Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

LiFePO4 friendly electrical system, was: Re: Premature Eart

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ceengland7(at)gmail.com
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2020 6:04 am    Post subject: LiFePO4 friendly electrical system, was: Re: Premature Eart Reply with quote

On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:52 AM Robert L. Nuckolls, III <nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com (nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com)> wrote:

Quote:
 P.S.

> Such a system would not necessarily be unfriendly
> to SVLA.

  I've got a new AeroVolts product on the test
  bench right now running the traps on energy
  vs. charge discharge profiles. I've got an
  EarthX device waiting to run the same
  tests.  Already have lots of SLVA data.

  I've been thinking a lot about the
  LiFePO4 friendly electrical system
  with a goal of reducing parts count
  and cost-of-ownership. The weight
  reduction may not produce observable
  benefits but at least it shouldn't
  cost so much or impact reliability.


  Bob . . .
Add my vote for an architecture that allows 'bare' LiFePO4 batteries to be used. While I have no desire to pay an almost 10X premium to save 10 lbs, I do think that the brand X crowd is deceiving themselves if they think the battery is a functional drop-in replacement for SLA. There are failure modes (and even 'normal' operating modes) that can take the battery off line, without any control by the operator (pilot). I suspect that many early adopters haven't done an adequate 'FMEA' on all the potential ramifications of inserting a fully automatic, non-user-controllable BMS in the loop.
Some things do benefit from automation, but others don't. For instance, most of us won't accept an engine controller that automatically shuts the engine down due to low oil pressure. We want to be notified, and make the call on shutdown based on immediate circumstances. Automatic dropping the battery off line could in some circumstances be just as hazardous.
Charlie


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
ceengland7(at)gmail.com
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2020 8:00 am    Post subject: LiFePO4 friendly electrical system, was: Re: Premature Eart Reply with quote

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 9:54 AM Rob Turk <matronics(at)rtist.nl (matronics(at)rtist.nl)> wrote:

Quote:
Just as another data point. I run an AeroAkku LFP450D which I bought in Germany. It's in my Rans S-6S with a Jabiru 3300 engine. The AeroAkku replaced an Odyssey PC680 and with mounting hardware combined I shaved about 14lbs off the weight of the plane, which equates to 40 minutes of fuel capacity. The LFP450D has integrated balancer and protection circuitry, nothing external needed. It costs about 3x the PC680.

The charge circuit required no changes, the cheap Kubota regulator and the 25A PMA work just fine with this setup. I do keep a LiFePO4 specific charger on the battery when not flying, but other than that it's maintenance free and it spins my Jabiru like there's no tomorrow. Even when cold, after 'waking up' the chemistry by running a couple of loads.

I should really replace the battery due to age, I installed it in 2013.. After 7 years still going strong every time.

Rob

On 7/15/2020 4:00 PM, Charlie England wrote:

Quote:




On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:52 AM Robert L. Nuckolls, III <nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com (nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com)> wrote:

Quote:
 P.S.

> Such a system would not necessarily be unfriendly
> to SVLA.

  I've got a new AeroVolts product on the test
  bench right now running the traps on energy
  vs. charge discharge profiles. I've got an
  EarthX device waiting to run the same
  tests.  Already have lots of SLVA data.

  I've been thinking a lot about the
  LiFePO4 friendly electrical system
  with a goal of reducing parts count
  and cost-of-ownership. The weight
  reduction may not produce observable
  benefits but at least it shouldn't
  cost so much or impact reliability.


  Bob . . .
Add my vote for an architecture that allows 'bare' LiFePO4 batteries to be used. While I have no desire to pay an almost 10X premium to save 10 lbs, I do think that the brand X crowd is deceiving themselves if they think the battery is a functional drop-in replacement for SLA. There are failure modes (and even 'normal' operating modes) that can take the battery off line, without any control by the operator (pilot). I suspect that many early adopters haven't done an adequate 'FMEA' on all the potential ramifications of inserting a fully automatic, non-user-controllable BMS in the loop.


Some things do benefit from automation, but others don't. For instance, most of us won't accept an engine controller that automatically shuts the engine down due to low oil pressure. We want to be notified, and make the call on shutdown based on immediate circumstances. Automatic dropping the battery off line could in some circumstances be just as hazardous.


Charlie




Hi Rob,
I'd never seen that brand before, so I looked them up.
https://www.aeroakku.com/LIGHT-SPORT-AIRCRAFT/-AEROAKKU-LiFePO4:::6_139.html?language=en&MODsid=3024acbfbb1e3575f16a62b009d3bb51
1st thing I noticed is that it costs 299 Euros, or  $341 US dollars. I pay around $40 for the SLA batteries I use.
2nd thing I noticed is that it's a 7AH battery. No doubt it's fine for starting, but it's about 1/3 the energy capacity of the SLAs that I use. That means that if you're running electronic fuel injection, it'll be good for about 15 minutes after the alternator dies.
What I *didn't* see (at least on that website) was any info whatsoever on the BMS. Since that company also sells the more common brands of batteries, it leads me to believe that they are rebranding someone else's battery, but there's no documentation. Which brings me back to what I wrote, above. With the addition of, 'we don't know what we don't know'. Smile
Charlie


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group