Matronics Email Lists :: View topic - Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch?

Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists

Get Email Distribution Too! FAQ Search Memberlist Usergroups Register

Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in

Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch?

Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author Message

nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest

Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 6:54 am Post subject: Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch?

At 11:14 AM 8/23/2017, you wrote:

  	  Quote: 	
		  --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "jonlaury" <jonlaury(at)impulse.net>



 Joe and Charlie,



 The switch controls an electronic lamp ballast driving two 75W UVC producing. I don't know if that is inductive or resistive  load. Steady state amperage is 800ma



 And found this white paper(excerpt) on electronic ballasts. :



 "Design Considerations for Electronic Ballasts



 Inrush currents at turn-on, produced from some electronic 

 ballasts can cause premature relay contact failures. 

 These inrush currents can be much higher than those 

 experienced with traditional tungsten or magnetic ballast 

 loads because many electronic ballasts employ large 

 energy storage capacitors. Such capacitors can charge up 

 to 400V for a 277V line voltage, and will briefly draw high 

 current from the line to achieve this voltage. 

 As mentioned above, these typically short inrush currents 

 can climb as high as 100 times the nominal operating 

 levels. 	


   ALL devices with metallic contacts have

   difficulties with capacitive loads.

   The majority of my experiences with 

   premature contact failures involved

   capacitive loads.



   Consider adding inrush limiting to the

   switched pathway



  http://tinyurl.com/yacaagsp



   These are negative temperature coefficient

   resistors with substantial room temperature

   resistance that falls to insignificant

   resistance after being allowed to warm up

   under the steady state load. 



   I've only had occasion to use these once

   on an airplane (P-180). The techs working

   the experimental airplane came to my desk

   complaining that the things kept 'blowing

   up'.  Turns out they had mounted the device

   to adjacent lamp housing such that internal

   heating was transferred to the housing.

   The devices were not being allowed to warm up,

   internal dissipation remained high and they

   went into self destruction.



   So be sure to mount these such that free air

   is the only heat sink.



   It may take a bit of fiddling to get the

   optimum part . . . but this one seems

   a likely starting point for your quest.



  http://tinyurl.com/y92bs8ba



 



 

   Bob . . .

jonlaury

Joined: 06 Nov 2006
Posts: 336

Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 10:41 am Post subject: Re: Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch?

Thanks Bob,

Although suspicion has risen that my step-down power supply is the culprit (40a inrush), I appreciate learning about inrush current limiters for their small form and small price compared to clunky hi amperage/price relays, mechanical or solid state.



John

nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest

Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2017 5:59 am Post subject: Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch?

At 01:36 PM 8/24/2017, you wrote:

  	  Quote: 	
		  --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "jonlaury" <jonlaury(at)impulse.net>



 After further investigation, suspicion has grown about the inrush current to the power supply that I'm using. 



 The ballast mfgr says any inrush to the ballast is not a problem for the garden-variety installation. The thing that is different about my install is the inclusion of a step-down power supply that specs 40A inrush current...8x the switch spec of 5A. 



 Stay tuned

 John 	


   Okay, I've lost my mental image of the

   configuration. Can you sketch and scan

   a schematic of the major components along

   with location of the switch?



 

 

   Bob . . .

jonlaury

Joined: 06 Nov 2006
Posts: 336

Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 9:00 am Post subject: Re: Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch?

Bob,

Here's the schematic, and late breaking...the ballast mfgr engineer informed me that the max inrush for the ballast is 101 A. Combined with the Pwr Supply's 40A inrush, rough duty for a 5A switch.



Thanks for looking at this,

John

MeanWell RS-100-24 -spec.pdf

Description:

Download

Filename:

MeanWell RS-100-24 -spec.pdf

Filesize:

123.13 KB

Downloaded:

618 Time(s)

M4 wireout.pdf

Description:

Download

Filename:

M4 wireout.pdf

Filesize:

8.61 KB

Downloaded:

542 Time(s)

nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest

Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2017 4:38 pm Post subject: Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch?

At 12:00 PM 8/26/2017, you wrote:

  	  Quote: 	
		  --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "jonlaury" <jonlaury(at)impulse.net>



 Bob,

 Here's the schematic, and late breaking...the ballast mfgr engineer informed me that the max inrush for the ballast is 101 A. Combined with the Pwr Supply's 40A inrush, rough duty for a 5A switch.



