|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
noms1reqd(at)yahoo.com Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:15 am Post subject: Multiplexer or new antenna |
|
|
Hello. I've added a new comm radio on my RV4. I currently have a Comant CI-122 bent whip. Space is limited on the belly of the RV4. Would it be OK to use a multiplexer and share the antenna or try to find a spot for another antenna? What multiplexer would you recommend?
Thanks.
Jeff Bertsch
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 5:30 am Post subject: Multiplexer or new antenna |
|
|
At 07:13 AM 6/12/2017, you wrote:
Quote: | Hello. I've added a new comm radio on my RV4. I currently have a Comant CI-122 bent whip. Space is limited on the belly of the RV4. Would it be OK to use a multiplexer and share the antenna or try to find a spot for another antenna? What multiplexer would you recommend?
|
Having two or more appliances share a single antenna
is problematic . . . and as Heinlein noted, "There ain't
no such thing as a free lunch".
There are various ways that the energy being received
or transmitted by an antenna may be split into multiple
pathways . . . but the first effect is attenuation of
said energy(ies). The second consideration is ability
to isolate one pathway from another . . . a transmitter
dumping thousands of milliwatts into the feedline
is a severe performance risk (if not destructive) of
other appliances where a pathway is conducting microwatts
of energy.
There ARE power dividers for driving up to two VOR and
two glideslope receivers from a single VOR antenna . . .
but the performance of ALL receivers downstream of
the signal source is degraded . . . and, of course,
NO transmitters are expected to share this system.
The short answer to your question is no. Separate
antennas go to maintaining both PERFORMANCE and
REDUNDANCY of the two transceivers.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kellym
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 1705 Location: Sun Lakes AZ
|
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 5:32 am Post subject: Multiplexer or new antenna |
|
|
Find a place for second antenna. If there isn't room on belly, consider
locations on top of fuselage, or.. I've had success locating a CI-122 on
an inspection plate on underside of a wing. I'm not aware of any
reasonable device that allow sharing a transmitting antenna with
adequate protection from frying the receiver on the other radio.
On 6/12/2017 5:13 AM, Jeff Bertsch wrote:
Quote: | Hello. I've added a new comm radio on my RV4. I currently have a
Comant CI-122 bent whip. Space is limited on the belly of the RV4.
Would it be OK to use a multiplexer and share the antenna or try to
find a spot for another antenna? What multiplexer would you recommend?
Thanks.
Jeff Bertsch
|
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
_________________ Kelly McMullen
A&P/IA, EAA Tech Counselor # 5286
KCHD |
|
Back to top |
|
|
noms1reqd(at)yahoo.com Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 8:26 pm Post subject: Multiplexer or new antenna |
|
|
Thanks Kelly.
Follow up question... I can put a second comm antenna about 3 feet from the existing antenna, but that will place it about 1 foot from the transponder antenna.
Would that be OK since the transponder is so much higher freq?
Jeff
On Monday, June 12, 2017 8:47 AM, Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com> wrote:
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com (kellym(at)aviating.com)>
Find a place for second antenna. If there isn't room on belly, consider
locations on top of fuselage, or.. I've had success locating a CI-122 on
an inspection plate on underside of a wing. I'm not aware of any
reasonable device that allow sharing a transmitting antenna with
adequate protection from frying the receiver on the other radio.
On 6/12/2017 5:13 AM, Jeff Bertsch wrote:
Quote: | Hello. I've added a new comm radio on my RV4. I currently have a
|
Quote: | Comant CI-122 bent whip. Space is limited on the belly of the RV4.
|
Quote: | Would it be OK to use a multiplexer and share the antenna or try to
|
Quote: | find a spot for another antenna? What multiplexer would you recommend?
|
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-Listhttp://forums.matronics.comnbsp; - NEW MATRONICS LIST WIKI -
http://www.matronics.com/contribution====================
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:10 am Post subject: Multiplexer or new antenna |
|
|
At 11:25 PM 6/12/2017, you wrote:
Quote: | Thanks Kelly.
Follow up question... I can put a second comm antenna about 3 feet from the existing antenna, but that will place it about 1 foot from the transponder antenna.
Would that be OK since the transponder is so much higher freq?
Jeff |
If it is a problem, the difficulty will manifest in
misbehaviors by the comm radio. You may hear a burst
of 'buzz' every time the reply light comes on. Baring
that, proximity to the antenna should not be a problem.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kellym
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 1705 Location: Sun Lakes AZ
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 5:18 am Post subject: Multiplexer or new antenna |
|
|
I would rather see you get the separation by putting a com antenna under
a wing. It may be okay, but what is backup plan if it doesn't work and
you have a hole to patch in the fuselage? It is much easier to make an
inspection plate mounting that can be discarded if you don't like the
results.
On 6/13/2017 5:09 AM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III wrote:
Quote: | At 11:25 PM 6/12/2017, you wrote:
> Thanks Kelly.
> Follow up question... I can put a second comm antenna about 3 feet
> from the existing antenna, but that will place it about 1 foot from
> the transponder antenna.
> Would that be OK since the transponder is so much higher freq?
>
> Jeff
If it is a problem, the difficulty will manifest in
misbehaviors by the comm radio. You may hear a burst
of 'buzz' every time the reply light comes on. Baring
that, proximity to the antenna should not be a problem.
Bob . . .
|
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
_________________ Kelly McMullen
A&P/IA, EAA Tech Counselor # 5286
KCHD |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|