Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

John H's position

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kolb-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
flyingfox(at)copper.net
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 10:59 am    Post subject: John H's position Reply with quote

So John;

Am I to take it after all the flaperon, flap debate that you fall into the
camp of separate flaps and ailerons? I am heading down to London first of
next month to size up the Mark IIIX for myself (since the 172 finally sold)
and at some point I need to start planning for the separate flap option.

I ask specifically because as an Army flight surgeon I always looked at the
principal function of Army W O s as keeping the FS from killing himself when
he take the flight controls.

Todd

PS: Thanks for attaching the separate photos of Miss P'Fer to some of your
posts. They make great screensavers to muse over....
--
Todd Fredricks, DO
Flying Fox Services

Visit my Blog at www.flyingfoxhangar.blogspot.com

POWERED BY MAC


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
John Hauck



Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 4639
Location: Titus, Alabama (hauck's holler)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:28 am    Post subject: John H's position Reply with quote

| Am I to take it after all the flaperon, flap debate that you fall
into the
| camp of separate flaps and ailerons?

|
| I ask specifically because as an Army flight surgeon I always looked
at the
| principal function of Army W O s as keeping the FS from killing
himself when
| he take the flight controls.
|
| Todd

Hi Todd/Gang:

Well..........I don't fall into any camp. I am pretty much an
individualist.

Have been extremely lucky, with a 22 year close association with both
old and new Kolb. I got to fly and compare most of the Kolb models.
Not just a quick flight, but extensively. This was a great way of
gathering info and making decisions on what I build, what I modify,
and what I fly. Made it very easy for me to determine what works best
for me.

It does not lend much credence, to me, for someone to tell me how much
better one system works than the other, when they do so without
actual experience of flying both systems. In some cases, without any
experience flying a Kolb.

I don't sell airplanes, so I can be very honest in my opinions of what
works for me, and what does not. I think I have the best that Kolb
offers in a 16 year old design, with a few of my own mods thrown in to
make my type of flying more comfortable and more likely to accomplish
successfully.

To me, flaps work much better than flaperons. Some aileron authority
is lost with the flaperon system. They are not nearly as effective in
steep approaches and landings as the flaps.

I wasn't a WO, but I know what you mean. I always relied on them to
keep me out of trouble, even to this day. I am very fortunate to have
a good friend and a retired Army CWO to fly with each year. I always
learn something when I am flying with him.

You are more than welcome for the photo posts.

john h
MKIII


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List

_________________
John Hauck
MKIII/912ULS
hauck's holler
Titus, Alabama
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
flyingfox(at)copper.net
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 1:21 pm    Post subject: John H's position Reply with quote

Well this is all good because when I spoke to Izek at OSH he told me that I
could order the IIIX with flaps as an option so I think that is the way to
go. I am going to be doing a lot of what you are doing and my 64 172E with
40 degrees of available flaps and my now-departed Maule M5-235C spoiled me
rotten for their ability to maintain a vertical line without excessive
airspeed.

My 900 feet of upsloping ridgeline will like the Kolb immensely I think.

So I take it that you were an RLO?

Really excited to work with a fine airplane and be able to envision trips to
far away places...

Todd

--
Todd Fredricks, DO
Flying Fox Services

Visit my Blog at www.flyingfoxhangar.blogspot.com

POWERED BY MAC


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kolb-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group