 Thanks for looking at this,

 John



 	


   Okay, let's talk about 'inrush' currents.



 [img]cid:.0[/img]



  Here's a simple model of an inrush-energy study that will

  suffice for this discussion. In reality, the model is

  much more complex with features (inductances and capacitances)

  combined with dynamics of the power source and timing . . .

  if you close a switch at the exact instant the AC voltage

  is at its peak, then MAXIMUM inrush currents can be expected.

  On the other hand, if you can somehow close the switch while

  the incoming voltage is zero . . . then inrush effects on

  the switch will be . . . uh . . . almost zero.



  I show two resistances, Rs which is the source resistance.

  This component sets the maximum current that can flow if a

  dead short is placed across the source. It also set the

  requirements for 'interrupt current ratings' on circuit

  breakers and fuses.



  Then I've show a load resistance Rl which is controlled

  by the configuration of your products input components,

  in this case . . . a combined ballast and power supply.



  The ballast mfgr has quoted a rather impressive inrush

  current number . . . which is only partly significant.

  Consider a range CAPACITORS sized from picofarads

  to farads.  The exact instant that your switch contacts

  close, the inrush current will be  V(applied)/Rs+Rl and

  may very well be on the order of 100 amps . . . which

  says NOTHING about the size of the capacitor, only that

  V is applied over the total resitance for some period of

  time after contact closure.



  If C is picofarads, the DURATION of the inrush event is

  very short, perhaps measured in picoseconds. If C is

  Farads (like some of those capacitors favored by

  installers of mobile gray-matter mashers) then the

  duration of inrush event is orders of magnitude more

  severe.



  The ability of a switch to manage that event has roots

  in contact mass, spring rates of closing forces and

  velocity of the moving contact mass as it crashes into it's

  stationary mate.



  Contact bounce is an inevitable feature of ALL mechanical

  switches. Further, the severity of bounce is only loosely

  related to the switches pedigree. Here's a study I did

  on a system with mil-spec, sealed relays that were GOING

  to stick irrespective of how well the device was

  built.



  http://tinyurl.com/pstsggm



  As you can see in this article, the sticking

  wasn't even a high energy event. The relays were being

  used in a situation well inside their catalog ratings . . .

  but a combination of capacitance and PROPAGATION delay

  down and back over a crude coaxial feed line stacked

  up to offer the 'perfect low energy relay welder'. 



  The 100A inrush value offered by your supplier simply

  acknowledges that there is some capacitive component

  across the input to their product . . . but no help

  for how large it might be.



  Obviously, the COMBINATION of that inrush energy event

  and contact bounce on your switch of choice has produced

  a condition prone to sticking.



  What kind of switch are we talking about? How long does

  it take to produce a failure event? Have you been able to

  duplicate the sticking even in a laboratory environment?

  Are there a lot of fielded devices that may need

  upgrading? One sure bet for fixing the problem and staying

  with your existing switch is to add some electronics behind

  the panel . . . perhaps a solid state relay with ZERO CROSSING

  detection that reduces inrush to a minimum.



  http://tinyurl.com/y7rst4a6



  http://tinyurl.com/y8g8zyj9



  Another possibility is to change the switch. Just a

  difference in brand for the same physical switch

  can make a big difference. Adding to Rl in the

  inrush loop, either inrush limiter or perhaps just

  a 3 ohm, 5 watt resistor (1A running current across

  three ohms is 3 volts drop, 3W dissipated . . . but

  a reduction in inrush MAGNITUDE by a factor of 3

  or more . . . with an insignificant change in

  over all performance.



  Making the elegant decision demands more data. Perhaps

  'scope traces on the inrush event. A study of bounce

  characteristics of the switch. Better data on exactly

  what the inputs to your loads look like will help.



  But it seems likely that a change in brand/style

  of switch is the shortest path and perhaps even

  doable as a field retrofit. The elegant equation

  demands a lot more 'numbers' 



  

  



 

 

   Bob . . .

2f27bc.jpg

Description:

Filesize:

214.33 KB

Viewed:

17097 Time(s)

jonlaury

Joined: 06 Nov 2006
Posts: 336

Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 8:14 am Post subject: Re: Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch?

Bob,

A thousand thanks!



And I found your explorations and findings about the relay failures on rolll trim control boards fascinating, if for no other reason than the failure symptoms are almost identical to what I'm seeing with my product.



