|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
art(at)zemon.name Guest
|
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2016 6:37 am Post subject: Skipping the Endurance Bus |
|
|
Folks,
Please double-check my logic. I am designing the electrical system for my BD-4C, which is a largely mechanical airplane. Totaling up the typical current draw for everything except pitot heat, I am at 21 amps. Max draw is 28 amps. Since a B&C backup alternator can supply 30 amps at cruise RPM, it seems that I don't need an endurance bus at all. Instead, I would have the following emergency procedure:
Quote: | In Case of Alternator Failure
- Primary alternator OFF
- Backup alternator ON
- Pitot heat OFF (unless required for flight)
|
I do still need to add a couple of items to my equipment list but neither draws much current: electronic ignition and a second com radio.
Does this make sense? Am I missing something?
-- Art Z.
--
http://CheerfulCurmudgeon.com/"If I am not for myself, who is for me? And if I am only for myself, what am I? And if not now, when?" Hillel
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
donjohnston
Joined: 13 Dec 2009 Posts: 231
|
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2016 2:51 pm Post subject: Re: Skipping the Endurance Bus |
|
|
That's the logic I used.
Primary alternator, secondary alternator (20a), battery.
My final backup is my iPad with Foreflight connected to a Stratus II that should be able to run for at least five hours.
If I have failures on all of those then someone up there really doesn't like me.
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ceengland7(at)gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2016 4:51 pm Post subject: Skipping the Endurance Bus |
|
|
On 8/7/2016 9:36 AM, Art Zemon wrote:
Quote: | Folks,
Please double-check my logic. I am designing the electrical system for my BD-4C, which is a largely mechanical airplane. Totaling up the typical current draw for everything except pitot heat, I am at 21 amps. Max draw is 28 amps. Since a B&C backup alternator can supply 30 amps at cruise RPM, it seems that I don't need an endurance bus at all. Instead, I would have the following emergency procedure:
Quote: | In Case of Alternator Failure
- Primary alternator OFF
- Backup alternator ON
- Pitot heat OFF (unless required for flight)
|
I do still need to add a couple of items to my equipment list but neither draws much current: electronic ignition and a second com radio.
Does this make sense? Am I missing something?
-- Art Z.
--
http://CheerfulCurmudgeon.com/ "If I am not for myself, who is for me? And if I am only for myself, what am I? And if not now, when?" Hillel
| The only question would be whether you intend to fly IFR, & actually need pitot heat. Plan B might be in order, because that alone would probably take almost half your backup alt's capacity.
On a tangent to that...
A friend who's a retired Pratt engineer built an RV-6A a number of years ago. His choice of engine monitor had the option of adding air data, so his regular ASI was hooked to the standard pitot, and the ASI input on the monitor was hooked to a 'pitot port' installed in the pressurized section of the cowl above the engine. Airspeed indications of the two indicators agreed with each other within a couple of knots, over the speed range of the plane.
Charlie
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
art(at)zemon.name Guest
|
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2016 7:12 pm Post subject: Skipping the Endurance Bus |
|
|
Charlie,
Good catch. Yes, this will be an IFR airplane. To the electrical load analysis that I have already done, I still need to add the second comm radio and the second EFIS screen, but those are minor loads compared to the pitot heat.
Cheers,
-- Art Z.
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Charlie England <ceengland7(at)gmail.com (ceengland7(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
Quote: | The only question would be whether you intend to fly IFR, & actually need pitot heat. Plan B might be in order, because that alone would probably take almost half your backup alt's capacity.
|
--
http://CheerfulCurmudgeon.com/"If I am not for myself, who is for me? And if I am only for myself, what am I? And if not now, when?" Hillel
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 12:53 pm Post subject: Skipping the Endurance Bus |
|
|
At 07:54 PM 8/7/2016, you wrote:
Quote: | On 8/7/2016 9:36 AM, Art Zemon wrote:
Quote: | Folks,
Please double-check my logic. I am designing the electrical system for my BD-4C, which is a largely mechanical airplane. Totaling up the typical current draw for everything except pitot heat, I am at 21 amps. Max draw is 28 amps. Since a B&C backup alternator can supply 30 amps at cruise RPM, it seems that I don't need an endurance bus at all. Instead, I would have the following emergency procedure:
In Case of Alternator Failure
Primary alternator OFF Backup alternator ON Pitot heat OFF (unless required for flight)
I do still need to add a couple of items to my equipment list but neither draws much current: electronic ignition and a second com radio.
