Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Static system tests

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Kellym



Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 1705
Location: Sun Lakes AZ

PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2020 3:18 pm    Post subject: Static system tests Reply with quote

I recently came upon a question that I don't find a clear answer in
91.411 or 91.413. Aircraft in question is either ELSA or E-AMB, built
for VFR only. It is based under Mode C veil, and may have need to fly
transitions through Class B, so it has to have ADS-B Out.
The question is what level, if any, of certification the static system
needs to assure that the ADS-B altitude reported is accurate?
I am thinking a leak check at a minimum, but don't see any clear
requirement. I would appreciate your thoughts on the subject.


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List

_________________
Kelly McMullen
A&P/IA, EAA Tech Counselor # 5286
KCHD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ornerycuss2001(at)protonm
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2020 4:53 pm    Post subject: Static system tests Reply with quote

91.217b requires that the pressure altitude for the transponder and ADSB come from the same source. Finding no other requirement for ADSB by itself it seems reasonable that a static system check for the transponder would be sufficient.

I believe ADSB transmits both pressure altitude and GPS altitude. I'm guessing any large discrepancy would be flagged by the ADSB ground system and a (computer generated) letter of correction would be sent to the registered owner.

FWIW, I just had my static system and transponder checked (transponder is also the ADSB box) and no separate check was performed for ADSB altitude information.


Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Monday, July 13, 2020 4:12 PM, Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com> wrote:

Quote:


I recently came upon a question that I don't find a clear answer in
91.411 or 91.413. Aircraft in question is either ELSA or E-AMB, built
for VFR only. It is based under Mode C veil, and may have need to fly
transitions through Class B, so it has to have ADS-B Out.
The question is what level, if any, of certification the static system
needs to assure that the ADS-B altitude reported is accurate?
I am thinking a leak check at a minimum, but don't see any clear
requirement. I would appreciate your thoughts on the subject.


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group