My switch failures are beginning to occur after about 30-60 cycles. Thinking that the sticking was purely mechanical, and acknowledging the problem to users, I suggested unplugging the machine, squirting WD40 into the pushbutton recess and cycling the switch until they got a blister on their finger, to erode/smooth the imagined rough edges of the switch internals. It either worked or customers just didn't want to talk to a crazy person any more, because very few reported a continuing problem. I even rigged up a reciprocating saw with a 'boxing glove' to wear-in the switch, as a misguided, pre-conditioning preventative.



Your analysis, with remedies, is a crescendo of angelic voices, coincident with brilliant, golden light, illuminating the path out of blasphemous tinkering to electronic righteousness. I feel cleansed.  



One more impertinent question:

In the zero-crossing relay suggested, the load side spec is 250vac (at) 2a. The steady-state ballast load is 800ma and the motor draws about 2a. Will the relay take it? or am I missing something here?



Thanks again,

John

user9253

Joined: 28 Mar 2008
Posts: 1926
Location: Riley TWP Michigan

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 5:10 am Post subject: Re: Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch?

What if a solid state relay and a mechanical relay are connected in parallel?  The solid state relay will turn on a fraction of a second prior to the mechanical contacts closing and will conduct while the mechanical contacts are bouncing.  Once the mechanical contacts have stopped bouncing, then they will carry the full load.

  Or use only a solid state relay rated for the current.

_________________
Joe Gores

nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 5:29 am Post subject: Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch?

At 11:14 AM 8/28/2017, you wrote:

  	  Quote: 	
		  --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "jonlaury" <jonlaury(at)impulse.net>



 Bob,

 A thousand thanks!



 And I found your explorations and findings about the relay failures on rolll trim control boards fascinating, if for no other reason than the failure symptoms are almost identical to what I'm seeing with my product.



 My switch failures are beginning to occur after about 30-60 cycles. Thinking that the sticking was purely mechanical, and acknowledging the problem to users, I suggested unplugging the machine, squirting WD40 into the pushbutton recess and cycling the switch until they got a blister on their finger, to erode/smooth the imagined rough edges of the switch internals. It either worked or customers just didn't want to talk to a crazy person any more, because very few reported a continuing problem. I even rigged up a reciprocating saw with a 'boxing glove' to wear-in the switch, as a misguided, pre-conditioning preventative. 	


   Yup, been there . . . or at least some of

   my compadres have. There was a chronic difficulty

   with nuisance tripping the ov system on the

   A36/B55 series aircraft . . .that stuck its

   head up several times over a span of some

   30 years. One attempt at a fix included taking

   brand new alternators and running them at load

   on a drive stand for 20 hours or so before putting

   them on the airplane . . . seems the problems were

   mitigated with service time.



   The operative theory at the time was that QC issues

   with slip ring/brush interface was root cause of

   the problem. A break-in operation seemed to help.

   As it turns out, the brush/slip ring interface

   was a NORMAL condition that was only a trigger

   for root cause.



   Got to watch that same problem pop up about every

   5-10 years or so. But it wasn't until my very last

   service offered to the then newly amalgamated Textron, 

   I suggested again, that it wasn't the alternator's

   fault . . . but that of the ov regulators ov

   protection system.



   We started a stone simple fix before my

   contract ran out. At least I didn't have to

   endure the machinations and pretzel twisting

   it took to get one set of guts lifted out of

   a regulator with a decades long, stellar track

   record and installed inside the regulator enclosure for

   the Beech products. i.e. a presto-changeo

   creation of a form-fit-function replacement

   for a regulator that had NEVER been subjected to

   DO-160 study for suitability to task. A task

   that we would have accomplished in mere

   days back in the day . . . took nearly a year

   under the 'new order'.



 

  	  Quote: 	
		  Your analysis, with remedies, is a crescendo of angelic voices, coincident with brilliant, golden light, illuminating the path out of blasphemous tinkering to electronic righteousness. I feel cleansed.  	


   You're too kind . . . but you appreciate the

   the kind of thought processes and experiments

   that have to be conducted to (1) eliminate that

   which does not work, (2) identify that which

   does work and (3) sift all the options in quest of

   the elegant solution.



   That relay study on roll trim cards took about

   two years as the activities had to be interleaved

   with more pressing matters. And I was the only

   one working on it. A 'tiger team' of similarly

   thoughtful and motivated students of the physical

   arts would have been very helpful. Same story with pitch

   trim motor failures that plagued Beech to the tune

   of $millions$ in warranty claims and lost

   customer confidence.



