|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
user9253
Joined: 28 Mar 2008 Posts: 1921 Location: Riley TWP Michigan
|
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 8:21 am Post subject: BATTERY FUSE |
|
|
A friend of mine is building a plane with an 8 cylinder automotive engine. I noticed that he had installed a 100 amp ANL fuse in series with the battery cable. The fuse is located 6 inches from the battery and all battery current will go through that fuse including starter current. I asked my friend if that 100 amp ANL will handle the starter current. His response was, "It's a 35 amp battery." I told him that a 100 amp ANL might not handle starting current. He said that if it doesn't, he will replace it with a 150 amp.
I think that the fuse will need to be bigger, like 200 amp or more. Actually I do not think that there should be a fuse in series with the battery cable at all. It is one more thing to fail and it adds resistance to the battery cranking circuit. How can I convince my friend that fuse is not necessary or even desired? If he will not change his mind, what size ANL fuse should he use?
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
_________________ Joe Gores |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yellowduckduo(at)gmail.co Guest
|
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 10:21 am Post subject: BATTERY FUSE |
|
|
Tell him to crank it for 20 seconds and check the temperature of the ANL??
If he was serious about "It's a 35 amp battery", the larger implications
are scary for someone trying to run an automotive engine!
A few guys put the blinders on by putting all their dollars and faith in
a particular vendor who may not be giving the best advice, they may be
unreceptive to any other ideas. Some guys just have to learn the hard
way but assure him that an ANL in the ground circuit is not standard
practice. And don't put yourself in the position where a friend or
lawyer will claim you oversaw the project.
Does his second engine ground path provide a current path to the
alternator? That reduces the chance that he will notice if the ANL pops
during a successful engine start though. He does have a second heavy
grounding strap/wire on his electric dependent engine??
FWIW with a crude meter I used to see well over 100 amps cranking sixes
and eights although it pulses heavily at each compression stroke. DC
(no typo) clamp on meters can be had for under $20. these days on ebay
but they are not very useful for pulsating loads like a starter. The 100
ANL will probably work ...for awhile. And hopefully he'll be on the
ground when it goes bad. I've also seen some 4 cylinder engines that
turn over faster and draw more current than the slower cranking larger
engines.
Ken
On 04/03/2017 11:21 AM, user9253 wrote:
Quote: |
A friend of mine is building a plane with an 8 cylinder automotive engine. I noticed that he had installed a 100 amp ANL fuse in series with the battery cable. The fuse is located 6 inches from the battery and all battery current will go through that fuse including starter current. I asked my friend if that 100 amp ANL will handle the starter current. His response was, "It's a 35 amp battery." I told him that a 100 amp ANL might not handle starting current. He said that if it doesn't, he will replace it with a 150 amp.
I think that the fuse will need to be bigger, like 200 amp or more. Actually I do not think that there should be a fuse in series with the battery cable at all. It is one more thing to fail and it adds resistance to the battery cranking circuit. How can I convince my friend that fuse is not necessary or even desired? If he will not change his mind, what size ANL fuse should he use?
--------
Joe Gores
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=466858#466858
|
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
user9253
Joined: 28 Mar 2008 Posts: 1921 Location: Riley TWP Michigan
|
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 11:00 am Post subject: Re: BATTERY FUSE |
|
|
I should have been more specific about the battery cable. He put the ANL in the positive cable, not the ground cable.
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
_________________ Joe Gores |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kellym
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 1705 Location: Sun Lakes AZ
|
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:23 pm Post subject: BATTERY FUSE |
|
|
The battery cable doesn't need protection. If it shorts, it will be a
very short term welding cable. As I'm sure you are trying to persuade,
the ANL should go in the alternator power output cable, and be sized
appropriate to the alternator capacity. Battery size is mostly irrelevant.
The battery/starter cables only need to carry big current during
cranking, and fusing that circuit makes zero sense. If they fail during
cranking, it will be on the ground, and not a hazard to pilot or pax.
On 3/4/2017 12:00 PM, user9253 wrote:
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
_________________ Kelly McMullen
A&P/IA, EAA Tech Counselor # 5286
KCHD |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Eric Page
Joined: 15 Feb 2017 Posts: 245
|
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 8:34 am Post subject: Re: BATTERY FUSE |
|
|
One thing that wasn't mentioned in the other responses...
I'm sure you're aware -- but your friend clearly is not -- that a "35-amp battery" is in no way limited to a maximum current output of 35 amps. That number is an expression of battery capacity: in this case 35 ampere-hours.
A battery's ability to grunt large output currents depends on its internal resistance, which will vary with chemistry, physical construction, temperature, age, and so on. A lead-acid starting battery is typically capable of supplying hundreds of amps.
Eric
user9253 wrote: | A friend of mine is building a plane with an 8 cylinder automotive engine. I noticed that he had installed a 100 amp ANL fuse in series with the battery cable. The fuse is located 6 inches from the battery and all battery current will go through that fuse including starter current. I asked my friend if that 100 amp ANL will handle the starter current. His response was, "It's a 35 amp battery." [SNIP]
|
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 1:15 pm Post subject: BATTERY FUSE |
|
|
At 10:21 AM 3/4/2017, you wrote:
Quote: | --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "user9253" <fransew(at)gmail.com>
A friend of mine is building a plane with an 8 cylinder automotive engine. I noticed that he had installed a 100 amp ANL fuse in series with the battery cable. The fuse is located 6 inches from the battery and all battery current will go through that fuse including starter current. I asked my friend if that 100 amp ANL will handle the starter current. His response was, "It's a 35 amp battery." I told him that a 100 amp ANL might not handle starting current. He said that if it doesn't, he will replace it with a 150 amp.
