Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Current Sensor basic question

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
donjohnston



Joined: 13 Dec 2009
Posts: 231

PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 11:34 am    Post subject: Current Sensor basic question Reply with quote

I'm using the 50a hall effect sensor which came with my Grand Rapids EIS 6000. But the current numbers don't jibe with the VPX. It's not a huge difference, but enough that I don't like it.

I've talked with GRT and verified the offset and scale factor configuration but it's still not right.

While searching to see if anyone else was having this issue I ran across an aftermarket sensor.

High accuracy current sensor
http://www.crazedpilot.com/high-accuracy-current-sensor-for-5v-input-7-30v-supply-engine-monitor-systems-dynon-mgl-grand-rapids-garmin-and-more-ems-efis-systems/

Interestingly, it looks just like the GRT sensor.

I contacted them to make sure it would work with the EIS6000 and if it came with the offset and scale factor values that needed to be configured on the EIS. They said yes and that the correct values were based on the wire size being used. There is nothing in the GRT documentation about the wire size having an effect on the offset and scale factor settings.

Is it true that the size of the wire effects the reading of a hall effect sensor?

Don


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yellowduckduo(at)gmail.co
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 11:52 am    Post subject: Current Sensor basic question Reply with quote

I can believe that wire size affects that sensor but not the hollow
round 60 amp sensor that GRT sold me several years ago.
The wonderful thing about the GRT sensor is that you can adjust the
offset and scale for almost any sensor. IMO the values from GRT are
simply a recommended starting value and all of my sensors benefited from
some tweaking when I calibrated them.
Ken

On 09/07/2016 3:34 PM, donjohnston wrote:
Quote:


I'm using the 50a hall effect sensor which came with my Grand Rapids EIS 6000. But the current numbers don't jibe with the VPX. It's not a huge difference, but enough that I don't like it.

I've talked with GRT and verified the offset and scale factor configuration but it's still not right.

While searching to see if anyone else was having this issue I ran across an aftermarket sensor.

High accuracy current sensor
http://www.crazedpilot.com/high-accuracy-current-sensor-for-5v-input-7-30v-supply-engine-monitor-systems-dynon-mgl-grand-rapids-garmin-and-more-ems-efis-systems/

Interestingly, it looks just like the GRT sensor.

I contacted them to make sure it would work with the EIS6000 and if it came with the offset and scale factor values that needed to be configured on the EIS. They said yes and that the correct values were based on the wire size being used. There is nothing in the GRT documentation about the wire size having an effect on the offset and scale factor settings.

Is it true that the size of the wire effects the reading of a hall effect sensor?

Don


Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=457996#457996



- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
billp(at)wwpc.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 12:32 pm    Post subject: Current Sensor basic question Reply with quote

If it's a Hall Effect sensor the wire size doesn't matter. Magnetic
field is what the Hall Effect device is measuring. What dictates the
magnetic field strength is Ampere-Turns. I assume you have the wire only
passing through the sensor once (one turn).

A smaller wire will have more voltage drop across it for any given
current flow than a larger one, but won't change the current measurement.

Look at your installation. If the wire and the sensor is laying tightly
with other wires, the field may be effected. This should be a very
localized effect so if you have about 1/2" from other wires carrying
current you should be OK.

Bill Putney - WB6RFW
Chief Engineer
KPTZ - Port Townsend, WA

PP-SEL/A&P-IA

"...you know me to be a very smart man. Don't you think if I were wrong, I'd know it?" -Sheldon Cooper

On 7/9/16 12:34 PM, donjohnston wrote:
Quote:


I'm using the 50a hall effect sensor which came with my Grand Rapids EIS 6000. But the current numbers don't jibe with the VPX. It's not a huge difference, but enough that I don't like it.

I've talked with GRT and verified the offset and scale factor configuration but it's still not right.

While searching to see if anyone else was having this issue I ran across an aftermarket sensor.

High accuracy current sensor
http://www.crazedpilot.com/high-accuracy-current-sensor-for-5v-input-7-30v-supply-engine-monitor-systems-dynon-mgl-grand-rapids-garmin-and-more-ems-efis-systems/

Interestingly, it looks just like the GRT sensor.

I contacted them to make sure it would work with the EIS6000 and if it came with the offset and scale factor values that needed to be configured on the EIS. They said yes and that the correct values were based on the wire size being used. There is nothing in the GRT documentation about the wire size having an effect on the offset and scale factor settings.