   Maybe I'll publish that paper one day . . . it's

   a real zinger . . . and like the roll trim relay

   studies, it took years of looking for the answers

   to 'what if' and 'how about this'. Sorta like

   technological whack-a-mole. Then one day, one

   of the heads that popped up was the Eureka mole.



 

  	  Quote: 	
		  One more impertinent question:

 In the zero-crossing relay suggested, the load side spec is 250vac (at) 2a. The steady-state ballast load is 800ma and the motor draws about 2a. Will the relay take it? or am I missing something here? 	


   Good eye. Yeah, if THAT option is attractive, you'll

   need a beefier device. Maybe something like this.



  http://tinyurl.com/y8bfqm5o



   While on a patient transfer from Wichita today I

   had a brain-fart that might be the simplest

   solution.  You could craft your own buffer

   circuit for the switch from a triac and a couple

   resistors like this. 



 

 [img]cid:.0[/img]



   This could be nothing more than two resistors

   soldered together with the triac, lead wires

   attached and then coated in some  insulating

   encapsulant . . . maybe RTV, E6000 or thixotropic

   epoxy. In technical terms this is known as a

   "Kludge".



   This would reduce stresses on your switch to mere

   tens of milliamps and then only for tens of

   microseconds at each re-triggering event just

   after the ac wave form zero-crossing. Even if the

   switch were close at the top of the wave form,

   current through the switch and its series resistor

   would be limited to an amp or so and again, for

   tens of microseconds.



   This buffer for your switch contacts raises

   potential for a new failure mode. . .  corrosion

   over time on switch contacts causing them

   to STOP conducting . . . not enough 'cleansing

   current' flowing during each switch closure

   to keep them free of oxides. But that risk

   is generally years out into the future. 



 

   Bob . . .

818a56c.jpg

Description:

Filesize:

74.53 KB

Viewed:

17067 Time(s)

Eric Page

Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Posts: 247

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:36 am Post subject: Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch?

 	  Quote: 	
		   	  Quote: 	
		  --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "jonlaury" <jonlaury(at)impulse.net (jonlaury(at)impulse.net)> In the zero-crossing relay suggested, the load side spec is 250vac (at) 2a. The steady-state ballast load is 800ma and the motor draws about 2a. Will the relay take it? or am I missing something here? 	
	




On Aug 29, 2017, at 6:29 AM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III <nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com (nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com)> wrote: 	  Quote: 	
		  Good eye. Yeah, if THAT option is attractive, you'll need a beefier device. Maybe something like this.



  http://tinyurl.com/y8bfqm5o

	


Careful...  the linked SSR is a DC-DC device.  It's basically an opto-isolated MOSFET or Darlington.  It might work as a rectifier, but only briefly!



For this application the output side has got to be labeled for AC, then it'll contain a triac or souce-connected N-MOSFETs.



If Jon isn't hesitant to use offshore sources for his parts, he might try these...



http://www.ebay.com/itm/112021093981



I've used a couple in mains-powered projects and had no trouble with them.  They're not a brand anyone has ever heard of, but they seem to work, the price is right, and the screw terminals lend themselves to a field retrofit better than a PCB-mounted SIP package.



If heat sinking or a safety cover are desired, see...



http://www.ebay.com/itm/112159075071

and...

http://www.ebay.com/itm/112266161948



Keep in mind also that anything from China with a $0.99 price tag and a name brand like OMRON printed on it is going to be a case of blatant IP theft.



Eric

[Edited to correct spelling of Jon's name, and for formatting.]

Eric Page

Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Posts: 247

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 10:41 am Post subject: Re: Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch?

Upon reflection, the SSR that I linked to won't work without some redesign of the machine's circuitry, as it needs a DC input.  The easiest retrofit for Jon to do would be to use an AC-AC SSR and control it with the existing switch that's already in the machine.



Here's an eBay search for parts that will work: http://preview.tinyurl.com/ybqcog6g



These SSRs are available from 10A to 100A; just change the eBay search term.



If using a known-source part is an issue, here's a Digi-Key search for AC-AC zero-cross SSRs, 5A or greater, sorted by price: http://preview.tinyurl.com/yamzd5vc



Connect as shown in the attached diagram.



