|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
haribole
Joined: 21 Feb 2014 Posts: 33 Location: United States
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2016 6:48 am Post subject: Fast-on tabs or screw terminals for ground? |
|
|
Hello Group
Intuitively screwed down ground terminals seem so much more reliable is there a reason the fast-on tabs are more popular?
Thanks
Hari
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
jbsoar(at)gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2016 7:58 am Post subject: Fast-on tabs or screw terminals for ground? |
|
|
Fast-on Tabs are more reliable, and probably lighter. Automobiles don't use screws to wires together, generally. The ground straps on automobiles are often screwed or bolted, and they are often the weak points in the electrical system...
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Hariharan Gopalan <rdu.hari(at)gmail.com (rdu.hari(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
Quote: | Hello Group
Intuitively screwed down ground terminals seem so much more reliable is there a reason the fast-on tabs are more popular?
Thanks
Hari
|
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
yellowduckduo(at)gmail.co Guest
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:25 am Post subject: Fast-on tabs or screw terminals for ground? |
|
|
I like that when fumbling behind and under the panel there is no screw
to drop or threads to strip.
I suppose screw terminals generally require an extra joint when
building. Crimping the ring terminal then the screw connection.
Ken
On 23/03/2016 10:44 AM, Hariharan Gopalan wrote:
Quote: | Hello Group
Intuitively screwed down ground terminals seem so much more reliable
is there a reason the fast-on tabs are more popular?
Thanks
Hari
|
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Robert Reed
Joined: 22 Oct 2009 Posts: 331 Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:26 am Post subject: Fast-on tabs or screw terminals for ground? |
|
|
Considering the fact that reliability of the Fast-on Tabs seems to be equal to the screw on terminals it comes down to accessibility. It seems that most of the electrical connections are always in a hard to access location and getting a screwdriver into those locations is always a chore that gets considerably worse with age, I will go with the fast-on tabs every time.
Bob
From: Hariharan Gopalan <rdu.hari(at)gmail.com>
To: aeroelectric-list(at)matronics.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 9:44 AM
Subject: Fast-on tabs or screw terminals for ground?
Hello Group
Intuitively screwed down ground terminals seem so much more reliable is there a reason the fast-on tabs are more popular?
Thanks
Hari
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
haribole
Joined: 21 Feb 2014 Posts: 33 Location: United States
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2016 10:02 am Post subject: Fast-on tabs or screw terminals for ground? |
|
|
Seems like intuition can be wrong, like in flying.
Thanks everyone.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Robert Reed <robertr237(at)att.net (robertr237(at)att.net)> wrote:
Quote: | Considering the fact that reliability of the Fast-on Tabs seems to be equal to the screw on terminals it comes down to accessibility. It seems that most of the electrical connections are always in a hard to access location and getting a screwdriver into those locations is always a chore that gets considerably worse with age, I will go with the fast-on tabs every time.
Bob
From: Hariharan Gopalan <rdu.hari(at)gmail.com (rdu.hari(at)gmail.com)>
To: aeroelectric-list(at)matronics.com (aeroelectric-list(at)matronics.com)
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 9:44 AM
Subject: AeroElectric-List: Fast-on tabs or screw terminals for ground?
Hello Group
Intuitively screwed down ground terminals seem so much more reliable is there a reason the fast-on tabs are more popular?
Thanks
Hari
|
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
bobnoffs
Joined: 04 Jul 2012 Posts: 132 Location: northern wi.
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2016 2:45 am Post subject: Fast-on tabs or screw terminals for ground? |
|
|
downside to fat ons is you really do need needle nose to remove them and it gets to the point you wonder if you are damaging the tab or its attachment so much force is needed
bob noffs
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Hariharan Gopalan <rdu.hari(at)gmail.com (rdu.hari(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
Quote: | Seems like intuition can be wrong, like in flying.
Thanks everyone.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Robert Reed <robertr237(at)att.net (robertr237(at)att.net)> wrote:
Quote: | Considering the fact that reliability of the Fast-on Tabs seems to be equal to the screw on terminals it comes down to accessibility. It seems that most of the electrical connections are always in a hard to access location and getting a screwdriver into those locations is always a chore that gets considerably worse with age, I will go with the fast-on tabs every time.
Bob
From: Hariharan Gopalan <rdu.hari(at)gmail.com (rdu.hari(at)gmail.com)>
To: aeroelectric-list(at)matronics.com (aeroelectric-list(at)matronics.com)
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 9:44 AM
Subject: AeroElectric-List: Fast-on tabs or screw terminals for ground?
Hello Group
Intuitively screwed down ground terminals seem so much more reliable is there a reason the fast-on tabs are more popular?
Thanks
Hari
|
|
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
donjohnston
Joined: 13 Dec 2009 Posts: 231
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2016 4:01 pm Post subject: Re: Fast-on tabs or screw terminals for ground? |
|
|
jbsoar(at)gmail.com wrote: | Fast-on Tabs are more reliable, and probably lighter. |
How can Fast-on Tabs be more reliable? They are held on with just friction. A ring terminal with a locknut would seem to be more secure.
I am NOT saying Fast-on's are unreliable. Just trying to understand the statement.
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
stein(at)steinair.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2016 4:43 pm Post subject: Fast-on tabs or screw terminals for ground? |
|
|
Ever tried to get a "fast on" terminal (PIDG type) off of a good spade with
your bare fingers? Almost impossible....yet screws and locknuts (without
locktite that is) can and do often work themselves loose, especially during
the first 40 hrs of flight as things "settle in".
We many thousands upon thousands of both per year, and I'm a bit ambivalent
to either being superior, but I do know that if you use high quality
terminals those things are VERY good.
Just my 2 cents as usual.
Cheers,
Stein
--
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
donjohnston
Joined: 13 Dec 2009 Posts: 231
|
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 4:45 am Post subject: Re: Fast-on tabs or screw terminals for ground? |
|
|
Well, to be fair, your 2 cents are worth about $2 compared to others.
And I will continue providing you funds so you can offer your 2 cents here.
Thanks for all that you do!
stein(at)steinair.com wrote: | Ever tried to get a "fast on" terminal (PIDG type) off of a good spade with
your bare fingers? Almost impossible....yet screws and locknuts (without
locktite that is) can and do often work themselves loose, especially during
the first 40 hrs of flight as things "settle in".
We many thousands upon thousands of both per year, and I'm a bit ambivalent
to either being superior, but I do know that if you use high quality
terminals those things are VERY good.
Just my 2 cents as usual.
Cheers,
Stein
-- |
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|