Is it true that the size of the wire effects the reading of a hall effect sensor?

Don


Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=457996#457996




- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
enginerdy(at)gmail.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 12:43 pm    Post subject: Current Sensor basic question Reply with quote

In general that is 100% correct, but this sensor doesn’t appear to have a split ring to concentrate the magnetic field into a Hall sensor.

When you’re not collecting the whole field, geometry has a large effect on field strength.

I’m curious how this sensor works or if they expect some sort of calibration step after installation.

Quote:
On Jul 9, 2016, at 3:29 PM, Bill Putney <billp(at)wwpc.com> wrote:



If it's a Hall Effect sensor the wire size doesn't matter. Magnetic field is what the Hall Effect device is measuring. What dictates the magnetic field strength is Ampere-Turns. I assume you have the wire only passing through the sensor once (one turn).

A smaller wire will have more voltage drop across it for any given current flow than a larger one, but won't change the current measurement.

Look at your installation. If the wire and the sensor is laying tightly with other wires, the field may be effected. This should be a very localized effect so if you have about 1/2" from other wires carrying current you should be OK.

Bill Putney - WB6RFW
Chief Engineer
KPTZ - Port Townsend, WA

PP-SEL/A&P-IA

"...you know me to be a very smart man. Don't you think if I were wrong, I'd know it?" -Sheldon Cooper

On 7/9/16 12:34 PM, donjohnston wrote:
>
>
> I'm using the 50a hall effect sensor which came with my Grand Rapids EIS 6000. But the current numbers don't jibe with the VPX. It's not a huge difference, but enough that I don't like it.
> I've talked with GRT and verified the offset and scale factor configuration but it's still not right.
> While searching to see if anyone else was having this issue I ran across an aftermarket sensor.
> High accuracy current sensor
> http://www.crazedpilot.com/high-accuracy-current-sensor-for-5v-input-7-30v-supply-engine-monitor-systems-dynon-mgl-grand-rapids-garmin-and-more-ems-efis-systems/
>
> Interestingly, it looks just like the GRT sensor.
> I contacted them to make sure it would work with the EIS6000 and if it came with the offset and scale factor values that needed to be configured on the EIS. They said yes and that the correct values were based on the wire size being used. There is nothing in the GRT documentation about the wire size having an effect on the offset and scale factor settings.
> Is it true that the size of the wire effects the reading of a hall effect sensor?
> Don
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=457996#457996
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>







- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
alec(at)alecmyers.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 12:46 pm    Post subject: Current Sensor basic question Reply with quote

It appears from the photograph that it's sensing the magnetic field at only one or two points; The field decays in strength with distance away from the conductor, and measured at the surface surface a larger conductor has a smaller field than a small conductor carrying the same current (because of the 1/r rule) so I would expect the size of the conductor to make a difference.

If the current sensor were a transformer (which effectively integrates the field strength around a closed loop surrounding the conductor) then no, the size of the conductor wouldn't make a difference; but this doesn't appear to be such a thing. Of course a transformer wouldn't be able to detect a DC current so you'd have to be doing something very smart like integrating the transformer output which would be expensive, and probably inaccurate.



If it's a Hall Effect sensor the wire size doesn't matter. Magnetic field is what the Hall Effect device is measuring. What dictates the magnetic field strength is Ampere-Turns. I assume you have the wire only passing through the sensor once (one turn).

A smaller wire will have more voltage drop across it for any given current flow than a larger one, but won't change the current measurement.

Look at your installation. If the wire and the sensor is laying tightly with other wires, the field may be effected. This should be a very localized effect so if you have about 1/2" from other wires carrying current you should be OK.