Eric

SSR_Ckt.jpg

Description:

Filesize:

37.62 KB

Viewed:

17032 Time(s)

jonlaury

Joined: 06 Nov 2006
Posts: 336

Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:20 am Post subject: Re: Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch?

[quote="Eric Page"] 	  Quote: 	
		  



Keep in mind also that anything from China with a $0.99 price tag and a name brand like OMRON printed on it is going to be a case of blatant IP theft. 	




Hi Eric

Thanks for your suggestion and I did buy a lot of 3 "Omron" AC-AC SSR's from Ebay. They're labelled with Omron's logo and Made in China, $25. Probably not Omron product, right?

The question that looms large in my mind is, are they truly zero-crossing relays? Is there a way to test that function without a lot of expensive equipment? Or who would have the needed equipment so that I could have them tested?



John

Eric Page

Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Posts: 247

Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2017 9:43 am Post subject: Re: Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch?

 	  jonlaury wrote: 	
		  

Hi Eric

Thanks for your suggestion and I did buy a lot of 3 "Omron" AC-AC SSR's from Ebay. They're labelled with Omron's logo and Made in China, $25. Probably not Omron product, right?

The question that looms large in my mind is, are they truly zero-crossing relays? Is there a way to test that function without a lot of expensive equipment? Or who would have the needed equipment so that I could have them tested?



John 	


There's probably no way to know for sure if they're genuine unless you have a known-good example to compare against.  Chinese knock-off products frequently have noticeable errors or differences in printing quality or method in the part markings (i.e. the real part may be laser-etched while the knock-off is screen printed).  Even this comparison isn't foolproof, as the manufacturer may produce differences between lots or between factories.



OMRON is a Japanese company, but like everyone else, they probably run -- or contract with -- factories in China.



Anyone with an oscilloscope should be able to determine if they're zero-cross SSRs by viewing the output waveform at switch-on.  There is potential to destroy an oscilloscope when measuring mains voltages, so be sure that whoever does this for you knows what they're doing WRT test setup, isolation and high voltage measurement.  It goes without saying that you touch ONLY the low voltage control side of the circuit during the test.



Knock-off or not, if they're marked as zero-cross SSRs, I'd be very surprised if they're not.  It's a pretty trivial thing to accomplish.



If you find that they're not, the AC-AC Fotek brand parts on eBay that I linked to in my last post look like they are...



http://www.fotek.com.hk/solid/SSR-2.htm



...and anything you get from Digi-Key, Newark, Mouser, Allied, Jameco, etc. will be genuine and function as specified.



Eric

nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest

Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:40 am Post subject: Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch?

At 11:20 AM 9/3/2017, you wrote:

  	  Quote: 	
		  --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "jonlaury" <jonlaury(at)impulse.net>

 [quote="Eric Page"]

 > 

 > 

 > Keep in mind also that anything from China with a $0.99 price tag and a name brand like OMRON printed on it is going to be a case of blatant IP theft.

 Hi Eric

 Thanks for your suggestion and I did buy a lot of 3 "Omron" AC-AC SSR's from Ebay. They're labelled with Omron's logo and Made in China, $25. Probably not Omron product, right?

 The question that looms large in my mind is, are they truly zero-crossing relays? Is there a way to test that function without a lot of expensive equipment? Or who would have the needed equipment so that I could have them tested? 	

    The SSR contains a triac (bi-directional, triggered

    switch). It's the same critter I sugeseted in my po'

    boy's SSR Kludge a fews posts back.

    By nature, ANY AC solid state relay will be

    as close to a 'zero crossing' controller as

    you can get.  On the upswing of each half of

    an AC waveform, a network of components are arranged

    to bias the TRIAC gate to the threshold of trigger.

    After that time, the TRIAC becomes almost a dead

    short (about 1.5v drop) and the switch can be

    deemed to be "ON".

    Here's a rudimentary lamp dimmer schematic:

   Notice one of the devices in the trigger network

   is called a DIAC . . . this is a voltage sensitive

   two terminal device that 'triggers' above some

   specified voltage. DIMMING is accomplished

   by adjusting the resistance in the R/C network

   to control DELAY in rise of the trigger volage.

   The more resistance, the longer the delay.  A

   longer delay moves the TRIAC trigger further away

   from zero crossing thus REDUCING energy fed to the

   load.