Does this make sense? Am I missing something? |
|
Do you have a battery contactor?
The e-bus structure eliminates the load
of a battery contactor during endurance
ops.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 12:56 pm Post subject: Skipping the Endurance Bus |
|
|
At 10:10 PM 8/7/2016, you wrote:
Quote: | Charlie,
Good catch. Yes, this will be an IFR airplane. To the electrical load analysis that I have already done, I still need to add the second comm radio and the second EFIS screen, but those are minor loads compared to the pitot heat. |
Have you ever shared a proposed disribution
diagram? It would be MUCH easier to for
electron-herders to convert words into
copper-reality when offering advise.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
art(at)zemon.name Guest
|
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 2:46 pm Post subject: Skipping the Endurance Bus |
|
|
Bob,
Thank you for mentioning the contactor. Yes, I will need one. No, I had not gotten far enough through my design to remember it. And no, I had not realized that the contactor uses significant power to stay closed. I'll add it to the list.
I found White-Rodgers contactors at Aircraft Spruce and the data sheet lists continuous power of 9 or 10 W which I figure to be approximately 0.75 A at 13.8 V. http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/pdf/11-03161.pdf
Does that sound right for planning purposes?
-- Art Z.
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III <nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com (nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com)> wrote:
Quote: | At 07:54 PM 8/7/2016, you wrote:
Quote: | On 8/7/2016 9:36 AM, Art Zemon wrote:
Quote: | Folks,
Please double-check my logic. I am designing the electrical system for my BD-4C, which is a largely mechanical airplane. Totaling up the typical current draw for everything except pitot heat, I am at 21 amps. Max draw is 28 amps. Since a B&C backup alternator can supply 30 amps at cruise RPM, it seems that I don't need an endurance bus at all. Instead, I would have the following emergency procedure:
|
| In Case of Alternator Failure
Primary alternator OFF Backup alternator ON Pitot heat OFF (unless required for flight)
I do still need to add a couple of items to my equipment list but neither draws much current: electronic ignition and a second com radio.
Does this make sense? Am I missing something?
Do you have a battery contactor?
The e-bus structure eliminates the load
of a battery contactor during endurance
ops.
Bob . . .
|
--
http://CheerfulCurmudgeon.com/"If I am not for myself, who is for me? And if I am only for myself, what am I? And if not now, when?" Hillel
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
art(at)zemon.name Guest
|
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 3:07 pm Post subject: Skipping the Endurance Bus |
|
|
Bob,
Here are the diagrams that I have so far:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzOP2gb9_3RQUHpIMjNfa0NnQW8
The overview is basically my table-of-contents and it has the list of devices with power requirements.
Cheers,
-- Art Z.
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III <nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com (nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com)> wrote:
Quote: | At 10:10 PM 8/7/2016, you wrote:
Quote: | Charlie,
Good catch. Yes, this will be an IFR airplane. To the electrical load analysis that I have already done, I still need to add the second comm radio and the second EFIS screen, but those are minor loads compared to the pitot heat. |
Have you ever shared a proposed disribution
diagram? It would be MUCH easier to for
electron-herders to convert words into
copper-reality when offering advise.
Bob . . .
|
--
http://CheerfulCurmudgeon.com/"If I am not for myself, who is for me? And if I am only for myself, what am I? And if not now, when?" Hillel
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|