Bill Putney - WB6RFW
Chief Engineer
KPTZ - Port Townsend, WA

PP-SEL/A&P-IA

"...you know me to be a very smart man. Don't you think if I were wrong, I'd know it?" -Sheldon Cooper

On 7/9/16 12:34 PM, donjohnston wrote:
Quote:


I'm using the 50a hall effect sensor which came with my Grand Rapids EIS 6000. But the current numbers don't jibe with the VPX. It's not a huge difference, but enough that I don't like it.
I've talked with GRT and verified the offset and scale factor configuration but it's still not right.
While searching to see if anyone else was having this issue I ran across an aftermarket sensor.
High accuracy current sensor
http://www.crazedpilot.com/high-accuracy-current-sensor-for-5v-input-7-30v-supply-engine-monitor-systems-dynon-mgl-grand-rapids-garmin-and-more-ems-efis-systems/

Interestingly, it looks just like the GRT sensor.
I contacted them to make sure it would work with the EIS6000 and if it came with the offset and scale factor values that needed to be configured on the EIS. They said yes and that the correct values were based on the wire size being used. There is nothing in the GRT documentation about the wire size having an effect on the offset and scale factor settings.
Is it true that the size of the wire effects the reading of a hall effect sensor?
Don




Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=457996#457996












- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
yellowduckduo(at)gmail.co
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 1:00 pm    Post subject: Current Sensor basic question Reply with quote

Bill
I certainly agree for what I'd call a common hall effect transformer
with the sensor in a gap of a magnetic torus and the wire through the
center hole but the pic that came up when I clicked on Don's link just
appeared to be hall sensors strapped directly on both the sides of the
wire. I would expect such an arrangement to be affected by wire diameter?
Ken

On 09/07/2016 4:29 PM, Bill Putney wrote:
Quote:


If it's a Hall Effect sensor the wire size doesn't matter. Magnetic
field is what the Hall Effect device is measuring. What dictates the
magnetic field strength is Ampere-Turns. I assume you have the wire
only passing through the sensor once (one turn).

A smaller wire will have more voltage drop across it for any given
current flow than a larger one, but won't change the current measurement.

Look at your installation. If the wire and the sensor is laying
tightly with other wires, the field may be effected. This should be a
very localized effect so if you have about 1/2" from other wires
carrying current you should be OK.

Bill Putney - WB6RFW
Chief Engineer
KPTZ - Port Townsend, WA

PP-SEL/A&P-IA

"...you know me to be a very smart man. Don't you think if I were
wrong, I'd know it?" -Sheldon Cooper

On 7/9/16 12:34 PM, donjohnston wrote:
>
> <don(at)velocity-xl.com>
>
> I'm using the 50a hall effect sensor which came with my Grand Rapids
> EIS 6000. But the current numbers don't jibe with the VPX. It's not
> a huge difference, but enough that I don't like it.
> I've talked with GRT and verified the offset and scale factor
> configuration but it's still not right.
> While searching to see if anyone else was having this issue I ran
> across an aftermarket sensor.
> High accuracy current sensor
> http://www.crazedpilot.com/high-accuracy-current-sensor-for-5v-input-7-30v-supply-engine-monitor-systems-dynon-mgl-grand-rapids-garmin-and-more-ems-efis-systems/
> Interestingly, it looks just like the GRT sensor.
> I contacted them to make sure it would work with the EIS6000 and if
> it came with the offset and scale factor values that needed to be
> configured on the EIS. They said yes and that the correct values were
> based on the wire size being used. There is nothing in the GRT
> documentation about the wire size having an effect on the offset and
> scale factor settings.
> Is it true that the size of the wire effects the reading of a hall
> effect sensor?
> Don
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=457996#457996
>
>


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
donjohnston



Joined: 13 Dec 2009
Posts: 231

PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 1:11 pm    Post subject: Re: Current Sensor basic question Reply with quote

Can you elaborate on the tweaking process? For example did you adjust the scale factor or offset? Which direction did you change for what effect?

yellowduckduo(at)gmail.co wrote:
I can believe that wire size affects that sensor but not the hollow
round 60 amp sensor that GRT sold me several years ago.
The wonderful thing about the GRT sensor is that you can adjust the
offset and scale for almost any sensor. IMO the values from GRT are
simply a recommended starting value and all of my sensors benefited from
some tweaking when I calibrated them.
Ken

On 09/07/2016 3:34 PM, donjohnston wrote:


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
donjohnston



Joined: 13 Dec 2009
Posts: 231

PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 1:13 pm    Post subject: Re: Current Sensor basic question Reply with quote

Only one pass through the sensor. No other wires within about 4-6".

billp(at)wwpc.com wrote:
If it's a Hall Effect sensor the wire size doesn't matter. Magnetic
field is what the Hall Effect device is measuring. What dictates the
magnetic field strength is Ampere-Turns. I assume you have the wire only
passing through the sensor once (one turn).

