you won't be disappointed. That was MY experience, anyway. Good luck ...
Dennis Kirby
Mark-3 / 912ul / Powerfin-72
Sandia Park, NM
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|