I think that the fuse will need to be bigger, like 200 amp or more. Actually I do not think that there should be a fuse in series with the battery cable at all. It is one more thing to fail and it adds resistance to the battery cranking circuit. How can I convince my friend that fuse is not necessary or even desired? If he will not change his mind, what size ANL fuse should he use? |
Fuses are cheap, after he pops the first one,
he'll discover that upsizing the limiter is
indicated.
Over a century of experience and product
evolution it was rationally deduced that
fat wires in light aircraft do not benefit
from the addition of over current protection.
Consider that hard-fault protection for
battery excited fat-wires can exceed 1000
amps. Okay, what's a hard fault? Get out
your hammers, chisels and pry-bars. What
would you do to create a connection to any
'grounded' feature of the aircraft such
that great amounts of current can flow . . .
for seconds if not tens of seconds?
Experience and experiments tell us
that inadvertent and tentative contact
of fat wires against anything 'grounded'
is orders of magnitude more likely to burn
away the conductors . . . with no observable
damage to the fat-wire.
I share your concerns but perhaps for not
the same reasons. Clearly, this gentleman
doesn't have a very good grasp of the simple-
ideas behind the performance and selection of
components. It seem likely that the conversation
you had with him about a battery fuse could
be repeated many times over concerning other
aspects of the build.
Perhaps the best thing we can do for him
is get him a copy of the 'Connection and
see how or if it changes his levels of
curiosity/awareness. I'll donate one to
the cause. Send me you mailing address.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
user9253
Joined: 28 Mar 2008 Posts: 1921 Location: Riley TWP Michigan
|
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 3:10 pm Post subject: Re: BATTERY FUSE |
|
|
Bob and others, thanks for your input. My friend already has a copy of your book. Thanks for the offer. I will quote some of the comments to my friend (and leave out others that he might take offense to).
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
_________________ Joe Gores |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bill Allen
Joined: 24 Aug 2009 Posts: 42 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 11:01 pm Post subject: BATTERY FUSE |
|
|
I think that this maybe an example of how what is appropriate standard practice in one industry is not appropriate in another. International safety standards for autos require that, in the event of an impact sufficient to trigger the airbags, certain other items are also activated, amongst which is the automatic battery disconnect. Most vehicles also have separate feeds/fusible links for the starter and consumers, with just the battery feed to the starter becoming disconnected in an impact.
Other inappropriate (to aviation) items are fault detection which place the engine management in "limp mode" which will get a car home at low speed, but cause a forced landing in an aircraft.
There are many other reasons why auto engines have a much higher risk of failure than aircraft engines, but to successfully transfer an auto engine to an aviation environment requires a much deeper understanding of the environment and operation of both than would at first appear. I hope your friend has done his homework.
Bill Allen
LongEzDiesel G-LEZE
CozyIV G-BYLZ
VariEze N2CR
On Sun, 5 Mar 2017 at 21:27, Robert L. Nuckolls, III <nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com (nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com)> wrote:
Quote: | At 10:21 AM 3/4/2017, you wrote: Quote: | --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "user9253" <fransew(at)gmail.com (fransew(at)gmail.com)> A friend of mine is building a plane with an 8 cylinder automotive engine. I noticed that he had installed a 100 amp ANL fuse in series with the battery cable. The fuse is located 6 inches from the battery and all battery current will go through that fuse including starter current. I asked my friend if that 100 amp ANL will handle the starter current. His response was, "It's a 35 amp battery." I told him that a 100 amp ANL might not handle starting current. He said that if it doesn't, he will replace it with a 150 amp. I think that the fuse will need to be bigger, like 200 amp or more. Actually I do not think that there should be a fuse in series with the battery cable at all. It is one more thing to fail and it adds resistance to the battery cranking circuit. How can I convince my friend that fuse is not necessary or even desired? If he will not change his mind, what size ANL fuse should he use? |
Fuses are cheap, after he pops the first one, he'll discover that upsizing the limiter is indicated. Over a century of experience and product evolution it was rationally deduced that fat wires in light aircraft do not benefit from the addition of over current protection. Consider that hard-fault protection for battery excited fat-wires can exceed 1000 amps. Okay, what's a hard fault? Get out your hammers, chisels and pry-bars. What would you do to create a connection to any 'grounded' feature of the aircraft such that great amounts of current can flow . . . for seconds if not tens of seconds? Experience and experiments tell us that inadvertent and tentative contact of fat wires against anything 'grounded' is orders of magnitude more likely to burn away the conductors . . . with no observable damage to the fat-wire. I share your concerns but perhaps for not the same reasons. Clearly, this gentleman doesn't have a very good grasp of the simple- ideas behind the performance and selection of components. It seem likely that the conversation you had with him about a battery fuse could be repeated many times over concerning other aspects of the build. Perhaps the best thing we can do for him is get him a copy of the 'Connection and see how or if it changes his levels of curiosity/awareness. I'll donate one to the cause. Send me you mailing address.
Bob . . .
|
--
Bill AllenLongEz160 N99BA FD51
CZ4 G-BYLZ EGBJ
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|