A smaller wire will have more voltage drop across it for any given
current flow than a larger one, but won't change the current measurement.

Look at your installation. If the wire and the sensor is laying tightly
with other wires, the field may be effected. This should be a very
localized effect so if you have about 1/2" from other wires carrying
current you should be OK.

On 7/9/16 12:34 PM, donjohnston wrote:


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:06 pm    Post subject: Current Sensor basic question Reply with quote

Quote:

High accuracy current sensor
http://www.crazedpilot.com/high-accuracy-current-sensor-for-5v-input-7-30v-supply-engine-monitor-systems-dynon-mgl-grand-rapids-garmin-and-more-ems-efis-systems/

This is obviously not a 'cored' sensor.
Because there is no control over the
concentration of flux in the measured
wire, there is similarly no physical filtering
of external magnetic fields normally afforded
by the use of a gapped core.

Hence, the need for two sensors on opposite
sides of the wire. Magnetic lines of force
will be equal/opposite in the two sensors
where the sum of the two will represent
a field proportional to flux surrounding
the wire.

Flux from outside the sensor pair will
affect each sensor approximately the same
and since they're wired for adding opposing
fields, non-opposing fields tend to cancel
each other.

As long as the instrumentation system has adequate
accommodation of scale factor and offset, then
this 'coreless' approach seems reasonable.

I use a closed loop, gapped core sensors in
my instrumentation packages. One of my favorites
is this critter

http://tinyurl.com/zxsdyj4



[img]cid:.0[/img]

It's core function is a plus-minus 6A sensor
but easy to 'jeep' into fractional multiples and
sub multiples of 6A. Of course, it's designed to
mount on an ECB but I've converted dozens of them
to remotely installed sensors at the end of pendant
cables.

These are gapped-core, closed-loop sensors with
great linearity and calibration numbers. They
too could probably be adapted to the popular
displays. The price sure is right.




Bob . . .


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List



57da7fe.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  164.43 KB
 Viewed:  7058 Time(s)

57da7fe.jpg


Back to top
yellowduckduo(at)gmail.co
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:27 pm    Post subject: Current Sensor basic question Reply with quote

Don
The formula is in Section 7.1.5 "Transfer Function" in my GRT manual.
From a quick refresher it seems that increasing the Aux Scale Factor
increases your reading by MULTIPLYING all sensor outputs by a larger
scale factor. Increases or decreases each reading by a similar
percentage so to speak.

Changing the offset simply adds (or subtracts) the same value to all
readings. For example you could change this by some value that adds say
5 amps to all indications. It would then add 5 amps to the indication
even when no current is flowing, and 5 amps to all readings. Tweak this
by an even number such as -2 or +2. Changing it by an odd number such as
1 or 3 reverses the direction for example from adding to subtracting.

If you describe what you are seeing on the display and what it actually
should be at one point preferably somewhere near a normal cruising
current and also with zero current flowing (such as with no wire or a
disconnected wire in the sensor) we can make a suggestion as to what
tweaking might help. There is an interaction in that we get the
multiplier correct and then use the offset to make it read zero when no
current is flowing. Sometimes it takes a couple of tries.

The suggested values from GRT for my sensor were Aux Scale Factor = 93
and Aux Offset = 177 so you probably have those set as a starting point
if it is the same sensor and you are setting it for +/- 50 amps.
Increasing the Aux Scale Factor to 94 would slightly raise all displayed
readings especially the highest readings. If it then reads above zero
with no current flowing you'd try tweaking the Aux Offset to maybe 175
to lower the zero current display a bit.

Ken

On 09/07/2016 5:11 PM, donjohnston wrote:
Quote:


Can you elaborate on the tweaking process? For example did you adjust the scale factor or offset? Which direction did you change for what effect?


yellowduckduo(at)gmail.co wrote:
> I can believe that wire size affects that sensor but not the hollow
> round 60 amp sensor that GRT sold me several years ago.
> The wonderful thing about the GRT sensor is that you can adjust the
> offset and scale for almost any sensor. IMO the values from GRT are
> simply a recommended starting value and all of my sensors benefited from
> some tweaking when I calibrated them.
> Ken
>
> On 09/07/2016 3:34 PM, donjohnston wrote:
>


Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=458012#458012


.



- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group