|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bicyclop(at)pacbell.net Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 5:47 pm Post subject: .020 tail feathers from .016 |
|
|
Howdy,
Our 6-a (O-320, Sensenich) suffered tail feather damage at the hands of
a drunk (we assume) who wasn't watching where he was going Saturday
night at Shelter Cove, CA. Beautiful place, no security. I'm fixing to
build new elevators and rudder and am looking at using .020 skins in
place of the, rather easily damaged, .016 skins. Has anybody out there
switched skin thickness and how did it affect your CG? Van's tells me
that it's 6 pounds heavier which seems like a lot that far aft. This is
the non-counter balanced rudder. I'm wondering if the 6 pound figure
includes the counterbalance on the later model rudder. It seems like a
lot for .004 worth of sheet metal on the 3 surfaces.
Pax,
Ed Holyoke
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gary.A.Sobek
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 217 Location: SoCAL USA
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 6:52 pm Post subject: .020 tail feathers from .016 |
|
|
I changed from 0.016 to 0.025 on the elevators 8 years ago after pushing my
airplane into a pole. I found NO weight difference. Yes the airplane
weighted 8 pounds more after painting (weighed on calibrated scales) and the
elevators but I do not know how much of the 8 pounds was just to the
elevators. I assumed it was all paint.
Gary A. Sobek
"My Sanity" RV-6 N157GS O-320 Hartzell,
1,894 + Flying Hours So. CA, USA
http://SoCAL_WVAF.rvproject.com
----Original Message Follows----
Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com
Howdy,
Our 6-a (O-320, Sensenich) suffered tail feather damage at the hands of
a drunk (we assume) who wasn't watching where he was going Saturday
night at Shelter Cove, CA. Beautiful place, no security. I'm fixing to
build new elevators and rudder and am looking at using .020 skins in
place of the, rather easily damaged, .016 skins. Has anybody out there
switched skin thickness and how did it affect your CG? Van's tells me
that it's 6 pounds heavier which seems like a lot that far aft. This is
the non-counter balanced rudder. I'm wondering if the 6 pound figure
includes the counterbalance on the later model rudder. It seems like a
lot for .004 worth of sheet metal on the 3 surfaces.
Pax,
Ed Holyoke
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
retasker(at)optonline.net Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 8:43 pm Post subject: .020 tail feathers from .016 |
|
|
Six pounds seems reasonably likely for the change in thickness. Since
aluminum weighs approximately 0.0955 lbs/cu. in. and you are adding
0.004" all over the elevator and rudder it follows that the tail surface
area would calculate to be 15,700 sq. in. or 109 sq. ft. (6 lbs / 0.0955
lbs/cu / 0.004" = 15707 sq. in.) which certainly seems to be in the ball
park.
Dick Tasker
Ed Holyoke wrote:
Quote: |
Howdy,
Our 6-a (O-320, Sensenich) suffered tail feather damage at the hands of
a drunk (we assume) who wasn't watching where he was going Saturday
night at Shelter Cove, CA. Beautiful place, no security. I'm fixing to
build new elevators and rudder and am looking at using .020 skins in
place of the, rather easily damaged, .016 skins. Has anybody out there
switched skin thickness and how did it affect your CG? Van's tells me
that it's 6 pounds heavier which seems like a lot that far aft. This is
the non-counter balanced rudder. I'm wondering if the 6 pound figure
includes the counterbalance on the later model rudder. It seems like a
lot for .004 worth of sheet metal on the 3 surfaces.
Pax,
Ed Holyoke
|
--
Please Note:
No trees were destroyed in the sending of this message. We do concede, however,
that a significant number of electrons may have been temporarily inconvenienced.
--
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bob Perkinson
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 51 Location: Hendersonville, Tennessee
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 9:38 pm Post subject: .020 tail feathers from .016 |
|
|
Doing a quick square measurement of my -9 rudder and elevators ( not taking
in consideration the Rudder taper or counter weight arms) I come up with
6678 sq inches. (Rudder 53" X 27" X 2 surfaces = 2862 sq. in., Elevators
17" X 56" X 4 surfaces = 3808 sq. in. total 6678 sq. in. If you throw in
another 322 sq. in. for good measure and rounding off the total to 7000 sq.
in., and using .0955 lbs/cu. in. you would come up with 2.674 lb. ( 2.674
/ 0.0955 lbs/cu. in./0.004" = 7000 sq. in. or 48.61 sq. ft. ) Of course
the increase in rivet length might bring the weight up slightly. YMMV
Bob Perkinson
Hendersonville, TN.
RV9 N658RP Reserved
If nothing changes
Nothing changes
Six pounds seems reasonably likely for the change in thickness. Since
aluminum weighs approximately 0.0955 lbs/cu. in. and you are adding
0.004" all over the elevator and rudder it follows that the tail surface
area would calculate to be 15,700 sq. in. or 109 sq. ft. (6 lbs / 0.0955
lbs/cu / 0.004" = 15707 sq. in.) which certainly seems to be in the ball
park.
Dick Tasker
Ed Holyoke wrote:
Quote: |
Howdy,
Our 6-a (O-320, Sensenich) suffered tail feather damage at the hands of
a drunk (we assume) who wasn't watching where he was going Saturday
night at Shelter Cove, CA. Beautiful place, no security. I'm fixing to
build new elevators and rudder and am looking at using .020 skins in
place of the, rather easily damaged, .016 skins. Has anybody out there
switched skin thickness and how did it affect your CG? Van's tells me
that it's 6 pounds heavier which seems like a lot that far aft. This is
the non-counter balanced rudder. I'm wondering if the 6 pound figure
includes the counterbalance on the later model rudder. It seems like a
lot for .004 worth of sheet metal on the 3 surfaces.
Pax,
Ed Holyoke
|
--
Please Note:
No trees were destroyed in the sending of this message. We do concede,
however,
that a significant number of electrons may have been temporarily
inconvenienced.
--
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
rv7(at)b4.ca Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 10:00 pm Post subject: .020 tail feathers from .016 |
|
|
On 21:36:56 2006-07-18 "Richard E. Tasker" <retasker(at)optonline.net> wrote:
Quote: | Six pounds seems reasonably likely for the change in thickness.
Since aluminum weighs approximately 0.0955 lbs/cu. in. and you are
adding 0.004" all over the elevator and rudder it follows that the
tail surface area would calculate to be 15,700 sq. in. or 109 sq. ft.
(6 lbs / 0.0955 lbs/cu / 0.004" = 15707 sq. in.) which certainly
seems to be in the ball park.
|
109 square feet for the elevator and rudder sounds quite high to me.
You've got about 10' of span, times about 1' of chord (average) times two
surfaces = 20 square feet of area for both sides of the elevator. Half
again for the rudder would be about 30 square feet total. So using your
numbers above, you should be looking at something under 2 lb.
-Rob
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
rv7(at)b4.ca Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 10:00 pm Post subject: .020 tail feathers from .016 |
|
|
On 22:37:04 2006-07-18 "Bob Perkinson" <bobperk(at)bellsouth.net> wrote:
Quote: | Of course the increase in rivet
length might bring the weight up slightly. YMMV
|
I just about said that too... But you included the increase as a uniform
increase across all the surfaces, so the increase in rivet length is
already included (if you assume the density of the rivets is comparable to
the density of the skins, which is reasonable in this case).
-Rob
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|