   Here's a rudimentary solid state AC "relay"

   Here we see a little different trigger network for the

   TRIAC. In this case, an LED is optically coupled to a

   light sensitive DIAC such that if the LED is illuminated,

   the DIAC will fire and trigger the TRIAC at the lowest

   practical amplitude in the upward excursion of each

   half of the AC waveform.

   So technically, this relay does not close at the true

   zero crossing . . . but it's very close. Within 10 volts

   or so. Good enough for most applications.

   These relays will work to mitigate your switch failure

   issues as the current flowing in the LED loop is on the

   order of 30mA or less. But you DO need a DC source of

   power to energize the LED. It's only a few volts but it

   does add to system complexity.  You could rig a bridge

   rectifier, a capacitor and a couple resistors to provide

   the low energy source of DC.

   But if you need to fabricate something anyhow, perhaps

   the Kludge I offered earlier is the more elegant configuration. 

   The short answer is: You don't need to test these relays

   for their zero-crossing qualities since chief complaint

   is switch failure. The relays will take care of the switch

   problem after you figure out how to integrate the SSR

   into your design. 

   There are AC/AC SSR's . . . they feature TWO opto couplers

   back to back so that an LED source of either polarity

   will turn the SSR ON. 

   Bob . . .

jonlaury

Joined: 06 Nov 2006
Posts: 336

Posted: Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:30 am Post subject: Re: Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch?



DNA



What I absolutely love about AEL.



Thanks to both of you, Bob and Eric, for piquing my curiosity, making me stretch to expand my knowledge and skill set. The forum is in every way the embodiment of the adage, "Give a man a fish and he eats tonight. Teach him to fish...he and his family eat for a lifetime" 



I've got some 47 Ω, 3A NTC thermistors I'm going to try, with the idea that I could, inexpensively, make up a bunch of low tech field-repair devices that can be installed with two wire nuts by users. For unshipped units henceforth, I plan to use the AC/AC SSR's until I can find a suitable, beefier power switch. 



All good things,

John



[[/b]

nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2017 3:09 pm Post subject: Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch?

At 02:30 PM 9/4/2017, you wrote:

  	  Quote: 	
		  --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "jonlaury" <jonlaury(at)impulse.net>



 

 DNA



 What I absolutely love about AEL.



 Thanks to both of you, Bob and Eric, for piquing my curiosity, making me stretch to expand my knowledge and skill set. The forum is in every way the embodiment of the adage, "Give a man a fish and he eats tonight. Teach him to fish...he and his family eat for a lifetime" 



 I've got some 47 Ω, 3A NTC thermistors I'm going to try, with the idea that I could, inexpensively, make up a bunch of low tech field-repair devices that can be installed with two wire nuts by users. For unshipped units henceforth, I plan to use the AC/AC SSR's until I can find a suitable, beefier power switch. 	


  3A?  Try to pick an NTC with (1) operating current

  close to your measured running loads and (2) max

  applied voltage of 120vac or greater. See

  this for the nitty-gritty guidelines . . .



  http://tinyurl.com/yahtoncs



 



 

 

   Bob . . .

jonlaury

Joined: 06 Nov 2006
Posts: 336

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2017 12:00 pm Post subject: Re: Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch?

In the first section of the article re selecting the right ICL, I'm asked for Capacitance. But neither the ballast nor the power supply list that info on their product cut-sheets.

Is there away to deduce the capacitance from other supplied info? E.G., inrush current on PS is 40A (at) 250vac. Ballast is 100A (at) 120vac



Power Supply and Ballast data sheets attached.

WH7-120-L datasheet.pdf

Description:

Download

Filename:

WH7-120-L datasheet.pdf

Filesize:

76.45 KB

Downloaded:

542 Time(s)

Meanwell RS-100-24-spec.pdf

Description:

Download

Filename:

Meanwell RS-100-24-spec.pdf

Filesize:

123.13 KB

Downloaded:

489 Time(s)

jonlaury

Joined: 06 Nov 2006
Posts: 336

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2017 12:27 pm Post subject: Re: Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch?

"3A?"



The steady state load is about 1A, to keep the ballast happy. There's a user selected load of 1.5A that has a 25 second cycle to open circuit. Often the selection is repeated multiple times in quick succession. So the 3A was to allow a little headroom for motor surge (Does a PM motor have a surge?) and 2.5 steady state. I installed the 3A ICL yesterday and everything seems to work fine with the ICL temp settling at about 145 deg F on my meat thermometer held on with a clothes pin.

Display posts from previous:

	Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List	All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum